Details for: PI 320936 LSP, Lens culinaris Medik. subsp. culinaris, DAGHESTANICA

Summary Data

Taxonomy:

Lens culinaris Medik. subsp. culinaris

Top Name:

DAGHESTANICA

Origin:

Collected – Washington, United States

Maintained:

Western Regional PI Station

Received by NPGS:

2009

PI Assigned:

1967

Improvement Status:

Cultivated material

Form Received:

Seed

Life Form:

Annual

Life Cycle:

Annual

Inventory Volume:

175
View original Plant Inventory data in pdf format

Availability

Form	Quantity	Note	Inventory	Cart
Seed	70 count		PI 320936 2012lsp SD

Images (7 total. Click on image for more.)

Core Passport Data

Taxonomy:

Lens culinaris Medik. subsp. culinaris

Top Name:

DAGHESTANICA

Origin:

Collected – Washington, United States

Maintained:

Western Regional PI Station

Received by NPGS:

2009

PI Assigned:

1967

Improvement Status:

Cultivated material

Form Received:

Seed

Life Form:

Annual

Life Cycle:

Annual

Source History

Collected

PRE 2003.
Russian Federation
Locality: Daghestan
Coordinates: 42.0000, 47.0000 (Map it)

Developed

NEAR 2009.
Washington, United States

Developer(s):

Coyne, Clare, USDA-ARS WRPIS

Donated

22 June 1967.
Russian Federation

Donor(s):

N.I. Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry

Accession Group(s)

Group name: Lens LSP (Lens single plant descent)
Note: Lens Single Plant descent (LSP)
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Lens LSP (Lens single plant descent)

Accession Names and Identifiers

DAGHESTANICA

Type: Unverified name

K-15

Type: Other or unclassified name

ILL 504

Type: CGIAR International Center Identifier

Group: ICARDA

International Center for Agr. Res. in the Dry Areas

Narrative

This accessions came from a single plant of PI 320936

Lens culinaris Medik. subspp. culinaris

Genus:

Lens

Family:

Fabaceae (alt. Leguminosae)

Subfamily:

Faboideae

Tribe:

Fabeae

Nomen number:

21739

Verified:

09/08/2000 by ARS Systematic Botanists.

Other conspecific taxa

Lens culinaris Medik. (16 active accession[s])
Lens culinaris Medik. subsp. orientalis (Boiss.) Ponert (56 active accession[s])
Lens culinaris Medik. subsp. tomentosus (Ladiz.) M. E. Ferguson et al. (3 active accession[s])

Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations

Homotypic Synonym(s)
Cicer lens (L.) Willd.
Ervum lens L.
Lens esculenta Moench
Lentilla lens (L.) W. Wight ex D. Fairchild
Vicia lens (L.) Coss. & Germ.

Common names

Language	Name	seq	Citation
English	gram	1	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
English	lentil	1	Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
French	lentille	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
French	lentille comestible	2	Demilly, D. et al. 2001. Liste alphabétique des principales espèces de plantes cultivées et de mauvaises herbes. Noms latins et noms français, ed. 7 GEVES-SNES, Beaucouzé, France.
French	lentillon	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
German	Linse	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
India	masur	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Italian	lenticchia	2	International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Portuguese	lentilha	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanish	lenteja	2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Swedish	lins	2	Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Chinese	bing dou	2	Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds. 1994-. Flora of China (English edition).

Annotations

Observations

Phenotype Data

Category	Descriptor	Description	Value	Sample Size	Study	Inventory	Availability
CHEMICAL	Calcium	Calcium concentration in the seed(ppm)	426		More information on Grusak's sampling and Experimental Design(a .doc file). A Excel files with the 2009 mineral data .">LENTIL.MINERALS.2009.GRUSAK	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
CHEMICAL	Copper	Copper concentration in the seed(ppm)	4.71		More information on Grusak's sampling and Experimental Design(a .doc file). A Excel files with the 2009 mineral data .">LENTIL.MINERALS.2009.GRUSAK	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
CHEMICAL	Iron	Iron concentration in the seed(ppm)	106.70		More information on Grusak's sampling and Experimental Design(a .doc file). A Excel files with the 2009 mineral data .">LENTIL.MINERALS.2009.GRUSAK	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
CHEMICAL	Potassium	Potassium concentration in the seed(ppm)	11469		More information on Grusak's sampling and Experimental Design(a .doc file). A Excel files with the 2009 mineral data .">LENTIL.MINERALS.2009.GRUSAK	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
CHEMICAL	Magnesium	Mangnesium concentration in the seed(ppm)	1390		More information on Grusak's sampling and Experimental Design(a .doc file). A Excel files with the 2009 mineral data .">LENTIL.MINERALS.2009.GRUSAK	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
CHEMICAL	Manganese	Manganese concentration in the seed(ppm)	21.83		More information on Grusak's sampling and Experimental Design(a .doc file). A Excel files with the 2009 mineral data .">LENTIL.MINERALS.2009.GRUSAK	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
CHEMICAL	Phosphorus	Phosphorus concentration in the seed(ppm)	5143		More information on Grusak's sampling and Experimental Design(a .doc file). A Excel files with the 2009 mineral data .">LENTIL.MINERALS.2009.GRUSAK	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
CHEMICAL	Zinc	Zinc concentration in the seed(ppm)	59.53		More information on Grusak's sampling and Experimental Design(a .doc file). A Excel files with the 2009 mineral data .">LENTIL.MINERALS.2009.GRUSAK	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
CHEMICAL	Protein percentage	Seed protein concentration (percentage) as calculated by the Leco nitrogen analyzer	20.81		LENTIL.PROTEIN.2009.COYNE	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
CHEMICAL	Sulfur	Sulfur concentration in the seed(ppm)	2150		More information on Grusak's sampling and Experimental Design(a .doc file). A Excel files with the 2009 mineral data .">LENTIL.MINERALS.2009.GRUSAK	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Height	Plant height measured in centimeters at physiological maturity.	27		LENTIL.2013.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2013lsp SD	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Height	Plant height measured in centimeters at physiological maturity.	31		LENTIL.2014.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Height	Plant height measured in centimeters at physiological maturity.	31	26	LENTIL.2017.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Height	Plant height measured in centimeters at physiological maturity.	35		LENTIL.2012.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
GROWTH	Plant Width	Plant width measured in centimeters at physiological maturity	18		LENTIL.2013.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2013lsp SD	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Width	Plant width measured in centimeters at physiological maturity	22	26	LENTIL.2017.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Width	Plant width measured in centimeters at physiological maturity	29		LENTIL.2014.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Width	Plant width measured in centimeters at physiological maturity	37		LENTIL.2012.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
MORPHOLOGY	Height to lowest pod	Estimate of the average height above ground of the lowest pod on unlodged plants at harvest (in CM)	13	26	LENTIL.2017.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Height to lowest pod	Estimate of the average height above ground of the lowest pod on unlodged plants at harvest (in CM)	18		LENTIL.2014.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Height to lowest pod	Estimate of the average height above ground of the lowest pod on unlodged plants at harvest (in CM)	9		LENTIL.2013.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2013lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pods per peduncle	Maximum number of pods per peduncle on 10 representative plants	2		LENTIL.2012.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
MORPHOLOGY	Pods per peduncle	Maximum number of pods per peduncle on 10 representative plants	2		LENTIL.2013.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2013lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pods per peduncle	Maximum number of pods per peduncle on 10 representative plants	2		LENTIL.2014.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Seeds per pod	Average number of seeds per pod of 10 representative plants	1	5	LENTIL.2012.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
MORPHOLOGY	Seeds per pod	Average number of seeds per pod of 10 representative plants	1	5	LENTIL.2017.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Seed weight 100	Weight of 100 seeds in grams.	2.4		LENTIL.SEEDWEIGHT.WRPIS	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
MORPHOLOGY	Pod shatter - yes/no	Pod dehiscense. Either yes or no	N - No, shattering was not observed		LENTIL.2014.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pod shatter - yes/no	Pod dehiscense. Either yes or no	N - No, shattering was not observed	26	LENTIL.2017.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pod shatter - yes/no	Pod dehiscense. Either yes or no	Y - Yes, shattering was found		LENTIL.2013.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2013lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pod drop - yes/no	Pod drop. Either yes or no	N - No dropping of pods was observed		LENTIL.2013.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2013lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pod drop - yes/no	Pod drop. Either yes or no	N - No dropping of pods was observed	26	LENTIL.2017.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Pod drop - yes/no	Pod drop. Either yes or no	Y - Yes, dropping of pods was observed		LENTIL.2014.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Lodging	Do the plants lodge, yes or no	N - No lodging		LENTIL.2013.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2013lsp SD	Not Available
MORPHOLOGY	Lodging	Do the plants lodge, yes or no	N - No lodging		LENTIL.2014.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
OTHER	Image/picture1	A picture or image	pod		LENTIL.IMAGE.2012.FIELD.SINGLE.PLANT	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
OTHER	Image/picture1	A picture or image	seed		IMAGE.2013.SEED	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
OTHER	Image/picture1	A picture or image	seed		These seeds will be planted for increase in 2014 in Pullman, Washington. These accessions come from a single plant selection.">LENTIL.IMAGE.2014.SEED.SINGLE.PLANT	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
OTHER	Image/picture1	A picture or image	vegetative		LENTIL.IMAGE.2012.FIELD.SINGLE.PLANT	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
PHENOLOGY	Days to flower	Number of days from sowing to first observed flower	58	26	LENTIL.2017.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days to flower	Number of days from sowing to first observed flower	59	19	LENTIL.2016.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
PHENOLOGY	Days to pod maturity	Number of days from sowing to 90% pod maturity	103		LENTIL.2014.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days to pod maturity	Number of days from sowing to 90% pod maturity	105	19	LENTIL.2016.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
PHENOLOGY	Days to pod maturity	Number of days from sowing to 90% pod maturity	115		LENTIL.2012.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
PHENOLOGY	Days to pod maturity	Number of days from sowing to 90% pod maturity	87	26	LENTIL.2017.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2014lsp SD	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days to pod maturity	Number of days from sowing to 90% pod maturity	99		LENTIL.2013.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2013lsp SD	Not Available
PRODUCTION	Seed Production	Seed production meased in Grams per plant	1.97	19	LENTIL.2016.PULLMAN.LSP	PI 320936 2012lsp SD
SUBSET	Lens single plant	Accessions was developed by selecting seed from a single plant	Y - Yes, The accessions came from a single plant		LENTIL.SINGLE.PLANT	PI 320936 2003lsp SD	Not Available