| 0 | PI 706649 | 'Tamcot 421' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2025 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | ‘Tamcot 421’ is a Sea Island (Gossypium barbadense L.)/ upland (G. hirsutum L.) (SIUP) cultivar developed by the Cotton Improvement Laboratory, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences and released in 2017 by Texas A&M AgriLife Research. This interspecific inbred line was the result of hybridization of a complex early generation upland hybrid and a Sea Island breeding line, (Gaddis/Puerto Rico 556). Tamcot 421 demonstrated fiber traits that were comparable to commercial cultivars as measured by high volume instrumentation (HVI). Lint yields were stable and generally either not different or higher than commercial cultivars in multiple replicated trials across years and locations. Plant morphology and fruiting habit were typical of upland cotton. Development and release of this cultivar represents an unusual combination of high-yield potential and good fiber quality in a line with a 50:50 pedigree contribution of Sea Island and upland parents. | 2172337 | PI 706649 |
| 1 | PI 706598 | 'USDA-ARS-GMD24141' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2025 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Three Upland cotton lines* that are resistant to reniform and root-knot nematodes were developed and released by the USDA-ARS in 2024. The three lines each contain simple genetic markers for the respective genes responsible for nematode resistance. In controlled environmental assays, the three lines reduced reniform and root-knot nematode eggs by an average of 84 and 97%, respectively. In field studies, the three lines outyielded commercial varieties by 12 to 20%, and possessed fiber quality equal to or greater than those of commercial varieties. The release and registration of these three cotton lines with genetic markers will provide breeders with agronomically elite germplasm that is resistant to both reniform and root-knot nematodes which, in turn, will also greatly reduce the severity of the Fusarium wilt disease caused by race 1. | 2170983 | PI 706598 |
| 2 | PI 706599 | 'USDA-ARS-GMD2427' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2025 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Three Upland cotton lines** that are resistant to reniform and root-knot nematodes were developed and released by the USDA-ARS in 2024. The three lines each contain simple genetic markers for the respective genes responsible for nematode resistance. In controlled environmental assays, the three lines reduced reniform and root-knot nematode eggs by an average of 84 and 97%, respectively. In field studies, the three lines outyielded commercial varieties by 12 to 20%, and possessed fiber quality equal to or greater than those of commercial varieties. The release and registration of these three cotton lines with genetic markers will provide breeders with agronomically elite germplasm that is resistant to both reniform and root-knot nematodes which, in turn, will also greatly reduce the severity of the Fusarium wilt disease caused by race 1. | 2170984 | PI 706599 |
| 3 | PI 706600 | 'USDA-ARS-GMD2442' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2025 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Three Upland cotton lines*** that are resistant to reniform and root-knot nematodes were developed and released by the USDA-ARS in 2024. The three lines each contain simple genetic markers for the respective genes responsible for nematode resistance. In controlled environmental assays, the three lines reduced reniform and root-knot nematode eggs by an average of 84 and 97%, respectively. In field studies, the three lines outyielded commercial varieties by 12 to 20%, and possessed fiber quality equal to or greater than those of commercial varieties. The release and registration of these three cotton lines with genetic markers will provide breeders with agronomically elite germplasm that is resistant to both reniform and root-knot nematodes which, in turn, will also greatly reduce the severity of the Fusarium wilt disease caused by race 1. | 2170985 | PI 706600 |
| 4 | PI 706595 | 'BARBREN 713-32-28' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2025 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | The three germplasm lines were selected in F5 progenies and were evaluated at seven locations during 2017 through 2020. In all trials, the three lines had significantly higher fiber strength compared with checks, 5% to 25% higher than the high fiber quality check, MD 15, and 10% to 18% higher than commercial checks. Other fiber properties including fiber length, uniformity, elongation, and micronaire were in acceptable ranges. Yield of the three lines was low to moderate compared with the high yielding checks. The three lines had significantly different fiber strength and lint yield among themselves. USDA-ARS-GMD24141 had high fiber strength with yield equivalent to SureGrow 747 and higher than MD 15. This line had intermediate resistance to Fusarium wilt race 4 (FOV4) compared to the susceptible checks and resistant checks. USDA-ARS-GMD24141 is registered with another two sister lines, USDA-ARS-GMD2427 and USDA-ARS-GMD2442. These lines can be used by breeders for genetic improvement of fiber strength and by molecular scientists for identification of high fiber strength genes and their genomic locations. | 2170980 | PI 706595 |
| 5 | PI 706596 | 'BARBREN 713-32-30' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2025 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | The three germplasm lines were selected in F5 progenies and were evaluated at seven locations during 2017 through 2020. In all trials, the three lines had significantly higher fiber strength compared with checks, 5% to 25% higher than the high fiber quality check, MD 15, and 10% to 18% higher than commercial checks. Other fiber properties including fiber length, uniformity, elongation, and micronaire were in acceptable ranges. Yield of the three lines was low to moderate compared with the high yielding checks. The three lines had significantly different fiber strength and lint yield among themselves. USDA-ARS-GMD24141 had high fiber strength with yield equivalent to SureGrow 747 and higher than MD 15. This line had intermediate resistance to Fusarium wilt race 4 (FOV4) compared to the susceptible checks and resistant checks. USDA-ARS-GMD24141 is registered with another two sister lines, USDA-ARS-GMD2427 and USDA-ARS-GMD2442. These lines can be used by breeders for genetic improvement of fiber strength and by molecular scientists for identification of high fiber strength genes and their genomic locations. | 2170981 | PI 706596 |
| 6 | PI 706597 | 'BARBREN 713-32-38' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2025 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | The three germplasm lines were selected in F5 progenies and were evaluated at seven locations during 2017 through 2020. In all trials, the three lines had significantly higher fiber strength compared with checks, 5% to 25% higher than the high fiber quality check, MD 15, and 10% to 18% higher than commercial checks. Other fiber properties including fiber length, uniformity, elongation, and micronaire were in acceptable ranges. Yield of the three lines was low to moderate compared with the high yielding checks. The three lines had significantly different fiber strength and lint yield among themselves. USDA-ARS-GMD24141 had high fiber strength with yield equivalent to SureGrow 747 and higher than MD 15. This line had intermediate resistance to Fusarium wilt race 4 (FOV4) compared to the susceptible checks and resistant checks. USDA-ARS-GMD24141 is registered with another two sister lines, USDA-ARS-GMD2427 and USDA-ARS-GMD2442. These lines can be used by breeders for genetic improvement of fiber strength and by molecular scientists for identification of high fiber strength genes and their genomic locations. | 2170982 | PI 706597 |
| 7 | PI 706424 | 'Arkot 1301' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1301 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1301 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over four years were greater than lint yields of UA222 and ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1301 were 10.0% and 23.6% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1301 produced higher open boll percentage (58 vs. 52%), lint fraction (41.5 vs. 40.1%), lint index (8.7 vs. 7.7 g), seed index (12.0 vs. 11.2 g), fibers per seed (17132 vs. 15975), and micronaire (4.80 vs. 4.42); equal seed ha-1 (16.12 × 106 vs. 16.50 × 106), S-score (80 vs. 74), fiber density (171 vs. 172 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), quality score (59 vs. 56), fiber length (31.6 vs. 31.6 mm), fiber uniformity index (86.0 vs. 85.5%), fiber strength (330 vs 329), short fiber content (5.6 vs. 5.8%), stem pubescence (5.2 vs. 5.3 rating); and lower plant height (94 vs. 96 cm), fiber elongation (7.5 vs. 8.3%), leaf pubescence rating (3.8 vs. 4.2), and marginal bract trichome density (37 vs. 40 trichomes cm-1). Arkot 1301 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1301 (74%) was lower than the susceptible Frego-bract check (93%), but higher than UA48 (68%) and UA222 (61%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1301 was equal to UA222 but lower than UA48. | 2169908 | PI 706424 |
| 8 | PI 706425 | 'Arkot 1308' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1308 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1308 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over four years were greater than lint yields of UA222 and ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location except Judd Hill. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1308 were 10.9% and 24.6% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1308 produced higher seed ha-1 (17.93 × 106 vs. 16.50 × 106), open boll percentage (58 vs. 52%), plant height (99 vs. 96 cm), and lint fraction (40.9 vs. 40.1%); equal lint index (7.8 vs. 7.7 g), seed index (11.0 vs. 11.2 g), S-score (75 vs. 74), fibers per seed (16341 vs. 15975), fiber density (176 vs. 172 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), leaf pubescence rating (4.6 vs. 4.2), stem pubescence (5.5 vs. 5.3 rating), quality score (57 vs. 56), micronaire (4.41 vs. 4.42), fiber length (31.6 vs. 31.6 mm), fiber uniformity index (85.6 vs. 85.5%), fiber strength (327 vs. 329), elongation (8.3 vs. 8.3%), short fiber content (5.8 vs. 5.8%); and lower marginal bract trichome density (37 vs. 40 trichomes cm-1). Arkot 1308 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1308 (61%) was lower than the susceptible Frego-bract check (93%) and UA48 (68%) and equal to UA222 (61%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1308 was lower than UA48 and UA222. | 2169909 | PI 706425 |
| 9 | PI 706426 | 'Arkot 1309' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1309 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1309 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over four years were greater than lint yields of ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) and UA222 at each location except Marianna. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1308 were 5.7% and 18.6% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1309 produced higher lint fraction (43.1 vs. 40.1%), lint index (8.2 vs. 7.7 g), plant height (101 vs. 96 cm), open boll percentage (58 vs. 52%), quality score (66 vs. 56), micronaire (4.60 vs. 4.42), fiber length (32.2 vs. 31.6 mm), fiber strength (345 vs 329); equal seed ha-1 (16.22 × 106 vs. 16.50 × 106), S-score (76 vs. 74), fibers per seed (15952 vs. 15975), fiber density (169 vs. 172 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), stem pubescence (5.3 vs. 5.3 rating), fiber uniformity index (85.6 vs. 85.5%), short fiber content (5.8 vs. 5.8%); lower seed index (10.7 vs. 11.2 g), leaf pubescence rating (3.0 vs. 4.2), marginal bract trichome density (35 vs. 40 trichomes cm-1), and fiber elongation (6.6 vs. 8.3%). Arkot 1309 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1309 (71%) was lower than the susceptible Frego-bract check (93%), equal to UA48 (68%) and higher than UA222 (61%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1309 was equal to UA222 but lower than UA48. | 2169910 | PI 706426 |
| 10 | PI 706427 | 'Arkot 1311' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1311 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1311 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over four years were greater than lint yields of ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) and UA222 at each location except Marianna. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1311 were 7.5% and 20.7% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1311 produced higher lint fraction (43.4 vs. 40.1%), lint index (7.9 vs. 7.7 g), plant height (104 vs. 96 cm), fiber density (177 vs. 172 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), leaf pubescence rating (5.5 vs. 4.2), marginal bract trichome density (43 vs. 40 trichomes cm-1), quality score (69 vs. 56), fiber length (32.3 vs. 31.6 mm), fiber uniformity index (86.1 vs. 85.5%), and fiber strength (335 vs 327); equal seed ha-1 (17.39 × 106 vs. 16.50 × 106), open boll percentage (54 vs. 52%), S-score (75 vs. 74), fibers per seed (16084 vs. 15975), stem pubescence (5.3 vs. 4.9 rating), micronaire (4.34 vs. 4.42), and short fiber content (5.6 vs. 5.8%); lower seed index (10.0 vs. 11.1 g), and fiber elongation (6.9 vs. 8.3%). Arkot 1311 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1311 (67%) was lower than the susceptible Frego-bract check (95%), equal to UA48 (67%) and higher than UA222 (58%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1311 was lower than UA222 and UA48 | 2169911 | PI 706427 |
| 11 | PI 706428 | 'Arkot 1317' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1317 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1317 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over four years were greater than lint yields of ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) and UA222 at each location except Marianna. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1317 were 6.1% and 19.1% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1317 produced higher seed ha-1 (18.03 × 106 vs. 16.50 × 106), plant height (103 vs. 96 cm), fiber density (177 vs. 172 fibers mm-2 of seed coat),quality score (60 vs. 56), fiber length (32.9 vs. 31.6 mm), fiber strength (348 vs 327); equal seed index (11.3 vs. 11.2 g), S-score (70 vs. 74), fibers per seed (16242 vs. 15975), open boll percentage (52 vs. 52%), leaf pubescence rating (4.7 vs. 4.2), stem pubescence rating (5.7 vs. 5.3). marginal bract trichome density (40 vs. 40 trichomes cm-1), fiber uniformity index (85.5 vs. 85.5%), and short fiber content (5.8 vs. 5.8%); lower lint fraction (39.3 vs. 40.1%), lint index (7.4 vs. 7.7 g), micronaire (4.17 vs. 4.42), and fiber elongation (7.1 vs. 8.3%). Arkot 1317 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1317 (62%) was lower than the susceptible Frego-bract check (93%) and UA48 (68%) and equal to UA222 (61%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1317 was equal to UA222 but lower than UA48. | 2169912 | PI 706428 |
| 12 | PI 705848 | '13AFX13' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | 13AFX13 (tested as 13AFX13-12-5) is a noncommercial breeding line of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) released by the USDA-Agricultural Research Service in 2023. 13AFX13 was selected from a cross of ‘CG-26201’ and ‘AGC208’. This initial cross was followed by individual plant selections in the F2 and F3 generations, and progeny row selection in the F4 generation. The F4 selections were grown in replicated tests at College Station, TX, and Florence, SC, in 2017 and 2018. Selected lines from these evaluations were grown in the Regional Breeders Testing Network (RBTN) at 10 locations in 2019. In the RBTN, 13AFX13 had excellent High Volume Instrument (HVI) based fiber strength (336 kN m kg-1) and fiber length (30.7 mm), significantly higher than the checks used in the trial. Lint yield (1302 kg ha-1) was similar to the DP493 check (1371 kg ha-1). | 2169007 | PI 705848 |
| 13 | PI 705849 | '13AFX6' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | 13AFX6 (tested as 13AFX6-27-2) is a noncommercial breeding line of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) released by the USDA-Agricultural Research Service in 2023. 13AFX6 was selected from a cross of ‘0145-2B-320’ and ‘PX06520-42-2-1’. This initial cross was followed by individual plant selections in the F2 and F3 generations, and progeny row selection in the F4 generation. The F4 selections were grown in replicated tests at College Station, TX, and Florence, SC, in 2017 and 2018. Selected lines from these evaluations were grown in the Regional Breeders Testing Network (RBTN) at 10 locations in 2019. In the RBTN, 13AFX6 had significantly higher High Volume Instrument (HVI) based fiber strength (372 kN m kg-1) and fiber length (33.0 mm) than any of the experimental entries or checks in the test. Lint yield (1267 kg ha-1) was similar to the FM958 check (1332 kg ha-1). | 2169008 | PI 705849 |
| 14 | PI 705627 | 'FM 1621GL' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2168847 | PI 705627 |
| 15 | PI 705628 | 'FM 2398GLTP' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2168848 | PI 705628 |
| 16 | PI 705613 | 'FM 868AXTP' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2168691 | PI 705613 |
| 17 | PI 705614 | 'FM 823AXTP' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2168692 | PI 705614 |
| 18 | PI 705615 | 'FM 765AX' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2168693 | PI 705615 |
| 19 | PI 705604 | 'Tamcot H12' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Tamcot H12 is taller than Tamcot 73 and exhibits good shatter resistance for production in Texas. This cultivar has smaller leaves and shorter average leaf peduncle length than Tamcot 73 and leaves are predominately three lobed while Tamcot 73 exhibits predominately three lobed leaves with some five lobed. Leaves and stems have moderate and average levels of pubescence for current upland cotton cultivars. Tamcot H12 has not been tested for resistance to any insects or diseases. Tamcot H12 ranges from 4.3 to 4.7 micronaire; 29.5 to 30.5 mm UHML; 273 to 310 kN m per kg; and comparable UI and elongation before bundle rupture. Yield potential is competitive with commercial cultivars in central and south Texas. | 2168185 | PI 705604 |
| 20 | PI 705597 | 'CA 4011' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | CA 4011 is a noncommercial breeding line of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) jointly released by Texas A&M AgriLife Research and the Agricultural Experiment Station at the University of Georgia-Tifton. Progeny row of CA 4011 was selected for 2008 preliminary yield testing in Southern High Plains by the Texas A&M AgriLife Research cotton breeding program in Lubbock. In 2012 CA 4011 had less damage from thrips feeding injury than 22 other genotypes tested in a greenhouse assay but was equal to the resistant check TX110 (PI163608). Performance testing for yield, fiber quality, and other related agronomic properties was conducted under organic management and on certified organic farms during 2012, 2013 and 2014 growing seasons. CA 4011 showed comparable yield and fiber quality to standard check cultivars grown in the Southern High Plains. Subsequent testing was done at the University of Georgia Coastal Plains Experiment Station in Tifton, GA to evaluate for resistance to the foliar diseases areolate mildew and target spot. Disease ratings were taken in 2018 and 2019 growing seasons. CA 4011 showed favorable resistance to areolate mildew in comparison to susceptible checks, providing less leaf infection and defoliation. | 2167985 | PI 705597 |
| 21 | PI 705018 | 'May 558' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2166377 | PI 705018 |
| 22 | PI 704805 | '11PDFV62' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2166129 | PI 704805 |
| 23 | PI 704487 | '23R036' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2165804 | PI 704487 |
| 24 | PI 704488 | '23R015' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2165805 | PI 704488 |
| 25 | PI 704489 | '18R027' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2165806 | PI 704489 |
| 26 | PI 704490 | '21R021' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2165807 | PI 704490 |
| 27 | PI 704491 | '23R013' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2165808 | PI 704491 |
| 28 | PI 704492 | '22R037' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2165809 | PI 704492 |
| 29 | PI 704481 | 'MS-4857' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | hirsutum L.) that significantly impact yield and fiber quality annually. Here, we describe two upland cotton germplasm lines that have combined resistance to RKN and RN while maintaining good yield and fiber quality traits. Upland germplasm lines MS-4857 and MS-4878 are F6 RILs from a cross between M240 RNR (RKN resistant) and MT2468 Ren1 (moderately RN resistant). These lines are highly resistant to RKN and show approximately 30% fewer RN eggs g-1 root than the MT2468 Ren1 parent due to significantly improved root system development compared to MT2468 Ren1. Yield and fiber quality traits are equivalent or superior to the parental lines. The upland-derived RN resistance in these lines provides a valuable alternative source of resistance to cotton breeding programs, especially in combination with high level RKN resistance. | 2165798 | PI 704481 |
| 30 | PI 704482 | 'MS-4878' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2024 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | The root-knot (RKN; Meloidogyne incognita Kofoid & White) and reniform (RN; Rotylenchulus reniformis Linford & Oliveira) nematodes are serious pathogens of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) that significantly impact yield and fiber quality annually. Here, we describe two upland cotton germplasm lines that have combined resistance to RKN and RN while maintaining good yield and fiber quality traits. Upland germplasm lines MS-4857 and MS-4878 are F6 RILs from a cross between M240 RNR (RKN resistant) and MT2468 Ren1 (moderately RN resistant). These lines are highly resistant to RKN and show approximately 30% fewer RN eggs g-1 root than the MT2468 Ren1 parent due to significantly improved root system development compared to MT2468 Ren1. Yield and fiber quality traits are equivalent or superior to the parental lines. The upland-derived RN resistance in these lines provides a valuable alternative source of resistance to cotton breeding programs, especially in combination with high level RKN resistance. | 2165799 | PI 704482 |
| 31 | PI 702793 | 'Arkot 1202' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1202 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1202 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were greater than lint yields of UA222 and ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location, except equal at Rohwer. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1202 were 9.9% and 23.5% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1202 produced higher lint index (8.1 vs. 7.7 g), seed index (11.4 vs. 11.1 g), fibers per seed (16883 vs. 16273), plant height (103 vs. 93 cm), open boll percentage (59 vs. 51%), quality score (72 vs. 58), fiber length (32.8 vs. 31.9 mm), and fiber uniformity index (86.1 vs. 85.6%); equal lint fraction (41.2 vs. 42.3%), seed ha-1 (18236 × 1000 vs. 17665 × 1000), S-score (77 vs. 70), fiber density (159 vs. 157 fibers mm-2 of seed coat) and short fiber content (6.0 vs. 6.1%); and lower micronaire (4.33 vs. 4.41), fiber strength (315 vs. 321 kN m kg-1), fiber elongation (5.3 vs. 7.8%), leaf pubescence rating (2.6 vs. 4.9), stem pubescence (3.6 vs. 5.1 rating), and marginal bract trichome density (32 vs. 38 trichomes cm-1). Arkot 1202 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1202 (67%) was lower than the susceptible check (95%), equal to UA48 (66%) and higher than UA222 (54%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1202 was better than UA222 and equal to UA48. | 2142981 | PI 702793 |
| 32 | PI 702794 | 'Arkot 1207' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1207 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1207 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were greater than lint yields of UA222 and ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1207 were 12.7% and 24.5% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1207 produced higher seed ha-1 (20454 × 1000 vs. 17665 × 1000), plant height (103 vs. 93 cm), marginal bract trichome density (40 vs. 38 trichomes cm-1), quality score (63 vs. 58), micronaire (4.52 vs. 4.41), and fiber uniformity index (86.0 vs. 85.6%); equal lint fraction (41.7 vs. 42.3%), S-score (69 vs. 70), fiber density (154 vs. 157 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), open boll percentage (53 vs. 51%), leaf pubescence rating (4.7 vs. 4.9), stem pubescence (5.7 vs. 5.1 rating), fiber length (32.0 vs. 31.9 mm), and short fiber content (5.9 vs. 6.1%); and lower lint index (7.4 vs. 7.7 g), seed index (10.2 vs. 11.1 g), fibers per seed (15185 vs. 16273), fiber strength (308 vs. 321 kN m kg-1), and fiber elongation (6.7 vs. 7.8%). Arkot 1207 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1207 (58%) was lower than the susceptible check (95%) and UA48 (66%) and equal to UA222 (54%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1207 was lower than UA222 and UA48. | 2142982 | PI 702794 |
| 33 | PI 702795 | 'Arkot 1208' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1208 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1208 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were greater than lint yields of UA222 and ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1208 were 15.6% and 29.8% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1208 produced higher seed ha-1 (18732 × 1000 vs. 17665 × 1000), lint index (8.3 vs. 7.7 g), S-score (81 vs. 70), open boll percentage (55 vs. 51%), micronaire (4.68 vs. 4.41), and fiber uniformity index (86.2 vs. 85.6%); equal lint fraction (42.2 vs. 42.3%), seed index (11.1 vs. 11.1 g), fibers per seed (16368 vs. 16273), fiber density (156 vs. 157 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), plant height (95 vs. 93 cm), leaf pubescence rating (4.4 vs. 4.9), stem pubescence (4.9 vs. 5.1 rating), quality score (59 vs. 58), fiber length (32.0 vs. 31.9 mm), fiber elongation (7.9 vs. 7.8%), and short fiber content (6.0 vs. 6.1%); and lower marginal bract trichome density (34 vs. 38 trichomes cm-1) and fiber strength (312 vs. 321 kN m kg-1). Arkot 1208 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1208 (52%) was lower than the susceptible check (95%) and UA48 (66%) and equal to UA222 (54%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1208 was lower than UA222 and UA48. | 2142983 | PI 702795 |
| 34 | PI 702796 | 'Arkot 1214' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1214 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1214 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were greater than lint yields of UA222 and ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location except equal at Judd Hill. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1214 were 10.8% and 24.5% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1214 produced higher seed ha-1 (19135 × 1000 vs. 17665 × 1000), fibers per seed (16754 vs. 16273), fiber density (166 vs. 157 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), plant height (98 vs. 93 cm), and fiber uniformity index (86.3 vs. 85.6%); equal lint fraction (42.4 vs. 42.3%), lint index (7.7 vs. 7.7 g), S-score (75 vs. 70), open boll percentage (54 vs. 51%), marginal bract trichome density (36 vs. 38 trichomes cm-1), quality score (61 vs. 58), fiber length (32.0 vs. 31.9 mm), and short fiber content (5.9 vs. 6.1%); and lower seed index (10.4 vs. 11.1 g), leaf pubescence rating (2.5 vs. 4.9), stem pubescence (3.5 vs. 5.1 rating), micronaire (4.31 vs. 4.41), fiber strength (314 vs. 321 kN m kg-1) and fiber elongation (6.5 vs. 7.8%). Arkot 1214 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1214 (68%) was lower than the susceptible check (95%), equal to UA48 (66%), and higher than UA222 (54%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1214 was lower than UA222 and UA48. | 2142984 | PI 702796 |
| 35 | PI 702733 | 'FM 1730GLTP' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2142912 | PI 702733 |
| 36 | PI 702651 | '11PADT76' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2142873 | PI 702651 |
| 37 | PI 702652 | '11PJUW91' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2142874 | PI 702652 |
| 38 | PI 702653 | '11PNRT71' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2142875 | PI 702653 |
| 39 | PI 702654 | '11PPJA47' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2142876 | PI 702654 |
| 40 | PI 702655 | '11PUJJ24' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2142877 | PI 702655 |
| 41 | PI 702656 | '11PWPY94' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2142878 | PI 702656 |
| 42 | PI 702657 | '11PYEJ60' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2142879 | PI 702657 |
| 43 | PI 702578 | '20B1091460' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2141911 | PI 702578 |
| 44 | PI 702579 | '20B1091458' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2141912 | PI 702579 |
| 45 | PI 702558 | 'Arkot 1102ne' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1102ne is a nectariless (no nectaries on leaves or flowers), conventional cotton germplasm line. Other morphological traits of Arkot 1102ne were similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar), except Arkot 1102ne has lower pubescence on leaves, stems (near glabrous), and bract margins. Lint yields of Arkot 1102ne from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were equal to or greater than lint yields of UA222 and ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1102ne were 7.9 and 20.8% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1102ne produced higher lint fraction (41.6 vs. 40.5%), seed ha-1 (18285 × 1000 vs. 16776 × 1000), fiber density (156 vs. 152 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), plant height (99 vs. 94 cm), open boll percentage (53 vs. 49%), and fiber uniformity index (86.3 vs. 85.5%); equal seed-score (72.9 vs. 73.4), fibers per seed (16253 vs. 16105), quality score (55 vs. 53), and fiber length (31.6 vs. 31.6 mm); and lower lint index (7.4 vs. 7.6 g), seed index (10.4 vs. 10.7 g), leaf pubescence rating (4.3 vs. 5.5), stem pubescence (2.2 vs. 6.2 rating), marginal bract trichome density (34 vs. 40 trichomes cm-1), fiber micronaire (4.26 vs. 4.45), fiber strength (296 vs. 316 kN m kg-1), fiber elongation (5.5 vs. 7.3%), and short fiber content (5.7 vs. 6.0%). Arkot 1102ne is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1102ne (63%) was lower than the susceptible check (92%), equal to UA48 (65%) but higher than UA222 (54%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1102ne was lower than UA222 and UA48, but % oil and % protein in seed were high. | 2141828 | PI 702558 |
| 46 | PI 702559 | 'Arkot 1112' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1112 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar). Lint yields of Arkot 1112 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were greater than lint yields of UA222 and ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1112 were 7.5% and 12.6% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1112 produced higher lint fraction (41.6 vs. 40.5%), lint index (7.8 vs. 7.6 g), fibers per seed (16753 vs. 16105), fiber density (159 vs. 152 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), plant height (101 vs. 94 cm), open boll percentage (53 vs. 49%), fiber uniformity index (86.3 vs. 85.5%), and fiber strength (343 vs. 316 kN m kg-1); equal seed index (10.7 vs. 10.7 g), seed ha-1 (17532 × 1000 vs. 16776 × 1000), seed-score (77.7 vs. 73.4), quality score (55 vs. 53), fiber length (31.5 vs. 31.6 mm), leaf pubescence rating (5.3 vs. 5.5), stem pubescence (6.2 vs. 6.2 rating), and marginal bract trichome density (39 vs. 40 trichomes cm-1); and lower fiber micronaire (4.36 vs. 4.45), fiber elongation (5.5 vs. 7.3%), and short fiber content (5.7 vs. 6.0%). Arkot 1112 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1112 (59%) was lower than the susceptible check (92%) and UA48 (65%) but higher than UA222 (54%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1112 was equal to UA222 and UA48. | 2141829 | PI 702559 |
| 47 | PI 702560 | 'Arkot 1114' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1114 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar), except Arkot 1114 has slightly lower pubescence on stems and greater trichome density on bract margins. Lint yields of Arkot 1114 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were equal to or greater than lint yields of UA222 and exceeded those ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1114 were 13.0 and 23.7% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1114 produced higher lint fraction (42.7 vs. 40.5%), seed ha-1 (18607 × 1000 vs. 16776 × 1000), fibers per seed (16696 vs. 16105), fiber density (168 vs. 152 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), open boll percentage (54 vs. 49%), marginal bract trichome density (48 vs. 40 trichomes cm-1), and quality score (57 vs. 53); equal plant height (92 vs. 94 cm), seed-score (68.8 vs. 73.4), leaf pubescence rating (5.6 vs. 5.5), fiber length (31.6 vs. 31.6 mm), fiber uniformity index (85.5 vs. 85.5%), and short fiber content (6.2 vs. 6.0%); lower seed index (9.6 vs. 10.7 g), lint index (7.4 vs. 7.6 g), stem pubescence (5.7 vs. 6.2 rating), fiber micronaire (4.21 vs. 4.45), fiber strength (299 vs. 316 kN m kg-1), and fiber elongation (5.3 vs. 7.3%). Arkot 1114 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1114 (65%) was lower than the susceptible check (92%), equal to UA48 (65%), and higher than UA222 (54%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1114 was lower than UA222 and UA48. | 2141830 | PI 702560 |
| 48 | PI 702561 | 'Arkot 1115' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1115 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to ‘UA222’ (check cultivar), except Arkot 1115 has slightly lower pubescence on leaves, stems, and bract margins. Lint yields of Arkot 1115 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were greater than lint yields of UA222 and ‘UA48’ (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1115 were 24.6% and 36.3% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1115 produced higher lint fraction (45.0 vs. 40.5%), seed ha-1 (18683 × 1000 vs. 16776 × 1000), lint index (7.8 vs. 7.6 g), fiber density (161 vs. 152 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), plant height (99 vs. 94 cm), open boll percentage (56 vs. 49%), quality score (66 vs. 53), fiber micronaire (4.55 vs. 4.45), fiber length (32.4 vs. 31.6 mm), and fiber uniformity index (86.7 vs. 85.5%) equal seed-score (68.5 vs. 73.4); and lower seed index (9.3 vs. 10.7 g), fibers per seed (15560 vs. 16105), leaf pubescence rating (4.3 vs. 5.5), stem pubescence (5.2 vs. 6.2 rating), and marginal bract trichome density (35 vs. 40 trichomes cm-1), fiber strength (308 vs. 316 kN m kg-1), fiber elongation (6.1 vs. 7.3%), and short fiber content (5.6 vs. 6.0%). Arkot 1115 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1115 (62%) was lower than the susceptible check (92%), equal to UA48 (65%) but higher than UA222 (54%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Resistance to seed deterioration of Arkot 1116 was lower than UA222 and UA48. | 2141831 | PI 702561 |
| 49 | PI 701917 | '21R033' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2141286 | PI 701917 |
| 50 | PI 701918 | '19R065' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2141287 | PI 701918 |
| 51 | PI 701919 | '22R027' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2141288 | PI 701919 |
| 52 | PI 701920 | '22R052' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2141289 | PI 701920 |
| 53 | PI 701921 | '22R026' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2141290 | PI 701921 |
| 54 | PI 701922 | '22R021' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2141291 | PI 701922 |
| 55 | PI 701923 | '22R033' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2141292 | PI 701923 |
| 56 | PI 701924 | '22R034' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2023 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2141293 | PI 701924 |
| 57 | PI 701073 | 'BARBREN-713-11' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Eight new germplasm lines have been developed and are being submitted for registration and inclusion in the National Cotton Germplasm Collection. All lines have high levels of resistance to reniform nematode and four have moderate resistance to root-knot nematode. When grown in nematode-infested fields the lines give yields greater than most commercial varieties and have fiber quality equal to or greater than commercial verities. The lines should be useful for breeders in developing new cotton varieties. | 2139613 | PI 701073 |
| 58 | PI 701074 | 'BARBREN-713-13' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Eight new germplasm lines have been developed and are being submitted for registration and inclusion in the National Cotton Germplasm Collection. All lines have high levels of resistance to reniform nematode and four have moderate resistance to root-knot nematode. When grown in nematode-infested fields the lines give yields greater than most commercial varieties and have fiber quality equal to or greater than commercial verities. The lines should be useful for breeders in developing new cotton varieties. | 2139614 | PI 701074 |
| 59 | PI 701075 | 'BARBREN-713-25' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Eight new germplasm lines have been developed and are being submitted for registration and inclusion in the National Cotton Germplasm Collection. All lines have high levels of resistance to reniform nematode and four have moderate resistance to root-knot nematode. When grown in nematode-infested fields the lines give yields greater than most commercial varieties and have fiber quality equal to or greater than commercial verities. The lines should be useful for breeders in developing new cotton varieties. | 2139615 | PI 701075 |
| 60 | PI 701076 | 'BARBREN-713-32' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Eight new germplasm lines have been developed and are being submitted for registration and inclusion in the National Cotton Germplasm Collection. All lines have high levels of resistance to reniform nematode and four have moderate resistance to root-knot nematode. When grown in nematode-infested fields the lines give yields greater than most commercial varieties and have fiber quality equal to or greater than commercial verities. The lines should be useful for breeders in developing new cotton varieties. | 2139616 | PI 701076 |
| 61 | PI 701077 | 'BARBREN-713-33' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Eight new germplasm lines have been developed and are being submitted for registration and inclusion in the National Cotton Germplasm Collection. All lines have high levels of resistance to reniform nematode and four have moderate resistance to root-knot nematode. When grown in nematode-infested fields the lines give yields greater than most commercial varieties and have fiber quality equal to or greater than commercial verities. The lines should be useful for breeders in developing new cotton varieties. | 2139617 | PI 701077 |
| 62 | PI 701078 | 'BARBREN-713-41' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Eight new germplasm lines have been developed and are being submitted for registration and inclusion in the National Cotton Germplasm Collection. All lines have high levels of resistance to reniform nematode and four have moderate resistance to root-knot nematode. When grown in nematode-infested fields the lines give yields greater than most commercial varieties and have fiber quality equal to or greater than commercial verities. The lines should be useful for breeders in developing new cotton varieties. | 2139618 | PI 701078 |
| 63 | PI 701079 | 'BARBREN-713-48' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Eight new germplasm lines have been developed and are being submitted for registration and inclusion in the National Cotton Germplasm Collection. All lines have high levels of resistance to reniform nematode and four have moderate resistance to root-knot nematode. When grown in nematode-infested fields the lines give yields greater than most commercial varieties and have fiber quality equal to or greater than commercial verities. The lines should be useful for breeders in developing new cotton varieties. | 2139619 | PI 701079 |
| 64 | PI 701080 | 'BARBREN-713-8' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Eight new germplasm lines have been developed and are being submitted for registration and inclusion in the National Cotton Germplasm Collection. All lines have high levels of resistance to reniform nematode and four have moderate resistance to root-knot nematode. When grown in nematode-infested fields the lines give yields greater than most commercial varieties and have fiber quality equal to or greater than commercial verities. The lines should be useful for breeders in developing new cotton varieties. | 2139620 | PI 701080 |
| 65 | PI 700940 | 'Arkot 0902' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 0902 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0902 has lower trichome density on abaxial leaves than UA222. Lint yields of Arkot 0902 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years was equal to or exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0902 were 10.3 and 20.5% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0902 produced higher lint fraction (42.0 vs. 40.2%), seed ha-1 (17725 x 1000 vs 15270 x 1000), plant height (107 vs. 100 cm), open boll percentage (54 vs. 50%), quality score (64 vs. 56), fiber micronaire (4.63 vs. 4.54), fiber length (31.9 vs. 31.2 mm) and fiber uniformity index (86.3 vs. 85.6%); equal stem pubescence (5.5 vs. 5.6 rating), marginal bract trichome density (38.1 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1 ), and fiber strength (324 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ); and lower seed index (9.8 vs. 11.1 g), lint index (7.2 vs. 7.7 g), fibers per seed (14470 vs. 16224 ), fiber density (142 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), leaf pubescence rating (2.6 vs. 4.1 ), fiber elongation (4.3 vs. 6.3%) and short fiber content (6.4 vs. 6.7%). Arkot 0902 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0902 (43%) was lower than UA48 (55%) and susceptible check (74%), and equal to UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Lint yields at Judd Hill location (site of high Verticillium wilt) suggest that Arkot 0902 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] than UA222 and UA48, but it expressed similar Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms as the check cultivars. | 2139109 | PI 700940 |
| 66 | PI 700852 | 'Arkot 1005' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1005 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' (check cultivar), except Arkot 1005 has slightly lower pubescence on leaves, stems and bract margins. Lint yields of Arkot 1005 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were equal to or greater than lint yields of UA222 and exceeded those 'UA48' (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1005 were equal to UA222 and 22.7% greater than UA48. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1005 produced higher lint index (8.1 vs. 7.8 g), seed index (12.1 vs. 11.2 g), plant height (101 vs. 99 cm), open boll percentage (56 vs. 49%), quality score (65 vs. 55), fiber micronaire (4.67 vs. 4.54), fiber length (32.2 vs. 31.8 mm), fiber uniformity index (87.1 vs. 86.1%), and fiber strength (342 vs. 324 kN m kg-1); equal seed ha-1 (15714 x 1000 vs. 15902 x 1000), fibers per seed (15714 vs. 15901 ),and lower lint fraction (39.8 vs. 40.5%), fiber density (137 vs. 147 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), leaf pubescence rating (4.5 vs. 5.1 ), stem pubescence (5.2 vs. 6.1 rating), marginal bract trichome density (36 vs. 38 trichomes cm-1 ), fiber elongation (6.1 vs. 7.3%), and short fiber content (5.9 vs. 6.3%). Arkot 1005 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1005 (65%) was lower than the susceptible check (92%), equal to UA48 (67%) but higher than UA222 (48%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at site of high Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] suggest that Arkot 1005 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt than UA48 and equal to UA222, but its Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms were equal to both check cultivars. | 2138265 | PI 700852 |
| 67 | PI 700853 | 'Arkot 1015' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1015 is a conventional cotton germ plasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' (check cultivar), except Arkot 1015 has slightly lower pubescence on leaves, stems and bract margins. Lint yields of Arkot 1015 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were equal to or greater than lint yields of UA222 and exceeded those 'UA48' (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1015 were 7 .1 % and 27. 7% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1015 produced higher lint fraction (41.6 vs. 40.5%), seed ha-1 (17539 x 1000 vs. 15902 x 1000), fiber density (152 vs. 147 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), plant height (102 vs. 99 cm), open boll percentage (57 vs. 49%), quality score (64 vs. 55), and fiber length (32.2 vs. 31.8 mm) and; equal fibers per seed (15794 vs. 16051 ), stem pubescence (5.9 vs. 6.1 rating), marginal bract trichome density (37 vs. 38 trichomes cm-1 ), fiber strength (325 vs. 324 kN m kg-1 ), fiber uniformity index (86.1 vs. 86.1 %), and short fiber content (6.3 vs. 6.3%). and lower lint index (7.6 vs. 7.8 g), seed index (10.4 vs. 11.2 g), leaf pubescence rating (4.1 vs. 5.1 ), fiber micronaire (4.40 vs. 4.54), and fiber elongation (5.6 vs. 7.3%). Arkot 1015 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1015 (65%) was lower than the susceptible check (92%), equal to UA48 (67%) but higher than UA222 (48%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at site of high Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] suggest that Arkot 1015 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt than UA48 and equal to UA222, but its Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms were equal to both check cultivars. | 2138266 | PI 700853 |
| 68 | PI 700854 | 'Arkot 1019' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2022 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Arkot 1019 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' (check cultivar), except Arkot 1019 has slightly lower pubescence on leaves, stems and bract margins. Lint yields of Arkot 1019 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years were equal to lint yields of UA222 and exceeded those 'UA48' (check cultivar) at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 1019 were equal to UA222 and 21.4% greater than UA48. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 1019 produced higher seed ha-1 (18061 x 1000 vs. 15902 x 1000), plant height (106 vs. 99 cm), open boll percentage (55 vs. 49%), marginal bract trichome density (44 vs. 38 trichomes cm-1 ), quality score (81 vs. 55), fiber length (33.8 vs. 31.8 mm), fiber uniformity index (87.1 vs. 86.1%), and fiber strength (335 vs. 324 kN m kg-1); equal lint fraction (40.8 vs. 40.5%), leaf pubescence rating (4.8 vs. 5.1 ), stem pubescence (5.8 vs. 6.1 rating), and short fiber content (6.2 vs. 6.3%); and lower lint index (7.0 vs. 7.8 g), seed index (10.0 vs. 11.2 g), fibers per seed (14001 vs. 16051 ), fiber density (139 vs. 147 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), fiber micronaire (4.36 vs. 4.54), and fiber elongation (5.7 vs. 7.3%). Arkot 1015 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 1019 (65%) was lower than the susceptible check (92%), equal to UA48 (67%) but higher than UA222 (48%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at site of high Verticillium wilt suggest that Arkot 1019 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] than UA48 and equal to UA222, but its Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms were equal to both check cultivars. | 2138267 | PI 700854 |
| 69 | PI 699401 | 'USDA MD 21-1' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | During 2018, 2019 and 2020, the three selected germplasm from the three crosses were planted with the check varieties in a randomized complete designs at two locations at Stoneville and were evaluated for their performances for lint yield, fuzz percent and quality traits. Significant differences were observed between entries for lint yield, fuzz percent, micronaire, fiber length and fiber strength. Overall, the candidate germplasm USDA MD 21-1 and USDA MD 21-2 did not perform better than the check varieties for lint yield. However, USDA MD 21-3 gave better yield than the check varieties. All the three candidate germplasm had lower fuzz percent than the check varieties. This indicates a better ginning efficiency of these germplasm. In fiber quality (fiber length and fiber strength) all the three germplasm performed significantly better than the check varieties. Micronaire and uniformity values were similar between the candidates and check varieties. | 2124809 | PI 699401 |
| 70 | PI 699402 | 'USDA MD 21-2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | During 2018, 2019 and 2020, the three selected germplasm from the three crosses were planted with the check varieties in a randomized complete designs at two locations at Stoneville and were evaluated for their performances for lint yield, fuzz percent and quality traits. Significant differences were observed between entries for lint yield, fuzz percent, micronaire, fiber length and fiber strength. Overall, the candidate germplasm USDA MD 21-1 and USDA MD 21-2 did not perform better than the check varieties for lint yield. However, USDA MD 21-3 gave better yield than the check varieties. All the three candidate germplasm had lower fuzz percent than the check varieties. This indicates a better ginning efficiency of these germplasm. In fiber quality (fiber length and fiber strength) all the three germplasm performed significantly better than the check varieties. Micronaire and uniformity values were similar between the candidates and check varieties. | 2124810 | PI 699402 |
| 71 | PI 699403 | 'USDA MD 21-3' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | During 2018, 2019 and 2020, the three selected germplasm from the three crosses were planted with the check varieties in a randomized complete designs at two locations at Stoneville and were evaluated for their performances for lint yield, fuzz percent and quality traits. Significant differences were observed between entries for lint yield, fuzz percent, micronaire, fiber length and fiber strength. Overall, the candidate germplasm USDA MD 21-1 and USDA MD 21-2 did not perform better than the check varieties for lint yield. However, USDA MD 21-3 gave better yield than the check varieties. All the three candidate germplasm had lower fuzz percent than the check varieties. This indicates a better ginning efficiency of these germplasm. In fiber quality (fiber length and fiber strength) all the three germplasm performed significantly better than the check varieties. Micronaire and uniformity values were similar between the candidates and check varieties. | 2124811 | PI 699403 |
| 72 | PI 698821 | CA 4008 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Enhancing genetic diversity to breed cotton for water-limited production in the Texas High Plains (THP) is one objective of the Texas A&M AgriLife Research breeding program in Lubbock. CA 4008 (Reg.#####, PI ####) was derived from TX 307 (PI 165390) and 07-A-05, an unreleased breeding line. TX 307, wild material of species Gossypium hirsutum, was used as a parent based on performance in hydroponic salinity characterization of 290 accessions conducted at Texas A&M AgriLife Research in Lubbock (LREC) from 2006-2009. Performance testing for yield, fiber quality, and other agronomic properties was conducted at six site-years from 2014-2017 with check cultivars FM 958 (PI 619096), a high yield and fiber quality regional standard, and DP 491 (PI 618609), which historically produced good yield and quality under water stress in the THP. CA 4008 produced similar yield and fiber quality, lower lint percent, and taller plants across site-years compared to checks. CA 4008 was tested at 11 locations across the U. S. in the 2017 Regional Breeder Testing Network and showed low leaf defoliation under Verticillium wilt pressure. In previous studies CA 4008 had less germination reduction under salinity than 27 of 31 LREC lines but equal to cultivar FM 989 (PI 603956). CA 4008 had less root dry weight reduction under salinity in hydroponic studies but equal to FM 989 in shoot and leaves dry weight reduction. CA 4008 is germplasm adapted to THP stress conditions developed from a wild accession. | 2116492 | PI 698821 |
| 73 | PI 698606 | PD 20170048 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | South Carolina, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | PD 20170048 was derived from a cross between TX-1321 (PI 403928) and PD 94042 (PI 603219). TX-1321 is a landrace accession collected from the Ivory Coast (formerly the Republic of Cote D’Ivoire) in 1975. PD 94042 was derived from a cross between ‘Jimian 8’ and ‘PD-3’ (PI 511353). PD 20170048 displays a mid- to full-season maturity and combines excellent yield potential, fiber quality, and wide adaptation. Averaged over six total locations in 2018 and 2019, PD 20170048 produced lint yield equal to ‘Phytogen 72’ and ‘UA 48’ while higher than ‘Deltapine 393’. Lint percent of PD 20170048 was lower than the three check cultivars while boll size, seeds boll-1, and lint index were equal to check cultivars. Seed index of PD 2017048 was higher than check cultivars. PD 20170048 produced fiber length and strength equal to Deltapine 393 and Phytogen 72 while higher than UA 48. Micronaire of PD 20170048 was higher than Deltapine 393 but equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48. PD 20170048 was equal to check cultivars for uniformity and quality score 1 (a weighted average of fiber length (50%), microniare (25%), uniformity (15%), and fiber strength (10%). For quality score 2 (a weighted average of fiber length (10%), microniare (10%), uniformity (30%), and fiber strength (50%), PD 20170048 was equal to Deltapine 393 and UA 48 while higher than Phytogen 72. | 2115979 | PI 698606 |
| 74 | PI 698607 | PD 20170049 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | South Carolina, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | PD 20170049 was derived from a cross between TX-2318 (PI 607644) and ‘UA 48’ (PI 660508). TX-2318 is a landrace accession collected from the former Soviet Union in 1987. UA 48 was developed by University of Arkansas from a cross between Arkot 8712 (PI 636101) and ‘FM 966’ (PI 642050). PD 20170049 displays a mid- to full-season maturity and combines excellent yield potential, fiber quality, and wide adaptation. Averaged over six total locations in 2018 and 2019, PD 20170049 produced lint yield equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48 while higher than Deltapine 393. Lint percent of PD 20170049 was lower than UA 48 but equal to Deltapine 393 and Phytogen 72. PD 20170049 was equivalent to check cultivars for boll size, seeds boll-1, and seed index, while lint index was equal to Deltapine 393 and UA 48 but lower than Phytogen 72. PD 20170049 produced fiber length and quality score 1 superior to check cultivars, while strength, micronaire, and uniformity were equal to check cultivars. For quality score 2, PD 20170049 was higher than Phytogen 72 and equal to Deltapine 393 and UA 48. | 2115980 | PI 698607 |
| 75 | PI 698608 | PD 20170050 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | South Carolina, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | PD 20170050 was derived from a cross between TX-2354 (PI 607669) and MD 25 (PI 659508). TX-2354 is a landrace accession collected from Paraguay in 1986. MD 25 was developed by USDA-ARS Stoneville, MS from a cross between MD 9ne and a non-commercial strain developed by Suregrow Seed Company (Centre, AL). PD 20170050 displays a mid- to full-season maturity and combines excellent yield potential, fiber quality, and wide adaptation. Averaged over six total locations in 2018 and 2019, PD 20170050 produced lint yield equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48 while higher than Deltapine 393. Lint percent of PD 20170050 was higher than Deltapine 393 and equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48. PD 20170050 was equivalent to check cultivars for boll size, seeds boll-1, seed index, and lint index. PD 20170050 produced fiber length and quality score 2 superior to check cultivars. PD 20170050 produced strength equal to check cultivars, while micronaire was higher than Deltapine 393 but equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48. Uniformity and quality score 1 of PD 20170050 was equal to Deltapine 393 but higher than Phytogen 72 and UA 48. | 2115981 | PI 698608 |
| 76 | PI 698609 | PD 20170053 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | South Carolina, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | PD 2017053 was derived from a cross between TX-2354 (PI 607669) and UA 48. TX-2354 is a landrace accession collected from Paraguay in 1986. UA 48 was developed by University of Arkansas from a cross between Arkot 8712 and FM 966. PD 20170053 displays a mid- to full-season maturity and combines excellent yield potential, fiber quality, and wide adaptation. Averaged over six total locations in 2018 and 2019, PD 20170053 produced lint yield equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48 while higher than Deltapine 393. Lint percent of PD 20170053 was lower than UA 48 but equal to Deltapine 393 and Phytogen 72. PD 20170053 was equivalent to check cultivars for boll size, seed index, and lint index. Seeds boll-1 was lower than Deltapine 393 but equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48. PD 20170053 produced fiber length higher than check cultivars, while strength was equal to Deltapine 393 and Phytogen 72 but higher than UA 48. PD 20170053 produced micronaire higher than Deltapine 393 and equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48. Uniformity of PD 20170053 was equal to Deltapine 393 and higher than Phytogen 72 and UA 48. PD 20170053 produced a quality score 1 greater than UA 48 and equal to Deltapine 393 and Phytogen 72, while quality score 2 was greater than Phytogen 72 and equal to Deltapine 393 and UA 48. | 2115982 | PI 698609 |
| 77 | PI 698610 | PD 20170054 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | South Carolina, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | PD 20170054 was derived from a cross between TX-1326 (PI 403933) and UA 48. TX-1326 is a landrace accession collected from the Ivory Coast (formerly the Republic of Cote D’Ivoire) in 1975. UA 48 was developed by University of Arkansas from a cross between Arkot 8712 and FM 966. PD 20170054 displays a mid- to full-season maturity and combines excellent yield potential, fiber quality, and wide adaptation. Averaged over six total locations in 2018 and 2019, PD 20170054 produced lint yield equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48 while higher than Deltapine 393. Lint percent of PD 20170054 was lower than Phytogen 72 and UA 48 but equal to Deltapine 393. PD 20170054 was equivalent to check cultivars for boll size, seeds boll-1, seed index, and lint index. PD 20170054 produced fiber length, quality score 1, and quality score 2 superior to check cultivars. PD 20170054 produced strength equal to check cultivars, while micronaire was higher than Deltapine 393 but equal to Phytogen 72 and UA 48. Uniformity of PD 20170054 was equal to check cultivars. | 2115983 | PI 698610 |
| 78 | PI 698445 | AD4 24 | Gossypium mustelinum Miers ex G. Watt | | COT | | Not Available | 2021 | | | | | | | | Donation from Professor Jonathan Wendel, Iowa State University. Packet number W-2. | 2115793 | PI 698445 |
| 79 | PI 698444 | AD4 23 | Gossypium mustelinum Miers ex G. Watt | | COT | | Not Available | 2021 | | | | | | | | Donation from Professor Jonathan Wendel, Iowa State University. Packet number W-1. | 2115792 | PI 698444 |
| 80 | PI 698460 | MS-RIL-009 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The genetic base for cotton fiber properties of strength and length is narrow. MS-RIL-009 is a recombinant inbred line of cotton with fiber properties of 379 KN m per kg strength, 30.19 mm length, 5.93 % elongation, 4.82 micronaire, 6.29% short fiber content, 86.0% maturity, 4.71 g boll weight, and 38.30% lint. It may be used as a parent in crosses to develop cultivars with greater fiber strength. | 2115815 | PI 698460 |
| 81 | PI 698461 | MS-RIL-037 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The genetic base for cotton fiber properties of strength and length is narrow. MS-RIL-037is a recombinant inbred line of cotton with fiber properties of 364 KN m per kg strength, 31.37mm length, 5.98 % elongation, 3.99 micronaire, 6.46% short fiber content, 85.9% maturity, 4.62 g boll weight, and 35.18% lint. It may be used as a parent in crosses to develop cultivars with greater fiber strength and length. | 2115816 | PI 698461 |
| 82 | PI 698462 | MS-RIL-204 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The genetic base for cotton fiber properties of strength and length is narrow. MS-RIL-204 is a recombinant inbred line of cotton with fiber properties of 333.3 KN m per kg strength, 32.16 mm length, 6.84 % elongation, 4.49 micronaire, 5.93% short fiber content, 85.8% maturity, 5.21 g boll weight, and 31.98% lint. It may be used as a parent in crosses to develop cultivars with greater fiber length. | 2115817 | PI 698462 |
| 83 | PI 698463 | MS-RIL-219 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The genetic base for cotton fiber properties of strength and length is narrow. MS-RIL-219 is a recombinant inbred line of cotton with fiber properties of 340.6 KN m per kg strength, 32.165mm length, 6.54 % elongation, 4.14 micronaire, 6.12% short fiber content, 85.6% maturity, 5.84 g boll weight, and 36.11% lint. It may be used as a parent in crosses to develop cultivars with greater fiber strength and length. | 2115818 | PI 698463 |
| 84 | PI 698464 | MS-RIL-282 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The genetic base for cotton fiber properties of strength and length is narrow. MS-RIL-282 is a recombinant inbred line of cotton with fiber properties of 294.4 KN m per kg strength, 31.63 mm length, 7.18 % elongation, 4.12 micronaire, 6.92% short fiber content, 83.9 % maturity, 4.76 g boll weight, and 35.84% lint. It may be used as a parent in crosses to develop cultivars with greater fiber length. | 2115819 | PI 698464 |
| 85 | PI 698465 | MS-RIL-303 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The genetic base for cotton fiber properties of strength and length is narrow. MS-RIL-303 is a recombinant inbred line of cotton with fiber properties of 369.2 KN m per kg strength, 31.11 mm length, 7.19 % elongation, 4.72 micronaire, 6.57% short fiber content, 85.1 % maturity, 5.64 g boll weight, and 38.57 % lint. It may be used as a parent in crosses to develop cultivars with greater fiber strength and length. | 2115820 | PI 698465 |
| 86 | PI 698466 | 'MS-RIL-490' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The genetic base for cotton fiber properties of strength and length is narrow. MS-RIL-490 is a recombinant inbred line of cotton with fiber properties of 315.2 KN m per kg strength, 32.95 mm length, 6.63 % elongation, 4.15 micronaire, 5.91 % short fiber content, 85.1 % maturity, 5.31 g boll weight, and 35.27 % lint. It may be used as a parent in crosses to develop cultivars with greater fiber length. | 2115821 | PI 698466 |
| 87 | PI 698207 | '16R042' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113474 | PI 698207 |
| 88 | PI 698208 | '20R040' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113475 | PI 698208 |
| 89 | PI 698209 | '20R054' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113476 | PI 698209 |
| 90 | PI 698210 | '20R036' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113477 | PI 698210 |
| 91 | PI 698211 | '20R028' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113478 | PI 698211 |
| 92 | PI 698212 | '20R010' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113479 | PI 698212 |
| 93 | PI 698213 | '20R045' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113480 | PI 698213 |
| 94 | PI 698214 | '20R027' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113481 | PI 698214 |
| 95 | PI 698215 | '20R035' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113482 | PI 698215 |
| 96 | PI 698216 | '20R032' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113483 | PI 698216 |
| 97 | PI 698217 | '20R033' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113484 | PI 698217 |
| 98 | PI 698218 | '20R013' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113485 | PI 698218 |
| 99 | PI 698219 | '20R030' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113486 | PI 698219 |
| 100 | PI 698220 | 'May 455' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113487 | PI 698220 |
| 101 | PI 698221 | 'May 505' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2113488 | PI 698221 |
| 102 | PI 698113 | '11PVVV09' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Indiana, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2113362 | PI 698113 |
| 103 | PI 698114 | '11PNQF08' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Indiana, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2113363 | PI 698114 |
| 104 | PI 698109 | TAM KJ-Q14 ESU | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | TAM KJ-Q14 ESU combines excellent fiber length with fiber bundle strength exceeding 370 kN m per kg under irrigated culture and 365 kN m per kg under dryland culture across multiple performance trials. TAM KJ-Q14 ESU was selected for its combination of fiber bundle strength with HVI upper half mean length averaging 33 mm across multiple performance trials. TAM KJ-Q14 ESU averaged 384 kN m per kg fiber bundle strength and 34 mm upper half mean length across nine sites in the 2018 USDA ARS Regional High Quality trial. TAM KJ-Q14 ESU produced yarn with greater tenacity and equivalent appearance quality when spun on either ring or vortex spinning platforms compared with Acala 1517-08 and Tamcot 73. | 2113358 | PI 698109 |
| 105 | PI 698110 | TAM 12 J-39 ESU | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | TAM 12 J-39 ESU combines competitive yield potential with fiber strength exceeding 350 kN m per kg. TAM 12J-39 ESU was evaluated in both the USDA-ARS RHQ in 2017 and the RBTN uniform trials in 2018 and 2019. In the 2017 Regional High Quality trials, TAM 12J-39 ESU was not different in lint yield than 13 of the 19 entries and was lower (p=0.05) yielding than only one of the commercial controls. Lint percent at 37.9 was lower than DP 1646 B2XF but was not different than PHY 764 WRF. TAM 12J-39 ESU averaged greater (p=0.05) fiber bundle strength than PHY 746 WRF and DP 1646 B2XF and TAM BB-2139 ELSU. In the 2018 RBTN national nurseries, TAM 12J-39 ESU yielded equivalent (p=0.05) to FM 958, DP 393, UA 222, and DP 493. TAM 12J-39 ESU averaged 365 kN m per kg across the multiple locations of these national nurseries and exceeded all commercial controls. All other HVI fiber properties were similar to commercial controls. | 2113359 | PI 698110 |
| 106 | PI 697030 | Arkot 0822 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0822 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA248' (developed from same cross), 'DP 393' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0822 has lower trichome density on abaxial leaves and on bract margins than the cultivars. Data from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over six years indicated that lint yields of Arkot 0822 were equal to UA248 and exceeded lint yields of DP393 and UA48 at each location, except equal yields with DP 393 at Judd Hill. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0822 were 7. 7 and 15.9% greater than DP 393 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA248, Arkot 0822 produced higher lint index (8.2 vs. 7.7 g), seed index (11.8 vs. 11.3 g), fiber micronaire (4.91 vs. 4.54), and fiber elongation (7.0 vs. 6.5%); equal open boll percentage (56 vs. 56%), stem pubescence (5.6 vs. 5.5 rating), marginal bract trichome density (24.7 vs. 26.4 trichomes cm-1), lint fraction (40.5 vs. 40.1 %), seed ha-1 (15983 x 1000 vs 16312 x 1000), fibers per seed (15686 vs. 15816), fiber length (31.8 vs. 32.0 mm), fiber uniformity index (85.7 vs. 85.6%), and fiber strength (320 vs. 323 kN m kg-1); and lower plant height (98 vs. 103 cm), leaf pubescence rating (2.0 vs 3.5), fiber density (134 vs 144 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), and quality score (63 vs. 73). Arkot 0822 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0822 (62%) was lower than UA48 (66%) and equal to DP 393 (60%) and UA248 (63%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris
(Palisot de Beauvais)]. As indicated by lint yield at Judd Hill location (site of high Verticillium wilt), response of Arkot 0822 to Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] was equal to UA248 and more tolerant than DP 393 and UA48. | 2112245 | PI 697030 |
| 107 | PI 697031 | Arkot 0912-41 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0912-41 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0912-41 has higher trichome density on abaxial leaves, stems and bract margins than UA222 and UA48. Lint yields of Arkot 0912-41 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location (except equal yields with UA222 at Rohwer). Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot
0912-41 were 12.9 and 23.3% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0912-41 produced higher lint fraction (41.0 vs. 40.2%), lint index (8.3 vs. 7. 7 g), seed index (11.6 vs. 11.1 g), plant height (103 vs. 100 cm), leaf pubescence rating (5.0 vs. 4.1 ), stem pubescence
(6.2 vs. 5.6 rating), marginal bract trichome density (41.1 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1 ), fiber micronaire (4.64 vs. 4.54), fiber length (31.8 vs. 31.2 mm), fiber uniformity index (86.5 vs. 85.6%), and fiber strength (336 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ); equal seed ha-1 (15919 x 1000 vs 15270 x 1000), fibers per seed (16574 vs. 16224), fiber density (148 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), open boll percentage (54 vs. 50%), quality score (62 vs. 56), and fiber elongation (6.6 vs. 6.3%); and lower short fiber content (6.3 vs. 6.7%). Arkot 0912-41 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0912-41 (51%) was lower than UA48
(55%) and susceptible check (74%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at Judd Hill location suggest that Arkot 0912-41 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] than UA222 and UA48, but it expressed more leaf symptoms than either check cultivar. | 2112246 | PI 697031 |
| 108 | PI 697032 | Arkot 0912-18 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0912-18 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0912-18 has higher trichome density on abaxial leaves, stems and bract margins than UA222 and UA48. Lint yields of Arkot 0912-18 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0912-18 were 13.8 and 24.3% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0912-18 produced higher lint fraction (40.8 vs. 40.2%), seed ha-1 (16635 x 1000 vs 15270 x 1000), lint index (7.9 vs. 7.7 g), plant height (105 vs. 100 cm), leaf pubescence rating (5.5 vs. 4.1 ), stem pubescence (6.3 vs. 5.6 rating), marginal bract trichome density (39.9 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1), fiber micronaire (4.68 vs. 4.54), fiber uniformity index (86.6 vs. 85.6%), fiber strength (340 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ), and fiber elongation (7 .0 vs. 6.3% ); equal seed index (11.2 vs. 11.1 g), fiber density (146 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), open boll percentage (53 vs. 50%), quality score (58 vs. 56), and fiber length (31.5 vs. 31.2 mm); and lower fibers per seed (15940 vs. 16224) and short fiber content(6.0 vs. 6.7%). Arkot 0912-18 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0912-18 (50%) was lower than UA48 (55%) and susceptible check (74%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at Judd Hill location (site of high Verticillium wilt) suggest that Arkot 0912-18 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] than UA222 and UA48, but it expressed more Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms than either check cultivar. | 2112247 | PI 697032 |
| 109 | PI 697033 | Arkot 0908-60 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0908-60 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0908-60 has lower trichome density on abaxial leaves than UA222, lower stem pubescence density than UA222 or UA48, and higher density on bract margins than UA48. Lint yields of Arkot 0908-60 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0908-60 were 16.6 and 27.3% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0908-60 produced higher lint fraction (41.9 vs. 40.2%), seed ha-1 (17878 x 1000 vs. 15270 x 1000), plant height (106 vs. 100 cm), fiber micronaire (4.83 vs. 4.54), and short fiber content (7.0 vs. 6.7%); equal open boll percentage (52 vs. 50%), lint index (7.6 vs. 7.7 fiber density (145 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), marginal bract trichome density (34.5 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1 ), quality score (54 vs. 56), fiber length (31.5 vs. 31.2 mm, fiber uniformity index (85.4 vs. 85.6%), fiber strength (317 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ), fiber elongation (5.8 vs. 6.3%), and lower seed index (10.2 vs. 11.1 g), fibers per seed (14876 vs. 16224), leaf pubescence rating (2.5 vs. 4.1 ), and stem pubescence (4.8 vs. 5.6 rating. Arkot 0908-60 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0908-60 (50%) was lower than UA48
(55%) and susceptible check (74%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at site of high Verticillium wilt suggest that Arkot 0912-60 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt than UA222 and UA48, but its Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms were equal to both check cultivars. | 2112248 | PI 697033 |
| 110 | PI 697034 | Arkot 0908-56 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0908-56 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0908-56 has higher trichome density on abaxial leaves and on bract margins than either cultivar, and lower density on stems than UA222. Lint yields of Arkot 0908-56 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0908-56 were 14.1 and 24.6% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0908-56 produced higher lint fraction (42.8 vs. 40.2%), seed ha-1 (16737 x 1000 vs 15270 x 1000), lint index (7.9 vs. 7.7 g), plant height (108 vs. 100 cm), leaf pubescence rating (5.4 vs. 4.1), marginal bract trichome density (41.8 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1 ), fiber micronaire (4.74 vs. 4.54), fiber length (31.8 vs. 31.2 mm); equal open boll percentage (56 vs. 50%), fiber density (150 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), quality score (62 vs. 56), fiber uniformity index (86.0 vs. 85.6%), fiber strength (320 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ); and lower stem pubescence (5.1 vs. 5.6 rating), seed index (10.3 vs. 11.1 g), fibers per seed (15589 vs. 16224), fiber elongation (5.7 vs. 6.3%), and short fiber content (6.5 vs. 6.7%). Arkot 0908-56 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0908-56 (50%) was lower than UA48 (55%) and susceptible check (74%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at site of high Verticillium wilt suggest that Arkot 0908-56 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt than UA222 and UA48, but it expressed more Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms than either check cultivar. | 2112249 | PI 697034 |
| 111 | PI 697035 | Arkot 0908-52 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0908-52 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0908-52 has lower trichome density on abaxial leaves than UA222 and higher density on bract margins than UA48. Lint yields of Arkot 0908-52 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location, except equal yields with UA222 at Rohwer. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0908-52 were 13.9 and 24.3% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0908-52 produced higher lint fraction (42.3 vs. 40.2%), seed ha-1 (17100 x 1000 vs 15270 x 1000), plant height (106 vs. 100 cm), quality score (67 vs. 56), fiber length (32.3 vs. 31.2 mm), and short fiber content (6.9 vs. 6.7%) ; equal lint index (7.7 vs. 7.7 g), fiber density (152 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), open boll percentage (51 vs. 50%), stem pubescence (5.6 vs. 5.6 rating), marginal bract trichome density (34.9 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1 ), fiber micronaire (4.57 vs. 4.54), and fiber uniformity index (85.6 vs. 85.6%); and lower seed index
(10.3 vs. 11.1 g), fibers per seed (15686 vs. 16224 ), leaf pubescence rating (2.0 vs. 4.1 ), fiber strength (307 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ), and fiber elongation (5.3 vs. 6.3%). Arkot 0908-52 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0908-52 (58%) was lower than the susceptible check (74%), equal to UA48 (55%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at site of high Verticillium wilt suggest that Arkot 0908-52 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt than UA222 and UA48, but its Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms were equal to both check cultivars. | 2112250 | PI 697035 |
| 112 | PI 697272 | NC18-05 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | North Carolina, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | NC18-05 resulted from a random mating population using multiple parents. Twelve cotton cultivars each with uniquely improved fiber quality and/or yield representing major cotton breeding programs of the United States were crossed with each other in a half diallele to produce the F1s. Equal amount of F1 hybrid seed from each of the 66 F1 hybrid combinations was mixed for planting in rows. The F1 hybrids and the progenies of the subsequent generations were randomly mated using natural outcrossing. Lines chosen for parents were: ‘Acala Ultima’ (A_Ultima, PI 603079), developed by California Planting Cotton Seed Distributors (Shafter, CA); ‘Coker315, PI 529530’, developed by Coker Pedigreed Seed Co. (Hartsville, SC); ‘Tamcot Pyramid’ (Pyramid, PI 617042), developed in the Texas Agriculture Experiment Station (Thaxton and El-Zik 2004); ‘Stoneville 825’ (STV825, PI 529524), developed by Stoneville Pedigreed Seed Co. (Stoneville, MS); ‘FiberMax 966’ (FM966, PI 619097), an Upland commercial cotton developed by Bayer Crop Science (Lubbock, TX); M-240RNR (M-240, PI 592511), a root knot nematode resistant line developed by the ARS (Shepherd et al., 1996); ‘Deltapine Acala 90’ (DP90, PI 529529), developed by Delta and Pine Land Co. (Scott, MS); ‘Sure-Grow 747’ (SG747, PI 656375), an Upland commercial cultivar developed by Sure-Grow Co. (Centre, AL); ‘Georgia King’ (GA_King, PI 552537) was developed and released by the University of Georgia (Baker, 1992); ‘Phytogen PSC 355’ (PSC355, PI 612974), ‘Stoneville 474’ (STV474, PI 578877), developed by Stoneville Pedigreed Seeds; and TM-1 (Texas Marker-1, PI 662944). Individual plants obtained after the fourth intermating cycle were self-pollinated in the field. About 700 F4 lines were grown for obtaining F4:5 lines in 2009. These F4:5 lines were planted in field for seed increase through self pollination in the summer of 2010. Released germplasm lines are selections from the F6 inbred lines. | 2112507 | PI 697272 |
| 113 | PI 697273 | NC18-06 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | North Carolina, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | NC18-06 resulted from a random mating population using multiple parents. Twelve cotton cultivars each with uniquely improved fiber quality and/or yield representing major cotton breeding programs of the United States were crossed with each other in a half diallele to produce the F1s. Equal amount of F1 hybrid seed from each of the 66 F1 hybrid combinations was mixed for planting in rows. The F1 hybrids and the progenies of the subsequent generations were randomly mated using natural outcrossing. Lines chosen for parents were: ‘Acala Ultima’ (A_Ultima, PI 603079), developed by California Planting Cotton Seed Distributors (Shafter, CA); ‘Coker315, PI 529530’, developed by Coker Pedigreed Seed Co. (Hartsville, SC); ‘Tamcot Pyramid’ (Pyramid, PI 617042), developed in the Texas Agriculture Experiment Station (Thaxton and El-Zik 2004); ‘Stoneville 825’ (STV825, PI 529524), developed by Stoneville Pedigreed Seed Co. (Stoneville, MS); ‘FiberMax 966’ (FM966, PI 619097), an Upland commercial cotton developed by Bayer Crop Science (Lubbock, TX); M-240RNR (M-240, PI 592511), a root knot nematode resistant line developed by the ARS (Shepherd et al., 1996); ‘Deltapine Acala 90’ (DP90, PI 529529), developed by Delta and Pine Land Co. (Scott, MS); ‘Sure-Grow 747’ (SG747, PI 656375), an Upland commercial cultivar developed by Sure-Grow Co. (Centre, AL); ‘Georgia King’ (GA_King, PI 552537) was developed and released by the University of Georgia (Baker, 1992); ‘Phytogen PSC 355’ (PSC355, PI 612974), ‘Stoneville 474’ (STV474, PI 578877), developed by Stoneville Pedigreed Seeds; and TM-1 (Texas Marker-1, PI 662944). Individual plants obtained after the fourth intermating cycle were self-pollinated in the field. About 700 F4 lines were grown for obtaining F4:5 lines in 2009. These F4:5 lines were planted in field for seed increase through self pollination in the summer of 2010. Released germplasm lines are selections from the F6 inbred lines. | 2112508 | PI 697273 |
| 114 | PI 695445 | AD5 5 | Gossypium darwinii G. Watt | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2110116 | PI 695445 |
| 115 | PI 695428 | AD5 1 | Gossypium darwinii G. Watt | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2110115 | PI 695428 |
| 116 | PI 695599 | D4 14 | Gossypium aridum (Rose & Standl.) Skovst. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2110107 | PI 695599 |
| 117 | PI 695598 | D3d 32 | Gossypium davidsonii Kellogg | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2110106 | PI 695598 |
| 118 | PI 698471 | K1 5 | Gossypium costulatum Tod. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2110005 | PI 698471 |
| 119 | PI 695601 | G2 15 | Gossypium australe F. Muell. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2109996 | PI 695601 |
| 120 | PI 695389 | CA 4009 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | CA 4009 is a non-commerical upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm line that was developed at Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at Lubbock as part of an established objective to improve fiber quality in combination with yield potential. CA 4009 has an improved fiber quality packaged compared to commercial checks and is capable of yielding statistically the same. Short fiber content was lower while fiber length, length uniformity, and fiber elongation were greater than commercial checks. Fiber strength was higher than two of the commercial checks, and external trial data (quality scores) suggest that this combination of fiber traits would result in improved yarn quality as well. This germplasm line offers a combination of improved fiber properties that are known to influence yarn quality making them valuable breeding sources for improving fiber quality and textile performance. | 2110483 | PI 695389 |
| 121 | PI 695390 | CA 4010 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | CA 4010 is a non-commerical upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm line that was developed at Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at Lubbock as part of an established objective to improve fiber quality in combination with yield potential. CA 4010 has an improved fiber quality packaged compared to commercial checks and is capable of yielding statistically the same. Short fiber content was lower while fiber length, length uniformity, and fiber elongation were greater than commercial checks. Fiber strength was higher than the commercial checks, and external trial data (quality scores) suggest that this combination of fiber traits would result in improved yarn quality as well. This germplasm line offers a combination of improved fiber properties that are known to influence yarn quality making them valuable breeding sources for improving fiber quality and textile performance. | 2110484 | PI 695390 |
| 122 | PI 695543 | C1 8 | Gossypium sturtianum J. H. Willis | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2107438 | PI 695543 |
| 123 | PI 694926 | SA-3941 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107428 | PI 694926 |
| 124 | PI 694925 | SA-3940 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107427 | PI 694925 |
| 125 | PI 694923 | SA-3938 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107425 | PI 694923 |
| 126 | PI 694924 | SA-3939 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107426 | PI 694924 |
| 127 | PI 694921 | SA-3936 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107423 | PI 694921 |
| 128 | PI 694922 | SA-3937 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107424 | PI 694922 |
| 129 | PI 694920 | SA-3935 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107422 | PI 694920 |
| 130 | PI 694918 | SA-3933 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107420 | PI 694918 |
| 131 | PI 694919 | SA-3934 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107421 | PI 694919 |
| 132 | PI 694916 | SA-3931 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107418 | PI 694916 |
| 133 | PI 694917 | SA-3932 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107419 | PI 694917 |
| 134 | PI 694915 | SA-3930 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107417 | PI 694915 |
| 135 | PI 694913 | SA-3928 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107415 | PI 694913 |
| 136 | PI 694914 | SA-3929 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107416 | PI 694914 |
| 137 | PI 694912 | SA-3927 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107414 | PI 694912 |
| 138 | PI 694910 | SA-3925 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107412 | PI 694910 |
| 139 | PI 694911 | SA-3926 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107413 | PI 694911 |
| 140 | PI 694909 | SA-3924 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107411 | PI 694909 |
| 141 | PI 694907 | SA-3922 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107409 | PI 694907 |
| 142 | PI 694908 | SA-3923 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107410 | PI 694908 |
| 143 | PI 694906 | SA-3921 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107408 | PI 694906 |
| 144 | PI 694904 | SA-3919 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107406 | PI 694904 |
| 145 | PI 694905 | SA-3920 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107407 | PI 694905 |
| 146 | PI 694903 | SA-3918 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107405 | PI 694903 |
| 147 | PI 694901 | SA-3916 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107403 | PI 694901 |
| 148 | PI 694902 | SA-3917 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107404 | PI 694902 |
| 149 | PI 694899 | SA-3914 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107401 | PI 694899 |
| 150 | PI 694900 | SA-3915 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107402 | PI 694900 |
| 151 | PI 694898 | SA-3913 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107400 | PI 694898 |
| 152 | PI 694897 | SA-3912 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107399 | PI 694897 |
| 153 | PI 694895 | SA-3910 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107397 | PI 694895 |
| 154 | PI 694896 | SA-3911 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107398 | PI 694896 |
| 155 | PI 694894 | SA-3909 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107396 | PI 694894 |
| 156 | PI 694893 | SA-3908 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107395 | PI 694893 |
| 157 | PI 694892 | SA-3907 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107394 | PI 694892 |
| 158 | PI 694890 | SA-3905 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107392 | PI 694890 |
| 159 | PI 694891 | SA-3906 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107393 | PI 694891 |
| 160 | PI 694889 | SA-3904 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107391 | PI 694889 |
| 161 | PI 694887 | SA-3902 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107389 | PI 694887 |
| 162 | PI 694888 | SA-3903 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107390 | PI 694888 |
| 163 | PI 694885 | SA-3900 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107387 | PI 694885 |
| 164 | PI 694886 | SA-3901 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107388 | PI 694886 |
| 165 | PI 694884 | SA-3899 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107386 | PI 694884 |
| 166 | PI 694883 | SA-3898 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107385 | PI 694883 |
| 167 | PI 694882 | SA-3897 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107384 | PI 694882 |
| 168 | PI 694880 | SA-3895 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107382 | PI 694880 |
| 169 | PI 694881 | SA-3896 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107383 | PI 694881 |
| 170 | PI 694878 | SA-3893 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107380 | PI 694878 |
| 171 | PI 694879 | SA-3894 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107381 | PI 694879 |
| 172 | PI 694877 | SA-3892 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107379 | PI 694877 |
| 173 | PI 694875 | SA-3890 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107377 | PI 694875 |
| 174 | PI 694876 | SA-3891 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107378 | PI 694876 |
| 175 | PI 694874 | SA-3889 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107376 | PI 694874 |
| 176 | PI 694873 | SA-3888 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107375 | PI 694873 |
| 177 | PI 694864 | SA 3832 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2107361 | PI 694864 |
| 178 | PI 694863 | SA 3817 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2107360 | PI 694863 |
| 179 | PI 694862 | SA 3544 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107358 | PI 694862 |
| 180 | PI 694861 | SA 3490 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107357 | PI 694861 |
| 181 | PI 694860 | SA 3489 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107356 | PI 694860 |
| 182 | PI 694859 | SA 3488 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107355 | PI 694859 |
| 183 | PI 694858 | SA 3487 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107354 | PI 694858 |
| 184 | PI 694857 | SA 3486 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107353 | PI 694857 |
| 185 | PI 694856 | SA 3485 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107352 | PI 694856 |
| 186 | PI 694854 | SA 3483 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107350 | PI 694854 |
| 187 | PI 694855 | SA 3484 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107351 | PI 694855 |
| 188 | PI 694853 | SA 3482 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107349 | PI 694853 |
| 189 | PI 694852 | SA 3481 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107348 | PI 694852 |
| 190 | PI 694851 | SA 3480 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107347 | PI 694851 |
| 191 | PI 694850 | SA 3479 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107346 | PI 694850 |
| 192 | PI 694849 | SA 3478 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107345 | PI 694849 |
| 193 | PI 694848 | SA 3477 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107344 | PI 694848 |
| 194 | PI 694847 | SA 3476 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107343 | PI 694847 |
| 195 | PI 694846 | SA 3475 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107342 | PI 694846 |
| 196 | PI 694845 | SA 3474 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107341 | PI 694845 |
| 197 | PI 694844 | SA 3473 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107340 | PI 694844 |
| 198 | PI 694843 | SA 3472 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107339 | PI 694843 |
| 199 | PI 694841 | SA 3470 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107337 | PI 694841 |
| 200 | PI 694842 | SA 3471 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107338 | PI 694842 |
| 201 | PI 694840 | SA 3469 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107336 | PI 694840 |
| 202 | PI 694838 | SA 3467 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107334 | PI 694838 |
| 203 | PI 694839 | SA 3468 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107335 | PI 694839 |
| 204 | PI 694837 | SA 3466 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107333 | PI 694837 |
| 205 | PI 694836 | SA 3465 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107332 | PI 694836 |
| 206 | PI 694835 | SA 3464 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107331 | PI 694835 |
| 207 | PI 694834 | SA 3463 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107330 | PI 694834 |
| 208 | PI 694833 | SA 3462 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107329 | PI 694833 |
| 209 | PI 694832 | SA 3461 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107328 | PI 694832 |
| 210 | PI 694830 | SA 3459 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107326 | PI 694830 |
| 211 | PI 694831 | SA 3460 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107327 | PI 694831 |
| 212 | PI 694829 | SA 3458 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107325 | PI 694829 |
| 213 | PI 694828 | SA 3457 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107324 | PI 694828 |
| 214 | PI 694827 | SA 3456 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107323 | PI 694827 |
| 215 | PI 694826 | SA 3455 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107322 | PI 694826 |
| 216 | PI 694825 | SA 3454 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107321 | PI 694825 |
| 217 | PI 694824 | SA 3453 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107320 | PI 694824 |
| 218 | PI 694823 | SA 3452 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107319 | PI 694823 |
| 219 | PI 694822 | SA 3451 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107318 | PI 694822 |
| 220 | PI 694820 | SA 3449 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107316 | PI 694820 |
| 221 | PI 694821 | SA 3450 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107317 | PI 694821 |
| 222 | PI 694819 | SA 3448 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107315 | PI 694819 |
| 223 | PI 694818 | SA 3447 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107314 | PI 694818 |
| 224 | PI 694817 | SA 3446 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107313 | PI 694817 |
| 225 | PI 694816 | SA 3445 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107312 | PI 694816 |
| 226 | PI 694815 | SA 3444 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107311 | PI 694815 |
| 227 | PI 694814 | SA 3443 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107310 | PI 694814 |
| 228 | PI 694813 | SA 3442 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107309 | PI 694813 |
| 229 | PI 694811 | SA 3440 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107307 | PI 694811 |
| 230 | PI 694812 | SA 3441 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107308 | PI 694812 |
| 231 | PI 694810 | SA 3439 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107306 | PI 694810 |
| 232 | PI 694809 | SA 3438 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107305 | PI 694809 |
| 233 | PI 694808 | SA 3437 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107304 | PI 694808 |
| 234 | PI 694807 | SA 3436 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107303 | PI 694807 |
| 235 | PI 694806 | SA 3435 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107302 | PI 694806 |
| 236 | PI 694805 | SA 3434 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107301 | PI 694805 |
| 237 | PI 694804 | SA 3433 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107300 | PI 694804 |
| 238 | PI 694803 | SA 3432 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107299 | PI 694803 |
| 239 | PI 694801 | SA 3430 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107297 | PI 694801 |
| 240 | PI 694802 | SA 3431 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107298 | PI 694802 |
| 241 | PI 694800 | SA 3429 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107296 | PI 694800 |
| 242 | PI 694799 | SA 3428 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107295 | PI 694799 |
| 243 | PI 694798 | SA 3427 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107294 | PI 694798 |
| 244 | PI 694797 | SA 3426 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107293 | PI 694797 |
| 245 | PI 694796 | SA 3425 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107292 | PI 694796 |
| 246 | PI 694795 | SA 3424 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107291 | PI 694795 |
| 247 | PI 694794 | SA 3423 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107290 | PI 694794 |
| 248 | PI 694793 | SA 3422 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107289 | PI 694793 |
| 249 | PI 694792 | SA 3421 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107288 | PI 694792 |
| 250 | PI 694790 | SA 3419 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107286 | PI 694790 |
| 251 | PI 694791 | SA 3420 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107287 | PI 694791 |
| 252 | PI 694789 | SA 3418 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107285 | PI 694789 |
| 253 | PI 694788 | SA 3417 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107284 | PI 694788 |
| 254 | PI 694787 | SA 3416 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107283 | PI 694787 |
| 255 | PI 694786 | SA 3415 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107282 | PI 694786 |
| 256 | PI 694784 | SA 3413 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107280 | PI 694784 |
| 257 | PI 694785 | SA 3414 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107281 | PI 694785 |
| 258 | PI 694783 | SA 3412 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107279 | PI 694783 |
| 259 | PI 694782 | SA 3411 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107278 | PI 694782 |
| 260 | PI 694781 | SA 3410 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107277 | PI 694781 |
| 261 | PI 694780 | SA 3409 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107276 | PI 694780 |
| 262 | PI 694779 | SA 3408 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107275 | PI 694779 |
| 263 | PI 694778 | SA 3407 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107274 | PI 694778 |
| 264 | PI 694777 | SA 3406 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107273 | PI 694777 |
| 265 | PI 694776 | SA 3405 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107272 | PI 694776 |
| 266 | PI 694775 | SA 3404 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107271 | PI 694775 |
| 267 | PI 694774 | SA 3403 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107270 | PI 694774 |
| 268 | PI 694773 | SA 3402 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107269 | PI 694773 |
| 269 | PI 694772 | SA 3401 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107268 | PI 694772 |
| 270 | PI 694771 | SA 3400 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107267 | PI 694771 |
| 271 | PI 694770 | SA 3399 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107266 | PI 694770 |
| 272 | PI 694768 | SA 3397 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107264 | PI 694768 |
| 273 | PI 694769 | SA 3398 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107265 | PI 694769 |
| 274 | PI 694767 | SA 3396 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107263 | PI 694767 |
| 275 | PI 694766 | SA 3395 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107262 | PI 694766 |
| 276 | PI 694765 | SA 3394 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107261 | PI 694765 |
| 277 | PI 694764 | SA 3393 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107260 | PI 694764 |
| 278 | PI 694762 | SA 3391 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107258 | PI 694762 |
| 279 | PI 694763 | SA 3392 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107259 | PI 694763 |
| 280 | PI 694761 | SA 3390 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107257 | PI 694761 |
| 281 | PI 694760 | SA 3389 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107256 | PI 694760 |
| 282 | PI 694759 | SA 3388 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107255 | PI 694759 |
| 283 | PI 694757 | SA 3386 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107253 | PI 694757 |
| 284 | PI 694758 | SA 3387 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107254 | PI 694758 |
| 285 | PI 694756 | SA 3385 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107252 | PI 694756 |
| 286 | PI 694755 | SA 3384 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107251 | PI 694755 |
| 287 | PI 694754 | SA 3383 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107250 | PI 694754 |
| 288 | PI 694753 | SA 3382 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107249 | PI 694753 |
| 289 | PI 694752 | SA 3381 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107248 | PI 694752 |
| 290 | PI 694751 | SA 3380 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107247 | PI 694751 |
| 291 | PI 694749 | SA 3378 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107245 | PI 694749 |
| 292 | PI 694750 | SA 3379 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107246 | PI 694750 |
| 293 | PI 694748 | SA 3377 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107244 | PI 694748 |
| 294 | PI 694747 | SA 3376 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107243 | PI 694747 |
| 295 | PI 694746 | SA 3375 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107242 | PI 694746 |
| 296 | PI 694745 | SA 3374 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107241 | PI 694745 |
| 297 | PI 694743 | SA 3372 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107239 | PI 694743 |
| 298 | PI 694744 | SA 3373 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107240 | PI 694744 |
| 299 | PI 694742 | SA 3371 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107238 | PI 694742 |
| 300 | PI 694741 | SA 3370 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107237 | PI 694741 |
| 301 | PI 694740 | SA 3369 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107236 | PI 694740 |
| 302 | PI 694739 | SA 3368 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107235 | PI 694739 |
| 303 | PI 694738 | SA 3367 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107234 | PI 694738 |
| 304 | PI 694737 | SA 3366 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107233 | PI 694737 |
| 305 | PI 694736 | SA 3365 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107232 | PI 694736 |
| 306 | PI 694735 | SA 3364 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107231 | PI 694735 |
| 307 | PI 694734 | SA 3363 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107230 | PI 694734 |
| 308 | PI 694733 | SA 3362 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107229 | PI 694733 |
| 309 | PI 694731 | SA 3360 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107227 | PI 694731 |
| 310 | PI 694732 | SA 3361 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107228 | PI 694732 |
| 311 | PI 694730 | SA 3359 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107226 | PI 694730 |
| 312 | PI 694729 | SA 3358 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107225 | PI 694729 |
| 313 | PI 694728 | SA 3357 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107224 | PI 694728 |
| 314 | PI 694727 | SA 3356 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107223 | PI 694727 |
| 315 | PI 694726 | SA 3355 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107222 | PI 694726 |
| 316 | PI 694725 | SA 3354 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107221 | PI 694725 |
| 317 | PI 694724 | SA 3353 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107220 | PI 694724 |
| 318 | PI 694723 | SA 3352 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107219 | PI 694723 |
| 319 | PI 694722 | SA 3351 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107218 | PI 694722 |
| 320 | PI 694721 | SA 3350 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107217 | PI 694721 |
| 321 | PI 694720 | SA 3349 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107216 | PI 694720 |
| 322 | PI 694719 | SA 3348 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107215 | PI 694719 |
| 323 | PI 694717 | SA 3346 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107213 | PI 694717 |
| 324 | PI 694718 | SA 3347 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107214 | PI 694718 |
| 325 | PI 694716 | SA 3345 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107212 | PI 694716 |
| 326 | PI 694715 | SA 3344 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107211 | PI 694715 |
| 327 | PI 694714 | SA 3343 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107210 | PI 694714 |
| 328 | PI 694713 | SA 3342 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107209 | PI 694713 |
| 329 | PI 694712 | SA 3341 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107208 | PI 694712 |
| 330 | PI 694710 | SA 3339 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107206 | PI 694710 |
| 331 | PI 694711 | SA 3340 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107207 | PI 694711 |
| 332 | PI 694709 | SA 3338 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107205 | PI 694709 |
| 333 | PI 694708 | SA 3337 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107204 | PI 694708 |
| 334 | PI 694707 | SA 3336 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107203 | PI 694707 |
| 335 | PI 694706 | SA 3335 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107202 | PI 694706 |
| 336 | PI 694705 | SA 3334 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107201 | PI 694705 |
| 337 | PI 694704 | SA 3333 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107200 | PI 694704 |
| 338 | PI 694703 | SA 3332 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107199 | PI 694703 |
| 339 | PI 694702 | SA 3331 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107198 | PI 694702 |
| 340 | PI 694700 | SA 3329 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107196 | PI 694700 |
| 341 | PI 694701 | SA 3330 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107197 | PI 694701 |
| 342 | PI 694699 | SA 3328 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107195 | PI 694699 |
| 343 | PI 694698 | SA 3327 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107194 | PI 694698 |
| 344 | PI 694697 | SA 3326 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107193 | PI 694697 |
| 345 | PI 694696 | SA 3325 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107192 | PI 694696 |
| 346 | PI 694695 | SA 3324 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107191 | PI 694695 |
| 347 | PI 694694 | SA 3323 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107190 | PI 694694 |
| 348 | PI 694693 | SA 3322 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107189 | PI 694693 |
| 349 | PI 694692 | SA 3321 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107188 | PI 694692 |
| 350 | PI 694691 | SA 3320 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107187 | PI 694691 |
| 351 | PI 694690 | SA 3319 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107186 | PI 694690 |
| 352 | PI 694689 | SA 3318 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107185 | PI 694689 |
| 353 | PI 694688 | SA 3317 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107184 | PI 694688 |
| 354 | PI 694687 | SA 3316 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107183 | PI 694687 |
| 355 | PI 694686 | SA 3315 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107182 | PI 694686 |
| 356 | PI 694685 | SA 3314 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107181 | PI 694685 |
| 357 | PI 694683 | SA 3312 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107179 | PI 694683 |
| 358 | PI 694684 | SA 3313 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107180 | PI 694684 |
| 359 | PI 694682 | SA 3311 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107178 | PI 694682 |
| 360 | PI 694681 | SA 3310 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107177 | PI 694681 |
| 361 | PI 694680 | SA 3309 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107176 | PI 694680 |
| 362 | PI 694679 | SA 3308 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107175 | PI 694679 |
| 363 | PI 694677 | SA 3306 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107173 | PI 694677 |
| 364 | PI 694678 | SA 3307 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107174 | PI 694678 |
| 365 | PI 694676 | SA 3305 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107172 | PI 694676 |
| 366 | PI 694675 | SA 3304 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107171 | PI 694675 |
| 367 | PI 694674 | SA 3303 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107170 | PI 694674 |
| 368 | PI 694673 | SA 3302 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107169 | PI 694673 |
| 369 | PI 694672 | SA 3301 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107168 | PI 694672 |
| 370 | PI 694670 | SA 3299 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107166 | PI 694670 |
| 371 | PI 694671 | SA 3300 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107167 | PI 694671 |
| 372 | PI 694669 | SA 3298 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107165 | PI 694669 |
| 373 | PI 694668 | SA 3297 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107164 | PI 694668 |
| 374 | PI 694667 | SA 3296 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107163 | PI 694667 |
| 375 | PI 694666 | SA 3295 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107162 | PI 694666 |
| 376 | PI 694664 | SA 3293 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107160 | PI 694664 |
| 377 | PI 694665 | SA 3294 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107161 | PI 694665 |
| 378 | PI 694663 | SA 3292 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107159 | PI 694663 |
| 379 | PI 694662 | SA 3291 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107158 | PI 694662 |
| 380 | PI 694661 | SA 3290 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107157 | PI 694661 |
| 381 | PI 694660 | SA 3289 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107156 | PI 694660 |
| 382 | PI 694659 | SA 3288 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107155 | PI 694659 |
| 383 | PI 694658 | SA 3287 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107154 | PI 694658 |
| 384 | PI 694657 | SA 3286 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107153 | PI 694657 |
| 385 | PI 694656 | SA 3285 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107152 | PI 694656 |
| 386 | PI 694655 | SA 3284 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107151 | PI 694655 |
| 387 | PI 694654 | SA 3283 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107150 | PI 694654 |
| 388 | PI 694653 | SA 3282 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107149 | PI 694653 |
| 389 | PI 694652 | SA 3281 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107148 | PI 694652 |
| 390 | PI 694651 | SA 3280 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107147 | PI 694651 |
| 391 | PI 694650 | SA 3279 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107146 | PI 694650 |
| 392 | PI 694649 | SA 3278 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107145 | PI 694649 |
| 393 | PI 694648 | SA 3277 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107144 | PI 694648 |
| 394 | PI 694647 | SA 3276 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107143 | PI 694647 |
| 395 | PI 694646 | SA 3275 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107142 | PI 694646 |
| 396 | PI 694645 | SA 3274 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107141 | PI 694645 |
| 397 | PI 694644 | SA 3273 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107140 | PI 694644 |
| 398 | PI 694643 | SA 3272 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107139 | PI 694643 |
| 399 | PI 694642 | SA 3271 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107138 | PI 694642 |
| 400 | PI 694641 | SA 3270 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107137 | PI 694641 |
| 401 | PI 694640 | SA 3269 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107136 | PI 694640 |
| 402 | PI 694639 | SA 3268 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107135 | PI 694639 |
| 403 | PI 694638 | SA 3267 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107134 | PI 694638 |
| 404 | PI 694637 | SA 3266 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107133 | PI 694637 |
| 405 | PI 694636 | SA 3265 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107132 | PI 694636 |
| 406 | PI 694635 | SA 3264 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107131 | PI 694635 |
| 407 | PI 694634 | SA 3263 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107130 | PI 694634 |
| 408 | PI 694633 | SA 3262 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107129 | PI 694633 |
| 409 | PI 694632 | SA 3261 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107128 | PI 694632 |
| 410 | PI 694631 | SA 3260 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107127 | PI 694631 |
| 411 | PI 694630 | SA 3259 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107126 | PI 694630 |
| 412 | PI 694629 | SA 3258 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107125 | PI 694629 |
| 413 | PI 694628 | SA 3257 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107124 | PI 694628 |
| 414 | PI 694627 | SA 3256 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107123 | PI 694627 |
| 415 | PI 694626 | SA 3255 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107122 | PI 694626 |
| 416 | PI 694625 | SA 3254 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107121 | PI 694625 |
| 417 | PI 694624 | SA 3253 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107120 | PI 694624 |
| 418 | PI 694623 | SA 3252 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107119 | PI 694623 |
| 419 | PI 694622 | SA 3251 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107118 | PI 694622 |
| 420 | PI 694621 | SA 3250 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107117 | PI 694621 |
| 421 | PI 694620 | SA 3249 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107116 | PI 694620 |
| 422 | PI 694619 | SA 3248 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107115 | PI 694619 |
| 423 | PI 694618 | SA 3247 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107114 | PI 694618 |
| 424 | PI 694617 | SA 3246 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107113 | PI 694617 |
| 425 | PI 694616 | SA 3245 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107112 | PI 694616 |
| 426 | PI 694615 | SA 3244 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107111 | PI 694615 |
| 427 | PI 694614 | SA 3243 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107110 | PI 694614 |
| 428 | PI 694613 | SA 3242 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107109 | PI 694613 |
| 429 | PI 694612 | SA 3241 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107108 | PI 694612 |
| 430 | PI 694610 | SA 3239 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107106 | PI 694610 |
| 431 | PI 694611 | SA 3240 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107107 | PI 694611 |
| 432 | PI 694609 | SA 3238 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107105 | PI 694609 |
| 433 | PI 694608 | SA 3237 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107104 | PI 694608 |
| 434 | PI 694607 | SA 3236 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107103 | PI 694607 |
| 435 | PI 694606 | SA 3235 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107102 | PI 694606 |
| 436 | PI 694604 | SA 3233 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107100 | PI 694604 |
| 437 | PI 694605 | SA 3234 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107101 | PI 694605 |
| 438 | PI 694603 | SA 3232 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107099 | PI 694603 |
| 439 | PI 694602 | SA 3231 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107098 | PI 694602 |
| 440 | PI 694601 | SA 3230 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107097 | PI 694601 |
| 441 | PI 694600 | SA 3229 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107096 | PI 694600 |
| 442 | PI 694598 | SA 3227 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107094 | PI 694598 |
| 443 | PI 694599 | SA 3228 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107095 | PI 694599 |
| 444 | PI 694597 | SA 3226 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107093 | PI 694597 |
| 445 | PI 694596 | SA 3225 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107092 | PI 694596 |
| 446 | PI 694595 | SA 3224 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107091 | PI 694595 |
| 447 | PI 694594 | SA 3223 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107090 | PI 694594 |
| 448 | PI 694593 | SA 3222 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107089 | PI 694593 |
| 449 | PI 694592 | SA 3221 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107088 | PI 694592 |
| 450 | PI 694591 | SA 3220 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107087 | PI 694591 |
| 451 | PI 694590 | SA 3219 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107086 | PI 694590 |
| 452 | PI 694589 | SA 3218 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107085 | PI 694589 |
| 453 | PI 694588 | SA 3217 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107084 | PI 694588 |
| 454 | PI 694587 | SA 3216 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107083 | PI 694587 |
| 455 | PI 694586 | SA 3215 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107082 | PI 694586 |
| 456 | PI 694585 | SA 3214 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107081 | PI 694585 |
| 457 | PI 694584 | SA 3213 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107080 | PI 694584 |
| 458 | PI 694583 | SA 3208 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107079 | PI 694583 |
| 459 | PI 694582 | SA 3207 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107078 | PI 694582 |
| 460 | PI 694581 | SA 3206 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107077 | PI 694581 |
| 461 | PI 694580 | SA 3205 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107076 | PI 694580 |
| 462 | PI 694579 | SA 3204 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107075 | PI 694579 |
| 463 | PI 694578 | SA 3203 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107074 | PI 694578 |
| 464 | PI 694577 | SA 3202 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107073 | PI 694577 |
| 465 | PI 694576 | SA 3201 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107072 | PI 694576 |
| 466 | PI 694575 | SA 3200 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107071 | PI 694575 |
| 467 | PI 694574 | SA 3199 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107070 | PI 694574 |
| 468 | PI 694573 | SA 3198 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107069 | PI 694573 |
| 469 | PI 694572 | SA 3197 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107068 | PI 694572 |
| 470 | PI 694571 | SA 3196 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107067 | PI 694571 |
| 471 | PI 694570 | SA 3195 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107066 | PI 694570 |
| 472 | PI 694569 | SA 3194 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107065 | PI 694569 |
| 473 | PI 694568 | SA 3193 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107064 | PI 694568 |
| 474 | PI 694567 | SA 3192 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107063 | PI 694567 |
| 475 | PI 694566 | SA 3181 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107062 | PI 694566 |
| 476 | PI 694565 | SA 3180 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107061 | PI 694565 |
| 477 | PI 694564 | SA 3179 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107060 | PI 694564 |
| 478 | PI 694563 | SA 3178 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107059 | PI 694563 |
| 479 | PI 694562 | SA 3177 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107058 | PI 694562 |
| 480 | PI 694561 | SA 3176 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107057 | PI 694561 |
| 481 | PI 694560 | SA 3175 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107056 | PI 694560 |
| 482 | PI 694559 | SA 3174 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107055 | PI 694559 |
| 483 | PI 694558 | SA 3173 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107054 | PI 694558 |
| 484 | PI 694557 | SA 3172 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107053 | PI 694557 |
| 485 | PI 694556 | SA 3171 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107052 | PI 694556 |
| 486 | PI 694555 | SA 3170 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107051 | PI 694555 |
| 487 | PI 694554 | SA 3169 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107050 | PI 694554 |
| 488 | PI 694553 | SA 3168 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107049 | PI 694553 |
| 489 | PI 694552 | SA 3167 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107048 | PI 694552 |
| 490 | PI 694551 | SA 3166 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107047 | PI 694551 |
| 491 | PI 694550 | SA 3165 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107046 | PI 694550 |
| 492 | PI 694549 | SA 3164 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107045 | PI 694549 |
| 493 | PI 694548 | SA 3163 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107044 | PI 694548 |
| 494 | PI 694547 | SA 3162 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107043 | PI 694547 |
| 495 | PI 694546 | SA 3161 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107042 | PI 694546 |
| 496 | PI 694545 | SA 3160 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107041 | PI 694545 |
| 497 | PI 694544 | SA 3159 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107040 | PI 694544 |
| 498 | PI 694543 | SA 3158 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107039 | PI 694543 |
| 499 | PI 694541 | SA 3156 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107037 | PI 694541 |