Details for: PI 641087, Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier, F. x ananasa escape AS-03-036

Summary Data

Taxonomy:

Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier

Top Name:

F. x ananasa escape AS-03-036

Origin:

Collected – Sakhalin, Russian Federation

Maintained:

National Clonal Germplasm Repository

Received by NPGS:

29 Jan 2004

Improvement Status:

Wild material

Reproductive Uniformity:

Hybrid

Form Received:

Seed

Life Form:

Perennial

Life Cycle:

Perennial

Availability

This accession is not available. Contact site for status.

National Clonal Germplasm Repository

Due to a recent decrease in resources, we are in the process of restructuring our distribution and are not able to accept requests for this material at this time.

Images (4 total. Click on image for more.)

Core Passport Data

Taxonomy:

Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier

Top Name:

F. x ananasa escape AS-03-036

Origin:

Collected – Sakhalin, Russian Federation

Maintained:

National Clonal Germplasm Repository

Received by NPGS:

29 Jan 2004

Improvement Status:

Wild material

Reproductive Uniformity:

Hybrid

Form Received:

Seed

Life Form:

Perennial

Life Cycle:

Perennial

Source History

Collected

Sakhalin, Russian Federation
Locality: Sakhalin Island, on the outskirts of Ujno-Sakjalinsk city, near the sanitarium called "Mountain Air"
Coordinates: 46.9604, 142.7712 (Map it)
Elevation: 178m.
Georeference protocol: Lat/lon determined by GPS
Habitat: Wild Habitat

Collector(s):

Donated

29 January 2004.
Primorye, Russian Federation

Donor(s):

Sabitov, Andrey, N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Res. Inst. of Plant Industry

Accession Names and Identifiers

F. x ananasa escape AS-03-036

Type: Collector identifier

Group: SPECIES

accession preserved for genes

AS-03-036

Type: Collector identifier

Group: FRAGARIA

Andrey Sabitov collection

Sabitov, Andrey N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Res. Inst. of Plant Industry

AS 0703

Type: Exploration identifier

Group: PEO-EXPLORATIONS

Exploration ID links

CFRA 1837

Type: Site identifier

Group: LOCAL

Corvallis local number

F. x ananasa AS-03-036 Iturup Open Pollinated

Type: Plot

Group: STRAWBERRY

seedlot name for backup

Narrative

Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier

Genus:

Fragaria

Family:

Rosaceae

Subfamily:

Rosoideae

Tribe:

Potentilleae

Subtribe:

Fragariinae

Nomen number:

244

Place of publication:

Cours compl. agric. 5:52, t. 5, fig. 1. 1785 (A. N. Duchesne in J. B. A. P. M. de Lamarck, Encycl. 2:538. 1788)(A. N. Duchesne, Hist. nat. frais. 190. 1766, as "races principales")

Verified:

03/24/2006 by ARS Systematic Botanists.

Other conspecific taxa

Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier nothosubsp. ananassa (1 active accession[s])
Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier nothosubsp. cuneifolia (Nutt. ex Howell) Staudt (57 active accession[s])

Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations

Autonym(s)
Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier var. ananassa

Homotypic Synonym(s)
Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Mill. var. ananassa (Duchesne ex Rozier) Ser.
Potentilla ×ananassa (Duchesne ex Rozier) Mabb.

Invalid Designation(s)
Fragaria ×magna auct.

Common names

Language	Name	seq	Citation
English	garden strawberry	1	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
English	strawberry	1	Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
French	fraisier	2	Feuillet, C. 1998. pers. comm. Note: re. French common names
French	fraisier ananas	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
German	Ananaserdbeere	2	Encke, F. et al. 1993. Zander: Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 14. Auflage
German	Erdbeere	2	Conrad, L. R. 1998. pers. comm. Note: re. German common names
German	Gartenerdbeere	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
German	Kulturerdbeere	2	Erhardt, W. et al. 2000. Zander: Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 16. Auflage Note: lists as Fragaria ×ananassa (Duchesne) Guédès
Japanese Rōmaji	oranda-ichigo	2	Iwatsuki, K. et al. 1993-. Flora of Japan.
Portuguese	morangueiro	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanish	fresa	2	León, B. 1998. pers. comm. Note: re. Spanish common names
Spanish	fresa ananás	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Transcribed Korean	ttalgi	2	Lee, Y. N. 1997. Flora of Korea.

Annotations

Nomenclature Name Change: 17 Oct 2005, from Fragaria yezoensis H. Hara to Fragaria nipponica Makino
Taxonomic Re-Identification: 27 Jan 2005, from Fragaria iinumae Makino to Fragaria yezoensis H. Hara
Taxonomic Re-Identification: 26 May 2006, from Fragaria nipponica Makino to Fragaria spp.
Taxonomic Re-Identification: 07 Mar 2008, from Fragaria spp. to Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier

Observations

Phenotype Data

Category	Descriptor	Description	Value	Sample Size	Study	Inventory	Availability
CHEMICAL	pH	pH READING OF THE FRUIT	0		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
CHEMICAL	pH	pH READING OF THE FRUIT	0		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
CYTOLOGIC	DNA Ratio	Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amount of sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant	0.76		FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY	CFRA 1837 .000 PL	Not Available
CYTOLOGIC	DNA Ratio	Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amount of sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant	0.77		FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
CYTOLOGIC	Ploidy	Number of sets of chromosomes. Example: 2x	8x		FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY	CFRA 1837 .000 PL	Not Available
CYTOLOGIC	Ploidy	Number of sets of chromosomes. Example: 2x	8x		FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
CYTOLOGIC	Ploidy Equation	Equation of the ploidy of the plant. Example 2n = 2x = YY	2n = 8x = 56		FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY	CFRA 1837 .000 PL	Not Available
CYTOLOGIC	Ploidy Equation	Equation of the ploidy of the plant. Example 2n = 2x = YY	2n = 8x = 56		FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
DISEASE	Powdery mildew rating 6 Aug 2009	Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) infections were rated on 6 August 2009, from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.	4.8	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
DISEASE	Powdery mildew rating 25 Sept 2009	Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) infections were rated on 25 September 2009, from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.	5.8 c	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
DISEASE	Leaf scorch rating on 6 Aug 2009	Leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 August 2009 from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.	2.2	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
DISEASE	Leaf Scorch rating 25 Sept 2009	Leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 25 September 2009 from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.	2.8	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pedicel length-epipodium [cm]	Epipodium length (upper part of the flower inflorescence) in cm	4		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pedicel length-epipodium [cm]	Epipodium length (upper part of the flower inflorescence) in cm	4.8		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runnering rating in Minnesota	Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from I = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10, 3 = 11-20, 4 = 21-30, and 5 =>30.	1.8f	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Fruit shape [category]	Shape of fruit	fingerling		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Fruit shape [category]	Shape of fruit	fingerling		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Fruit weight [g]	Average berry weight	1.2		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Fruit weight [g]	Average berry weight	4.6		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runners per plant [number]	Number of runners per plant over the season	3		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runners per plant [number]	Number of runners per plant over the season	3.5		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runner length total [m]	Total length of runners over the season	0.7		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runner length total [m]	Total length of runners over the season	1.6		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runner daughters [number]	Number of daughters produced per runner	4		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runner daughters [number]	Number of daughters produced per runner	7		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days to ripen [date]	Number of days between bloom and harvest	38		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days to ripen [date]	Number of days between bloom and harvest	48		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Fruit harvest date first [date]	Calendar or Julian date of first fruit harvest	161.3		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Fruit harvest date first [date]	Calendar or Julian date of first fruit harvest	165		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Bloom date first [date]	Julian date on which the first open blossoms were observed	113.3		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Bloom date first [date]	Julian date on which the first open blossoms were observed	127		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	Frost resistance rating October 2009	Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 Oct. 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 Oct. to 13 Oct. 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated.	5.6	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	Plant Height (cm)	Mean plant height in centimeters	10.7		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	Plant Height (cm)	Mean plant height in centimeters	16		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	5 fruit weight [g]	Harvest, weigh and calculate the mean of the heaviest 5 fruit per crown	2.4		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	5 fruit weight [g]	Harvest, weigh and calculate the mean of the heaviest 5 fruit per crown	23		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
PRODUCTION	Crop estimate [g]	Total amount of harvested fruit per plant per season	65.7		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Total water soluble content [g/100g]	Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids (°Brix)	13.8		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Total water soluble content [g/100g]	Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids (°Brix)	15.1		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Total anthocyanin in fruit [g/100g]	Total anthocyanin in fruit	0		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Total anthocyanin in fruit [g/100g]	Total anthocyanin in fruit	10.9		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Ratio total water soluble content : titratable acidity	Ratio total water soluble content : titratable acidity	0		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1837 .001 PL	Not Available