Details for: PI 616936, Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier, 'Mesabi'

Summary Data

Taxonomy:

Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier

Cultivar:

'Mesabi'

Origin:

Developed – Minnesota, United States

Maintained:

National Clonal Germplasm Repository

Received by NPGS:

25 Feb 1999

Improvement Status:

Cultivar

Reproductive Uniformity:

Hybrid

Form Received:

Plant

Life Form:

Perennial

Life Cycle:

Perennial

Availability

This accession is not available. Contact site for status.

National Clonal Germplasm Repository

Due to a recent decrease in resources, we are in the process of restructuring our distribution and are not able to accept requests for this material at this time.

Images (5 total. Click on image for more.)

Core Passport Data

Taxonomy:

Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier

Cultivar:

'Mesabi'

Origin:

Developed – Minnesota, United States

Maintained:

National Clonal Germplasm Repository

Received by NPGS:

25 Feb 1999

Improvement Status:

Cultivar

Reproductive Uniformity:

Hybrid

Form Received:

Plant

Life Form:

Perennial

Life Cycle:

Perennial

Source History

Developed

1998.
Minnesota, United States

Developer(s):

Donated

25 February 1999.
Indiana, United States

Donor(s):

Indiana Berry and Fruit Co.

Accession Names and Identifiers

'Mesabi'

Type: Cultivar name

Group: STRAWBERRY

'Mesabi' is a trademarked strawberry name, it is a transliteration of the Ojibway word for 'giant'.

Luby, James University of Minnesota

MNUS 248

Type: Developer identifier

MNUS 248

Type: Developer identifier

Group: OTHERNUM

other identifier

Luby, James University of Minnesota

CFRA 1687

Type: Site identifier

Group: LOCAL

Corvallis local number

Mesabi Open Pollinated

Type: Plot

Group: STRAWBERRY

seedlot name for backup

Narrative

Mesabi' (MNUS 248) strawberry is a mid-season, June-bearing (short day), (Fragaria x ananassa) that is notable for high productivity and being tolerant of cold winter and warm summer temperatures. Mesabi has been productive in matted row production systems on soils of heavy and light texture in Minnesota and in hill systems in Maryland. Resistant to five eastern North American races of Phytophthora fragariae, the causal organism of red stele root rot and also have moderate resistance to leaf spot, leaf scorch and powdery mildew. Mesabi was raised as a seedling from the Cross Glooscap x MNUS 99. It is the second cultivar to be released from a breeding program begun in 1980 through the collaboration of the University of Minnesota with the USDA-ARS. The word Mesabi is a transliteration of the Ojibway word for 'giant' and is a popular geographical name in northern Minnesota, perhaps most notably for the Mesabi iron ore range north of Duluth. Mesabi generally produced high yields and medium to large berries in trials in Minnesota. The fruit matures in the middle part of the season for short-day cultivars, about the same time as its parent, Glooscap, and other common midseason cultivars grown in Minnesota such as Kent and Cavendish. In all trials in Minnesota, Mesabi consistently had yields similar to or greater than these other mid-season varieties. Glooscap is probably the most popular mid-season cultivar with commercial Minnessota producers. Between 1992 to 1996, Mesabi strawberry had a greater yield than its parent, Glooscap, in 1O of 15 trials and greater average berry weight in 14 of 15 trials. The fruit of Mesabi strawberry have a glossy scarlet skin that does not tend to darken as much as Glooscap, and a uniform red interior color. The flavor is well balanced between sugars and acids with a characteristic strawberry aroma. The flesh is firm with a creamy, meeting mouthfeel. The skin is medium to tough but tends to become weak in hot weather.

'Mesabi' is a trademarked strawberry name, it is a transliteration of the Ojibway word for 'giant'.

Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier

Genus:

Fragaria

Family:

Rosaceae

Subfamily:

Rosoideae

Tribe:

Potentilleae

Subtribe:

Fragariinae

Nomen number:

244

Place of publication:

Cours compl. agric. 5:52, t. 5, fig. 1. 1785 (A. N. Duchesne in J. B. A. P. M. de Lamarck, Encycl. 2:538. 1788)(A. N. Duchesne, Hist. nat. frais. 190. 1766, as "races principales")

Verified:

03/24/2006 by ARS Systematic Botanists.

Other conspecific taxa

Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier nothosubsp. ananassa (1 active accession[s])
Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier nothosubsp. cuneifolia (Nutt. ex Howell) Staudt (57 active accession[s])

Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations

Autonym(s)
Fragaria ×ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier var. ananassa

Homotypic Synonym(s)
Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Mill. var. ananassa (Duchesne ex Rozier) Ser.
Potentilla ×ananassa (Duchesne ex Rozier) Mabb.

Invalid Designation(s)
Fragaria ×magna auct.

Common names

Language	Name	seq	Citation
English	garden strawberry	1	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
English	strawberry	1	Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
French	fraisier	2	Feuillet, C. 1998. pers. comm. Note: re. French common names
French	fraisier ananas	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
German	Ananaserdbeere	2	Encke, F. et al. 1993. Zander: Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 14. Auflage
German	Erdbeere	2	Conrad, L. R. 1998. pers. comm. Note: re. German common names
German	Gartenerdbeere	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
German	Kulturerdbeere	2	Erhardt, W. et al. 2000. Zander: Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 16. Auflage Note: lists as Fragaria ×ananassa (Duchesne) Guédès
Japanese Rōmaji	oranda-ichigo	2	Iwatsuki, K. et al. 1993-. Flora of Japan.
Portuguese	morangueiro	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanish	fresa	2	León, B. 1998. pers. comm. Note: re. Spanish common names
Spanish	fresa ananás	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Transcribed Korean	ttalgi	2	Lee, Y. N. 1997. Flora of Korea.

Annotations

Observations

Phenotype Data

Category	Descriptor	Description	Value	Sample Size	Study	Inventory	Availability
CHEMICAL	TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS	TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS MEASURED BY REFRACTOMETRY	7.7		FRAGARIA.Mathey.Finn.Phenotyping.2013		Not Available
CHEMICAL	pH	pH READING OF THE FRUIT	0		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
CHEMICAL	pH	pH READING OF THE FRUIT	3.8		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
DISEASE	Powdery mildew rating 6 Aug 2009	Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) infections were rated on 6 August 2009, from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.	3.8	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
DISEASE	Powdery mildew rating 25 Sept 2009	Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) infections were rated on 25 September 2009, from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.	4.6 de	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
DISEASE	Leaf scorch rating on 6 Aug 2009	Leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 August 2009 from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.	3.2	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
DISEASE	Leaf Scorch rating 25 Sept 2009	Leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 25 September 2009 from I = no disease to 9 = severe infection.	4.2	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
GENSTOCK	TRUE TO TYPE	Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis (parents and or offspring) using molecular markers	YES		FRAGARIA.Zurn.etal.PopulationStructure.2022	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pedicel length-epipodium [cm]	Epipodium length (upper part of the flower inflorescence) in cm	2.6		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pedicel length-epipodium [cm]	Epipodium length (upper part of the flower inflorescence) in cm	4.5		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runnering rating in Minnesota	Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from I = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10, 3 = 11-20, 4 = 21-30, and 5 =>30.	1.9f	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Fruit shape [category]	Shape of fruit	conic		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Fruit shape [category]	Shape of fruit	conic		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Fruit weight [g]	Average berry weight	15.9		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Fruit weight [g]	Average berry weight	9.9		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runners per plant [number]	Number of runners per plant over the season	2		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runners per plant [number]	Number of runners per plant over the season	5		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runner length total [m]	Total length of runners over the season	0.6		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runner length total [m]	Total length of runners over the season	1.6		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runner daughters [number]	Number of daughters produced per runner	3		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Runner daughters [number]	Number of daughters produced per runner	7.7		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	FLAVOR	QUALITY OF THE FRUIT FLAVOR CODED 1-9.	3 - (1 = WORST, 9 = MOST TASTEY)		FRAGARIA.Mathey.Finn.Phenotyping.2013		Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days to ripen [date]	Number of days between bloom and harvest	39.7		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days to ripen [date]	Number of days between bloom and harvest	62.8		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Fruit harvest date first [date]	Calendar or Julian date of first fruit harvest	148		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Fruit harvest date first [date]	Calendar or Julian date of first fruit harvest	163.3		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Bloom date first [date]	Julian date on which the first open blossoms were observed	100.5		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Bloom date first [date]	Julian date on which the first open blossoms were observed	108.3		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	Frost resistance rating October 2009	Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 Oct. 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 Oct. to 13 Oct. 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated.	3	4	Wild strawberries were shipped as runners from NCGR-Corvallis and propagated in the greenhouse and in the field at NCROC in 2008. In mid-October 2008, plants were dug and potted to 10 cm pots and grown in a heated greenhouse until January 2009, when they were moved to a cellar to spend their dormancy. Potted plants were moved out of the cellar on May 10, 2009, and stayed outdoors until planting. On 28 May 2009, two, two-plant plots of each genotype were established in each of four blocks in a split block design. In each block, there were two sub-blocks with identical planting plans. One was overwintered with straw mulch, and the adjacent sub-block was overwintered without mulch. fn addition to the 34 replicated entries, two other wild genotypes, PI 637954 and Pl 641089, with insufficient plants for complete replication, were planted in a border row for observation. Starter fertilizer (11-52-0), monoammonium phosphate at rate of 80 g·114 L-1 rate and 500 ml solution per plant was used at planting and no additional fertilizer was applied after planting. Drip irrigation was installed as one T-tape per row (emitters spaced at 305 mm, 1.7 L·min-1, 102 L·h-1 for 30 mat 55.6 k Pa, John Deere Water, San Marcos, CA) and the field was irrigated once or twice per week as a supplement to precipitation. Weeds were manually removed and the space between rows was tilled as necessary to control weeds and runners. Straw mulch of 10-15 cm was applied on mulched plots in early November 2009, and removed to between rows in early April 2010. Straw was also added between the rows of the non-mulched plots in April so that all plots had surrounding straw during the 2010 growing season. 2009 Evaluations Plants in each plot were initially spaced 0.6 m apart in rows 1.3 m apart. Plants were allowed to runner in 2010 to form short matted row plots. Some genotypes with excessive runners were trimmed manually to maintain them within their plot. Runners per plot were rated on 6 Aug. 2010 from 1 = 1-5 runners per plot; 2 = 6-10; 3 = 11-20; 4 = 21-30; and 5 => 30. Powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takamatsu) and fungal leaf spot (Mycosphaerella fragariae (Tul.) Lindau) and leaf scorch (Diplocarpon earliana Ell. et Ev. (Wolf)) infections were rated on 6 Aug. and 25 September 2009, from 1 = no disease to 9 = severe infection. Frost resistance was evaluated on 13 October 2009, after several hard frosts from 9 to 13 October 2009, on a scale from I = no damage to 9 = all leaves fully desiccated. 2010 Evaluations In 2010, genotypes were evaluated for several plant and fruit traits. The stand (% coverage of the plot) was estimated on 15 May during flowering and again at the early stage fruiting on 18 June. Winter injury was rated on 4 June from 1 (= all plants surviving , and vigorously growing) to 9 (= all plants dead) based on visual estimation of survival of the plants and the health and regrowth of the surviving plants. Plant vigor was rated on 18 June from 0 (= dead) to 9 (= highly vigorous) based primarily on the number and size of leaves produced. Growth habit was rated on 28 June from 1 (= prostrate) to 5 (= erect). Productivity was rated from 0 (no fruit) to 9 (heavily fruiting) when approximately 50% of the fruit appeared to be ripe. Using the same rating scale as in 2009, powdery mildew, fungal leaf spotting (leaf scorch/blight/spot) severity were rated on 7 July and 27 July. Fungal leaf spotting diseases appeared to include leaf scorch, leaf blight and leaf spot in 2010. As all three could be observed on one genotype, and necrotic lesions often coincided, a single fungal leaf disease score was given for each plot. Berry weight was estimated based on random samples of 20 berries from a midseason harvest date (approximately 50% ripe fruit) from plots that fruited. Fruit shape was described as oblate, globose, globose conic, conic, long conic, necked, long wedge or short wedge according to the University of Florida key. External and internal fruit colors were described. Skin toughness was rated from 1 (very tender) to 9 (very tough) based on resistance to thumb abrasion when rubbed between thumb and forefinger. Firmness was rated from 1 (very soft) to 9 (very firm) when squeezed between thumb and forefinger. Flavor was characterized with descriptors and rated hedonically by JJL from 1 (very poor) to 9 (excellent). Ratings were performed by SY and JJL in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Data for plant and fruit traits in each year were analyzed, where appropriate, using ANOVA with Statistix Software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL). Mean separations were based on Fisher's protected LSD (P<=0.05). ">FRAGARIA.Yao.Luby.Hummer.EvaluationOfStrawberrySpecies.2012		Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	Plant Height (cm)	Mean plant height in centimeters	12.3		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	Plant Height (cm)	Mean plant height in centimeters	3		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	5 fruit weight [g]	Harvest, weigh and calculate the mean of the heaviest 5 fruit per crown	37.9		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PHYSIOLOGY	5 fruit weight [g]	Harvest, weigh and calculate the mean of the heaviest 5 fruit per crown	79.4		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
PRODUCTION	Crop estimate [g]	Total amount of harvested fruit per plant per season	106.7		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Total water soluble content [g/100g]	Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids (°Brix)	10.3		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Total water soluble content [g/100g]	Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids (°Brix)	7.5		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Total anthocyanin in fruit [g/100g]	Total anthocyanin in fruit	1		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Total anthocyanin in fruit [g/100g]	Total anthocyanin in fruit	24		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2020	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available
QUALITY	Ratio total water soluble content : titratable acidity	Ratio total water soluble content : titratable acidity	10.6		FRAGARIA.Hummer.etal.StrawberryPhenotypeEval.2019	CFRA 1687 .001 PL	Not Available