Select the tab for the type of search. Each tab has everything you need to do to perform that type of search.

(Results of more than 500 will not return images.)

This search will show only accessions that have material that may be requested, including those not seasonally available.
You may list accessions with separators (commas or semicolons, as shown below) or by entering them on separate lines, such as
PI 651794
PI 651649
PI 651650
When searching a range of accessions, use the Advanced Search tab with the Accession Identifier Range criterion.

The more information you provide, the better the search will be.


Scientific name (any part, no hybrid symbols)

Plant name


Genebank
Country of Origin


Other search criteria:



With genomic data With NCBI link With images Only non-Genetically Engineered

If your results aren't what you expected, try using the Advanced Search tab and filling in more information.
Your query included: All accessions

View Observation Data

Selected item(s) below:


ACCESSIONPLANT NAMETAXONOMYORIGINGENEBANKIMAGEAVAILABILITYRECEIVEDSOURCE TYPESOURCE DATECOLLECTION SITECOORDINATESELEVATIONHABITATIMPROVEMENT LEVELNARRATIVE
0PI 658374'Bahman Persian nucellar #2'Citrus ×lumia Risso Khūzestān, IranRIV1998DONATED10/1998CultivarThis accession was received as seed collected by the donor during a trip to Iran. He stated that the tree from which the seeds were collected represented a typical type of Iranian sweet lime that was not represented in the collection at that time. (RR Krueger, 08/2007)1735294PI 658374
1PI 658366'BAHMAN PERSIAN NUCELLAR'Citrus ×limon (L.) Osbeck Khūzestān, IranRIV1995DONATED08/1995CultivarThis accession was received as seed collected by the donor during a trip to Iran. He stated that the tree from which the seeds were collected represented a typical type of Iranian sweet lemon that was not represented in the collection at that time. He described it as being an early variety of sweet lemon (harvested in August) and sweeter than the accession of 'Iran' lemon existing at that time (PI 539295/RCRC 3162). The fruit was described as being medium-sized (smaller than the Iraqi lemon), with yellow-green skin, a medium-thick rind, no nipple, and white-fleshed.

Based upon ISSR, a nucellar seedling was selected. Trees were propagated from this seedling and planted in the field for observation. The fruit matched the description and it was decided to officially accession this variety. (RRK, 08/2007)

1735219PI 658366
2PI 539170'Goutoucheng'Citrus ×aurantium L. Sichuan Sheng, China Historic1985DONATED03/01/1985RootstockSeed received and grown by RK Soost. This is listed as "tristeza and salt tolerant" on original USDA spec list. (EM Nauer, 1988)

No fruit yet. (EM Nauer, 11/1989)

The origins of this accession are somewhat unclear. There is a series of Chinese materials that were received as both budwood through the Plant Germplasm Quarantine Office in Beltsville and subsequently CCPP and as seed directly to Bob Soost (and possibly people in Florida). However, there is no current active budwood-derived accession of 'Goutoucheng'. RRUT 149 is an accession derived from budwood during this same exchange but it is currently under quarantine. The current active accession of 'Goutoucheng' is PI 539173. PI 539173 is pathogen tested and available both through the NCGRCD and with a VI number through the CCPP. There is another inactive accessions of 'Goutoucheng': RRUT 80. PI 539170, PI 539173, and RRUT 80 all appeared identical via ISSR markers (Krueger and Roose, 2003), so there is no need for more than one active accession. PI 539170 was therefore inactivated. RRUT 149 appeared to be quite different via the markers and also morphologically. It is possible that it was misidentified at some point. (RR Krueger, 05/24/2011)

1434106PI 539170
3RRUT 388'Gainesville 71'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United StatesRIV2008COLLECTED1963RootstockReintroduction of RRUT 203, which perished in the Great Greenhouse Meltdown of 2007. Budwood source of RSD 1998017, which appeared to be monoembryonic based upon iSSR markers (Krueger and Roose, 2003). This is consistent with the observation of Herb Barrett, as recorded in the WFF Accession Book, that it is "same as gainesville 70 except seems to produce more hybrids." (RR Krueger, 07/01/2008)1779744RRUT 388
4RRUT 203'Gainesville 71'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United States Historic2002COLLECTED1963RootstockBudwood source of RSD 1998017, which appeared to be monoembryonic based upon iSSR markers (Krueger and Roose, 2003). (RRK, 2006-06)

This accession perished in the Great Greenhouse Meltdown of 2007. (RRK, 07/08/2007)

Reintroduced as RRUT 388, (RR Krueger, 07/01/2008)

1698298RRUT 203
5RRUT 119'Corniculata (OPS)'Citrus ×aurantium L. RIV2000DONATED03/2000CultivarThis is one of several historical citrus types accessed at historic botanic gardens in Europe and generously donated. According to the donor, and in accordance with its name and older literature, this variety has horned fruits (ie, is "corniculated"). Since only one tree was established from the received seeds, it needs to be planted in the field and observed in order to verify this. (RR Krueger, 05/2004)1841621RRUT 119
6RCRC 4138'Swingle nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998035. Of 100 seeds of RSD 199034 received, 37 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998035SG008 = RRUT 137) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 137 (later renumbered as RCRC 4138 for inclusion in the Citrus Variety Collection) (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998035 was then inactivated. This accession is in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847628RCRC 4138
7RRUT 114'Christian'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998012. Of 29 seeds of RSD 1998012, 21 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998012SG006 = RRUT 114) was selected and retained as RRUT 114 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998012 was then inactivated. This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). Note that this was apparently received in Florida as a 2N and the tetraploidy induced sometime thereafter (conjectured from WFF Accession Book). There is also a 2N 'Christiansen' at WFF, which was received with with the same seedlot number of C63-26, supporting this supposition. The 2N version is apparently the same as PI 539771. (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)

This accession was lost as all props were dead as of 07-07-2023 (RR Krueger, 2023-07-07)

1847583RRUT 114
8RRUT 115'Davis A nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998013. Of 50 seeds of RSD 1998013 received, 31 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998013SG001= RRUT 115) was selected using ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 115. RSD 1998013 was then inactivated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847584RRUT 115
9RRUT 116'English large nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED1945RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998014. Of seeds of RSD received, germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998014SG004 = RRUT 116) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 116 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998014 was then inactivated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). Note that the origin of C63-28 at USDCS, Indio, is not shown in the Indio Accession Book; it might be C56-13 'English' or it might be another line. (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847585RRUT 116
10RRUT 117'English small nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED1945RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998015. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998015 received, 44 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998015SG014 = RRUT 117) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 117 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998015 was then inactivated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). 'English small' "originated from under very small Valencia, English grove, Tulare County." (Information from Indio Accession Book). The Indio Accession Book also has this note from Ted Frolich (dated 05/10/1958: "...we do not know whether or not ... the English small [is] genetically dwarf or whether the fdwarfing is caused by a virus. None of these materials has shown any exocortis. We have had most of them 10 yrs or longer but the English small for only about 5 years." (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847586RRUT 117
11RRUT 118'Gainesville 70 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED1963RootstockNucellar selection of RSD 1998016. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998016, 32 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD 1998016SG012 = RRUT 118) was selected using ISSR markers (Krueger and Roose, 2003) and RSD 1998016 was inacitvated. There was some ambiguity as to which of the groups of Fang et al (1997) this accession belongs to. (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010)1847587RRUT 118
12RRUT 120'Gotha Road #1 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED1990RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998018. Of 100 seeds received, 42 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998018SG008 = RRUT 120) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 120 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998018 was inactivated. This accession fell into the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). The ISSR markers indicated a high proportion (~ 70 %) of zygotic seedlings. (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010) 1847588RRUT 120
13RRUT 121'Gotha Road #2 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED1977RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998019. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998019 received, 41 germinated. A nucellar seedling was selected with ISSR markers (RSD1998019SG002 = RRUT 121) and retained as RRUT 121. RSD was inactivated. This accession belongs to the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). A high proportion of zygotic seedlings (30 %) was indicated with ISSR. (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010) 1847589RRUT 121
14RRUT 122'Kryder 25-4 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED1945RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998020. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998020 received, 23 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998020SG013 = RRUT 122) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 122 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998020 was then inactivated. This accession was in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847590RRUT 122
15RRUT 123'Kryder 43-3 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED1945RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998021. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1989021 received, 34 germinated. A nucellar seedling was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 123. RSD 1998021 was then inactivated. This accession was in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847591RRUT 123
16RRUT 124'Large flower nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United StatesRIV1998DEVELOPED1964RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998022. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998022 received, 37 germinated. A nucellar selection (RSD1998022SG010 = RRUT 124) was selected and retained as RRUT 124 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998022 was inactivated. This accession was in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010)1847592RRUT 124
17RRUT 125'Large flower (Australia) nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. AustraliaRIV1998DONATED1980RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998023. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998023 received, 32 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998023SG008 = RRUT 125) was selected with ISSR markers (Krueger and Roose, 2003) and retained as RRUT 125. This accession is in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010).Of 100 seeds received, 32 germinated.1847593RRUT 125
18RRUT 126'Marks small nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998024. Of 50 seeds of RSD 1998024 received, 45 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998024SG004 = RRUT 126) was identified with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 126. RSD 1998024 was then inactivated. This accession was in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). The reason for the designation "small" might indicate that this produces a small tree. This would be consistent with the nomenclature employed with other old trifoliate selections. (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847594RRUT 126
19RRUT 127'Marks 1 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998025. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998025 received, 37 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998025SG011 = RRUT 127) was selected using ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 127. RSD 1998025 was then inactivated. This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847595RRUT 127
20RRUT 128'Marks 11 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockNucellar selection of https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/accessiondetail.aspx?1847618"RSD 1998026. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998026 received, 31 germinated. A nucellar selection (RSD1998026SG016 = RRUT 128) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 128. RSD 1998026 was then inactivated. This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847596RRUT 128
21RRUT 129'Marks 13 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockNucellar selection of RSD 1998027. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998027 received, 37 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998027SG016 = RRUT 129) was selected using ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 129. RSD 1998027 was then inactivated. This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847597RRUT 129
22RRUT 130'Rich 21-3 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED1945RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998028. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998028 received, 48 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998028SG009 = RRUT 130) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998028 was then inactivated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847598RRUT 130
23RRUT 131'Rich 5-2 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED1945RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998029. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998029 received, 43 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998029SG009 = RRUT 131) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 131 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998029 was then inactivated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847599RRUT 131
24RRUT 132'Rubidoux 123 2N nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIVNot Available1998COLLECTED08/18/1956RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998030. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998030 received, 22 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998030SG007 = RRUT 132) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 132 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998030 was then inactivated. The Indio Accession Book states: "55-123 and 55-124 budwood from two different seedlings -- all of these trees were grown from seed from Corona -- presumably from budded Rubidoux." This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). However, the standard line of 'Rubidoux', PI 539168 is small flower. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847600RRUT 132
25RRUT 133'Rubidoux 123 4N nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED08/18/1956RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998031. Of seeds of RSD received, germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998031SG012 = RRUT 133) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 133 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998031 was then inactivated. The Indio Accession Book states: "55-123 and 55-124 budwood from two different seedlings -- all of these trees were grown from seed from Corona -- presumably from budded Rubidoux." This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). However, the standard line of 'Rubidoux', PI 539168 is small flower. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. The tetraploidy of this accession needs to be confirmed. It was apparently induced in Florida since this and the 2N versions RSD 1998030 and were derived from the same seedlot. (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847601RRUT 133
26RRUT 134'Rubidoux 124 nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United StatesRIV1998COLLECTED08/18/1956RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998032. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998032 received, 38 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998032SG012 = RRUT 134) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 134 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998032 was then inactivated. The Indio Accession Book states: "55-123 and 55-124 budwood from two different seedlings -- all of these trees were grown from seed from Corona -- presumably from budded Rubidoux." This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). However, the standard line of 'Rubidoux', PI 539168 is small flower. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847602RRUT 134
27RRUT 135'Small flower nucellar'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United StatesRIV1998DEVELOPED1964RootstockNucellar seedling of RSD 1998033. Of 100 seeds of RSD 1998033 received, 28 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998033SG001 = RRUT 135) was selected using ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 135 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998033 was then inacitvated. This accession is in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847603RRUT 135
28RSD 1998012'Christiansen 4N OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockOf 29 seeds, 21 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998012SG006 = RRUT 114) was selected and retained as RRUT 114 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998012 was then inactivated. This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). Note that this was apparently received in Florida as a 2N and the tetraploidy induced sometime thereafter (conjectured from WFF Accession Book). There is also a 2N 'Christiansen' at WFF, which was received with with the same seedlot number of C63-26, supporting this supposition. The 2N version is apparently the same as PI 539771. (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847604RSD 1998012
29RSD 1998013'Davis A OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockOf 50 seeds received, 31 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998013SG001= RRUT 115) was selected using ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 115. RSD 1998013 was then inactivated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847605RSD 1998013
30RSD 1998014'English large OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1945RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 58 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998014SG004 = RRUT 116) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RSD 1998015'English small OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1945RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 44 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998015SG014 = RRUT 117) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 117 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998015 was then inactivated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). 'English small' "originated from under very small Valencia, English grove, Tulare County." (Information from Indio Accession Book). The Indio Accession Book also has this note from Ted Frolich (dated 05/10/1958: "...we do not know whether or not ... the English small [is] genetically dwarf or whether the fdwarfing is caused by a virus. None of these materials has shown any exocortis. We have had most of them 10 yrs or longer but the English small for only about 5 years." (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847607RSD 1998015
32RSD 1998016'Gainesville 70 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1963RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 32 germinated. A nucellar seedling RRUT 118 was selected using ISSR markers and RSD 1998016 was inactivated. There was some ambiguity as to which of the groups of Fang et al (1998) this accesion belonged to. (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010)1847608RSD 1998016
33RSD 1998017'Gainesville 71 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1963RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 24 germinated. ISSR analysis indicated that all seedlings had unique banding patterns (Krueger and Roose, 2003). This meant that no nucellar selection could be made and that this accession was probably monoembryonic. It was therefore reqcquired as budwood (active accession = RRUT 388) and RSD 1998017 was inactivated. These results explain the statement by Herb Barrett in the WFF Acession Book that this is "the same as gainesville 70 except seems to produce more hybrids." (RR Krueger, 09/14/2010)1847609RSD 1998017
34RSD 1998018'Gotha Road #1 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1990RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 42 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998018SG008 = RRUT 120) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 120 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998018 was inactivated. This accession fell into the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). The ISSR markers indicated a high proportion (~ 70 %) of zygotic seedlings. (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010)1847610RSD 1998018
35RSD 1998019'Gotha Road #2 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1977RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 41 germinated. A nucellar seedling was selected with ISSR markers (RSD1998019SG002 = RRUT 121) and retained as RRUT 121. RSD was inactivated. This accession belonged to the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). A high proportion of zygotic seedlings (30 %) was indicated with ISSR. (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010)1847611RSD 1998019
36RSD 1998020'Kryder 25-4 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1945RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 23 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998020SG013 = RRUT 122) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 122 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 19980020 was then inactivated. This accession was in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847612RSD 1998020
37RSD 1998021'Kryder 43-3 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1945RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 34 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998021SG010 = RRUT 123) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 123 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998021 was then inactivated. This accession was in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847613RSD 1998021
38RSD 1998022'Large flower OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED1964RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 37 germinated. A nucellar selection (RSD1998022SG010 = RRUT 124) was selected and retained as RRUT 124 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998022 was inactivated. This accession was in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010)1847614RSD 1998022
39RSD 1998023'Large flower (Australia) OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. Australia Historic1998DONATED1980RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 32 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998023SG008 = RRUT 125) was selected with ISSR markers (Krueger and Roose, 2003) and retained as RRUT 125. This accession is in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010).1847615RSD 1998023
40RSD 1998024'Marks small OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockOf 50 seeds received, 45 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998024SG004 = RRUT 126) was identified with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 126. RSD 1998024 was then inactivated. This accession was in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). The reason for the designation "small" might indicate that this produces a small tree. This would be consistent with the nomenclature employed with other old trifoliate selections. (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847616RSD 1998024
41RSD 1998025'Marks 1 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 37 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998025SG011 = RRUT 127) was selected using ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 127. RSD 1998025 was then inactivated. This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847617RSD 1998025
42RSD 1998026'Marks 11 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 31 germinated. A nucellar selection (RSD1998026SG016 = RRUT 128) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 128. RSD 1998026 was then inactivated. This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847618RSD 1998026
43RSD 1998027'Marks 13 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 37 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998027SG016 = RRUT 129) was selected using ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 129. RSD 1998027 was then inactivated. This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847619RSD 1998027
44RSD 1998028'Rich 21-3 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1945RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 48 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998028SG009 = RRUT 130) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 130 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998028 was then inactivated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847620RSD 1998028
45RSD 1998029'Rich 5-2 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998COLLECTED1945RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 22 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998029SG009 = RRUT 131) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 131 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998029 was then inactivated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847621RSD 1998029
46RSD 1998030'Rubidoux 123 2N OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998COLLECTED08/18/1956RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 22 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998030SG007 = RRUT 132) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 132 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998030 was then inactivated. The Indio Accession Book states: "55-123 and 55-124 budwood from two different seedlings -- all of these trees were grown from seed from Corona -- presumably from budded Rubidoux." This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). However, the standard line of 'Rubidoux', PI 539168 is small flower. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847622RSD 1998030
47RSD 1998031'Rubidoux 123 4N OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998COLLECTED08/18/1956RootstockOf 50 seeds received, 47 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998031SG012 = RRUT 133) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 133 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998031 was then inactivated. The Indio Accession Book states: "55-123 and 55-124 budwood from two different seedlings -- all of these trees were grown from seed from Corona -- presumably from budded Rubidoux." This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). However, the standard line of 'Rubidoux', PI 539168 is small flower. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. The tetraploidy of this accession needs to be confirmed. It was apparently induced in Florida since this and the 2N versions RSD 1998030 and were derived from the same seedlot. (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847623RSD 1998031
48RSD 1998032'Rubidoux 124 OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998COLLECTED08/18/1956RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 38 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998032SG012 = RRUT 134) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 134 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998032 was then inactivated. The Indio Accession Book states: "55-123 and 55-124 budwood from two different seedlings -- all of these trees were grown from seed from Corona -- presumably from budded Rubidoux." This accession is in the large flower group of Fang et al (1997). However, the standard line of 'Rubidoux', PI 539168 is small flower. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. (RR Krueger, 09/19/2010)1847624RSD 1998032
49RSD 1998033'Small flower OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. Florida, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED1964RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 28 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998033SG001 = RRUT 135) was selected using ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 135 (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998033 was then inacitvated. This accession was in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847625RSD 1998033
50RSD 1998035'Swingle OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED08/2001RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 37 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998035SG008 = RRUT 137) was selected with ISSR markers and retained as RRUT 137 (later renumbered as RCRC 4138 for inclusion in the Citrus Variety Collection) (Krueger and Roose, 2003). RSD 1998035 was then inactivated. This accession is in the small flower group of Fang et al (1997). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2010)1847626RSD 1998035
51RSD 1998036'Towne G OPS'Citrus trifoliata L. California, United States Historic1998DEVELOPED1945RootstockOf 100 seeds received, 30 germinated. A nucellar seedling (RSD1998036SG020) was identified using ISSR markers (Krueger and Roose, 2001). This fell into the large flower group of Fang et al, 1997). However, this was accession was inactivated as being apparently redundant with PI 539748. (RR Krueger, 09/15/2010)1847627RSD 1998036