| CHEMICAL | Sucrose | Sucrose content (percent of fresh weight) | 10.25 | | SUGARBEET.SUCROSE.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| CHEMICAL | Potassium | Potassium content of roots (milligrams per liter) | 2529 | 0 | SUGARBEET.POTASSIUM.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| CHEMICAL | Sodium | Sodium content of roots measured as milligrams per liter | 924 | 0 | SUGARBEET.SODIUM.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| CHEMICAL | Nitrogen | a-Amino-Nitrogen content of roots (milligrams/liter) | 909 | 0 | SUGARBEET.NITROGEN.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Beet Western Yellows Virus | Susceptability to Beet Western Yellows Virus. | 3 - 3: RESISTANT | | SUGARBEET.1997.LEWELLEN | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Cercospora | Susceptability to Cercospora. | 3 - 3: RESISTANT | 11 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Cercospora | Susceptability to Cercospora. | 5 - 5: INTERMEDIATE | | Beta PIs from the USDA-ARS NPGS evaluated for resistance to Cercospora beticola, 2008. Sixty one Plant Introductions (PIs) from the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) (Garden Beet, Sugar Beet, Leaf Beet, Fodder Beet, and wild beet) were evaluated in an artificially produced epiphytotic environment (Ruppel, E.G., and J.O. Gaskill. 1971. Techniques for evaluating sugarbeet for resistance to Cercospora beticola in the field. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 16:384-389) at the Saginaw Valley Bean and Beet Research Farm (B&B) in MI. A randomized complete-block design, with three replications was used to evaluate germplasm. Internal controls included a susceptible check, variety USH20, and a resistant check, ACH355. One-row plots m long, with 56 cm between rows were planted on 1 May 08. Azoxystrobin was applied in a band in furrow at planting and broadcast on 16 Jun 08 to control Rhizoctonia damping-off and root rot. The nursery was inoculated on 10 Jul 08 with a liquid spore suspension. Visual evaluations on the plot with a disease index (DI) on a scale from 0 (no disease) to 10 (plant dead) at the B&B were made on 5 Aug, 12 Aug, 19 Aug, 26 Aug, 2 Sep and 9 Sep 08, with the peak of the epidemic occurring around 2 Sep 08. The field was sprayed four times with phenmedipham, desmedipham, triflusulfuron methyl, and clopyralid (9 and 20 May and 2 and 12 Jun 08) and a cultivation was performed on 7 July 08 to control weeds. The field was thinned by hand. Bolting beets were removed 1 Sep 08, after which some annual materials could not be rated as there was not sufficient remaining tissue. The moderate nighttime temperatures in the summer of 2008, combined with good moisture, contributed to a moderate leaf spot epidemic. Disease severity peaked by early September, after which regrowth started to outpace new disease development, so that disease ratings remained constant or decreased after that rating (trial mean 9 Sep 08 = 4.2), thus ratings are not given after this date. At our 2 Sep 08 rating means of the resistant and susceptible internal control for the entire nursery (including three additional experiments) were 2.4 and 5.2 (scale of 0-10), respectively, across the nursery. In 2007 (27 Sep), these means were 1.8 and 5.3, respectively. Means of contributor lines in the entire nursery (including five additional tests) in 2008 ranged from 2.3 to 6.8. An analysis of variance (PROC GLM - SAS) on the disease indices (visual evaluation scores) determined that there were significant differences among entries (P#0.05) on all dates of evaluation. One accession (PI540576) had ratings that were not significantly different from the resistant control at all rating dates. Five accessions (PI518309, PI504261, PI540612, PI518371, and PI540600) had disease ratings that were significantly lower than the susceptible control on at least three of the last rating dates. These data, and more information on the accessions evaluated, are available through the USDA-ARS GRIN database at http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs. For a .doc file with the disease index data ">SUGARBEET.CERCOSPORA.2008.HANSON | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Aphanomyces | Susceptibility to Black Root (Aphanomyces cochliodes). | 3 - 3: RESISTANT | | SUGARBEET.APHANOMYCES.1997.RUSH | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Curly Top | Susceptability to Curly top. | 6 - 6: in 0-9 scale between Intermediate and Susceptible | | SUGARBEET.CURLYTOP.1997.BROWN | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Curly Top | Susceptability to Curly top. | 6 - 6: in 0-9 scale between Intermediate and Susceptible | | SUGARBEET.CURLYTOP.2008.STRAUSBAUGH | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Fusarium | Susceptability to Fusarium. | 5 - 5: INTERMEDIATE | | SUGARBEET.FUSARIUM.1997.RUSH | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania | Susceptability to Rhizomania. | 4 - 4: in 0-9 scale between Resistant and Intermediate | 19 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST910 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania | Susceptability to Rhizomania. | 4 - 4: in 0-9 scale between Resistant and Intermediate (53.3%) | 18 | SUGARBEET.1997.LEWELLEN | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania | Susceptability to Rhizomania. | 7 - 7: SUSCEPTIBLE | 14 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania | Susceptability to Rhizomania. | 7 - 7: SUSCEPTIBLE | 11 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Rhizoctonia | Susceptability to Rhizoctonia. | 7 - 7: SUSCEPTIBLE | 25 | SUGARBEET.RHIZOCTONIA.2009.PANELLA | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Rhizoctonia | Susceptability to Rhizoctonia. | 8 - 8: in 0-9 scale between Susceptible and Highly Susceptible | | SUGARBEET.RHIZOCTONIA.1997.RUPPEL | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania Canopy yellowing | Susceptability to Rhizomania scored by the yellowing of the canopy; 0 is none and 9 is most yellowing | 2 - 2: in 0-9 scale between Very Resistant and Resistant | 116 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST910 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania Canopy yellowing | Susceptability to Rhizomania scored by the yellowing of the canopy; 0 is none and 9 is most yellowing | 3 - 3: RESISTANT | 14 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania Canopy yellowing | Susceptability to Rhizomania scored by the yellowing of the canopy; 0 is none and 9 is most yellowing | 4 - 4: in 0-9 scale between Resistant and Intermediate | 11 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| GROWTH | Growth habit | General growth habit | 2 - Intermediate reading between 1 and 3 | | SUGARBEET.1997.LEWELLEN | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| INSECT | Beet Cyst Nematode | Susceptability to Beet Cyst Nematode (Heterodera schachtii). | 8 - (0 = IMMUNE, 9 = HIGHLY SUSCEPTIBLE) | | SUGARBEET.BCN.1997.HAFEZ(1) | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| INSECT | Beet Cyst Nematode | Susceptability to Beet Cyst Nematode (Heterodera schachtii). | 8 - (0 = IMMUNE, 9 = HIGHLY SUSCEPTIBLE) | | SUGARBEET.BCN.1997.HAFEZ(2) | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| INSECT | Root Maggot | Susceptability to Root Maggot. | 3 - 3: RESISTANT | 40 | SUGARBEET.ROOTMAGGOT.2008.BOETEL | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| INSECT | Root Maggot | Susceptability to Root Maggot. | 5 - 5: INTERMEDIATE | | SUGARBEET.ROOTMAGGOT.1997.ARMSTRONG | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| INSECT | Root Aphids | Susceptibility to Root Aphids. | 9 - 9: HIGHLY SUSCEPTIBLE | | For an Excel (xlsx) file of Michels screening data from 1995 to 2010">SUGARBEET.ROOTAPHID.1997.MICHELS | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| INSECT | Root Aphids (1-4) | Susceptibility to Root Aphids. | 4 - nymphs present, mant adults present | 15 | For an Excel (xlsx) file of Michels screening data from 1995 to 2010">SUGARBEET.ROOTAPHID.1997.MICHELS | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| MORPHOLOGY | Petiole color | Color of petiole | 1 - Green | | SUGARBEET.1997.LEWELLEN | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| MORPHOLOGY | Hypocotyl color | Hypocotyl pigmentation | 2 - Pink | | SUGARBEET.HYPOCOTYL.2022.PULLMAN | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| MORPHOLOGY | Flesh color | Main color of flesh | 4 - Red | | SUGARBEET.1997.LEWELLEN | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| MORPHOLOGY | Ring color | Color of rings (compared to main color of flesh) | 1 - White | | SUGARBEET.1997.LEWELLEN | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| MORPHOLOGY | Bolting tendency 1 | Bolting tendency - (percentage of bolters from an early sowing). | 4 | | SUGARBEET.1997.LEWELLEN | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| MORPHOLOGY | Seed weight 100 | Weight of 100 seeds in grams. | 1.276 | | SUGARBEET.SEEDWEIGHT.WRPIS | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| PRODUCTION | Tare Percent | Percentage of the difference in weight between harvested beets and those that have been cleaned for processing. | 3.67 | 0 | SUGARBEET.TARE.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| PRODUCTION | Tare Check Percent | Percentage difference between the accession and a locally adapted sugarbeet hybrid grown and harvested under the same conditions as the accessions being evaluated. | 146 | 0 | SUGARBEET.TARECH.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| PRODUCTION | Sodium Check Percent | Percentage difference between the sodium content of the accession (mg per liter) and a locally adapted sugarbeet hybrid grown and harvested under the same conditions as the accessions being evaluated. | 114 | 0 | SUGARBEET.SODIUMCH.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| PRODUCTION | Potassium Check Percent | Percentage difference between the potassium content of the accession (mg per liter) and a locally adapted sugarbeet hybrid grown and harvested under the same conditions as the accessions being evaluated. | 114 | 0 | SUGARBEET.POTASSCH.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| PRODUCTION | a-Amino-Nitrogen Check Percent | Percentage difference between the a-Amino-nitrogen content of the accession (mg per liter) and a locally adapted sugarbeet hybrid grown and harvested under the same conditions as the accessions being evaluated. | 95 | 0 | SUGARBEET.NITROGENCH.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| PRODUCTION | Yield | Root yield in tons per hectare | 5 | 11 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| PRODUCTION | Yield | Root yield in tons per hectare | 54 | 0 | SUGARBEET.YIELD.1997.DOLEY | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| PRODUCTION | Yield | Root yield in tons per hectare | 7 | 19 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST910 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| PRODUCTION | Yield | Root yield in tons per hectare | 8 | 14 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310 | PI 535842 92ncei01 SD | |
| SUBSET | Core subset | A flag to indicate the accession is part of the core subset. | Y - Yes, the accession is part of the core subset. | | SUGARBEET.CORE.1999.MARITIMA | PI 535842 89ncpo01 SD | Not Available |