Skip to main content
Skip to site map
United States Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service
0
Cart
Welcome!
***THIS IS A TESTING SITE ONLY.***
Please do not place germplasm orders on this site.
GRIN-Global
Menu
USDA National Plant Germplasm System
Version:
2.3.12 [npgstest -- bhunt2312-0204]
Menu
Accessions
Descriptors
Reports
GRIN Taxonomy
Search Taxonomy
Crop Wild Relative Data
Nodulation Data
Regulations
World Economic Plants
About GRIN Taxonomy
GRIN
USDA Genetic Resource Collections
About GRIN-Global
Use of Cookies
NPGS Distribution Policy
Software Disclaimer
GRIN-U
Help
Contact Us
Your Profile
Your Profile
Your Web Request History
Your Address Book
Your Wish List
Details for: PI 641087,
Fragaria
×
ananassa
Duchesne ex Rozier, F. x ananasa escape AS-03-036
Summary
Passport
Taxonomy
Other
Pedigree
IPR
Observation
Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Fragaria
×
ananassa
Duchesne ex Rozier
Top Name:
F. x ananasa escape AS-03-036
Origin:
Collected – Sakhalin, Russian Federation
Maintained:
National Clonal Germplasm Repository
Received by NPGS:
29 Jan 2004
Improvement Status:
Wild material
Reproductive Uniformity:
Hybrid
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Perennial
Life Cycle:
Perennial
Availability
This accession is not available. Contact site for status.
National Clonal Germplasm Repository
Due to a recent decrease in resources, we are in the process of restructuring our distribution and are not able to accept requests for this material at this time.
Images
(4
total. Click on image for more.)
Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Fragaria
×
ananassa
Duchesne ex Rozier
Top Name:
F. x ananasa escape AS-03-036
Origin:
Collected – Sakhalin, Russian Federation
Maintained:
National Clonal Germplasm Repository
Received by NPGS:
29 Jan 2004
Improvement Status:
Wild material
Reproductive Uniformity:
Hybrid
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Perennial
Life Cycle:
Perennial
Source History
Collected
Sakhalin, Russian Federation
Locality:
Sakhalin Island, on the outskirts of Ujno-Sakjalinsk city, near the sanitarium called "Mountain Air"
Coordinates:
46.9604, 142.7712
(Map it)
Elevation:
178m.
Georeference protocol:
Lat/lon determined by GPS
Habitat:
Wild Habitat
Collector(s):
Cherbukin, Pavel, Vavilov Research Institute
Popova, Luda, Vavilov Research Institute
Sabitov, Andrey, N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Res. Inst. of Plant Industry
Donated
29 January 2004.
Primorye, Russian Federation
Donor(s):
Sabitov, Andrey, N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Res. Inst. of Plant Industry
Accession Names and Identifiers
F. x ananasa escape AS-03-036
Type: Collector identifier
Group: SPECIES
accession preserved for genes
AS-03-036
Type: Collector identifier
Group: FRAGARIA
Andrey Sabitov collection
Sabitov, Andrey N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Res. Inst. of Plant Industry
AS 0703
Type: Exploration identifier
Group: PEO-EXPLORATIONS
Exploration ID links
CFRA 1837
Type: Site identifier
Group: LOCAL
Corvallis local number
F. x ananasa AS-03-036 Iturup Open Pollinated
Type: Plot
Group: STRAWBERRY
seedlot name for backup
Narrative
Fragaria
×
ananassa
Duchesne ex Rozier
Genus:
Fragaria
Family:
Rosaceae
Subfamily:
Rosoideae
Tribe:
Potentilleae
Subtribe:
Fragariinae
Nomen number:
244
Place of publication:
Cours compl. agric. 5:52, t. 5, fig. 1. 1785 (A. N. Duchesne in J. B. A. P. M. de Lamarck, Encycl. 2:538. 1788)(A. N. Duchesne, Hist. nat. frais. 190. 1766, as "races principales")
Verified:
03/24/2006
by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Fragaria
×
ananassa
Duchesne ex Rozier nothosubsp.
ananassa
(1 active accession[s])
Fragaria
×
ananassa
Duchesne ex Rozier nothosubsp.
cuneifolia
(Nutt. ex Howell) Staudt
(57 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Autonym(s)
Fragaria
×
ananassa
Duchesne ex Rozier var.
ananassa
Homotypic Synonym(s)
Fragaria chiloensis
(L.) Mill. var.
ananassa
(Duchesne ex Rozier) Ser.
Potentilla
×
ananassa
(Duchesne ex Rozier) Mabb.
Invalid Designation(s)
Fragaria
×
magna
auct.
Common names
Language
Name
Alternate name
note
seq
Citation
English
garden strawberry
1
Rehm, S.
1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
English
strawberry
1
Wiersema, J. H. & B. León.
1999.
World economic plants: a standard reference
CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
French
fraisier
2
Feuillet, C.
1998. pers. comm.
Note:
re. French common names
French
fraisier ananas
2
Rehm, S.
1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
German
Ananaserdbeere
2
Encke, F. et al.
1993. Zander: Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 14. Auflage
German
Erdbeere
2
Conrad, L. R.
1998. pers. comm.
Note:
re. German common names
German
Gartenerdbeere
2
Rehm, S.
1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
German
Kulturerdbeere
2
Erhardt, W. et al.
2000. Zander: Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 16. Auflage
Note:
lists as
Fragaria
×
ananassa
(Duchesne) Guédès
Japanese Rōmaji
oranda-ichigo
2
Iwatsuki, K. et al.
1993-. Flora of Japan.
Portuguese
morangueiro
2
Rehm, S.
1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanish
fresa
2
León, B.
1998. pers. comm.
Note:
re. Spanish common names
Spanish
fresa ananás
2
Rehm, S.
1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Transcribed Korean
ttalgi
2
Lee, Y. N.
1997. Flora of Korea.
Name
References
Annotations
Nomenclature Name Change:
17 Oct 2005, from
Fragaria yezoensis
H. Hara to
Fragaria nipponica
Makino
Taxonomic Re-Identification:
27 Jan 2005, from
Fragaria iinumae
Makino to
Fragaria yezoensis
H. Hara
Taxonomic Re-Identification:
26 May 2006, from
Fragaria nipponica
Makino to
Fragaria
spp.
Taxonomic Re-Identification:
07 Mar 2008, from
Fragaria
spp. to
Fragaria
×
ananassa
Duchesne ex Rozier
Other Links
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
Pedigree
Date released:
2004
Description:
Collected from Sakhalin, Russian Federation.
Material Transfer Agreement
Observations
Phenotype Data
Category
Descriptor
Description
Value
Sample Size
Study
Inventory
Availability
CHEMICAL
pH
pH READING OF THE FRUIT
0
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
CHEMICAL
pH
pH READING OF THE FRUIT
0
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
CYTOLOGIC
DNA Ratio
Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amount of sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant
0.76
FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY
CFRA 1837 .000 PL
Not Available
CYTOLOGIC
DNA Ratio
Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amount of sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant
0.77
FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
CYTOLOGIC
Ploidy
Number of sets of chromosomes. Example: 2x
8x
FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY
CFRA 1837 .000 PL
Not Available
CYTOLOGIC
Ploidy
Number of sets of chromosomes. Example: 2x
8x
FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
CYTOLOGIC
Ploidy Equation
Equation of the ploidy of the plant. Example 2n = 2x = YY
2n = 8x = 56
FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY
CFRA 1837 .000 PL
Not Available
CYTOLOGIC
Ploidy Equation
Equation of the ploidy of the plant. Example 2n = 2x = YY
2n = 8x = 56
FRAGARIA.2007.CYTOLOGY
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
DISEASE
Powdery mildew rating 6 Aug 2009
Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) infections were rated on 6 August 2009, from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.
4.8
4
Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting.
On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season.
2009 Evaluations
Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated.
2010 Evaluations
In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot.
Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent).
Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012
Not Available
DISEASE
Powdery mildew rating 25 Sept 2009
Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) infections were rated on 25 September 2009, from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.
5.8 c
4
Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting.
On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season.
2009 Evaluations
Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated.
2010 Evaluations
In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot.
Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent).
Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012
Not Available
DISEASE
Leaf scorch rating on 6 Aug 2009
Leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 August 2009 from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.
2.2
4
Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting.
On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season.
2009 Evaluations
Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated.
2010 Evaluations
In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot.
Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent).
Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012
Not Available
DISEASE
Leaf Scorch rating 25 Sept 2009
Leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 25 September 2009 from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.
2.8
4
Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting.
On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season.
2009 Evaluations
Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated.
2010 Evaluations
In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot.
Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent).
Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Pedicel length-epipodium [cm]
Epipodium length (upper part of the flower inflorescence) in cm
4
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Pedicel length-epipodium [cm]
Epipodium length (upper part of the flower inflorescence) in cm
4.8
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Runnering rating in Minnesota
Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from I = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10, 3 = 11-20, 4 = 21-30, and 5 =>30.
1.8f
4
Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting.
On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season.
2009 Evaluations
Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated.
2010 Evaluations
In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot.
Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent).
Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Fruit shape [category]
Shape of fruit
fingerling
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Fruit shape [category]
Shape of fruit
fingerling
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Fruit weight [g]
Average berry weight
1.2
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Fruit weight [g]
Average berry weight
4.6
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Runners per plant [number]
Number of runners per plant over the season
3
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Runners per plant [number]
Number of runners per plant over the season
3.5
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Runner length total [m]
Total length of runners over the season
0.7
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Runner length total [m]
Total length of runners over the season
1.6
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Runner daughters [number]
Number of daughters produced per runner
4
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
MORPHOLOGY
Runner daughters [number]
Number of daughters produced per runner
7
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHENOLOGY
Days to ripen [date]
Number of days between bloom and harvest
38
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHENOLOGY
Days to ripen [date]
Number of days between bloom and harvest
48
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHENOLOGY
Fruit harvest date first [date]
Calendar or Julian date of first fruit harvest
161.3
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHENOLOGY
Fruit harvest date first [date]
Calendar or Julian date of first fruit harvest
165
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHENOLOGY
Bloom date first [date]
Julian date on which the first open blossoms were observed
113.3
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHENOLOGY
Bloom date first [date]
Julian date on which the first open blossoms were observed
127
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY
Frost resistance rating October 2009
Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 Oct. 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 Oct. to 13 Oct. 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated.
5.6
4
Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting.
On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season.
2009 Evaluations
Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated.
2010 Evaluations
In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot.
Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent).
Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012
Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY
Plant Height (cm)
Mean plant height in centimeters
10.7
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY
Plant Height (cm)
Mean plant height in centimeters
16
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY
5 fruit weight [g]
Harvest, weigh and calculate the mean of the heaviest 5 fruit per crown
2.4
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY
5 fruit weight [g]
Harvest, weigh and calculate the mean of the heaviest 5 fruit per crown
23
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
PRODUCTION
Crop estimate [g]
Total amount of harvested fruit per plant per season
65.7
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
QUALITY
Total water soluble content [g/100g]
Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids (°Brix)
13.8
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
QUALITY
Total water soluble content [g/100g]
Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids (°Brix)
15.1
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
QUALITY
Total anthocyanin in fruit [g/100g]
Total anthocyanin in fruit
0
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
QUALITY
Total anthocyanin in fruit [g/100g]
Total anthocyanin in fruit
10.9
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available
QUALITY
Ratio total water soluble content : titratable acidity
Ratio total water soluble content : titratable acidity
0
FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019
CFRA 1837 .001 PL
Not Available