| 0 | PI 705349 | | Gossypium nelsonii Fryxell | | | | Historic | 2024 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2167811 | PI 705349 |
| 1 | PI 705350 | PI | Gossypium nelsonii Fryxell | | | | Historic | 2024 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2167810 | PI 705350 |
| 2 | PI 705347 | | Gossypium nelsonii Fryxell | | | | Historic | 2024 | | | | | | | Wild material | Conflict with PI 691655. Wild species from earlier exchange with Australian Collection | 2167647 | PI 705347 |
| 3 | PI 705348 | -1 | Gossypium nelsonii Fryxell | | | | Historic | 2024 | | | | | | | Wild material | Wild species, from earlier exchange with Australia Collection. Conflict with PI 691655 | 2167646 | PI 705348 |
| 4 | PI 698445 | AD4 24 | Gossypium mustelinum Miers ex G. Watt | | COT | | Not Available | 2021 | | | | | | | | Donation from Professor Jonathan Wendel, Iowa State University. Packet number W-2. | 2115793 | PI 698445 |
| 5 | PI 698444 | AD4 23 | Gossypium mustelinum Miers ex G. Watt | | COT | | Not Available | 2021 | | | | | | | | Donation from Professor Jonathan Wendel, Iowa State University. Packet number W-1. | 2115792 | PI 698444 |
| 6 | PI 698109 | TAM KJ-Q14 ESU | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | TAM KJ-Q14 ESU combines excellent fiber length with fiber bundle strength exceeding 370 kN m per kg under irrigated culture and 365 kN m per kg under dryland culture across multiple performance trials. TAM KJ-Q14 ESU was selected for its combination of fiber bundle strength with HVI upper half mean length averaging 33 mm across multiple performance trials. TAM KJ-Q14 ESU averaged 384 kN m per kg fiber bundle strength and 34 mm upper half mean length across nine sites in the 2018 USDA ARS Regional High Quality trial. TAM KJ-Q14 ESU produced yarn with greater tenacity and equivalent appearance quality when spun on either ring or vortex spinning platforms compared with Acala 1517-08 and Tamcot 73. | 2113358 | PI 698109 |
| 7 | PI 697030 | Arkot 0822 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0822 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA248' (developed from same cross), 'DP 393' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0822 has lower trichome density on abaxial leaves and on bract margins than the cultivars. Data from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over six years indicated that lint yields of Arkot 0822 were equal to UA248 and exceeded lint yields of DP393 and UA48 at each location, except equal yields with DP 393 at Judd Hill. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0822 were 7. 7 and 15.9% greater than DP 393 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA248, Arkot 0822 produced higher lint index (8.2 vs. 7.7 g), seed index (11.8 vs. 11.3 g), fiber micronaire (4.91 vs. 4.54), and fiber elongation (7.0 vs. 6.5%); equal open boll percentage (56 vs. 56%), stem pubescence (5.6 vs. 5.5 rating), marginal bract trichome density (24.7 vs. 26.4 trichomes cm-1), lint fraction (40.5 vs. 40.1 %), seed ha-1 (15983 x 1000 vs 16312 x 1000), fibers per seed (15686 vs. 15816), fiber length (31.8 vs. 32.0 mm), fiber uniformity index (85.7 vs. 85.6%), and fiber strength (320 vs. 323 kN m kg-1); and lower plant height (98 vs. 103 cm), leaf pubescence rating (2.0 vs 3.5), fiber density (134 vs 144 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), and quality score (63 vs. 73). Arkot 0822 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0822 (62%) was lower than UA48 (66%) and equal to DP 393 (60%) and UA248 (63%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris
(Palisot de Beauvais)]. As indicated by lint yield at Judd Hill location (site of high Verticillium wilt), response of Arkot 0822 to Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] was equal to UA248 and more tolerant than DP 393 and UA48. | 2112245 | PI 697030 |
| 8 | PI 697031 | Arkot 0912-41 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0912-41 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0912-41 has higher trichome density on abaxial leaves, stems and bract margins than UA222 and UA48. Lint yields of Arkot 0912-41 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location (except equal yields with UA222 at Rohwer). Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot
0912-41 were 12.9 and 23.3% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0912-41 produced higher lint fraction (41.0 vs. 40.2%), lint index (8.3 vs. 7. 7 g), seed index (11.6 vs. 11.1 g), plant height (103 vs. 100 cm), leaf pubescence rating (5.0 vs. 4.1 ), stem pubescence
(6.2 vs. 5.6 rating), marginal bract trichome density (41.1 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1 ), fiber micronaire (4.64 vs. 4.54), fiber length (31.8 vs. 31.2 mm), fiber uniformity index (86.5 vs. 85.6%), and fiber strength (336 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ); equal seed ha-1 (15919 x 1000 vs 15270 x 1000), fibers per seed (16574 vs. 16224), fiber density (148 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), open boll percentage (54 vs. 50%), quality score (62 vs. 56), and fiber elongation (6.6 vs. 6.3%); and lower short fiber content (6.3 vs. 6.7%). Arkot 0912-41 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0912-41 (51%) was lower than UA48
(55%) and susceptible check (74%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at Judd Hill location suggest that Arkot 0912-41 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] than UA222 and UA48, but it expressed more leaf symptoms than either check cultivar. | 2112246 | PI 697031 |
| 9 | PI 697032 | Arkot 0912-18 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0912-18 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0912-18 has higher trichome density on abaxial leaves, stems and bract margins than UA222 and UA48. Lint yields of Arkot 0912-18 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0912-18 were 13.8 and 24.3% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0912-18 produced higher lint fraction (40.8 vs. 40.2%), seed ha-1 (16635 x 1000 vs 15270 x 1000), lint index (7.9 vs. 7.7 g), plant height (105 vs. 100 cm), leaf pubescence rating (5.5 vs. 4.1 ), stem pubescence (6.3 vs. 5.6 rating), marginal bract trichome density (39.9 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1), fiber micronaire (4.68 vs. 4.54), fiber uniformity index (86.6 vs. 85.6%), fiber strength (340 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ), and fiber elongation (7 .0 vs. 6.3% ); equal seed index (11.2 vs. 11.1 g), fiber density (146 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), open boll percentage (53 vs. 50%), quality score (58 vs. 56), and fiber length (31.5 vs. 31.2 mm); and lower fibers per seed (15940 vs. 16224) and short fiber content(6.0 vs. 6.7%). Arkot 0912-18 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0912-18 (50%) was lower than UA48 (55%) and susceptible check (74%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at Judd Hill location (site of high Verticillium wilt) suggest that Arkot 0912-18 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] than UA222 and UA48, but it expressed more Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms than either check cultivar. | 2112247 | PI 697032 |
| 10 | PI 697033 | Arkot 0908-60 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0908-60 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0908-60 has lower trichome density on abaxial leaves than UA222, lower stem pubescence density than UA222 or UA48, and higher density on bract margins than UA48. Lint yields of Arkot 0908-60 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0908-60 were 16.6 and 27.3% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0908-60 produced higher lint fraction (41.9 vs. 40.2%), seed ha-1 (17878 x 1000 vs. 15270 x 1000), plant height (106 vs. 100 cm), fiber micronaire (4.83 vs. 4.54), and short fiber content (7.0 vs. 6.7%); equal open boll percentage (52 vs. 50%), lint index (7.6 vs. 7.7 fiber density (145 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), marginal bract trichome density (34.5 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1 ), quality score (54 vs. 56), fiber length (31.5 vs. 31.2 mm, fiber uniformity index (85.4 vs. 85.6%), fiber strength (317 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ), fiber elongation (5.8 vs. 6.3%), and lower seed index (10.2 vs. 11.1 g), fibers per seed (14876 vs. 16224), leaf pubescence rating (2.5 vs. 4.1 ), and stem pubescence (4.8 vs. 5.6 rating. Arkot 0908-60 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0908-60 (50%) was lower than UA48
(55%) and susceptible check (74%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at site of high Verticillium wilt suggest that Arkot 0912-60 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt than UA222 and UA48, but its Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms were equal to both check cultivars. | 2112248 | PI 697033 |
| 11 | PI 697034 | Arkot 0908-56 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0908-56 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0908-56 has higher trichome density on abaxial leaves and on bract margins than either cultivar, and lower density on stems than UA222. Lint yields of Arkot 0908-56 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0908-56 were 14.1 and 24.6% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0908-56 produced higher lint fraction (42.8 vs. 40.2%), seed ha-1 (16737 x 1000 vs 15270 x 1000), lint index (7.9 vs. 7.7 g), plant height (108 vs. 100 cm), leaf pubescence rating (5.4 vs. 4.1), marginal bract trichome density (41.8 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1 ), fiber micronaire (4.74 vs. 4.54), fiber length (31.8 vs. 31.2 mm); equal open boll percentage (56 vs. 50%), fiber density (150 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), quality score (62 vs. 56), fiber uniformity index (86.0 vs. 85.6%), fiber strength (320 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ); and lower stem pubescence (5.1 vs. 5.6 rating), seed index (10.3 vs. 11.1 g), fibers per seed (15589 vs. 16224), fiber elongation (5.7 vs. 6.3%), and short fiber content (6.5 vs. 6.7%). Arkot 0908-56 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0908-56 (50%) was lower than UA48 (55%) and susceptible check (74%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at site of high Verticillium wilt suggest that Arkot 0908-56 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt than UA222 and UA48, but it expressed more Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms than either check cultivar. | 2112249 | PI 697034 |
| 12 | PI 697035 | Arkot 0908-52 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0908-52 is a conventional cotton germplasm line with morphological traits similar to 'UA222' and 'UA48' (check cultivars), except Arkot 0908-52 has lower trichome density on abaxial leaves than UA222 and higher density on bract margins than UA48. Lint yields of Arkot 0908-52 from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years exceeded lint yields of UA222 and UA48 at each location, except equal yields with UA222 at Rohwer. Over all locations, lint yields of Arkot 0908-52 were 13.9 and 24.3% greater than UA222 and UA48, respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to UA222, Arkot 0908-52 produced higher lint fraction (42.3 vs. 40.2%), seed ha-1 (17100 x 1000 vs 15270 x 1000), plant height (106 vs. 100 cm), quality score (67 vs. 56), fiber length (32.3 vs. 31.2 mm), and short fiber content (6.9 vs. 6.7%) ; equal lint index (7.7 vs. 7.7 g), fiber density (152 vs. 149 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), open boll percentage (51 vs. 50%), stem pubescence (5.6 vs. 5.6 rating), marginal bract trichome density (34.9 vs. 35.5 trichomes cm-1 ), fiber micronaire (4.57 vs. 4.54), and fiber uniformity index (85.6 vs. 85.6%); and lower seed index
(10.3 vs. 11.1 g), fibers per seed (15686 vs. 16224 ), leaf pubescence rating (2.0 vs. 4.1 ), fiber strength (307 vs. 323 kN m kg-1 ), and fiber elongation (5.3 vs. 6.3%). Arkot 0908-52 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for Arkot 0908-52 (58%) was lower than the susceptible check (74%), equal to UA48 (55%) but higher than UA222 (42%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Lint yields at site of high Verticillium wilt suggest that Arkot 0908-52 is more tolerant to Verticillium wilt than UA222 and UA48, but its Verticillium wilt leaf symptoms were equal to both check cultivars. | 2112250 | PI 697035 |
| 13 | PI 697272 | NC18-05 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | North Carolina, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | NC18-05 resulted from a random mating population using multiple parents. Twelve cotton cultivars each with uniquely improved fiber quality and/or yield representing major cotton breeding programs of the United States were crossed with each other in a half diallele to produce the F1s. Equal amount of F1 hybrid seed from each of the 66 F1 hybrid combinations was mixed for planting in rows. The F1 hybrids and the progenies of the subsequent generations were randomly mated using natural outcrossing. Lines chosen for parents were: ‘Acala Ultima’ (A_Ultima, PI 603079), developed by California Planting Cotton Seed Distributors (Shafter, CA); ‘Coker315, PI 529530’, developed by Coker Pedigreed Seed Co. (Hartsville, SC); ‘Tamcot Pyramid’ (Pyramid, PI 617042), developed in the Texas Agriculture Experiment Station (Thaxton and El-Zik 2004); ‘Stoneville 825’ (STV825, PI 529524), developed by Stoneville Pedigreed Seed Co. (Stoneville, MS); ‘FiberMax 966’ (FM966, PI 619097), an Upland commercial cotton developed by Bayer Crop Science (Lubbock, TX); M-240RNR (M-240, PI 592511), a root knot nematode resistant line developed by the ARS (Shepherd et al., 1996); ‘Deltapine Acala 90’ (DP90, PI 529529), developed by Delta and Pine Land Co. (Scott, MS); ‘Sure-Grow 747’ (SG747, PI 656375), an Upland commercial cultivar developed by Sure-Grow Co. (Centre, AL); ‘Georgia King’ (GA_King, PI 552537) was developed and released by the University of Georgia (Baker, 1992); ‘Phytogen PSC 355’ (PSC355, PI 612974), ‘Stoneville 474’ (STV474, PI 578877), developed by Stoneville Pedigreed Seeds; and TM-1 (Texas Marker-1, PI 662944). Individual plants obtained after the fourth intermating cycle were self-pollinated in the field. About 700 F4 lines were grown for obtaining F4:5 lines in 2009. These F4:5 lines were planted in field for seed increase through self pollination in the summer of 2010. Released germplasm lines are selections from the F6 inbred lines. | 2112507 | PI 697272 |
| 14 | PI 697273 | NC18-06 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | North Carolina, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2021 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | NC18-06 resulted from a random mating population using multiple parents. Twelve cotton cultivars each with uniquely improved fiber quality and/or yield representing major cotton breeding programs of the United States were crossed with each other in a half diallele to produce the F1s. Equal amount of F1 hybrid seed from each of the 66 F1 hybrid combinations was mixed for planting in rows. The F1 hybrids and the progenies of the subsequent generations were randomly mated using natural outcrossing. Lines chosen for parents were: ‘Acala Ultima’ (A_Ultima, PI 603079), developed by California Planting Cotton Seed Distributors (Shafter, CA); ‘Coker315, PI 529530’, developed by Coker Pedigreed Seed Co. (Hartsville, SC); ‘Tamcot Pyramid’ (Pyramid, PI 617042), developed in the Texas Agriculture Experiment Station (Thaxton and El-Zik 2004); ‘Stoneville 825’ (STV825, PI 529524), developed by Stoneville Pedigreed Seed Co. (Stoneville, MS); ‘FiberMax 966’ (FM966, PI 619097), an Upland commercial cotton developed by Bayer Crop Science (Lubbock, TX); M-240RNR (M-240, PI 592511), a root knot nematode resistant line developed by the ARS (Shepherd et al., 1996); ‘Deltapine Acala 90’ (DP90, PI 529529), developed by Delta and Pine Land Co. (Scott, MS); ‘Sure-Grow 747’ (SG747, PI 656375), an Upland commercial cultivar developed by Sure-Grow Co. (Centre, AL); ‘Georgia King’ (GA_King, PI 552537) was developed and released by the University of Georgia (Baker, 1992); ‘Phytogen PSC 355’ (PSC355, PI 612974), ‘Stoneville 474’ (STV474, PI 578877), developed by Stoneville Pedigreed Seeds; and TM-1 (Texas Marker-1, PI 662944). Individual plants obtained after the fourth intermating cycle were self-pollinated in the field. About 700 F4 lines were grown for obtaining F4:5 lines in 2009. These F4:5 lines were planted in field for seed increase through self pollination in the summer of 2010. Released germplasm lines are selections from the F6 inbred lines. | 2112508 | PI 697273 |
| 15 | PI 695445 | AD5 5 | Gossypium darwinii G. Watt | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2110116 | PI 695445 |
| 16 | PI 695428 | AD5 1 | Gossypium darwinii G. Watt | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2110115 | PI 695428 |
| 17 | PI 695422 | E3 3 | Gossypium areysianum Deflers | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2110109 | PI 695422 |
| 18 | PI 695600 | D9 5 | Gossypium laxum L. Ll. Phillips | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2110108 | PI 695600 |
| 19 | PI 698474 | K10 2 | Gossypium marchantii Fryxell et al. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2109999 | PI 698474 |
| 20 | PI 698473 | K10 1 | Gossypium marchantii Fryxell et al. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2109998 | PI 698473 |
| 21 | PI 698472 | K8 1 | Gossypium exiguum Fryxell et al. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2109997 | PI 698472 |
| 22 | PI 695427 | B1 6 | Gossypium anomalum Wawra | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | | 2109993 | PI 695427 |
| 23 | PI 698438 | AD3 32 | Gossypium tomentosum Nutt. ex Seem. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | Donation from Professor Jonathan Wendel, Iowa State University. Collected in Hawaii. Packet number W-5 | 2107704 | PI 698438 |
| 24 | PI 695549 | D1 40 | Gossypium thurberi Tod. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | Collected by Dr. Scott Chamberlain, Rice University. Source Adelaide Canyon Arizona USA. Donated to the US National Cotton Germplasm Collection | 2107673 | PI 695549 |
| 25 | PI 695551 | D1 39 | Gossypium thurberi Tod. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | Collected by Dr. Richard Percy, USDA, Maricopa, Arizona. Source Sasabe Arizona USA. | 2107672 | PI 695551 |
| 26 | PI 695550 | D1 41 | Gossypium thurberi Tod. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | Collected by Dr. Scott Chamberlain, Rice University. Source Floridade Canyon Arizona USA. Donated to the US National Cotton Germplasm Collection | 2107671 | PI 695550 |
| 27 | PI 695545 | D1 38 | Gossypium thurberi Tod. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | Wild material | Donated lby David Ferguson, Fresno, California | 2107670 | PI 695545 |
| 28 | PI 694757 | SA 3386 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107253 | PI 694757 |
| 29 | PI 694758 | SA 3387 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107254 | PI 694758 |
| 30 | PI 694756 | SA 3385 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107252 | PI 694756 |
| 31 | PI 694755 | SA 3384 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107251 | PI 694755 |
| 32 | PI 694754 | SA 3383 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107250 | PI 694754 |
| 33 | PI 694753 | SA 3382 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107249 | PI 694753 |
| 34 | PI 694752 | SA 3381 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107248 | PI 694752 |
| 35 | PI 694751 | SA 3380 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107247 | PI 694751 |
| 36 | PI 694749 | SA 3378 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107245 | PI 694749 |
| 37 | PI 694750 | SA 3379 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107246 | PI 694750 |
| 38 | PI 694748 | SA 3377 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107244 | PI 694748 |
| 39 | PI 694747 | SA 3376 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107243 | PI 694747 |
| 40 | PI 694746 | SA 3375 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107242 | PI 694746 |
| 41 | PI 694745 | SA 3374 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107241 | PI 694745 |
| 42 | PI 694743 | SA 3372 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107239 | PI 694743 |
| 43 | PI 694744 | SA 3373 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107240 | PI 694744 |
| 44 | PI 694742 | SA 3371 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107238 | PI 694742 |
| 45 | PI 694741 | SA 3370 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107237 | PI 694741 |
| 46 | PI 694740 | SA 3369 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107236 | PI 694740 |
| 47 | PI 694739 | SA 3368 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107235 | PI 694739 |
| 48 | PI 694738 | SA 3367 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107234 | PI 694738 |
| 49 | PI 694737 | SA 3366 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107233 | PI 694737 |
| 50 | PI 694736 | SA 3365 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107232 | PI 694736 |
| 51 | PI 694735 | SA 3364 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107231 | PI 694735 |
| 52 | PI 694734 | SA 3363 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107230 | PI 694734 |
| 53 | PI 694733 | SA 3362 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107229 | PI 694733 |
| 54 | PI 694731 | SA 3360 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107227 | PI 694731 |
| 55 | PI 694732 | SA 3361 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107228 | PI 694732 |
| 56 | PI 694730 | SA 3359 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107226 | PI 694730 |
| 57 | PI 694729 | SA 3358 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107225 | PI 694729 |
| 58 | PI 694728 | SA 3357 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107224 | PI 694728 |
| 59 | PI 694727 | SA 3356 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107223 | PI 694727 |
| 60 | PI 694726 | SA 3355 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107222 | PI 694726 |
| 61 | PI 694725 | SA 3354 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107221 | PI 694725 |
| 62 | PI 694724 | SA 3353 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107220 | PI 694724 |
| 63 | PI 694723 | SA 3352 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107219 | PI 694723 |
| 64 | PI 694722 | SA 3351 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107218 | PI 694722 |
| 65 | PI 694721 | SA 3350 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107217 | PI 694721 |
| 66 | PI 694720 | SA 3349 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107216 | PI 694720 |
| 67 | PI 694719 | SA 3348 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107215 | PI 694719 |
| 68 | PI 694717 | SA 3346 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107213 | PI 694717 |
| 69 | PI 694718 | SA 3347 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107214 | PI 694718 |
| 70 | PI 694716 | SA 3345 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107212 | PI 694716 |
| 71 | PI 694715 | SA 3344 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107211 | PI 694715 |
| 72 | PI 694714 | SA 3343 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107210 | PI 694714 |
| 73 | PI 694713 | SA 3342 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107209 | PI 694713 |
| 74 | PI 694712 | SA 3341 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107208 | PI 694712 |
| 75 | PI 694710 | SA 3339 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107206 | PI 694710 |
| 76 | PI 694711 | SA 3340 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107207 | PI 694711 |
| 77 | PI 694709 | SA 3338 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107205 | PI 694709 |
| 78 | PI 694708 | SA 3337 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107204 | PI 694708 |
| 79 | PI 694707 | SA 3336 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107203 | PI 694707 |
| 80 | PI 694706 | SA 3335 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107202 | PI 694706 |
| 81 | PI 694705 | SA 3334 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107201 | PI 694705 |
| 82 | PI 694704 | SA 3333 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107200 | PI 694704 |
| 83 | PI 694703 | SA 3332 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107199 | PI 694703 |
| 84 | PI 694702 | SA 3331 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107198 | PI 694702 |
| 85 | PI 694700 | SA 3329 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107196 | PI 694700 |
| 86 | PI 694701 | SA 3330 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107197 | PI 694701 |
| 87 | PI 694699 | SA 3328 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107195 | PI 694699 |
| 88 | PI 694698 | SA 3327 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107194 | PI 694698 |
| 89 | PI 694697 | SA 3326 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107193 | PI 694697 |
| 90 | PI 694696 | SA 3325 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107192 | PI 694696 |
| 91 | PI 694695 | SA 3324 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107191 | PI 694695 |
| 92 | PI 694694 | SA 3323 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107190 | PI 694694 |
| 93 | PI 694693 | SA 3322 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107189 | PI 694693 |
| 94 | PI 694692 | SA 3321 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107188 | PI 694692 |
| 95 | PI 694691 | SA 3320 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107187 | PI 694691 |
| 96 | PI 694690 | SA 3319 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107186 | PI 694690 |
| 97 | PI 694689 | SA 3318 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107185 | PI 694689 |
| 98 | PI 694688 | SA 3317 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107184 | PI 694688 |
| 99 | PI 694687 | SA 3316 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107183 | PI 694687 |
| 100 | PI 694686 | SA 3315 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107182 | PI 694686 |
| 101 | PI 694685 | SA 3314 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107181 | PI 694685 |
| 102 | PI 694683 | SA 3312 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107179 | PI 694683 |
| 103 | PI 694684 | SA 3313 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107180 | PI 694684 |
| 104 | PI 694682 | SA 3311 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107178 | PI 694682 |
| 105 | PI 694681 | SA 3310 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107177 | PI 694681 |
| 106 | PI 694680 | SA 3309 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107176 | PI 694680 |
| 107 | PI 694679 | SA 3308 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107175 | PI 694679 |
| 108 | PI 694677 | SA 3306 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107173 | PI 694677 |
| 109 | PI 694678 | SA 3307 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107174 | PI 694678 |
| 110 | PI 694676 | SA 3305 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107172 | PI 694676 |
| 111 | PI 694675 | SA 3304 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107171 | PI 694675 |
| 112 | PI 694674 | SA 3303 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107170 | PI 694674 |
| 113 | PI 694673 | SA 3302 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107169 | PI 694673 |
| 114 | PI 694672 | SA 3301 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107168 | PI 694672 |
| 115 | PI 694670 | SA 3299 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107166 | PI 694670 |
| 116 | PI 694671 | SA 3300 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107167 | PI 694671 |
| 117 | PI 694669 | SA 3298 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107165 | PI 694669 |
| 118 | PI 694668 | SA 3297 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107164 | PI 694668 |
| 119 | PI 694667 | SA 3296 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107163 | PI 694667 |
| 120 | PI 694666 | SA 3295 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107162 | PI 694666 |
| 121 | PI 694664 | SA 3293 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107160 | PI 694664 |
| 122 | PI 694665 | SA 3294 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107161 | PI 694665 |
| 123 | PI 694663 | SA 3292 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107159 | PI 694663 |
| 124 | PI 694662 | SA 3291 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107158 | PI 694662 |
| 125 | PI 694661 | SA 3290 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107157 | PI 694661 |
| 126 | PI 694660 | SA 3289 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107156 | PI 694660 |
| 127 | PI 694659 | SA 3288 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107155 | PI 694659 |
| 128 | PI 694658 | SA 3287 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107154 | PI 694658 |
| 129 | PI 694657 | SA 3286 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107153 | PI 694657 |
| 130 | PI 694656 | SA 3285 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107152 | PI 694656 |
| 131 | PI 694655 | SA 3284 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107151 | PI 694655 |
| 132 | PI 694654 | SA 3283 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107150 | PI 694654 |
| 133 | PI 694653 | SA 3282 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107149 | PI 694653 |
| 134 | PI 694652 | SA 3281 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107148 | PI 694652 |
| 135 | PI 694651 | SA 3280 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107147 | PI 694651 |
| 136 | PI 694650 | SA 3279 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107146 | PI 694650 |
| 137 | PI 694649 | SA 3278 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107145 | PI 694649 |
| 138 | PI 694648 | SA 3277 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107144 | PI 694648 |
| 139 | PI 694647 | SA 3276 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107143 | PI 694647 |
| 140 | PI 694646 | SA 3275 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107142 | PI 694646 |
| 141 | PI 694645 | SA 3274 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107141 | PI 694645 |
| 142 | PI 694644 | SA 3273 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107140 | PI 694644 |
| 143 | PI 694643 | SA 3272 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107139 | PI 694643 |
| 144 | PI 694642 | SA 3271 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107138 | PI 694642 |
| 145 | PI 694641 | SA 3270 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107137 | PI 694641 |
| 146 | PI 694640 | SA 3269 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107136 | PI 694640 |
| 147 | PI 694639 | SA 3268 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107135 | PI 694639 |
| 148 | PI 694638 | SA 3267 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107134 | PI 694638 |
| 149 | PI 694637 | SA 3266 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107133 | PI 694637 |
| 150 | PI 694636 | SA 3265 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107132 | PI 694636 |
| 151 | PI 694635 | SA 3264 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107131 | PI 694635 |
| 152 | PI 694634 | SA 3263 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107130 | PI 694634 |
| 153 | PI 694633 | SA 3262 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107129 | PI 694633 |
| 154 | PI 694632 | SA 3261 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107128 | PI 694632 |
| 155 | PI 694631 | SA 3260 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107127 | PI 694631 |
| 156 | PI 694630 | SA 3259 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107126 | PI 694630 |
| 157 | PI 694629 | SA 3258 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107125 | PI 694629 |
| 158 | PI 694628 | SA 3257 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107124 | PI 694628 |
| 159 | PI 694627 | SA 3256 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107123 | PI 694627 |
| 160 | PI 694626 | SA 3255 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107122 | PI 694626 |
| 161 | PI 694625 | SA 3254 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107121 | PI 694625 |
| 162 | PI 694624 | SA 3253 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107120 | PI 694624 |
| 163 | PI 694623 | SA 3252 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107119 | PI 694623 |
| 164 | PI 694622 | SA 3251 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107118 | PI 694622 |
| 165 | PI 694621 | SA 3250 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107117 | PI 694621 |
| 166 | PI 694620 | SA 3249 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107116 | PI 694620 |
| 167 | PI 694619 | SA 3248 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107115 | PI 694619 |
| 168 | PI 694618 | SA 3247 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107114 | PI 694618 |
| 169 | PI 694617 | SA 3246 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107113 | PI 694617 |
| 170 | PI 694616 | SA 3245 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107112 | PI 694616 |
| 171 | PI 694615 | SA 3244 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107111 | PI 694615 |
| 172 | PI 694614 | SA 3243 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107110 | PI 694614 |
| 173 | PI 694613 | SA 3242 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107109 | PI 694613 |
| 174 | PI 694612 | SA 3241 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107108 | PI 694612 |
| 175 | PI 694610 | SA 3239 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107106 | PI 694610 |
| 176 | PI 694611 | SA 3240 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107107 | PI 694611 |
| 177 | PI 694609 | SA 3238 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107105 | PI 694609 |
| 178 | PI 694608 | SA 3237 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107104 | PI 694608 |
| 179 | PI 694607 | SA 3236 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107103 | PI 694607 |
| 180 | PI 694606 | SA 3235 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107102 | PI 694606 |
| 181 | PI 694604 | SA 3233 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107100 | PI 694604 |
| 182 | PI 694605 | SA 3234 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107101 | PI 694605 |
| 183 | PI 694603 | SA 3232 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107099 | PI 694603 |
| 184 | PI 694602 | SA 3231 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107098 | PI 694602 |
| 185 | PI 694601 | SA 3230 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107097 | PI 694601 |
| 186 | PI 694600 | SA 3229 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107096 | PI 694600 |
| 187 | PI 694598 | SA 3227 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107094 | PI 694598 |
| 188 | PI 694599 | SA 3228 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107095 | PI 694599 |
| 189 | PI 694597 | SA 3226 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107093 | PI 694597 |
| 190 | PI 694596 | SA 3225 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107092 | PI 694596 |
| 191 | PI 694595 | SA 3224 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107091 | PI 694595 |
| 192 | PI 694594 | SA 3223 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107090 | PI 694594 |
| 193 | PI 694593 | SA 3222 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107089 | PI 694593 |
| 194 | PI 694592 | SA 3221 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107088 | PI 694592 |
| 195 | PI 694591 | SA 3220 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107087 | PI 694591 |
| 196 | PI 694590 | SA 3219 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107086 | PI 694590 |
| 197 | PI 694589 | SA 3218 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107085 | PI 694589 |
| 198 | PI 694588 | SA 3217 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107084 | PI 694588 |
| 199 | PI 694587 | SA 3216 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107083 | PI 694587 |
| 200 | PI 694586 | SA 3215 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107082 | PI 694586 |
| 201 | PI 694585 | SA 3214 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107081 | PI 694585 |
| 202 | PI 694584 | SA 3213 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107080 | PI 694584 |
| 203 | PI 694583 | SA 3208 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107079 | PI 694583 |
| 204 | PI 694582 | SA 3207 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107078 | PI 694582 |
| 205 | PI 694581 | SA 3206 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107077 | PI 694581 |
| 206 | PI 694580 | SA 3205 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107076 | PI 694580 |
| 207 | PI 694579 | SA 3204 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107075 | PI 694579 |
| 208 | PI 694578 | SA 3203 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107074 | PI 694578 |
| 209 | PI 694577 | SA 3202 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107073 | PI 694577 |
| 210 | PI 694576 | SA 3201 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107072 | PI 694576 |
| 211 | PI 694575 | SA 3200 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107071 | PI 694575 |
| 212 | PI 694574 | SA 3199 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107070 | PI 694574 |
| 213 | PI 694573 | SA 3198 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107069 | PI 694573 |
| 214 | PI 694572 | SA 3197 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107068 | PI 694572 |
| 215 | PI 694571 | SA 3196 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107067 | PI 694571 |
| 216 | PI 694570 | SA 3195 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107066 | PI 694570 |
| 217 | PI 694569 | SA 3194 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107065 | PI 694569 |
| 218 | PI 694568 | SA 3193 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107064 | PI 694568 |
| 219 | PI 694567 | SA 3192 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107063 | PI 694567 |
| 220 | PI 694566 | SA 3181 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107062 | PI 694566 |
| 221 | PI 694565 | SA 3180 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107061 | PI 694565 |
| 222 | PI 694564 | SA 3179 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107060 | PI 694564 |
| 223 | PI 694563 | SA 3178 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107059 | PI 694563 |
| 224 | PI 694562 | SA 3177 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107058 | PI 694562 |
| 225 | PI 694561 | SA 3176 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107057 | PI 694561 |
| 226 | PI 694560 | SA 3175 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107056 | PI 694560 |
| 227 | PI 694559 | SA 3174 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107055 | PI 694559 |
| 228 | PI 694558 | SA 3173 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107054 | PI 694558 |
| 229 | PI 694557 | SA 3172 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107053 | PI 694557 |
| 230 | PI 694556 | SA 3171 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107052 | PI 694556 |
| 231 | PI 694555 | SA 3170 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107051 | PI 694555 |
| 232 | PI 694554 | SA 3169 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107050 | PI 694554 |
| 233 | PI 694553 | SA 3168 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107049 | PI 694553 |
| 234 | PI 694552 | SA 3167 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107048 | PI 694552 |
| 235 | PI 694551 | SA 3166 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107047 | PI 694551 |
| 236 | PI 694550 | SA 3165 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107046 | PI 694550 |
| 237 | PI 694549 | SA 3164 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107045 | PI 694549 |
| 238 | PI 694548 | SA 3163 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107044 | PI 694548 |
| 239 | PI 694547 | SA 3162 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107043 | PI 694547 |
| 240 | PI 694546 | SA 3161 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107042 | PI 694546 |
| 241 | PI 694545 | SA 3160 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107041 | PI 694545 |
| 242 | PI 694544 | SA 3159 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107040 | PI 694544 |
| 243 | PI 694543 | SA 3158 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107039 | PI 694543 |
| 244 | PI 694541 | SA 3156 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107037 | PI 694541 |
| 245 | PI 694542 | SA 3157 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107038 | PI 694542 |
| 246 | PI 694540 | SA 3155 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107036 | PI 694540 |
| 247 | PI 694539 | SA 3154 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107035 | PI 694539 |
| 248 | PI 694538 | SA 3153 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107034 | PI 694538 |
| 249 | PI 694537 | SA 3143 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107033 | PI 694537 |
| 250 | PI 694536 | SA 3142 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107032 | PI 694536 |
| 251 | PI 694183 | GB 1607 | Gossypium barbadense L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107002 | PI 694183 |
| 252 | PI 694182 | GB 1606 | Gossypium barbadense L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107001 | PI 694182 |
| 253 | PI 694181 | GB 1605 | Gossypium barbadense L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2107000 | PI 694181 |
| 254 | PI 694180 | GB 1599 | Gossypium barbadense L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106999 | PI 694180 |
| 255 | PI 694179 | GB 1596 | Gossypium barbadense L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106998 | PI 694179 |
| 256 | PI 694178 | GB 1586 | Gossypium barbadense L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106997 | PI 694178 |
| 257 | PI 694177 | GB 1585 | Gossypium barbadense L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106996 | PI 694177 |
| 258 | PI 694176 | TX 2547 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106827 | PI 694176 |
| 259 | PI 694175 | TX 2528 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106826 | PI 694175 |
| 260 | PI 694173 | TX 2526 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106824 | PI 694173 |
| 261 | PI 694174 | TX 2527 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106825 | PI 694174 |
| 262 | PI 694172 | TX 2525 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106823 | PI 694172 |
| 263 | PI 694171 | TX 2524 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106822 | PI 694171 |
| 264 | PI 694170 | TX 2523 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106821 | PI 694170 |
| 265 | PI 694169 | TX 2522 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106820 | PI 694169 |
| 266 | PI 694168 | A2 1710 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106819 | PI 694168 |
| 267 | PI 694167 | A2 1709 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106818 | PI 694167 |
| 268 | PI 694166 | A2 1708 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106817 | PI 694166 |
| 269 | PI 694165 | A2 1707 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106816 | PI 694165 |
| 270 | PI 694163 | A2 1705 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106814 | PI 694163 |
| 271 | PI 694164 | A2 1706 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106815 | PI 694164 |
| 272 | PI 694162 | A2 1704 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106813 | PI 694162 |
| 273 | PI 694161 | A2 1703 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106812 | PI 694161 |
| 274 | PI 694160 | A2 1702 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106811 | PI 694160 |
| 275 | PI 694159 | A2 1701 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106810 | PI 694159 |
| 276 | PI 694158 | A2 1700 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106809 | PI 694158 |
| 277 | PI 694157 | A2 1699 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106808 | PI 694157 |
| 278 | PI 694156 | A2 1698 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106807 | PI 694156 |
| 279 | PI 694155 | A2 1697 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106806 | PI 694155 |
| 280 | PI 694154 | A2 1696 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106805 | PI 694154 |
| 281 | PI 694152 | A2 1694 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106803 | PI 694152 |
| 282 | PI 694153 | A2 1695 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106804 | PI 694153 |
| 283 | PI 694151 | A2 1693 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106802 | PI 694151 |
| 284 | PI 694150 | A2 1692 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106801 | PI 694150 |
| 285 | PI 694149 | A2 1691 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106800 | PI 694149 |
| 286 | PI 694148 | A2 1690 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106799 | PI 694148 |
| 287 | PI 694147 | A2 1689 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106798 | PI 694147 |
| 288 | PI 694146 | A2 1688 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106797 | PI 694146 |
| 289 | PI 694145 | A2 1687 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106796 | PI 694145 |
| 290 | PI 694143 | A2 1685 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106794 | PI 694143 |
| 291 | PI 694144 | A2 1686 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106795 | PI 694144 |
| 292 | PI 694142 | A2 1684 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106793 | PI 694142 |
| 293 | PI 694141 | A2 1683 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106792 | PI 694141 |
| 294 | PI 694140 | A2 1682 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106791 | PI 694140 |
| 295 | PI 694139 | A2 1681 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106790 | PI 694139 |
| 296 | PI 694138 | A2 1680 | Gossypium arboreum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106789 | PI 694138 |
| 297 | PI 694137 | A1 205 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106788 | PI 694137 |
| 298 | PI 694136 | A1 214 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106787 | PI 694136 |
| 299 | PI 694135 | A1 213 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | Not Available | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106786 | PI 694135 |
| 300 | PI 694134 | A1 212 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106785 | PI 694134 |
| 301 | PI 694133 | A1 211 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106784 | PI 694133 |
| 302 | PI 694132 | A1 210 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106783 | PI 694132 |
| 303 | PI 694131 | A1 209 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106782 | PI 694131 |
| 304 | PI 694129 | A1 207 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106780 | PI 694129 |
| 305 | PI 694130 | A1 208 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106781 | PI 694130 |
| 306 | PI 694128 | A1 206 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106779 | PI 694128 |
| 307 | PI 694127 | A1 204 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106778 | PI 694127 |
| 308 | PI 694126 | A1 203 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106777 | PI 694126 |
| 309 | PI 694125 | A1 202 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106776 | PI 694125 |
| 310 | PI 694124 | A1 201 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106775 | PI 694124 |
| 311 | PI 694123 | A1 200 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106774 | PI 694123 |
| 312 | PI 694122 | A1 199 | Gossypium herbaceum L. | | COT | | | 2020 | | | | | | | | | 2106773 | PI 694122 |
| 313 | PI 693969 | 'A1087159' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2106613 | PI 693969 |
| 314 | PI 693970 | 'A1087145' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2106614 | PI 693970 |
| 315 | PI 693971 | 'A1087160' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2106615 | PI 693971 |
| 316 | PI 693972 | 'A1087148' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2106616 | PI 693972 |
| 317 | PI 693973 | 'A1088572' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2106617 | PI 693973 |
| 318 | PI 693974 | 'A1088553' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2106618 | PI 693974 |
| 319 | PI 693975 | 'A1088519' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2106619 | PI 693975 |
| 320 | PI 693976 | 'A1088555' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2106620 | PI 693976 |
| 321 | PI 693977 | 'A1088562' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2106621 | PI 693977 |
| 322 | PI 693978 | 'A1088573' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2106622 | PI 693978 |
| 323 | PI 693979 | 'A1088597' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2106623 | PI 693979 |
| 324 | PI 693980 | 'A1088585' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2106624 | PI 693980 |
| 325 | PI 693981 | 'A1088542' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2106625 | PI 693981 |
| 326 | PI 693774 | 'Ton Buster Elite' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 2105792 | PI 693774 |
| 327 | PI 693757 | 'Acala 1517-21' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | The New Mexico Agricultural Experiment Station announces the release of Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivar 'Acala 1517-21 '. Acala 1517-21 was derived from a single plant selection in F3 from a bi-parental cross between LA05307029 and AU-5491. This new cultivar was tested in 8 replicated field trials in New Mexico in 2012-2017 and 21 tests across 12 states of the Cotton Belt in 2016-2017. In New Mexico, Acala 1517-21 yielded similarly to medium-staple cultivars or transgenic commercial Acala cultivars including 'PHY 725 RF', 'PHY 755 WRF', 'PHY 764 WRF', 'FM 2322 GL', and 'FM 1830 GLT'. As compared to 'Acala 1517-08', Acala 1517-21 averaged 12.9% higher lint yield and 11.5% higher lint percent, with a similar boll weight, fiber length, length uniformity, elongation, micronaire, and short fiber content. However, Acala 1517-21 had similar or slightly lower fiber strength with significantly lower strength and elongation in one test. Compared to commercial transgenic and non-transgenic cultivars across the Cotton Belt, Acala 1517-21 had consistently longer and stronger fibers or lower micronaire readings. Acala 1517-21 represents a high-yielding Upland cotton cultivar with high lint percent and a long-staple. | 2105789 | PI 693757 |
| 328 | PI 693756 | 'UA248' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | UA248 is a conventional cotton cultivar with morphological traits similar to ‘DP 393’ and ‘UA48’ (check cultivars), except UA248 is taller and has lower trichome density on bract margins than either cultivar. Data from replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas over five years indicated that lint yields of UA248 were equal to lint yields of DP393 at each location, but were 13.3, 10.3, 12.5, and 9.7% higher than UA48 at Keiser (north), Judd Hill (north), Marianna (central delta) and Rohwer (south), respectively. Soils at all sites are silt loams, except the Sharkey clay at Keiser. Compared to DP 393, lint yields of UA248 were produced with equal number of seeds per area, seed index, lint fraction, and fiber density (estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface), but higher weight of lint per seed (lint index) per seed. Compared to UA48, UA248 produced higher plant height (103 vs, 96 cm), lint percentage (40.1 vs 37.8%), seed ha-1 (16.312 × 106 vs 14.985 × 106), lint index (7.7 vs. 7.5 g), fibers per seed (15819 vs. 13679), fiber density (144 vs 119 fibers mm-2 of seed coat), fiber elongation (6.9 vs. 4.5%) and leaf pubescence rating (3.5 vs 2.4); equal quality score, fiber uniformity index, and stem pubescence; and lower seed index (11.3 vs. 12.1 g), marginal bract trichome density (26.4 vs. 28.9 trichomes cm-1), fiber micronaire (4.54 vs. 4.94) and fiber strength (323 vs 356 kN m kg-1. UA248 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Damaged flowers for UA248 (63%) was lower than UA48 (66%) and higher than DP 393 (60%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. As indicated by lint yield at Judd Hill location (site of high Verticillium wilt), response of UA248 to Verticillium wilt [caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb] was equal to DP 393 and more tolerant than UA48. Note: Plants, from which seed were produced, were evaluated and determined to be free of Bt (BG1 and BGII) and RR Flex transgenes.
| 2105788 | PI 693756 |
| 329 | PI 693257 | 'PX3D32W3FE' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2104854 | PI 693257 |
| 330 | PI 693258 | 'PX3D43W3FE' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2104855 | PI 693258 |
| 331 | PI 693259 | 'PX5C45W3FE' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2104856 | PI 693259 |
| 332 | PI 693260 | 'PX5E28WEFE' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2104857 | PI 693260 |
| 333 | PI 693261 | 'PX5E34W3FE' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2104858 | PI 693261 |
| 334 | PI 693262 | 'PX444W3E-15CB' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2104859 | PI 693262 |
| 335 | PI 693263 | 'PX444W3E-15CBRN' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2020 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 2104860 | PI 693263 |
| 336 | PI 691666 | G1 6 | Gossypium bickii Prokh. | | COT | | Not Available | 2019 | | | | | | | | | 2097079 | PI 691666 |
| 337 | PI 698592 | D1 87 | Gossypium thurberi Tod. | Arizona, United States | COT |  | Not Available | 2018 | | | | | | | Wild material | Millenium Seed Bank Project, Bureau of Land Mgmt Save Our Seeds Project Transferred from USDA, Pullman, WA to College Station, TX. | 1970386 | PI 698592 |
| 338 | PI 698593 | D1 88 | Gossypium thurberi Tod. | Arizona, United States | COT |  | Not Available | 2018 | | | | | | | Wild material | Millenium Seed Bank Project, Bureau of Land Mgmt Save Our Seeds Project Transferred from USDA, Pullman, WA to College Station, TX. | 1970562 | PI 698593 |
| 339 | PI 698594 | D1 89 | Gossypium thurberi Tod. | Arizona, United States | COT |  | Not Available | 2018 | | | | | | | Wild material | Millenium Seed Bank Project, Bureau of Land Mgmt Save Our Seeds Project Transferred from USDA, Pullman, WA to College Station, TX. | 1970564 | PI 698594 |
| 340 | PI 688427 | NM 990764 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | | 1965699 | PI 688427 |
| 341 | PI 688428 | NM 990649 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | | 1965700 | PI 688428 |
| 342 | PI 688429 | NM 990815 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | | 1965701 | PI 688429 |
| 343 | PI 688430 | NM 990827 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | | 1965702 | PI 688430 |
| 344 | PI 688431 | Acala 1517-18 GLS | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | | 1965703 | PI 688431 |
| 345 | PI 688432 | NM 970123 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | | 1965704 | PI 688432 |
| 346 | PI 688413 | 'TTU SCM3-7-3-A3' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetic material | Three cotton populations that had been exposed to Ethyl MethaneSulfonate (EMS) using conventional chemical mutagenesis techniques provided the original M5 parental populations screened in this study. No DNA or RNA were utilized at any time in this process to ensure that selected lines would not be considered transgenic or GMO in origin. The parental populations were TAM 94L-25 (PI 631440) (Smith, 2003); Acala 1517-99 (Reg. no. CV-115, PI 612326) (Cantrell, et al., 2000); and TTU SCM3-7-3-3 (Reg. No.GS-4, PI 657942) (Bechere, et al., 2010). | 1965685 | PI 688413 |
| 347 | PI 688414 | TTU SCM3-7-3-A3 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetic material | Three cotton populations that had been exposed to Ethyl MethaneSulfonate (EMS) using conventional chemical mutagenesis techniques provided the original M5 parental populations screened in this study. No DNA or RNA were utilized at any time in this process to ensure that selected lines would not be considered transgenic or GMO in origin. The parental populations were TAM 94L-25 (PI 631440) (Smith, 2003); Acala 1517-99 (Reg. no. CV-115, PI 612326) (Cantrell, et al., 2000); and TTU SCM3-7-3-3 (Reg. No.GS-4, PI 657942) (Bechere, et al., 2010). | 1965686 | PI 688414 |
| 348 | PI 688415 | AFIS 1-1-1422-A5 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetic material | Three cotton populations that had been exposed to Ethyl MethaneSulfonate (EMS) using conventional chemical mutagenesis techniques provided the original M5 parental populations screened in this study. No DNA or RNA were utilized at any time in this process to ensure that selected lines would not be considered transgenic or GMO in origin. The parental populations were TAM 94L-25 (PI 631440) (Smith, 2003); Acala 1517-99 (Reg. no. CV-115, PI 612326) (Cantrell, et al., 2000); and TTU SCM3-7-3-3 (Reg. No.GS-4, PI 657942) (Bechere, et al., 2010). | 1965687 | PI 688415 |
| 349 | PI 688416 | AFIS 1-136-A5 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetic material | Three cotton populations that had been exposed to Ethyl MethaneSulfonate (EMS) using conventional chemical mutagenesis techniques provided the original M5 parental populations screened in this study. No DNA or RNA were utilized at any time in this process to ensure that selected lines would not be considered transgenic or GMO in origin. The parental populations were TAM 94L-25 (PI 631440) (Smith, 2003); Acala 1517-99 (Reg. no. CV-115, PI 612326) (Cantrell, et al., 2000); and TTU SCM3-7-3-3 (Reg. No.GS-4, PI 657942) (Bechere, et al., 2010). | 1965688 | PI 688416 |
| 350 | PI 688417 | AFIS 2-340-A5 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetic material | Three cotton populations that had been exposed to Ethyl MethaneSulfonate (EMS) using conventional chemical mutagenesis techniques provided the original M5 parental populations screened in this study. No DNA or RNA were utilized at any time in this process to ensure that selected lines would not be considered transgenic or GMO in origin. The parental populations were TAM 94L-25 (PI 631440) (Smith, 2003); Acala 1517-99 (Reg. no. CV-115, PI 612326) (Cantrell, et al., 2000); and TTU SCM3-7-3-3 (Reg. No.GS-4, PI 657942) (Bechere, et al., 2010). | 1965689 | PI 688417 |
| 351 | PI 687864 | Arkot 0611 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0611 are similar to 'DP 393' (check cultivar), except trichome density of Arkot 0611 was higher on abaxial leaf surfaces and bract margins. Lint yield of Arkot 0611 was 10.3% higher than DP 393 over 16 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas. By location, lint yields of Arkot 0611 were equal to lint yields of DP 393 on Sharkey clay soil at Keiser (north) and on silt loam soil at Rohwer (south), but were 19.4% higher on silt loam soil at Judd Hill (north) and 11.7% higher on silt loam soil at Marianna ( central Arkansas). Compared to DP 393, lint yields of Arkot 0611 were produced with higher lint percentage, number of seed per area, lint index, fibers per seed, and fiber density ( estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface); and lower seed size (seed index). Compared to DP 393, Arkot 06 I 1 produced higher leaf pubescence rating ( 4.0 vs. 2.5), marginal bract trichome density (34.0 vs. 24.9 trichomes cm-1), open boll percentage (66 vs. 61 %), lint percentage (40.8 vs. 39.5), seed per area(8.3% higher), lint index (7.6 vs. 7.5 g), fibers per seed (l 0.1 % higher), fiber density (13. 7% higher), fiber elongation (7.8 vs. 6.6%); equal plant height and stem pubescence; and lower seed index (I 0.3 vs. 11.3 g), quality score (40 vs. 49), micronaire (4.77 vs. 4.96), fiber length (30.0 vs 29.7 mm), uniformity index (83.9 vs. 85.1 %), and fiber strength (300 vs. 326 kN m Kg-1). Arkot 0611 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum ( ex Smith 190 I) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0611 had lower damaged flowers (more resistance) than DP 393 in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Response of Arkot 06 I I to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. & Hans.] was equal to the ,resistant check, M-315. | 1964026 | PI 687864 |
| 352 | PI 687866 | Arkot 0617 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2018 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0617 are similar to 'DP 393' (check cultivar), except trichome density of Arkot 0617 was higher on abaxial leaf surfaces and bract margins but lower on stems. Over 16 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0617 were equal to lint yields of DP 393 on silt loam soil at Marianna (central Arkansas) and on silt loam soil at Rohwer (south), but were 10 .. 3% higher on Sharkey clay soil at Keiser (north) and 5.4% higher on silt loam soil at Judd Hill (north). Compared to DP 393, lint yields of Arkot 0617 were produced with higher lint percentage; equal number of seed per area, fibers per seed, and fiber density (estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface); and lower seed size (seed index) and weight of lint per seed (lint index). Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0617 produced higher leaf pubescence rating (4.1 vs. 2.5), marginal bract trichome density (27.6 vs. 24.9 trichomes cm·'), open boll percentage (67 vs. 61 %), lint percentage (40.3 vs. 39.5), fiber quality score (58 vs. 49), and fiber length (30.5 vs. 29.7 g); equal seed per area, fibers per seed, fiber density, micronaire, uniformity index, fiber strength, and elongation; and lower stem pubescence rating (3.2 vs. 5.0), lint index (7.4 vs. 7.5 g), and seed index (10.9 vs. 11.3 g). Arkot 0617 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0617 had equal damaged flowers as DP 393 in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. | 1964028 | PI 687866 |
| 353 | PI 685636 | Arkot 0705 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits (including height, leaf shape, and leaf color) of Arkot 0705 are similar to 'DP 393' (check cultivar). Arkot 0705 has equal density of trichomes on leaves, but lower density (less pubescence) on stems and the marginal of bracts. Over 16 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0705 exceeded lint yields of DP 393 by 10.7%, but were equal to DP 393 at Judd Hill (site having silt loam soil in north Arkansas). Over 12 locations of the 2015 Regional Cotton Breeders Testing Network test, Arkot 0705 produced higher lint yield than any other of the 28 entries. Compared to DP 393, lint yields of Arkot 0705 were produced with equal number of seed per area, seed size (seed index), and fiber density (estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface), but higher lint weight per seed (lint index) and number of fibers per seed. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0705 produced higher lint percentage (40.6 vs. 39.3%), lint index (8.1 vs. 7.5 g), fibers per seed (4.2%), micronaire (5.09 vs. 4.89), and fiber strength (333 vs. 323 kN m kg·1); equal open boll percentage, number of seed per area, seed index, fiber density, fiber length, uniformity index, and elongation; and lower Q-score (47 vs. 54). Arkot 0705 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum ( ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. In field tests, it demonstrated tolerance to Verticillium wilt (caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb.). In small plot tests, Arkot 0705 was more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than the susceptible check and equal to DP 393.Response of Arkot 0705 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. & Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. Note: Plants, from which seed were produced, were evaluated and determined to be free of Bt (BG 1 and BGII) and RR Flex transgenes. | 1954448 | PI 685636 |
| 354 | PI 685637 | Arkot 0711 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits (including height, leaf shape and color) of Arkot 0711 are similar to 'DP 393' (check cultivar). Arkot 0711 has higher density oftrichomes (more pubescence) on leaves, but lower density of trichomes on stems and the marginal of bracts. Over 16 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0711 exceeded lint yields of DP 393 by 12.0%, but were equal to DP 393 at Keiser (site having clay soil in north Arkansas). Over 12 locations of the 2015 Regional Cotton Breeders Testing Network test, Arkot 0711 produced the 9th highest yield of 28 entries. Compared to DP 393, lint yields of Arkot 0711 were produced with equal number of seed per area and seed size (seed index), but had higher weight of lint per seed (lint index), fibers per seed and fiber density ( estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0711 produced higher lint percentage (41.6 vs. 39.3%), lint index (8.3 vs. 7.5 g), fibers per seed (I 3.0% higher), fiber density (164 vs. 146), and open bolls (66 vs. 57%); equal seed per area, seed index, plant height, micronaire, uniformity index, fiber strength, and elongation; and lower fiber length (28.9 vs 29.7 mm). Arkot 0711 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum ( ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. In field tests, it demonstrated tolerance to Verticillium wilt (caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb.). In small plot tests, Arkot 0711 was more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than the susceptible check and equal to DP 93. Response of Arkot 0711 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. & Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. Note: Plants, from which seed were produced, were evaluated and determined to be free of Bt (BG 1 and BGII) and RR Flex transgenes. | 1954449 | PI 685637 |
| 355 | PI 685638 | 'UA107' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | UA 107 is an open-canopy ("okra-leaf') cotton with other morphological traits similar to 'DP 393' ( check cultivar), except UA 103 has lower trichome density on abaxial leaf surfaces, stems, and bract margins. Over 16 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields of UA I 07 were equal to lint yields of DP393 on Sharkey clay soil at Keiser (north), but were 8.3%, 8.7%, and 7.8% higher than DP 393 on silt loam soils at Judd Hill (north), Marianna (central), and Rohwer (south), respectively. Compared to DP 393, lint yields ofUA 107 were produced with equal number of seed per area, but higher weight of lint per seed (lint index), fibers per seed, and fiber density ( estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface). Compared to DP 393, UA107 produced higher plant height (103 vs 101 cm), open boll percentage (64 vs. 57%), lint percentage (40.3 vs 39.3%), lint index (8.3 vs. 7.5 g), seed index (12.1 vs. 11.2 g), fibers per seed (14.0% higher), and fiber density (8.2% more fibers per unit area of seed coat); equal seed per area, length uniformity index, and fiber strength; and lower leaf pubescence rating ( 1.3 vs. 2.8), stem pubescence rating (2.6 vs. 5.1 ), marginal bract trichome density (21.3 vs. 3 I .6 trichomes cm·1), micronaire (4.55 vs. 4.85) and fiber elongation (6.3 vs. 6.8%). UAI 07 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum ( ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. UA107 had slightly more damaged flowers than DP 393 (62 vs. 56%) in tests of resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Response ofUA 107 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. & Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-3 I 5. Note: Plants, from which seed were produced, were evaluated and determined to be free of Bt (BG 1 and BGil) and RR Flex transgenes. | 1954450 | PI 685638 |
| 356 | PI 685639 | 'UA114' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | Morphological traits of UA 114 are similar to 'DP 393' ( check cultivar), except UA 114 has higher trichome density on abaxial leaf surfaces and bract margins. Over 16 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields ofUAl 14 were equal to lint yields ofDP393 on silt loam soil at Rohwer (south), but were 8.3% higher than DP 393 on Sharkey clay soil at Keiser, 6.5% higher on silt loam soil at Judd Hill (north), and 9.3% higher on silt loam soil at Marianna (central). Compared to DP 393, lint yields of UA 107 were produced with higher number of seed per area, but lower weight of lint per seed (lint index), fibers per seed, and fiber density ( estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface). Compared to DP 393, UAl 14 produced higher open boll percentage (65 vs. 61 %), seed per area (9.3% higher), open boll percentage (65 vs. 61 %), leaf pubescence rating ( 4.1 vs. 2.5), marginal bract trichome density (32.6 vs. 24.9 trichomes cm-1), quality score (64 vs. 49), fiber length (30.7 vs. 29.7 mm), length uniformity index (85.9 vs. 85. 1 %), fiber strength (335 vs 326 kN m kg-1, and fiber elongation (7.2 vs 6.6%); equal plant height, stem pubescence, seed index, and micronaire; and lower lint percentage (38.9 vs 39.5%), lint index (7 .3 vs. 7 .5 g), fibers per seed ( 4. 7% lower), and fiber density ( 4.3% fewer fibers per unit area of seed coat). UAl 14 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. UAl 14 had damaged flowers equal to DP 393 in tests ofresistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Response ofUAl 14 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. & Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. Note: Plants, from which seed were produced, were evaluated and determined to be free ofBt (BGl and BGII) and RR Flex transgenes. | 1954451 | PI 685639 |
| 357 | PI 685768 | 'A1076944' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954580 | PI 685768 |
| 358 | PI 685769 | 'A1076918' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954581 | PI 685769 |
| 359 | PI 685770 | 'A1076956' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954582 | PI 685770 |
| 360 | PI 685771 | 'A1076951' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954583 | PI 685771 |
| 361 | PI 685772 | 'A1076922' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954584 | PI 685772 |
| 362 | PI 685773 | 'A1076935' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954585 | PI 685773 |
| 363 | PI 685774 | 'A1076921' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954586 | PI 685774 |
| 364 | PI 685775 | 'A1076937' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954587 | PI 685775 |
| 365 | PI 685776 | 'A1076916' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954588 | PI 685776 |
| 366 | PI 685777 | 'A1076942' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954589 | PI 685777 |
| 367 | PI 684664 | 'ST 5020GLT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1954304 | PI 684664 |
| 368 | PI 684656 | 'TAM 11K-13 ELSU' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | TAM 11 K-13 ELSU is an extra long staple upland cotton germplasm line that expresses UHML equal to or exceeding the minimum UHML of pima cotton, Gossypium barbadense, when grown with supplemental irrigation. When grown under severe drought, TAM 11 K-13 ELSU will produce UHML exceeding the minimum of 27.8 mm required for non-discount in international markets. TAM 11 K-13 ELS U has lower lint percent than commercial cultivars but is competitive in seedcotton yield potential in central and south Texas. All other HVI fiber properties meet or exceed standards. | 1953976 | PI 684656 |
| 369 | PI 684657 | 'TAM 11L-24 LSU' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | TAM 11 L-24 LSU is an upland cotton germplasm line that expresses the Long Staple Upland trait, i.e., UHML equal to or exceeding 32 mm but less than the Extra Long Staple Upland UHML of 34.9 mm when grown with supplemental irrigation. When grown under severe drought, TAM 11 L-24 LSU produced UHML exceeding the minimum of 27 .8 mm required for non-discount in international markets. TAM 11 L-24 LSU has lower lint percent than commercial cultivars but is competitive in seedcotton yield potential in central and south Texas. All other HVI fiber properties meet or exceed standards. | 1953977 | PI 684657 |
| 370 | PI 684658 | 'TAM 11T-08 ELSU-ESU' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | TAM 11 T-08 ELSU-ESU is an upland cotton germplasm line that expresses the Extra Long Staple Upland trait, i.e., UHML equal to or exceeding the minimum UHML of pima cotton, Gossypium barbadense, and the Extra Strength Upland trait, i.e., HVI fiber bundle strength exceeding 353 kN m per kg, when grown with supplemental irrigation. When grown under severe drought, TAM 11T-08 ELSU-ESU will produce UHML exceeding the minimum of 27.8 mm required for non-discount in international markets and fiber bundle strength exceeding 353 kN m per kg. TAM 11 T-08 ELSU-ESU has lower lint percent than commercial cultivars but is competitive in seedcotton yield potential in central and south Texas. All other HVI fiber properties meet or exceed standards. | 1953978 | PI 684658 |
| 371 | PI 684632 | 'ST 5517GLTP' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Georgia, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1953945 | PI 684632 |
| 372 | PI 683534 | 'FM1953GLTP' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1953803 | PI 683534 |
| 373 | PI 682743 | 'Tamcot G11' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | Tamcot G11 is a conventional cultivar that is competitive in lint yield potential with current upland cultivars available for production in central and south Texas. Tamcot G11 exhibited significantly longer UHML. measured by high volume instrument (HVI), than the average of all comparison cultivars In 16 of 17 performance trials across central and south Texas during 2013 through 2016. Micronalre (Mic) of Tamcot G11 was within the premium range in 12 of the 17 performance trials while the control cultlvars averaged within the premium range in only 3 or the 17 trials. Strength of Tamcot G11 and the mean of all controls were equal in all except two trials while Tamcot G11 tended to have lower fiber elongation at break. Lint yield of Tamcot G11 was equal to or greater than the average of all control cultivars in 16 of the 17 trials. Lint percent of Tamcot G11 was acceptable yet below that of most current upland cultivars. UHML of Tamcot G11 was significantly longer under irrigated culture at 33.3 mm compared with 30 mm for the comparison genotypes under irrigated culture; significantly longer under moderate drought stress at 32.5 mm compared with 28.4 mm for the control cultivars; and significantly longer than the control cultivars under severe drought. 29.7 mm compared with 27.0 mm. Tamcot G11 provides producers with a competitive, high quality conventional cultivar with UHML sufficient to reduce the probability of discounts based on fiber length. | 1953698 | PI 682743 |
| 374 | PI 682133 | USDA MD 16-1 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | From 2012 to 2016 the two candidate germplasm yielded higher than the check cultivars. USDA MD 16-1 yielded 14 % higher than MD 10-5, the most recent release from the program and 8 % higher than MD 25, a high yielding, quality germplasm in the Mississippi Delta. USDA MD 16-2, on the other hand, gave higher yields than all the check varieties but its' yield was 6 % lower than USDA MD 16-1. In the 2015 and 2016 RBTN (Regional Breeder Testing Network) tests at 13 locations across the Southeast,which included 34-36 breeding lines and checks USDA MD 16-1 had the highest yield (1701 kg/ha) The check varieties in the RBTN (SG 747, DP 393, DP 493, MD 15, and FM 958) all had significantly lower yield than MD 16-1. In addition to its good yield performance, USDA MD 16-2 had good fiber length (31-34 mm) and the strongest fiber in the RBTN tests (36.2 g/tex) MD 16-1 had fiber length of 29-31 mm. Both USDA MD 16-1 an USDA MD 16-2 had longer, stronger and more uniform fibers than MD 10-5 and the other check varieties. The negative associations between lint yield and fiber quality have been a persistent problem for cotton breeders for a long time. These negative associations have been significantly reduced in some germplasm populations developed by public cotton breeding programs. In a recent report, however, analysis of 102 strains and commercial cultivars evaluated across 56 environments in the Regional High Quality Tests from 2001 to 2007, the genetic correlations between lint yield and fiber strength between lint yield and fiber length were -0.63 and -0.56, respectively. The data from 2012 to 2015 for USDA MD 16-1 and USDA MD 16-2 indicated that the correlations between lint yield and fiber quality were -0.16 for fiber strength and -0.14 for fiber length. These significant reductions are steps in the right direction. | 1950011 | PI 682133 |
| 375 | PI 682134 | USDA MD 16-2 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | From 2012 to 2016 the two candidate germplasm yielded higher than the check cultivars. USDA MD 16-1 yielded 14 % higher than MD 10-5, the most recent release from the program and 8 % higher than MD 25, a high yielding, quality germplasm in the Mississippi Delta. USDA MD 16-2, on the other hand, gave higher yields than all the check varieties but its' yield was 6 % lower than USDA MD 16-1. In the 2015 and 2016 RBTN (Regional Breeder Testing Network) tests at 13 locations across the Southeast,which included 34-36 breeding lines and checks USDA MD 16-1 had the highest yield (1701 kg/ha) The check varieties in the RBTN (SG 747, DP 393, DP 493, MD 15, and FM 958) all had significantly lower yield than MD 16-1. In addition to its good yield performance, USDA MD 16-2 had good fiber length (31-34 mm) and the strongest fiber in the RBTN tests (36.2 g/tex) MD 16-1 had fiber length of 29-31 mm. Both USDA MD 16-1 an USDA MD 16-2 had longer, stronger and more uniform fibers than MD 10-5 and the other check varieties. The negative associations between lint yield and fiber quality have been a persistent problem for cotton breeders for a long time. These negative associations have been significantly reduced in some germplasm populations developed by public cotton breeding programs. In a recent report, however, analysis of 102 strains and commercial cultivars evaluated across 56 environments in the Regional High Quality Tests from 2001 to 2007, the genetic correlations between lint yield and fiber strength between lint yield and fiber length were -0.63 and -0.56, respectively. The data from 2012 to 2015 for USDA MD 16-1 and USDA MD 16-2 indicated that the correlations between lint yield and fiber quality were -0.16 for fiber strength and -0.14 for fiber length. These significant reductions are steps in the right direction. | 1950012 | PI 682134 |
| 376 | PI 682095 | 'CRIS-129' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Sindh, Pakistan | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | medium boll size and average boll weight is 2.5 to 2.8gm. Growth habbit is semi spreadfing and Sakrand condition varety mature in 130 to 140 days | 1950008 | PI 682095 |
| 377 | PI 682065 | 'DP 1747NR B2XF' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1949860 | PI 682065 |
| 378 | PI 682066 | 'A1070829' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1949861 | PI 682066 |
| 379 | PI 681709 | 'MD 15-Mut 89' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Typically, a fiber length above 32 mm is considered to be ‘extra-long’, and a fiber strength of above 314 kN m kg-1 is considered to be ‘very strong’. Uniformity index above 85 is ‘very high’ (USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, 1995). Mutations in upland cotton strains that exhibit fiber length ≥32 mm and fiber bundle strength ≥420 KN m kg-1 are unique. The mutants MD 15-Mut 13, MD 15-Mut 31, MD 15-Mut 61, MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 138 have unique, extra-long, very strong and very highly uniform fibers. MD 15-Mut 31 had fiber length that was 10 percent longer than that of the fibers of MD 15 and 12 percent longer than that of MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 13 both had fibers that were 6 percent longer than MD 15 and 8 percent longer than MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 61 and MD 15-Mut 138 had 4 percent longer fiber than the check germplasm,10-5. In terms of fiber strength, all five mutants had very strong fibers. The mutant MD 15-Mut 31, had superior performance in fiber strength. It had fiber strength which was 12 percent higher than MD 15 and 23 percent higher than MD 10-5 The other four mutants had 4 to 9 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5 and 14 to 20 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5. All fiber mutants showed very high fiber uniformity which ranged from 86 to 88 percent. The 2015 Regional High Quality (RHQ) test at Stoneville, MS indicated that MD 15-Mut 31 and MD 15-Mut 89 had higher fiber length and strength than the national checks ‘PHY 725RF’ and ‘FM 2484B2F, the local check varieties MD 10-5 and MD 87 and the other 16 breeding lines in the test. Cotton breeders can incorporate the superior fiber quality from these mutants into high yielding germplasm to suit their local conditions. These characteristics may allow the development of cotton cultivars that could be utilized in higher value textile markets increasing the economic competitiveness of cotton producers in the US. | 1947846 | PI 681709 |
| 380 | PI 681710 | 'MD 15-Mut 138' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Typically, a fiber length above 32 mm is considered to be ‘extra-long’, and a fiber strength of above 314 kN m kg-1 is considered to be ‘very strong’. Uniformity index above 85 is ‘very high’ (USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, 1995). Mutations in upland cotton strains that exhibit fiber length ≥32 mm and fiber bundle strength ≥420 KN m kg-1 are unique. The mutants MD 15-Mut 13, MD 15-Mut 31, MD 15-Mut 61, MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 138 have unique, extra-long, very strong and very highly uniform fibers. MD 15-Mut 31 had fiber length that was 10 percent longer than that of the fibers of MD 15 and 12 percent longer than that of MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 13 both had fibers that were 6 percent longer than MD 15 and 8 percent longer than MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 61 and MD 15-Mut 138 had 4 percent longer fiber than the check germplasm,10-5. In terms of fiber strength, all five mutants had very strong fibers. The mutant MD 15-Mut 31, had superior performance in fiber strength. It had fiber strength which was 12 percent higher than MD 15 and 23 percent higher than MD 10-5 The other four mutants had 4 to 9 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5 and 14 to 20 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5. All fiber mutants showed very high fiber uniformity which ranged from 86 to 88 percent. The 2015 Regional High Quality (RHQ) test at Stoneville, MS indicated that MD 15-Mut 31 and MD 15-Mut 89 had higher fiber length and strength than the national checks ‘PHY 725RF’ and ‘FM 2484B2F, the local check varieties MD 10-5 and MD 87 and the other 16 breeding lines in the test. Cotton breeders can incorporate the superior fiber quality from these mutants into high yielding germplasm to suit their local conditions. These characteristics may allow the development of cotton cultivars that could be utilized in higher value textile markets increasing the economic competitiveness of cotton producers in the US. | 1947847 | PI 681710 |
| 381 | PI 681708 | 'MD 15-Mut 61' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Typically, a fiber length above 32 mm is considered to be ‘extra-long’, and a fiber strength of above 314 kN m kg-1 is considered to be ‘very strong’. Uniformity index above 85 is ‘very high’ (USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, 1995). Mutations in upland cotton strains that exhibit fiber length ≥32 mm and fiber bundle strength ≥420 KN m kg-1 are unique. The mutants MD 15-Mut 13, MD 15-Mut 31, MD 15-Mut 61, MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 138 have unique, extra-long, very strong and very highly uniform fibers. MD 15-Mut 31 had fiber length that was 10 percent longer than that of the fibers of MD 15 and 12 percent longer than that of MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 13 both had fibers that were 6 percent longer than MD 15 and 8 percent longer than MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 61 and MD 15-Mut 138 had 4 percent longer fiber than the check germplasm,10-5. In terms of fiber strength, all five mutants had very strong fibers. The mutant MD 15-Mut 31, had superior performance in fiber strength. It had fiber strength which was 12 percent higher than MD 15 and 23 percent higher than MD 10-5 The other four mutants had 4 to 9 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5 and 14 to 20 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5. All fiber mutants showed very high fiber uniformity which ranged from 86 to 88 percent. The 2015 Regional High Quality (RHQ) test at Stoneville, MS indicated that MD 15-Mut 31 and MD 15-Mut 89 had higher fiber length and strength than the national checks ‘PHY 725RF’ and ‘FM 2484B2F, the local check varieties MD 10-5 and MD 87 and the other 16 breeding lines in the test. Cotton breeders can incorporate the superior fiber quality from these mutants into high yielding germplasm to suit their local conditions. These characteristics may allow the development of cotton cultivars that could be utilized in higher value textile markets increasing the economic competitiveness of cotton producers in the US. | 1947845 | PI 681708 |
| 382 | PI 681707 | 'MD 15-Mut 31' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Typically, a fiber length above 32 mm is considered to be ‘extra-long’, and a fiber strength of above 314 kN m kg-1 is considered to be ‘very strong’. Uniformity index above 85 is ‘very high’ (USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, 1995). Mutations in upland cotton strains that exhibit fiber length ≥32 mm and fiber bundle strength ≥420 KN m kg-1 are unique. The mutants MD 15-Mut 13, MD 15-Mut 31, MD 15-Mut 61, MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 138 have unique, extra-long, very strong and very highly uniform fibers. MD 15-Mut 31 had fiber length that was 10 percent longer than that of the fibers of MD 15 and 12 percent longer than that of MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 13 both had fibers that were 6 percent longer than MD 15 and 8 percent longer than MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 61 and MD 15-Mut 138 had 4 percent longer fiber than the check germplasm,10-5. In terms of fiber strength, all five mutants had very strong fibers. The mutant MD 15-Mut 31, had superior performance in fiber strength. It had fiber strength which was 12 percent higher than MD 15 and 23 percent higher than MD 10-5 The other four mutants had 4 to 9 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5 and 14 to 20 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5. All fiber mutants showed very high fiber uniformity which ranged from 86 to 88 percent. The 2015 Regional High Quality (RHQ) test at Stoneville, MS indicated that MD 15-Mut 31 and MD 15-Mut 89 had higher fiber length and strength than the national checks ‘PHY 725RF’ and ‘FM 2484B2F, the local check varieties MD 10-5 and MD 87 and the other 16 breeding lines in the test. Cotton breeders can incorporate the superior fiber quality from these mutants into high yielding germplasm to suit their local conditions. These characteristics may allow the development of cotton cultivars that could be utilized in higher value textile markets increasing the economic competitiveness of cotton producers in the US. | 1947844 | PI 681707 |
| 383 | PI 681706 | 'MD 15-Mut 13' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | Typically, a fiber length above 32 mm is considered to be ‘extra-long’, and a fiber strength of above 314 kN m kg-1 is considered to be ‘very strong’. Uniformity index above 85 is ‘very high’ (USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, 1995). Mutations in upland cotton strains that exhibit fiber length ≥32 mm and fiber bundle strength ≥420 KN m kg-1 are unique. The mutants MD 15-Mut 13, MD 15-Mut 31, MD 15-Mut 61, MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 138 have unique, extra-long, very strong and very highly uniform fibers. MD 15-Mut 31 had fiber length that was 10 percent longer than that of the fibers of MD 15 and 12 percent longer than that of MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 89 and MD 15-Mut 13 both had fibers that were 6 percent longer than MD 15 and 8 percent longer than MD 10-5. MD 15-Mut 61 and MD 15-Mut 138 had 4 percent longer fiber than the check germplasm,10-5. In terms of fiber strength, all five mutants had very strong fibers. The mutant MD 15-Mut 31, had superior performance in fiber strength. It had fiber strength which was 12 percent higher than MD 15 and 23 percent higher than MD 10-5 The other four mutants had 4 to 9 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5 and 14 to 20 percent higher fiber strength than MD 10-5. All fiber mutants showed very high fiber uniformity which ranged from 86 to 88 percent. The 2015 Regional High Quality (RHQ) test at Stoneville, MS indicated that MD 15-Mut 31 and MD 15-Mut 89 had higher fiber length and strength than the national checks ‘PHY 725RF’ and ‘FM 2484B2F, the local check varieties MD 10-5 and MD 87 and the other 16 breeding lines in the test. Cotton breeders can incorporate the superior fiber quality from these mutants into high yielding germplasm to suit their local conditions. These characteristics may allow the development of cotton cultivars that could be utilized in higher value textile markets increasing the economic competitiveness of cotton producers in the US. | 1947843 | PI 681706 |
| 384 | PI 681593 | CA 4005 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | CA 4005 is an upland cotton germplasm line originally developed for cold tolerance at Texas AandM Agrilife Research in Lubbock, and subsequently evaluated for potential resistance to thrips feeding injury in replicated trials at four field locations and in three separate greenhouse tests from 2012 to 2014. CA 4005 was not directly selected for thrips tolerance at the field level, but indirectly selected during the time period each year when thrips populations, and their subsequent effects on seedling cotton, are greatest on the Texas High Plains. CA 4005 consistently displayed greater resistance to thrips feeding injury than commercial and susceptible checks at the field level. Greenhouse evaluations revealed CA 4005 to have only partial resistance that can be overcome at high enough thrips densities. Yield potential and other agronomic characteristics of CA 4005 are comparable to evaluated commercial checks. HVI fiber quality is also comparable and, in some cases, superior to that of the checks. CA 4005 could be valuable source of partial thrips resistance in adapted upland cotton germplasm. | 1947458 | PI 681593 |
| 385 | PI 681594 | CA 4006 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | CA 4006 is an upland cotton germplasm line originally developed for cold tolerance at Texas AandM Agrilife Research in Lubbock, and subsequently evaluated for potential resistance to thrips feeding injury in replicated trials at four field locations and in three separate greenhouse tests from 2012 to 2014. CA 4006 was not directly selected for thrips tolerance at the field level, but indirectly selected during the time period each year when thrips populations, and their subsequent effects on seedling cotton, are greatest on the Texas High Plains. CA 4006 consistently displayed greater resistance to thrips feeding injury than commercial and susceptiblechecks at the field level. Greenhouse evaluations revealed CA 4006 to have only partial resistance that can be overcome at high enough thrips densities. Yield potential and other agronomic characteristics of CA 4006 are comparable to evaluated commercial checks. HVI fiber quality is also comparable and, in some cases, superior to that of the checks. CA 4006 could be valuable source of partial thrips resistance in adapted upland cotton germplasm. | 1947460 | PI 681594 |
| 386 | PI 679942 | 'FM 1900GLT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1943536 | PI 679942 |
| 387 | PI 679943 | 'FM 1911GLT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2017 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1943537 | PI 679943 |
| 388 | PI 678938 | 'M Rk-Rn1' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | M Rk-Rn 1 was developed by marker assisted selection. Reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, resistance is associated with three QTLs, Ren barb1 and Ren barb2 located on chromosome 21 and Ren barb3 located on chromosome 18 (Gutierrez et al. 2011 Theo Appl Genet 122:271-280). The SSR markers CIR 316 and BNL 3661 are linked to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, resistance (Gutierrez et al 2010 Theo Appl Genet 121:1323-1337. M Rk-Rn 1 is homozygous for SSR markers (GH 132_201, BNL3279_106, and BNL569_131) for the three QTLs (Ren barb1, Ren barb2, and Ren barb3) associated with reniform nematode resistance and is also homozygous for SSR markers CIR 316_201 and BNL 3661_285, which are associated with root-knot nematode resistance. Root-knot and reniform nematode resistance was verified in growth chamber tests. Most agronomic and fiber traits are equivalent to cultivars. Plant growth habit is similar to standard cutivars. M Rk-Rn 1 offers an excellent source of resistance to root-knot and reniform nematodes with acceptable agronomic and fiber traits. | 1943172 | PI 678938 |
| 389 | PI 678939 | 'M Rk-Rn 2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | M Rk-Rn 2 was developed by marker assisted selection. Reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, resistance is associated with three QTLs, Ren barb1 and Ren barb2 located on chromosome 21 and Ren barb3 located on chromosome 18 (Gutierrez et al. 2011 Theo Appl Genet 122:271-280). The SSR markers CIR 316 and BNL 3661 are linked to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, resistance (Gutierrez et al 2010 Theo Appl Genet 121:1323-1337. M Rk-Rn 2 is homozygous for SSR markers (GH 132_201, BNL3279_106, and BNL569_131) for the three QTLs (Ren barb1, Ren barb2, and Ren barb3) associated with reniform nematode resistance and is also homozygous for SSR markers CIR 316_201 and BNL 3661_285, which are associated with root-knot nematode resistance. Root-knot and reniform nematode resistance was verified in growth chamber tests. Most agronomic and fiber traits are equivalent to cultivars. Plant growth habit is similar to standard cutivars. M Rk-Rn 2 offers an excellent source of resistance to root-knot and reniform nematodes with acceptable agronomic and fiber traits. | 1943173 | PI 678939 |
| 390 | PI 678940 | 'M Rk-Rn3' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | M Rk-Rn 3 was developed by marker assisted selection. Reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, resistance is associated with three QTLs, Ren barb1 and Ren barb2 located on chromosome 21 and Ren barb3 located on chromosome 18 (Gutierrez et al. 2011 Theo Appl Genet 122:271-280). The SSR markers CIR 316 and BNL 3661 are linked to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, resistance (Gutierrez et al 2010 Theo Appl Genet 121:1323-1337. M Rk-Rn 3 is homozygous for SSR markers (GH 132_201, BNL3279_106, and BNL569_131) for the three QTLs (Ren barb1, Ren barb2, and Ren barb3) associated with reniform nematode resistance and is also homozygous for SSR markers CIR 316_201 and BNL 3661_285, which are associated with root-knot nematode resistance. Root-knot and reniform nematode resistance was verified in growth chamber tests. Most agronomic and fiber traits are equivalent to cultivars. Plant growth habit is similar to standard cutivars. M Rk-Rn 3 offers an excellent source of resistance to root-knot and reniform nematodes with acceptable agronomic and fiber traits. | 1943174 | PI 678940 |
| 391 | PI 678941 | 'M Rk-Rn4' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | M Rk-Rn 4 was developed by marker assisted selection. Reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, resistance is associated with three QTLs, Ren barb1 and Ren barb2 located on chromosome 21 and Ren barb3 located on chromosome 18 (Gutierrez et al. 2011 Theo Appl Genet 122:271-280). The SSR markers CIR 316 and BNL 3661 are linked to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, resistance (Gutierrez et al 2010 Theo Appl Genet 121:1323-1337. M Rk-Rn 4 is homozygous for SSR markers (GH 132_201, BNL3279_106, and BNL569_131) for the three QTLs (Ren barb1, Ren barb2, and Ren barb3) associated with reniform nematode resistance and is also homozygous for SSR markers CIR 316_201 and BNL 3661_285, which are associated with root-knot nematode resistance. Root-knot and reniform nematode resistance was verified in growth chamber tests. Most agronomic and fiber traits are equivalent to cultivars. Plant growth habit is similar to standard cutivars. M Rk-Rn 4 offers an excellent source of resistance to root-knot and reniform nematodes with acceptable agronomic and fiber traits. | 1943175 | PI 678941 |
| 392 | PI 678942 | 'M Rk-Rn 5' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | M Rk-Rn 5 was developed by marker assisted selection. Reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, resistance is associated with three QTLs, Ren barb1 and Ren barb2 located on chromosome 21 and Ren barb3 located on chromosome 18 (Gutierrez et al. 2011 Theo Appl Genet 122:271-280). The SSR markers CIR 316 and BNL 3661 are linked to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, resistance (Gutierrez et al 2010 Theo Appl Genet 121:1323-1337. M Rk-Rn 5 is homozygous for SSR markers (GH 132_201, BNL3279_106, and BNL569_131) for the three QTLs (Ren barb1, Ren barb2, and Ren barb3) associated with reniform nematode resistance and is also homozygous for SSR markers CIR 316_201 and BNL 3661_285, which are associated with root-knot nematode resistance. Root-knot and reniform nematode resistance was verified in growth chamber tests. Most agronomic and fiber traits are equivalent to cultivars. Plant growth habit is similar to standard cutivars. M Rk-Rn 5 offers an excellent source of resistance to root-knot and reniform nematodes with acceptable agronomic and fiber traits. | 1943176 | PI 678942 |
| 393 | PI 678943 | 'M Rk-Rn 6' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | M Rk-Rn 6 was developed by marker assisted selection. Reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, resistance is associated with three QTLs, Ren barb1 and Ren barb2 located on chromosome 21 and Ren barb3 located on chromosome 18 (Gutierrez et al. 2011 Theo Appl Genet 122:271-280). The SSR markers CIR 316 and BNL 3661 are linked to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, resistance (Gutierrez et al 2010 Theo Appl Genet 121:1323-1337. M Rk-Rn 6 is homozygous for SSR markers (GH 132_201, BNL3279_106, and BNL569_131) for the three QTLs (Ren barb1, Ren barb2, and Ren barb3) associated with reniform nematode resistance and is also homozygous for SSR markers CIR 316_201 and BNL 3661_285, which are associated with root-knot nematode resistance. Root-knot and reniform nematode resistance was verified in growth chamber tests. Most agronomic and fiber traits are equivalent to cultivars. Plant growth habit is similar to standard cutivars. M Rk-Rn 6 offers an excellent source of resistance to root-knot and reniform nematodes with acceptable agronomic and fiber traits. | 1943177 | PI 678943 |
| 394 | PI 678847 | 'A1064504' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1943014 | PI 678847 |
| 395 | PI 678848 | 'A1064505' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1943015 | PI 678848 |
| 396 | PI 678420 | 'ST 4848GLT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1942289 | PI 678420 |
| 397 | PI 678421 | 'ST 4949GLT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1942290 | PI 678421 |
| 398 | PI 678370 | 'Acala 1517-10 B2RF' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | The New Mexico Agricultural Experiment Station announces the release of an insect-resistant and glyphosate herbicide-tolerant Acala cotton cultivar 'Acala 1517-16 B2RF' (Gossypium hirsutum L.) possessing Bollguard II (82) and Roundup-ready Flex (RF) traits. Acala 1517-16 B2RF has an excellent season-long in-plant protection against pink bollworm [Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund .)], tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens F.), American bollworm [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] and glyphosate herbicide and an improved resistance to beet armyworm [Spodoptera exigua (Hubner)], soybean looper (Pseudoplusia includens Walker), and bollworm (H. zea Boddie). The new cultivar was selected as a progeny row derived from a backcross BC3F3 between a Monsanto B2RF donor and NM 970123 as the recurrent parent. Acala 1517-16 B2RF possesses superior Acala cotton type fiber quality and high yield potential. Acala 1517-16 B2RF was tested in 11 replicated field trials in New Mexico from 2007 to 2009, one field test in the High Plains of Texas, and nine locations outside of the Southwest region in 2009. Acala 1517-16 B2RF had similar lint yield to 'Acala 1517-99W' containing two Bt genes and two conventional cultivars 'Acala 1517-08' and 'PHY 72 Acala'. The most improved trait was its consistently greater boll weight. In generally, Acala 1517-16 B2RF had similar fiber quality to the three checks in most of the tests, but its fibers were coarser than Acala 1517-99W and finer than | 1942262 | PI 678370 |
| 399 | PI 678371 | 'NuMex COT 15 GLS' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | The New Mexico Agricultural Experiment Station announces the release of a glandless 'NuMex COT 15 GLS' cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) which carries the incomplete dominant glandless allele Gl2e NuMex COT 15 GLS was derived from an advanced backcross progeny of a cross between the Gl2e allele donor 'Bahtim 11 O' (G. barbadense) and glanded Upland cotton 'CRI 12', followed by five backcrosses with glanded Upland 'CRI 35' as the recurrent parent. In the advanced backcross population, the conventional NuMex COT 15 GLS was selected as a glandless progeny out of a mixture of glandless and glanded plants, followed by further testing for adventitious presence of genetically engineered (GE) biotech traits controlled by insect resistant Bt gene(s) and herbicide tolerant gene(s). This new cultivar was tested in 4 replicated field trials in New Mexico in 2013-2014 and in 11 tests across 9 states in 2014. As compared to glandless 'Acala GLS', NuMex COT 15 GLS yielded 50% more lint, and it produced 90% of that of glanded 'Acala 1517-08'. Its fiber quality is classified as a medium to long staple with strong fiber strength and high uniformity, similar to other commercial medium staple cultivars, but it was inferior to both Acala cultivars. It had higher fiber elongation than most commercial cultivars tested in New Mexico. Nu Mex COT 15 GLS responded to thrips and Verticillium wilt similarly to Acala 1517-08 and Acala GLS. | 1942263 | PI 678371 |
| 400 | PI 678372 | NM W1218 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | When compared in eight tests in Las Cruces, NM, in 1998-2005, NM W1218 had similar or higher lint yield (1881 vs. 1777 kg ha-1 ), and the difference was significant in three tests , as compared with Acala 1517-99. NM W1218 had slightly higher lint percent (41 .51 vs. 40.89%), and the difference was significant in two tests. However, no significant difference was detected for boll weight, fiber length and strength, and micronaire between NM W1218 and the check in the eight field tests, except for two tests where significant differences in opposite directions were noted for micronaire. One noticeable advantage of NM W1218 over Acala 1517-99 is its stormproof bolls with tighter locks that can reduce seedcotton loss before harvest, because Acala 1517 cotton usually has loose bolls with yield loss due to a strong wind or storm. Compared with Acala 1517-99, NM W1218 had similar plant height and maturity. NM W1218 was tested for resistance to Verticillium wilt in 2003 and showed a greater susceptibi lity than Acala 1517-99. In the greenhouse, NM W1218 had a higher severity rating (2 .7 vs. 2.3 for Acala 1517-99). In the field test, it also had higher diseased plant percentage (40 .7 vs. 32.7%). But its response to Verticillium wilt was similar to Acala 1517-95 (with a severity rating of 3.6 in the greenhouse and 31.3% of diseased plants in the field). The differences among the three genotypes were not significant. | 1942264 | PI 678372 |
| 401 | PI 678373 | NM 990813 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | New Mexico, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The most significant improvement in NM 990813 is its high yield potential. On average, NM990813 exhibited 14.1 % higher yield than Acala 1517-99 in four replicated field trials conducted in Las Cruces, NM from 2000 to 2004. It consistently yielded higher (2 .7-36.5% higher) than the check in all the four tests, three of which showed significant differences. Compared with Acala 1517-99, it had slightly lower boll weight and lint percent but the differences were not significant. Therefore, its higher·yield could be due to increased boll numbers harvested on an individual plant or per area basis. NM 990813 had similar fiber quality traits to Acala 1517-99. On average, its fiber length was 31 .50 mm, slightly longer than that of Acala 1517-99 (30.48 mm). Its fiber strength tested by Stelometer was 226.87 kN m kg-1 , 4. 9% weaker than that for Acal a 1517-99 (238.53 kN m kg-1 ), but the difference was not significant in three of the four tests . Its micronaire readings were similar to Acala 1517-99 in different tests. | 1942265 | PI 678373 |
| 402 | PI 677330 | Arkot 0502ne | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0502ne is a nectariless (no nectaries on leaves or flowers) line. Other morphological traits of Arkot 0502ne are similar to 'DP 393' (check cultivar), except Arkot 0502ne has lower density oftrichomes (less pubescence) on leaves, stems, and the marginal of bracts. Over 20 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0502ne were equal to lint yields of DP 393, but were 7% higher at Judd Hill (site having silt loam soil in north Arkansas). Compared to DP 393, lint yields of Arkot 0502ne were produced with equal number of seed per area, weight of lint per seed (lint index), and seed size (seed index), but lower number of fibers per seed and fiber density (estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface). Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0502ne produced higher Q-score (70 vs. 51), fiber length (31 .6 vs. 30.2 mm), length uniformity index (86.3 vs. 85.2%), and fiber strength (352 vs. 332 kN m kg- 1; equalseed per area, plant height, open bolls percentage, lint percentage, lint index, seed index, micronaire; and lower fibers per seed (7 .5% lower), fiber density (6.4% fewer fibers per unit area of seed surface) and fiber elongation (5.8 vs. 6.5%). Arkot 0502ne is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp.malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. In field tests, it demonstrated tolerance to Verticillium wilt (caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb.). Its nectariless trait should provide Arkot 0502ne some resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)].Notes:1. Plants, from which seed were produced, were evaluated and determined to be free ofBt (BGl and BGII) and RR Flex transgenes.2. Delinted seed were inadvertently treated with Evergol Prime (0.32oz/cwt), Vortex FL (0.08oz/cwt), Allegiance FL (0.75oz/cwt), and Gaucho 600 (6 oz/cwt). Treated seed were washed thoroughly but some red dye is visible on micropylar ends of seed. | 1940826 | PI 677330 |
| 403 | PI 677331 | 'Arkot 0504ne' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0504ne is a nectariless (no nectaries on leaves or flowers) line. Other morphological traits of Arkot 0504ne are similar to 'DP 393' (check cultivar), except Arkot 0504ne is taller and has lower density of trichomes (less pubescence), but higher density of trichomes on bract margins. Over 20 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0504ne were equal to lint yields of DP 393. Compared to DP 393, lint yields of Arkot 0504ne were produced with lower weight of lint per seed (lint index), but equal number of seed per area, seed size (seed index), fibers per seed, and fiber density (estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface). Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0504ne produced taller plants (106 vs 100 cm), higher open boll percentage (67 vs. 59%), better Q-score (64 vs. 51 ), and longer fiber length (31.2 vs. 30.2 mm); equal lint percentage, seed per area, seed index, fibers per seed, and fiber density, length uniformity index, and fiber strength; and lower lint index (7.3 vs 7.5 g), micronaire (4.62 vs. 4.80) and fiber elongation (6.0 vs. 6.5%). Arkot 0504ne is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 190 I) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Its nectariless trait should provide Arkot 0504ne some resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvais)]. Response of Arkot 0504ne to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. Note: Plants, from which seed were produced, were evaluated and determined to be free of Bt (BG 1 and BGII) and RR Flex transgenes. | 1940827 | PI 677331 |
| 404 | PI 677332 | 'Arkot 0506ne' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 0506ne is a nectariless (no nectaries on leaves or flowers) line. Other morphological traits of Arkot 0506ne are similar to 'DP 393' (check cultivar), except Arkot 0506ne had less stem pubescence. Over 20 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0502ne were equal to lint yields of DP393, but were 9% higher at Keiser (Sharkey clay soil in north Arkansas). Compared to DP 393, lint yields of Arkot 0506ne were produced with higher seed per area, but lower weight of lint per seed (lint index), fibers per seed, and fiber density (estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface). Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0506ne produced higher seed per area (5.5% more), open boll percentage (64 vs. 59%), Q-score (64 vs. 51 ), and longer fiber length (31.5 vs. 30.2 mm); equal plant height, seed index, length uniformity index, fiber strength, and micronaire; and lower lint percentage (38.1 vs. 39.2%), lint index (7.3 vs 7.5 g), fibers per seed (7.6% lower), fiber density (8.6% fewer fibers per unit of seed surface), and fiber elongation (5.3 vs. 6.5%). Arkot 0506ne is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Its nectariless trait should provide Arkot 0506ne some resistance to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)]. Response of Arkot 0506ne to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. Note: Plants, from which seed were produced, were evaluated and determined to be free of Bt (BG I and BGII) and RR Flex transgenes. | 1940828 | PI 677332 |
| 405 | PI 677333 | 'Arkot 0517HG' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Arkot 05 l 7HG displays the high glanding (HG) trait which is expressed by gossypol glands found in the calyx lobes. Other morphological traits of Arkot 05 l 7HG are similar to 'DP 393' (check cultivar), except Arkot 05 I 7HG has higher density of trichomes on leaves (leaf pubescence), but lower density of trichomes on stems (stem pubescence) and on the margins of bracts. Over 20 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0517HG were equal to lint yields of DP393, but were 9% higher at Judd Hill and Marianna (silt loam soils in north Arkansas). Compared to DP 393, lint yields of Arkot 05 l 7HG were produced with fewer seed per area, but higher weight of lint per seed (lint index), seed size (seed index), fibers per seed, and fiber density (estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface). Compared to DP 393, Arkot 05 l 7HG produced higher lint index (8.3 vs. 7 .5 g), seed index (12.3 vs. 11.4 g), fibers per seed (14% more), fiber density (8.6% more), Q-score (67 vs 51), and fiber length (31.0 vs. 30.2 mm); equal plant height, open boll percentage, lint percentage, length uniformity index, fiber strength, and fiber elongation; and lower seed per area (6.6% fewer) and micronaire (4.49 vs. 4.80). Arkot 0517HG is resistance to all U.S. races ofXanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Its high glanding trait should provide Arkot 0517HG some resistance to boll feeding lepidopteria. In field tests, it demonstrated tolerance to VerticiJlium wilt (caused by Verticillium dahliae Kleb.). Response of Arkot 0517HG to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315.Notes:1. Plants, from which seed were produced, were evaluated and determined to be free of Bt (BG 1 and BGII) and RR Flex transgenes.2. Delinted seed were inadvertently treated with Evergol Prime (0.32ozlcwt), Vortex FL (0.08ozlcwt), Allegiance FL (0.75ozlcwt), and Gaucho 600 (6 ozlcwt). Treated seed were washed thoroughly but some red dye is visible on micropylar ends of seed. | 1940829 | PI 677333 |
| 406 | PI 677343 | 'PX06520-42-2-1' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | PX06520-42-2-1 is a high fiber quality line that in testing across 23 tests produced an average fiber length of 31.8 mm, a fiber strength of 353 kN m kg-1, a fiber length uniformity of 85.3%, and a short fiber content of 7.04%. This is in contrast to the commercial cultivar check, FM958, that had a fiber length of 29.6 mm, a fiber strength of 308 kN m kg-1, a fiber length uniformity of 83.8%, and a short fiber content of 7.62%. In the 23 tests, PX06520-42-2-1 had an average lint yield of 1,619 kg ha-1 and lint percent of 41.1%, in contrast to the high yielding commercial cultivar check, DP 393, that had a lint yield of 1,710 kg ha-1 and a lint percent of 42.1%. PX06520-42-2-1 has a large boll size (5.78 g) and high seed weight (11.44 g/100 seed). | 1940839 | PI 677343 |
| 407 | PI 677344 | 'PX06520-42-2-3' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | PX06520-42-2-3 is a high fiber quality line that in testing across 13 tests produced an average fiber length of 32.5 mm, a fiber strength of 366 kN m kg-1, a fiber length uniformity of 85.8%, and a short fiber content of 6.62%. This is in contrast to the commercial cultivar check, FM958, that had a fiber length of 29.5 mm, a fiber strength of 308 kN m kg-1, a fiber length uniformity of 83.5%, and a short fiber content of 7.67%. In the 13 tests, PX06520-42-2-3 had an average lint yield of 1,572 kg ha-1 and lint percent of 39.7%, in contrast to the high yielding commercial cultivar check, DP 393, that had a lint yield of 1,775 kg ha-1 and a lint percent of 41.6%. PX06520-42-2-3 has a large boll size (5.96 g) and high seed weight (12.37 g/100 seed). | 1940840 | PI 677344 |
| 408 | PI 677334 | 'CS-B05sh-RI-10' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The CS-B05sh-RIL-10 (078-8623) were selected from the fifty CS-B05shRILs for release based on their improved fiber quality traits especially superior elongation percentage of 7 .64. This line showed improved elongation percentage compared to the commercial lines of DP 393 and PHY 370 WR, which had elongation percentage of 6.86 and 6.25, respectively. These line had also higher elongation percentages than the recurrent parent TM-1, 3-79 and CS-B05sh, which were grown in the same locations and same year in a separate experiment. However, this line had poor agronomic qualities compared to the commercial lines. Fiber elongation (ability to stretch before breaking) is one of the important traits in determining yarn quality. This line carrying a small segment of chromosome five short arm from G. barbadense provide an effective way of Upland cotton improvement by targeted interspecific introgression of desirable traits from G. barbadense with reduced linkage drag effects. | 1940830 | PI 677334 |
| 409 | PI 677335 | 'CS-B05sh-RI-34' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The CS-B05sh-RIL-34 (078-8634) were selected from the fifty CS-805shRILs for release based on their improved fiber quality traits especially superior elongation percentage of 7.64. This line showed improved elongation percentage compared to the commercial lines of DP 393 and PHY 370 WR, which had elongation percentage of 6.86 and 6.25, respectively. These line had also higher elongation percentages than the recurrent parent TM-1, 3-79 and CS-805sh, which were grown in the same locations and same year in a separate experiment. However, this line had poor agronomic qualities compared to the commercial lines. Fiber elongation (ability to stretch before breaking) is one of the important traits in determining yarn quality. This line carrying a small segment of chromosome five short arm from G. barbadense provide an effective way of Upland cotton improvement by targeted interspecific introgression of desirable traits from G. barbadense with reduced linkage drag effects. | 1940831 | PI 677335 |
| 410 | PI 677336 | 'CS-B05sh-RI-66' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The CS-B05sh-RIL-66 (078-8656) were selected from the fifty CS-B05shRILs for release based on their improved fiber quality traits especially superior elongation percentage of 7.64. This line showed improved elongation percentage compared to the commercial lines of DP 393 and PHY 370 WR, which had elongation percentage of 6.86 and 6.25, respectively. These line had also higher elongation percentages than the recurrent parent TM-1, 3-79 and CS-B05sh, which were grown in the same locations and same year in a separate experiment. However, this line had poor agronomic qualities compared to the commercial lines. Fiber elongation (ability to stretch before breaking) is one of the important traits in determining yarn quality. This line carrying a small segment of chromosome five short arm from G. barbadense provide an effective way of Upland cotton improvement by targeted interspecific introgression of desirable traits from G. barbadense with reduced linkage drag effects. | 1940832 | PI 677336 |
| 411 | PI 677337 | 'CS-B05sh-RI-68' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The CS-B05sh-RIL-68 (078-8657) were selected from the fifty CS-B05shRILs for release based on their improved fiber quality traits especially superior elongation percentage of 7.64. This lineshowed improved elongation percentage compared to the commercial lines of DP 393 and PHY 370 WR, which had elongation percentage of 6.86 and 6.25, respectively. These line had also higher elongation percentages than the recurrent parent TM-1, 3-79 and CS-B05sh, which were grown in the same locations and same year in a separate experiment. However, this line had poor agronomic qualities compared to the commercial lines. Fiber elongation (ability to stretch before breaking) is one of the important traits in determining yarn quality. This line carrying a small segment of chromosome five short arm from G. barbadense provide an effective way of Upland cotton improvement by targeted interspecific introgression of desirable traits from G. barbadense with reduced linkage drag effects | 1940833 | PI 677337 |
| 412 | PI 677338 | 'CS-B05sh-RI-83' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The CS-B05sh-RIL-83 (078-8664) were selected from the fifty CS-B05shRILs for release based on their improved fiber quality traits especially superior elongation percentage of 7.64. This line showed improved elongation percentage compared to the commercial lines of DP 393 and PHY 370 WR, which had elongation percentage of 6.86 and 6.25, respectively. These line had also higher elongation percentages than the recurrent parent TM-1, 3-79 and CS-805sh, which were grown in the same locations and same year in a separate experiment. However, this line had poor agronomic qualities compared to the commercial lines. Fiber elongation (ability to stretch before breaking) is one of the important traits in determining yarn quality. This line carrying a small segment of chromosome five short arm from G. barbadense provide an effective way of Upland cotton improvement by targeted interspecific introgression of desirable traits from G. barbadense with reduced linkage drag effects. | 1940834 | PI 677338 |
| 413 | PI 677339 | 'CS-B05sh-RI-93' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The CS-B05sh-RIL-93 (078-8667) were selected from the fifty CS-BOSshRILs for release based on their improved fiber quality traits especially superior elongation percentage of 7.64. This line showed improved elongation percentage compared to the commercial lines of DP 393 and PHY 370 WR, which had elongation percentage of 6.86 and 6.25, respectively. These line had also higher elongation percentages than the recurrent parent TM-1, 3-79 and CS-805sh, which were grown in the same locations and same year in a separate experiment. However, this line had poor agronomic qualities compared to the commercial lines. Fiber elongation (ability to stretch before breaking) is one of the important traits in determining yarn quality. This line carrying a small segment of chromosome five short arm from G. barbadense provide an effective way of Upland cotton improvement by targeted interspecific introgression of desirable traits from G. barbadense with reduced linkage drag effects. | 1940835 | PI 677339 |
| 414 | PI 677340 | 'CS-B17-RIL-59' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The population of 50 lines of CS-B17RILs were grown in three locations for two years. The CS-B17RILs segregated only for the genes located on chromosome 17. This CS-B17 -RIL-59 (078-8691) line was selected for reduced micronaire, an improved fiber quality trait from 50 CS-8 17 Rl Ls based on the results of three years field trials at two different locations in diverse environments. It had also lower micronaire than the recurrent parent TM-1 , 3-79 and CS-B17, which were grown in the same locations and same year in a separate experiment. This unique line carrying a small segment of chromosome 17 from G. barbadense provides an effective way of Upland cotton improvement by targeted interspecific introgression of desirable traits especially micronaire from G. barbadense with reduced linakge drag effects. | 1940836 | PI 677340 |
| 415 | PI 677341 | 'CS-B17-RIL-60' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The population of 50 lines of CS-B17Rils were grown in three locations for two years. The CS-817RILs segregated only for the genes located on chromosome 17. This CS-B17-RIL-60 (078-8692) line was selected for reduced micronaire, an improved fiber quality trait from 50 CS-B17 Rlls based on the results of three years field trials at two different locations in diverse environments. It had also lower micronaire than the recurrent parent TM-1, 3-79 and CS-B17, which were grown in the same locations and same year in a separate experiment. This unique line carrying a small segment of chromosome 17 from G. barbadense provides an effective way of Upland cotton improvement by targeted interspecific introgression of desirable traits especially micronaire from G. barbadense with reduced linakge drag effects. | 1940837 | PI 677341 |
| 416 | PI 677342 | 'CS-B17-RIL-98' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The population of 50 lines of CS-B17Rils were grown in three locations for two years. The CS-B17Rils segregated only for the genes located on chromosome 17. This CS-B17-RIL-98 (078-8717) line was selected for reduced micronaire, an improved fiber quality trait from 50 CS-B17 Rlls based on the results of three years field trials at two different locations in diverse environments. It had also lower micron a ire than the recurrent parent TM-1, 3-79 and CS-B17, which were grown in the same locations and same year in a separate experiment. This unique line carrying a small segment of chromosome 17 from G. barbadense provides an effective way of Upland cotton improvement by targeted interspecific introgression of desirable traits especially micronaire from G. barbadense with reduced linakge drag effects. | 1940838 | PI 677342 |
| 417 | PI 676997 | 'ST 6182GLT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Georgia, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1939903 | PI 676997 |
| 418 | PI 676996 | 'ST 5115GLT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1939902 | PI 676996 |
| 419 | PI 676277 | 'FM2007GLT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2016 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1937586 | PI 676277 |
| 420 | PI 687865 | Arkot 0712 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2015 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0712 are similar to 'DP 393' (check cultivar) except Arkot 0712 has higher trichome density on leaves, bract margins and stems and is shorter in height. Over 16 replicated field tests at four sites in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0712 were equal to lint yields of DP 393 at each location. Over I 2 locations of the 2015 Regional Cotton Breeders Testing Network test, Arkot 0712 produced the 20th highest yield of 28 entries. Compared to DP 393, lint yields of Arkot 0712 were produced by higher rumber of seed per area; equal lint percentage and fibers per seed; and lower weight of lint per seed (lint index), seed size (seed index), but had lower weight of lint per seed (lint index), seed index and fiber density (estimated number of fibers per unit area of seed surface). Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0712 produced higher open boll percentage (61 vs. 57%), leaf pubescence (3.8 vs. 2.8), stem pubescence (5.5 vs. 5.1 ), marginal bract trichomes ( 42.1 vs 3 1.6), seed per area (8. 7% higher), Q-score ( 62 vs. 54 ), fiber length (30.5 vs. 29.7 mm), and elongation (7.4 vs. 6.8%),); equal lint percentage and fibers per seed; and lower plant height (4.0% shorter), lint index (7.0 vs. 7.5 g), seed index (10.6 vs. 11.2 g), fiber density (4.8% fewer), micronaire (4.48 vs. 4.85), uniformity index (84.2 vs. 85.2%) and fiber strength (294 vs 323 kN m kg-1). Arkot 0712 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas citri ssp. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Schaad et al. 2007, the causal agent of bacterial blight. In small plot tests, Arkot 0712 was more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than the susceptible check and equal to DP 393. Response of Arkot 0712 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. & Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. | 1964027 | PI 687865 |
| 421 | PI 667753 | 'ST 4946GLB2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2013 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1909651 | PI 667753 |
| 422 | PI 667658 | NC05-11 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | North Carolina, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2013 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | NC05-11 , the normal-leaf shape germplasm line being released , had comparable lint yields to DP 451 BG/RR and similar lint percent and fiber properties with an exception of fiber elongation (Table 4). NC05-11 had Significantly higher fiber strength than the commercial cultivar (35.1 g/tex vs 31 .1 g/tex) and showed slightly longer fibers(29. 7 mm vs 29.2 mm) (Table 4). NC05-11 had a rating of 0 which is the same as the resistant check, M315 (Glass et aI., 2011). NC05-11 has an intermediate plant type which averages 139 cm in height. It averages 4.6 nodes to the first fruiting branch or 24.4 cm; it has pubescence and extrafloral nectaries. It has normal leaf, stem, and calyx glanding and no petal spot. It averages 32.3 seeds per boll with a seed index of 10.2 g and 5.7 grams per boll and 4.1 locks per boll . | 1908724 | PI 667658 |
| 423 | PI 667659 | NC05AZ21 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | North Carolina, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2013 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | NC05AZ21 significantly out yielded FM 832 in 2009 and 2010. NC05AZ21 had higher lint percent (43.2 vs 41 .9), about the same micronaire (4.9 vs 5.0) and fiber length (28.4 mm vs 28.7mm), but significantly lower fiber strength (30.2 g/tex vs 36.6 g/tex). Although the fiber strength was lower for NC05AZ21 than FM 832, the strength was within the acceptable range for the Upland cotton market while its fiber fineness was found to be 171 mTex. Yarn testing showed that NC05AZ21 had a yarn tenacity of 13.96 cN/tex, and a count strength product of 726, Fusarium wilt score for NC05AZ21 was the same as the resistant check M315 (0) (Glass et aI., 2012). NC05AZ21 has an open boll type, intermediate growth/plant habit, intermediate foliage density, intermediate stalk strength, a nOi mal fruiting branch pattern, medium green foliage color, averages 23.7 cm to first fruiting branch, 4.6 nodes to first fruiting branch, 35.4 seeds/boll, 8.7 seed index, 4.3 locks/boll, medium density pubescence, extra-floral nectaries present, normal glanding of the leaf, stem, and calyx lobe, with no petal spot. | 1908725 | PI 667659 |
| 424 | PI 667662 | 'FM 2989GLB2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2013 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1908728 | PI 667662 |
| 425 | PI 667663 | 'FM 2484B2F' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2013 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1908729 | PI 667663 |
| 426 | PI 667553 | 9023n4t | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | NLGRP | | Not Available | 2013 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | The 9023n4t mutant is quite unique since it has a partially naked body with a small tuft attached to one end of the seed. The lint percent of the mutant is 39 % higher than the lint percent of n2n2 and 57 % higher than that of N1N1. The mutant had lower short fiber content, lower seed coat neps and better yarn quality than the wild type cultivar. This mutant gins faster and with less energy when compared to other conventional and transgenic cultivars. This mutant can be included in cotton breeding programs to exploit its positive traits without the fear of adverse effect from low lint percent exhibited by N1, n2 and n3. The 9023n4t seed is restricted-use material, currently subject to pending U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/197,296, having an expected expiration date of 8/2 4/ 2028 . Availability of 9023n4t seed is for non- commercial research and breeding use onl y on a non- exclusive bas i s during the restricted use period. For questions regarding other use o f this material please contact the Texas Tech University Office of Technology Commercialization at 806 - 742-4105 . | 1907492 | PI 667553 |
| 427 | PI 667563 | ST 5445LLB2 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | North Carolina, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2013 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1907503 | PI 667563 |
| 428 | PI 666042 | 'MD 25-26ne' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | The three reselections out of MD25 were developed from an evaluation program starting with 153 F5:6 progenies in 2009. Based on 2009 results in the initial population, 42 progeny were retested in 2010 and 17 retested in 2011. The average yield from five location-year evaluations in 2010 and 2011 show that the three new MD25 progenies average yield was 155 kg ha-1 , significantly higher (11.3%) than that of the MD25check. No difference in yield components and fiber traits was detected. The 2011 Regional High Quality (RHO) study with eight locations and 22 entries showed that MD25-26ne, MD25-27, and MD25-87's yield was competitive with the leading USA varieties and that the three overall fiber quality traits, yarn tenacity and QS1 and QS2 scores exceeded all entries in the RHQ and RBTN, respectively. | 1905193 | PI 666042 |
| 429 | PI 666043 | 'MD 25-27' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | The three reselections out of MD25 were developed from an evaluation program starting with 153 F5:6 progenies in 2009. Based on 2009 results in the initial population, 42 progeny were retested in 2010 and 17 retested in 2011. The average yield from five location-year evaluations in 2010 and 2011 show that the three new MD25 progenies average yield was 155 kg ha-1 , significantly higher (11.3%) than that of the MD25check. No difference in yield components and fiber traits was detected. The 2011 Regional High Quality (RHO) study with eight locations and 22 entries showed that MD25-26ne, MD25-27, and MD25-87's yield was competitive with the leading USA varieties and that the three overall fiber quality traits, yarn tenacity and QS1 and QS2 scores exceeded all entries in the RHQ and RBTN, respectively. | 1905194 | PI 666043 |
| 430 | PI 666044 | 'MD 25-87' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | | The three reselections out of MD25 were developed from an evaluation program starting with 153 F5:6 progenies in 2009. Based on 2009 results in the initial population, 42 progeny were retested in 2010 and 17 retested in 2011. The average yield from five location-year evaluations in 2010 and 2011 show that the three new MD25 progenies average yield was 155 kg ha-1 , significantly higher (11.3%) than that of the MD25check. No difference in yield components and fiber traits was detected. The 2011 Regional High Quality (RHO) study with eight locations and 22 entries showed that MD25-26ne, MD25-27, and MD25-87's yield was competitive with the leading USA varieties and that the three overall fiber quality traits, yarn tenacity and QS1 and QS2 scores exceeded all entries in the RHQ and RBTN, respectively. | 1905195 | PI 666044 |
| 431 | PI 666052 | '11R110B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1905197 | PI 666052 |
| 432 | PI 666053 | DP 1321 B2RF | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1905198 | PI 666053 |
| 433 | PI 666054 | '11R115B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1905204 | PI 666054 |
| 434 | PI 666055 | '11R124B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1905205 | PI 666055 |
| 435 | PI 666056 | '11R136B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1905206 | PI 666056 |
| 436 | PI 666057 | '11R140B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1905207 | PI 666057 |
| 437 | PI 666058 | '11R154B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | | | Historic | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1905208 | PI 666058 |
| 438 | PI 665949 | 'BRS 286' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | North Carolina, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1904853 | PI 665949 |
| 439 | PI 665950 | 'RMBUP-C4' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | When the euploid parental chromosome substitution lines (CS-B) were crossed with 5 diverse cultivars, 15 CS-B lines showed favorable additive effects that were greater than the corresponding chromosome or arm from TM-1 as follows: lint yield (2), boll weight (3), lint percentage (5), fiber strength (7), fiber length (7), micronaire (3), fiber uniformity (3) fiber elongation (5). After C3 (4 cycles) of random mating the mean agronomic and fiber properties of the S1 bulk are different than the mean of CS-B or mean of cultivar parents. Lint yield, fiber strength, micronaire, and elongation are closer to the mean of cultivar parents. Seed index is closer to mean of CS-B parents. Lint percentage and boll weight are near the mean of CS-B and cuHivar parents. Fiber UHM length is greater than the mean of either group of parents. Correlations among traits were changed and many correlations in C4 S1 are not Significantly different than zero. Agronomic and fiber properties and linkage relationships among alleles are different in this population. Data for the fifth cycle S1 are not available; however, we do not expect these mean values will vary much from the fourth cycle of random mating. One should be able to extract individual lines with agronomic and fiber properties superior to the mean of the segregating generation. Theoretically this population should have many introgressed alleles from G. barbadense. No reports in the literature of these CS-B lines being used in crosses with cultivars followed by the development of a random mated population were found. Thus, the random mated population, RMBU P-C4S 1 , is unique and should have great genetic and breeding value to the cotton industry. It is suggested that this introgressed population can be used for direct plant-to-row selections or that one boll or lock could be bulk harvested from each plant and planted and individual plant selections made in the S2 or later generations. | 1904855 | PI 665950 |
| 440 | PI 665928 | 'M713 Ren1' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | M713 Ren1 was developed by marker assisted selection. The reniform nematode resistance in GB-713 is significantly associated with three QTLs, Ren barb1 and Ren barb2 located on chromosome 21 and Ren barb3 located on chromosome 18 (Osman et al. 2011 Theor Appl Genect 122:271-280). M713 Ren1 is homozygous (SSR markers GH 132_201, BNL3279_106, BNL4011_152 and BNL569_131) for three QTLs (Ren barb1, Ren barb2 and Ren barb3). Reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, was verified in greenhouse test. Reniform nematode egg production was reduced approximately 90% compared to a susceptible cultivar. Over-all plant size is similar to standard cultivars. M713 Ren1 offers an excellent source of resistance to the reniform nematode with acceptable agronomic and fiber traits and by using marker assisted selection the development of reniform resistant cultivars should be expedited. | 1904833 | PI 665928 |
| 441 | PI 665929 | 'M713 Ren2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | | 1904834 | PI 665929 |
| 442 | PI 665930 | 'M713 Ren5' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | M713 Ren5 was developed by marker assisted selection. The reniform nematode resistance in GB-713 is significantly associated with three QTLs, Ren barb1 and Ren barb2 located on chromosome 21 and Ren barb3 located on chromosome 18 (Osman et al. 2011 Theor Appl Genect 122:271-280). M713 Ren5 is homozygous (SSR markers GH 132_201, BNL3279_106, and BNL4011_152 ) for two QTLs (Ren barb1, and Ren barb2). Reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, was verified in greenhouse test. Reniform nematode egg production was reduced approximately 90% compared to a susceptible cultivar. Over-all plant size is similar to standard cultivars. M713 Ren5 has green seed fuzz and offers an excellent source of resistance to the reniform nematode with acceptable agronomic and fiber traits and by using marker assisted selection the development of reniform resistant cultivars should be expedited. | 1904835 | PI 665930 |
| 443 | PI 665638 | 'MD 15 M4' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Mean, range, and sample variance statistical parameters were used to compare the mutants with their parents. Line charts from 150 random individual plants from the mutant and check variety indicated that there was a shift in means to the right for the mutant for fiber length and strength indicating an improvement of these traits in the mutant. The ranges of the mutant in fiber length, fiber strength, lint percent, and seed index were wider for the mutants. In 2010, significant differences in the sample variances were observed for fiber length, lint percent, micronaire, and seed index for the MD 15 M4 mutants and the check cultivar. Higher variances were accompanied by wider ranges for the mutant as compared to the check parent, MD 15. Overall, chemical mutagenesis appeared to have created new extremes at both the low and high ends for fiber length, fiber strength, lint percent, micronaire, and seed index. Cotton breeders and geneticists can exploit this new variability in their cotton improvement programs. This is relevant in light of the narrow germplasm base currently observed in cotton germ plasm which limits the success of breeding programs. | 1903421 | PI 665638 |
| 444 | PI 665226 | 'CA 4002' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Proposed release CA 4002, tested as experimental number 08-10-706, is a non-commercial, early-maturing, competitive yielding, Verticillium wilt resistant germplasm line of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) developed in the cotton breeding program at Texas Agrilife Research in Lubbock. CA 4002 is well adapted to the Texas High Plains region and has shorter stature, quicker fruiting habit and more storm tolerant bolls than most Verticillium wilt resistant germplasm sources. CA 4002 has excellent fiber properties, equivalent to available commercial cultivars with highest fiber quality grown on the Texas High Plains. | 1901743 | PI 665226 |
| 445 | PI 665058 | 'NN-3' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Pakistan | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | NN-3 was also tested in NCVT for two cotton-growing seasons (2008 and 2009). In 2008, SCY of NN-3 out yielded the standard CIM-496 for CIM-496 . However, in 2009, NN-3 out yielded the standard cultivar (CIM-496) by 73.54%. This substantial increase in yield has been attributed to the high tolerance of NN-3 to the CLCuD, also shown by NN-3 in NCVT as in this year the disease severely infected most cotton lines/varieties including the standard. Response to CLCuD was estimated for three consecutive cotton growing seasons at NIBGE cotton field. The elite genotype NN-3 has shown absolute resistance to the disease in 2005 versus 60%, 90% and 26% for CIM-496, NIAB-111 and NIBGE-2, respectively. In 2006, minimum infection of the disease was observed on NN-3 compared to the three standards. The same trend was noted during 2007 . NN-3 (140 cm) was taller than CIM-496 (120 cm), N-111 (115 cm) and NIBGE-2 (125 cm). Average number of monopodial branches of NN-3 were more than CIM-496 and NIAB-111 but similar to NIBGE-2. A total of 27.5 number of sympodial branches plant-1 were found on NN-3, however, minimum number of sympodial branches plant-1 (24) were observed on NIAB-111. Average number of bolls plant-1 were 46 for NN-3, 48 for CIM-496, 41 for NIAB-111 and 49 for NIBGE-2 while, maximum average boll weight were recorded for NIAB-111 followed by CIM-496, NN-3 and NIBGE-2. The ginning turn out percentage (GOT) of NN-3 was 39% which was marginally lower than CIM-496 and significantly higher than N-111 and NIBGE-2 (Table 5). However, staple length of NN-3 is relatively shorter than CIM-496 and NIAB-111 (Table 5). Micronaire value of NN-3 is similar to the value of CIM-496 while it is higher than NIAB-111 and NIBGE-2. Fiber bundle strength of all the genotypes is comparable, except NIBGE-2 which is the highest. We calculated non significant difference of uniformity index values among all the genotypes. | 1901545 | PI 665058 |
| 446 | PI 664925 | 'Arkot 0111' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0111 are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except Arkot 0111 was shorter and has higher trichome density on leaves and bract margins, and lower trichome density on stems. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0111 were 3.5% lower and equal to yields of DP 393 and `SG 105?, respectively. Lint yields of Arkot 0111 were produced with higher weight (lint index) and number of fibers per seed, and lower number of seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0111 produced lower seed per area and lint percentage; similar percentage of open bolls; and higher lint index, seed index, fibers per seed, quality score, fiber length and length uniformity. Arkot 0111 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0111 is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than susceptible a Frego bract check, is similar in resistance as SG 105, but is less resistant than DP 393. Fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] plants of Arkot 0111 was higher than the resistant check, M-315, but less than the susceptible check. | 1898816 | PI 664925 |
| 447 | PI 664926 | Arkot 0113 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0113 are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except Arkot 0113 has higher trichome density on leaves and bract margins. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0113 were 9.1% and 10.8% higher than yields of DP 393 and `SG 105?, respectively. Lint yields of Arkot 0113 were produced with higher weight (lint index) and number of fibers per seed, and higher number of seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0113 produced lower lint fraction, micronaire, and fiber strength; similar plant height, percentage of open bolls, quality score, and fiber elongation; and higher seed per area, lint index, seed index, fibers per seed, and fiber length. Arkot 0113 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0113 is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than susceptible a Frego bract check, is intermediate in resistance between DP 393 and SG 105. Fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] plants of Arkot 0113 was higher than the resistant check, M-315, but less than the susceptible check. | 1898831 | PI 664926 |
| 448 | PI 664927 | Arkot 0114 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0114 are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except Arkot 0114 has higher trichome density on leaves but lower trichome density on stems and marginal bract margins. Stem pubescence of Arkot 0114 is sparse. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0114 were 17.9% and 19.8% higher than yields of DP 393 and `SG 105?, respectively. Lint yields of Arkot 0114 were produced with higher weight (lint index) and number of fibers per seed, and equal number of seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0114 produced lower micronaire and fiber strength; similar percentage of open bolls, seed per area, lint fraction, quality score, fiber length and fiber elongation; and lint index, seed index, and fibers per seed. Arkot 0114 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0114 is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than susceptible a Frego bract check, is intermediate in resistance between DP 393 and SG 105. Response of Arkot 0114 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. | 1898832 | PI 664927 |
| 449 | PI 664928 | UA103 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | UA103 is an open-canopy (?okra-leaf?) cotton with other morphological traits similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except UA103 has lower trichome density on abaxial leaf surfaces, stems, and bract margins. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of UA222 were equal to DP393 and `SG105?. Yields of UA103 were produced with higher weight of lint per seed (lint index) and similar number of seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, UA103 produced lower seed per area, lower micronaire, and elongation; equal plant height, and lint percentage, and fiber uniformity index; and higher percentage of open bolls, lint index, seed index, fiber per seed, quality score and fiber length. UA103 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. UA222 is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than a susceptible Frego bract check, is similar in resistance as SG105, but is less resistant than DP393. UA222 is as resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] as DP393 and more resistant than SG105 and a susceptible Frego bract check. Response of UA103 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. | 1898833 | PI 664928 |
| 450 | PI 664929 | UA222 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | | 1898834 | PI 664929 |
| 451 | PI 664553 | TAM 94L-25-M24 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | TAM 94L-25-M24 was developed by treating the parent germplasm line, TAM 94L-25 (PI 631440), an upland cotton line with improved high volume instrument (HVI) upper half mean length (UHML), with the chemical mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). TAM 94L-25-M24 exhibits UHML and fiber bundle strength that exceeds that ofthe parent, TAM 94L-25, FM 832, and Phytogen 355. Other HVI fiber quality parameters were within acceptable ranges. TAM 94L-25-M24 should be useful in creating cultivars with improved fiber length and strength. | 1898008 | PI 664553 |
| 452 | PI 664554 | TAM 94L-25-M25 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | TAM 94L-25-M25 was developed by treating the parent germplasm line, TAM 94L-25 (PI 631440), an upland cotton line with improved high volume instrument (HVI) upper half mean length (UHML), with the chemical mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). TAM 94L-25-M25 exhibits UHML and fiber bundle strength that exceeds that of the parent, TAM 94L-25, FM 832, and Phytogen 355. Other HVI fiber quality parameters were within acceptable ranges. TAM 94L-25-M25 should be useful in creating cultivars with improved fiber length and strength. | 1898009 | PI 664554 |
| 453 | PI 664555 | TAM 94L-25-M30 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2012 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | TAM 94L-25-M30 was developed by treating the parent germplasm line, TAM 94L-25 (PI 631440), an upland cotton line with improved high volume instrument (HVI) upper half mean length (UHML), with the chemical mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). TAM 94L-25-M30 exhibits UHML and fiber bundle strength that exceeds that ofthe parent, TAM 94L-25, FM 832, and Phytogen 355. Other HVI fiber quality parameters were within acceptable ranges. TAM 94L-25-M30 should be useful in creating cultivars with improved fiber length and strength. | 1898010 | PI 664555 |
| 454 | PI 663908 | 'MT2468 Ren1' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | MT2468 Ren1 was evaluated for reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, resistance in greenhouse tests. It exhibited a moderate level of resistance compared to a susceptible cultivar. In agronomic evaluations it had lower lint percentage, smaller bolls, smaller seed, and lower yield compared to a cultivar check Deltapine 393. MT2468 Ren1 had shorter fibers, lower strength but higher elongation compared to Deltapine 393. This line initiates fruit about two later than standard cultivars: therefore, it?s later in reaching maturity. Over-all plant size is similar to standard cultivars. | 1890005 | PI 663908 |
| 455 | PI 663909 | MT2468 Ren2 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | MT2468 Ren2 was evaluated for reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, resistance in greenhouse tests. It exhibited a moderate level of resistance compared to a susceptible cultivar. In agronomic evaluations it had lower lint percentage, smaller bolls, and lower yield compared to a cultivar check Deltapine 393. MT2468 Ren2 had shorter fibers but higher fiber strength compared to Deltapine 393. This line initiates fruit about two later than standard cultivars; therefore, it?s later in reaching maturity. Over-all plant size is similar to standard cultivars. | 1890007 | PI 663909 |
| 456 | PI 663910 | MT2468 Ren3 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | MT2468 Ren3 was evaluated for reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, resistance in greenhouse tests. It exhibited a moderate level of resistance compared to a susceptible cultivar. In agronomic evaluations it had smaller bolls, smaller seed and lower yield compared to a cultivar check Deltapine 393. MT2468 Ren3 had shorter fibers, a lower fiber uniformity, weaker fibers compared to Deltapine 393. This line initiates fruit about two later than standard cultivars; therefore, it?s later in reaching maturity. Over-all plant size is similar to standard cultivars. | 1890010 | PI 663910 |
| 457 | PI 663892 | '09R784B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888710 | PI 663892 |
| 458 | PI 663893 | '10R022R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888711 | PI 663893 |
| 459 | PI 663894 | 10R018R2 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888713 | PI 663894 |
| 460 | PI 663895 | '10R019R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888715 | PI 663895 |
| 461 | PI 663896 | '10R014R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888716 | PI 663896 |
| 462 | PI 663897 | '09R637R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888717 | PI 663897 |
| 463 | PI 663898 | '11R159B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888718 | PI 663898 |
| 464 | PI 663899 | '10R047B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888719 | PI 663899 |
| 465 | PI 663900 | '10R008B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888720 | PI 663900 |
| 466 | PI 663901 | '10R050B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888721 | PI 663901 |
| 467 | PI 663902 | '10R040B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888722 | PI 663902 |
| 468 | PI 663903 | '10R015B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888723 | PI 663903 |
| 469 | PI 663904 | '10R051B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888724 | PI 663904 |
| 470 | PI 663905 | '10R020B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888725 | PI 663905 |
| 471 | PI 663906 | '10R013B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Missouri, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1888726 | PI 663906 |
| 472 | PI 660980 | SA 3825 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Georgia, United States | COT | | | 2011 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | GA 120R1B3 is a non-commercial breeding line of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) jointly released by the USDA Agricultural Research Service and the Agricultural Experiment Station at the University of Georgia in 2010. GA 120R1B3 was created using a single-seed decent method in a backcrossing program to combine the resistance to Meloidogyne incognita (the southern root-knot nematode) from M-120 RNR with the high yielding, high fiber quality characteristics of PD 94042. Two greenhouse evaluations of nematode reproduction were conducted in 2007. Field evaluations for yield and fiber quality were conducted from 2007 to 2009 and included three tests in fields infested with M. incognita and four tests in fields without M. incognita. GA 120R1B3 has a high level of resistance to M. incognita which is equivalent to the resistance found in M-120 RNR, but GA120R1B3 has significantly better lint percentage and fiber quality than M-120 RNR. GA 120R1B3 has yield and fiber quality generally comparable to commercial cultivars at the time of testing, and a lint percentage that was often greater than the commercial standards. GA 120R1B3 had good yield and excellent fiber quality in both the presence and absence of M. incognita. | 1864454 | PI 660980 |
| 473 | PI 660502 | Arkot 0008 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0008 are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except Arkot 0008 was shorter and has higher trichome density on leaves, and bract margins and lower trichome density on stems. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0008 were comparable to yields of `SG 105? and DP 393 with slightly better adaptation to more southern locations. Yields of Arkot 0008 were produced with lower weight (lint index) and number of fibers per seed, and higher seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0008 produced lower lint index, seed index, lint percentage, fibers per seed, uniformity index, strength and elongation; similar quality score and micronaire; and highe seed per area and open boll percentage. Arkot 0008 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0008 is as susceptible as SG 105 and DP 393 to root-knot nematode {Meloidogyne incognita [(Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949]}. Arkot 0008 is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than susceptible a Frego bract check, is similar in resistance as SG 105, but is less resistant than DP 393. Response of Arkot 0008 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. | 1855205 | PI 660502 |
| 474 | PI 660503 | Arkot 0009 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0009 are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except Arkot 0009 has lower trichome density on leaves, stems and bract margins. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0009 were comparable to yields of `SG 105? and DP 393 with better adaptation to more southern locations. Yields of Arkot 0009 were produced with similar weight (lint index) and number of fibers per seed, and similar seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0009 produced micronaire, fiber strength and elongation; similar fibers per seed, seed per area, lint index, uniformity index, and percentage open bolls; and higher seed index, quality score and fiber length. Arkot 0009 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0009 is as susceptible as SG 105 and DP 393 to root-knot nematode {Meloidogyne incognita [(Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949]}. Arkot 0009 is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than susceptible a Frego bract check, is similar in resistance as SG 105, but is less resistant than DP 393. | 1855206 | PI 660503 |
| 475 | PI 660504 | Arkot 0012 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0012 are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except Arkot 0012 was taller and has higher trichome density on leaves, but lower trichome density on stems and bract margins. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0012 were 14% higher than lint yields of `SG 105? and DP 393 with slightly better adaptation to more southern locations. Yields of Arkot 0012 were produced with higher weight (lint index) of fibers per seed, and similar seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0012 produced lower fiber elongation; similar open boll percentage, seed per area, fibers per seed, lint percentage, quality score, micronaire, length, uniformity index, and strength; and higher lint index, and seed index. Arkot 0012 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0012 is as susceptible as SG 105 and DP 393 to root-knot nematode {Meloidogyne incognita [(Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949]}. Arkot 0012 is similar to DP 393 in resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] and more resistant than susceptible a Frego bract check and SG 105. Response of Arkot 0012 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. | 1855211 | PI 660504 |
| 476 | PI 660505 | Arkot 0015a | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0015a are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except Arkot 0015a has lower trichome density on bract margins and stems. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0015a were comparable to yields of `SG 105? and DP 393 with slightly better adaptation to more southern locations. Yields of Arkot 0015a were produced with higher fibers per seed, but similar seed per area and weight of fibers per seed (lint index) as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0015a produced lower micronaire, fiber strength, and length uniformity index; similar seed index, lint index, lint percentage, plant height, and percentage of open bolls; and higher number of fibers per seed, quality score, fiber length, and elongation. Arkot 0015a is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0015a is as susceptible as SG 105 and DP 393 to root-knot nematode {Meloidogyne incognita [(Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949]}. Arkot 0015a is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than susceptible a Frego bract check, is similar in resistance as SG 105, but is less resistant than DP 393. Response of Arkot 0015a to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. | 1855217 | PI 660505 |
| 477 | PI 660506 | Arkot 0015b | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0015b are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except Arkot 0015a has lower trichome density on leaves, stems, and bract margins. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0015b were comparable to yields of `SG 105? and DP 393 with slightly better adaptation to more southern locations. Yields of Arkot 0015b were produced with higher weight (lint index) and number of fibers per seed, but similar seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0015b produced lower micronaire, fiber strength, and length uniformity index; similar seed per area, lint percentage, plant height, percentage of open bolls, quality score, and fiber length; and higher number of fibers per seed, seed index, lint index, and elongation. Arkot 0015b is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0015b is as susceptible as SG 105 and DP 393 to root-knot nematode {Meloidogyne incognita [(Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949]}. Arkot 0015b is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than susceptible a Frego bract check, is similar in resistance as SG 105, but is less resistant than DP 393. Response of Arkot 0015b to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. | 1855229 | PI 660506 |
| 478 | PI 660507 | Arkot 0016 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of Arkot 0016 are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except Arkot 0015a has lower trichome density on stems, and bract margins. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of Arkot 0016 were comparable to yields of `SG 105? and DP 393 with slightly better adaptation to more southern locations. Yields of Arkot 0016 were produced with higher weight (lint index) and number of fibers per seed, but similar seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, Arkot 0016 produced lower micronaire, and fiber strength; similar seed per area, lint percentage, plant height, percentage of open bolls, and length uniformity index; and higher number of fibers per seed, seed index, lint index, quality score, length, and elongation. Arkot 0016 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. Arkot 0016 is as susceptible as SG 105 and DP 393 to root-knot nematode {Meloidogyne incognita [(Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949]}. Arkot 0016 is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than susceptible a Frego bract check, is similar in resistance as SG 105, but is less resistant than DP 393. Response of Arkot 0016 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. | 1855240 | PI 660507 |
| 479 | PI 660508 | UA48 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Arkansas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Morphological traits of UA48 are similar to `DP 393? (check cultivar), except UA48 has lower trichome density on stems and bract margins. Over 16 replicated field tests in Arkansas, lint yields of UA 48 were comparable to yields of `SG 105? and DP 393 with slightly better adaptation to more northern locations. Yields of UA48 were produced with similar weight of lint per seed (lint index) and seed per area as DP 393. Compared to DP 393, UA48 produced lower lint percentage, fibers per seed, and plant height; and higher percentage of open bolls, quality score, micronaire, fiber length, length uniformity, and strength. UA48 possesses a rare combination of very early maturation, highly competitive yields, and exceptional fiber quality. UA48 is resistance to all U.S. races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum (Smith) Dye, the causal agent of bacterial blight. UA48 is as susceptible as SG 105 and DP 393 to root-knot nematode {Meloidogyne incognita [(Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949]}. UA48 is more resistant to tarnished plant bug [Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois)] than susceptible a Frego bract check, is similar in resistance as SG 105, but is less resistant than DP 393. Response of UA48 to fusarium wilt [caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. F. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. and Hans.] was equal to the resistant check, M-315. | 1855256 | PI 660508 |
| 480 | PI 660292 | 'FM 9170B2F' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1854085 | PI 660292 |
| 481 | PI 660293 | 'FM 9103GT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1854086 | PI 660293 |
| 482 | PI 660294 | 'FM 9101GT' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1854087 | PI 660294 |
| 483 | PI 660295 | 'FM 1845LLB2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | | | Historic | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1854088 | PI 660295 |
| 484 | PI 660296 | 'FM 9160B2F' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | | 1854089 | PI 660296 |
| 485 | PI 659699 | TAM B139-17 ELS | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Exhibits high volume instrument (HVI) upper half mean length (UHML) greater than the minimum for extra long staple (ELS) pima combined with fiber bundle strength (Str) greater than Fibermax 832 (PI 603955) and other non-acala upland cultivars. Exhibits greater lint percent than previously released ELS lines yet well below current cultivars. Is approximately 10 later maturing than commercial cultivars in central and south Texas. Is morphologically similar to current cultivars, including pubescent leaves and stems, and has excellent shatter resistance. | 1846639 | PI 659699 |
| 486 | PI 659666 | '08W303B2R2' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Iowa, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1843974 | PI 659666 |
| 487 | PI 658596 | SA 3796 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | | 2010 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Replicated testing of 7 progeny lines was conducted in a total of 13 location-year environments at Florence, SC, Blackville, SC, Tifton, GA, Plains, GA, Alexandria, LA, Maricopa, AZ and Shafter, CA in 2007 and 2008. CRB 252 produced a UHM fiber length (31.3 mm) that was superior to the fiber lengths of the high fiber quality check cultivars PHY 72 (30.3 mm) and FM 958 (29.3 mm), as well as the agronomic and yield performance checks DP 393 (29.0 mm) and SG 747 (28.6 mm). Fiber length uniformity of CRB 252 (84.1%) did not differ from that of the check cultivars, with the exception of FM 958 (83.3%), which was inferior to CRB 252. Fiber strength of CRB 252 (318 kN m kg-1) was superior to that of DP 393, SG 747, and FM 958. High fiber quality check PHY 72 produced a fiber strength that was slightly superior to CRB 252. CRB 252 produced a fiber elongation (5.4%) that was lower than all the check cultivars. Lower fiber elongation values may indicate a "brittle" fiber that is more prone to damage. Short fiber content (often resulting from fiber damage) of CRB 252 (7.0%) did not differ from that of PHY 72 or DP 393 and was superior (lower) than that of SG 747 and FM 958. Micronaire of CRB 252 (4.3) was lower than that of all the check cultivars. Across locations, the yield of CRB 252 (1420 Kg ha-1) was lower than that of the agronomic and yield performance checks DP 393 (1632 Kg ha-1) and SG 747 (1593 Kg ha-1 28.6 mm), equivalent to the yield of FM 958 (1435 Kg ha-1) and higher than that of the fiber quality check PHY 72 (1336 Kg ha-1). At 38.5%, the lint percent of CRB 252 is lower than the check cultivars. Did not differ from the check cultivars in boll weight. Overall, is an excellent source of fiber quality and acceptable yield potential that appears to be stable across production environments. | 1830352 | PI 658596 |
| 488 | PI 654370 | 'FM 9180B2F' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2008 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1780975 | PI 654370 |
| 489 | PI 654371 | 'FM 9150F' | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2008 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Genetically Engineered | | 1780976 | PI 654371 |
| 490 | PI 654359 | SA 3760 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2008 | DEVELOPED | 2008 | | | | | Breeding material | Has High Volume Instrument (HVI) UHM fiber length greater than 32.0 mm, which is the minimum UHM to be classified as upland extra long staple upland, and exceeded the minimum UHM length of 34.8 mm for pima (G. barbadense) in some comparisons. Fiber bundle strength is equal to or higher than Fibermax 832. Is later maturing than current upland cotton cultivars recommended for production in central and south Texas. Is morphologically similar, with smooth leaves and stems, and excellent shatter resistance. Combines Extra Long Staple fiber length with excellent fiber bundle strength in an upland phenotype. | 1780858 | PI 654359 |
| 491 | PI 654360 | SA 3761 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | | 2008 | DEVELOPED | 2008 | | | | | Breeding material | Has High Volume Instrument (HVI) UHM fiber length greater than 32.0 mm, which is the minimum UHM to be classified as upland extra long staple upland, and exceeded the minimum UHM length of 34.8 mm for pima (G. barbadense) in some comparisons. Fiber bundle strength is equal to or higher than Fibermax 832. Later maturing than current upland cotton cultivars recommended for production in central and south Texas. Is morphologically similar, with smooth leaves and stems, and excellent shatter resistance. Combines Extra Long Staple fiber length with excellent fiber bundle strength in an upland phenotype. | 1780859 | PI 654360 |
| 492 | PI 654361 | SA 3762 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | | 2008 | DEVELOPED | 2008 | | | | | Breeding material | Has High Volume Instrument (HVI) UHM fiber length greater than 32.0 mm, which is the minimum UHM to be classified as upland extra long staple upland, and exceeded the minimum UHM length of 34.8 mm for pima (G. barbadense) in some comparisons. Fiber bundle strength is equal to or higher than Fibermax 832. Later maturing than current upland cotton cultivars recommended for production in central and south Texas. Morphologically similar, having pubescent leaves and stems, and exellent shatter resistance. Combines Extra Long Staple fiber length with excellent fiber bundle strength in an upland phenotype. | 1780860 | PI 654361 |
| 493 | PI 654362 | SA 3763 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | | 2008 | DEVELOPED | 2008 | | | | | Breeding material | Has High Volume Instrument (HVI) UHM fiber length greater than 32.0 mm, which is the minimm UHM to be classified as upland extra long staple upland, and exceeded the minimum UHM length of 34.8 mm for pima (G. barbadense) in some comparisons. Fiber bundle strength is equal to or higher than Fibermax 832. Later maturing than current upland cotton cultivars recommended for production in central and south Texas. Is morphologically similar, having pubescent leaves and stems, and excellent shatter resistance. Combines Extra Long Staple fiber length with excellent fiber bundle strength in an upland phenotype. | 1780861 | PI 654362 |
| 494 | PI 654363 | SA 3764 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | | 2008 | DEVELOPED | 2008 | | | | | Breeding material | Has High Volume Instrument (HVI) UHM fiber length greater than 32.0 mm, which is the minimum UHM to be classified as upland extra long staple upland, and exceeded the minimum UHM length of 32.8 mm for pima (G. barbadense) in some comparisons. Fiber bundle strength is equal to or higher than Fibermax 832. Later maturing than current upland cotton cultivars recommended for production in central and south Texas. Morphologically similar, having pubescent leaves and stems, and excellent shatter resistance. Combines Extra Long Staple fiber length with excellent fiber bundle strength in an upland phenotype. | 1780862 | PI 654363 |
| 495 | PI 654364 | SA 3765 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | | 2008 | DEVELOPED | 2008 | | | | | Breeding material | Has High Volume Instrument (HVI) UHM fiber length greater than 32.0 mm, which is the minimum UHM to be classified as upland extra long staple upland, and exceeded the minimum UHM length of 34.8 mm for pima (G. barbadense) in some comparisons. Fiber bundle strength is equal to or higher than Fibermax 832. Later maturing than current upland cotton cultivars recommended for production in central and south Texas. Morphologically similar, having pubescent leaves and stems, and excellent shatter resistance. Combines Extra Long Staple fiber length with excellent fiber bundle strength in an upland phenotype. | 1780863 | PI 654364 |
| 496 | PI 654365 | SA 3766 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | | 2008 | DEVELOPED | 2008 | | | | | Breeding material | Has High Volume Instrument (HVI) UHM fiber length greater than 32.0 mm, which is the minimum UHM to be classified as upland extra long staple upland. Fiber bundle strength is equal to or higher than Fibermax 832. Later maturing than current upland cotton cultivars recommended for production in central and south Texas. Morphologically similar, having pubescent leaves and stems, and excellent shatter resistance. Combines Extra Long Staple fiber length with excellent fiber bundle strength in an upland phenoptype. | 1780864 | PI 654365 |
| 497 | PI 654366 | SA 3767 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Texas, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2008 | DEVELOPED | 2008 | | | | | Breeding material | Has High Volume Instrument (HVI) UHM fiber length greater than 32.0 mm, which is the minimum UHM to be classified as upland extra long staple upland, and exceeded the minimum UHM length of 32.8 mm for pima (G. barbadense) in some comparisons. Fiber bundle strength is equal to or higher than Fibermax 832. Later maturing than current upland cotton cultivars recommended for production in central and south Texas. Morphologically similar, having pubescent leaves and stems, and excellent shatter resistance. Combines Extra Long Staple fiber length with excellent fiber bundle strength in an upland phenotype. | 1780865 | PI 654366 |
| 498 | PI 654087 | SP156 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2008 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Progeny evaluation and selection was conducted at two locations with two replicates each at Stoneville, MS in 2005. Selected progeny lines were further tested in replicated trials at Stoneville, MS in 2006 and 2007. Averaged over locations and years, lint yields of SP179 and SP225 were 1221 and 1348 kg ha-1, respectively, similar or equivalent to high yielding check cultivar DP555BR (1359 kg ha-1). Lint percent of SP225 was 39.5%. Bundle strength of SP179 and SP225 was 233 kNmkg-1 and 228 kNmkg-1, respectively, superior or equivalent to that of high fiber quality check FM960B2R (227 kNmkg-1). Elongation of SP179 and SP225 was 6.6% and 6.5%, respectively, superior to that of FM960B2R (5.2%). Short fiber content of these two lines (5.0%) was also superior to FM960B2R (5.4%). Fineness of SP179 was 170 mtex, similar to FM960B2R (168 mtex). However, maturity ratio of SP179 was 0.95 comparing to 0.91 for FM960B2R. Average yield of SP156, SP177, and SP205 was 1080 kg ha-1, higher than the average of the check cultivars FM960B2R and PHY72 (965 kg ha-1). Fiber properties of these lines were similar to the averages of FM960B2R and PHY72, 6.3% of elongation, 241 kNmkg-1 of bundle strength, 14.4 mm of 50% span length, 29.9 mm 2.5% span length, and 4.9% of short fiber content. Plant height of these five SP lines ranged from 145 to 153 cm at maturity. Leaf area of the 4th fully extended leaf from top of plant ranged from 125 to 148 cm2. Leaf length ranged from 12.0 to 13.8 cm. Nodes of the first fruiting branch ranged from 6.5 to 8.3. Days from planting to the first boll of the five SP lines averaged 126. Pair-wise genetic distances were estimated using molecular markers (SSR) between the five SP lines and five check cultivars, DP555BR, FM960B2R, PHY72, PM2167R, and ST4892BR. All SP lines except SP225 had less than 0.52 similarity coefficient with the check cultivars. SP225 had 0.70 similarity with DP555BR. | 1779052 | PI 654087 |
| 499 | PI 654088 | SP177 | Gossypium hirsutum L. | Mississippi, United States | COT | | Not Available | 2008 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Breeding material | Progeny evaluation and selection was conducted at two locations with two replicates each at Stoneville, MS in 2005. Selected progeny lines were further tested in replicated trials at Stoneville, MS in 2006 and 2007. Averaged over locations and years, lint yields of SP179 and SP225 were 1221 and 1348 kg ha-1, respectively, similar or equivalent to high yielding check cultivar DP555BR (1359 kg ha-1). Lint percent of SP225 was 39.5%. Bundle strength of SP179 and SP225 was 233 kNmkg-1 and 228 kNmkg-1, respectively, superior or equivalent to that of high fiber quality check FM960B2R (227 kNmkg-1). Elongation of SP179 and SP225 was 6.6% and 6.5%, respectively, superior to that of FM960B2R (5.2%). Short fiber content of these two lines (5.0%) was also superior to FM960B2R (5.4%). Fineness of SP179 was 170 mtex, similar to FM960B2R (168 mtex). However, maturity ratio of SP179 was 0.95 comparing to 0.91 for FM960B2R. Average yield of SP156, SP177, and SP205 was 1080 kg ha-1, higher than the average of the check cultivars FM960B2R and PHY72 (965 kg ha-1). Fiber properties of these lines were similar to the averages of FM960B2R and PHY72, 6.3% of elongation, 241 kNmkg-1 of bundle strength, 14.4 mm of 50% span length, 29.9 mm 2.5% span length, and 4.9% of short fiber content. Plant height of these five SP lines ranged from 145 to 153 cm at maturity. Leaf area of the 4th fully extended leaf from top of plant ranged from 125 to 148 cm2. Leaf length ranged from 12.0 to 13.8 cm. Nodes of the first fruiting branch ranged from 6.5 to 8.3. Days from planting to the first boll of the five SP lines averaged 126. Pair-wise genetic distances were estimated using molecular markers (SSR) between the five SP lines and five check cultivars, DP555BR, FM960B2R, PHY72, PM2167R, and ST4892BR. All SP lines except SP225 had less than 0.52 similarity coefficient with the check cultivars. SP225 had 0.70 similarity with DP555BR. | 1779053 | PI 654088 |