Details for: PI 278720, Zea mays L. subsp. mays, Woodburn


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Zea mays L. subsp. mays
Top Name:
Woodburn
Origin:
Collected – Ohio, United States
Received by NPGS:
1961
PI Assigned:
1962
Improvement Status:
Landrace
Reproductive Uniformity:

Population
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Availability
FormQuantityNoteInventoryCart
Seed100 countPI 278720 85ncab01 SD
 
Images (2 total. Click on image for more.)

KERNELS

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Zea mays L. subsp. mays
Top Name:
Woodburn
Origin:
Collected – Ohio, United States
Received by NPGS:
1961
PI Assigned:
1962
Improvement Status:
Landrace
Reproductive Uniformity:

Population
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Source History
Collected
PRE 1961.
Ohio, United States

Donated
1961.
Ohio, United States
Comment: Donated from the variety collection held at the Agriculture Experiment Station, Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio.
Donor(s):
16 January 1962.
Iowa, United States
Comment: Plant Inventory, unlike current custom, indicates donation from a Regional Station.
Donor(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
Woodburn
Type: Unverified name

Narrative
Medium maturity. Widely grown in Ohio at one time. Attempts to extract useful inbred lines have been completely unsuccessful.
Zea mays L. subspp. mays
Genus:
Zea
Family:
Poaceae (alt. Gramineae)
Subfamily:
Panicoideae
Tribe:
Andropogoneae
Subtribe:
Tripsacinae
Nomen number:

311987
Verified:
07/15/1987 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Zea mays L. (1531 active accession[s])
Zea mays L. subsp. huehuetenangensis (H. H. Iltis & Doebley) Doebley (6 active accession[s])
Zea mays L. subsp. mexicana (Schrad.) H. H. Iltis (128 active accession[s])
Zea mays L. subsp. parviglumis H. H. Iltis & Doebley (250 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Autonym(s)
Zea mays L. var. mays

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
Englishcorn  1Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Englishdent corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishfield corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishflint corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishmaize  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Englishpod corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishpopcorn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishsweet corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Arabicdura shami  2Boulos, L. 1999-. Flora of Egypt
Chineseyu shu shu玉蜀黍 2Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds. 1994-. Flora of China (English edition).
Frenchmaïs  2Demilly, D. et al. 1996. Liste alphabétique des principales espèces de plantes cultivées et de mauvaises herbes. Noms latins et noms français, ed. 6. Note: GEVES-SNES, Beaucouzé, France
GermanMais  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Italiangranoturco  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Italianmais  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Japanese Rōmajitō-morokoshi  2Batra, L. R. 1995. Names of Japanese plants sorted by their Japanese names in Romanized Katakana and scientific nomenclature
Portuguesemilho  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishmaíz  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Swedishmajs  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Koreangangnaengi  2Mun-Chan, B. et al. 1986. A checklist of the Korean cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 34:134.
Transcribed Koreanogsusu  2Lee, Y. N. 1997. Flora of Korea.
Annotations
  • Nomenclature Name Change: 01 Dec 1989, from Zea mays L. to Zea mays L. subsp. mays
Other Links
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
  • Labate, J. A., K. R. Lamkey, S. E. Mitchell, S. Kresovich, H. Sullivan & J. S. C. Smith. 2003. Molecular and Historical Aspects of Corn Belt Dent Diversity. Crop Sci. (Madison) 43(1):80-91. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2003.8000. Number of accessions cited: 68
  • Smith, J. S. C. 1986. Genetic diversity within the Corn Belt Dent racial complex of maize (Zea mays L). Maydica 31:349-367. Number of accessions cited: 47
  • Yu, P., C. Li, M. Li, X. He, D. Wang, H. Li, C. Marcon, Y. Li, S. Perez-Limon, X. Chen, M. Delgado-Baquerizo, R. Koller, R. Metzner, D. van Dusschoten, D. Pflugfelder, L. Borisjuk, I. Plutenko, A. Mahon, M. F. R. Resende, S. Salvi, A. Akale, M. Abdalla, M. A. Ahmed, F. M. Bauer, A. Schnepf, G. Lobet, A. Heymans, K. Suresh, L. Schreiber, C. M. McLaughlin, C. Li, M. Mayer, C. Schon, V. Bernau, N. von Wiren, R. J. H. Sawers, T. Wang & F. Hochholdinger. 2024. Seedling root system adaptation to water availability during maize domestication and global expansion. Nat. Genet. 56(6):1245-1256. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01761-3. Number of accessions cited: 4333
Pedigree

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
CHEMICALOil PercentageWhole kernel oil concentration corrected to a standard moisture level (dry weight basis). Value is expressed in percent oil. The method of obtaining the value is described in the method record and may be by calibrated NIR or using wet lab procedures.5 MAIZE.NIR.DUPONT-PIONEER.2000PI 278720 62ncei01 SDNot Available
DISEASENorthern Leaf BlightLeaf response to northern leaf blight organism (Exserhilum turcicum [Pass.] Leonard & Suggs - previous name was Helminthosporium turcicum.7 - 7 on a scale 0 = No symptoms observed, 9 = Severe disease development19MAIZE.NLB.PIONEER.JOHNSTON.2009PI 278720 85ncab01 SD
DISEASECommon SmutPlant response to the common smut organism (Ustilago zeae(Beckm.) Unger = U. maydis (DC.) Corda)). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.6 - (0 = NO SYMPTOMS, 9 = SEVERE DISEASE DEVLOPMENT) MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
DISEASEDiplodia Stalk RotSTALK RESPONSE TO DIPLODIA STALK ROT ORGANISM (Diplodia maydis (Berc.) Sacc.)7 - 66-95% OF INOCULATED INTERNODE ROTTED MAIZE.DIPLODIA.MULT Not Available
DISEASEGray Leaf SpotLeaf response to gray leaf spot caused by (Cercospora zeae-maydis Tehon & E.Y. Daniels). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.5 - (5) Intermediately susceptible. MAIZE.GRAYLEAF.MONSANTO.MONMOUTH_IL.2000PI 278720 62ncei01 SDNot Available
INSECTEuropean Corn Borer Gen1RESISTANCE TO THE FIRST GENERATION OF EUROPEAN CORN BORER.9 - (9) Mostly susceptible. Long lesions on most all leaves MAIZE.ECB1.AMES.MULT Not Available
INSECTECB2 Shank DamageSHEATH DAMAGE FROM SECOND BROOD OF EUROPEAN CORN BORER. AVERAGE CAVITIES (INCHES OF DAMAGE) PER SHANK.2.5 MAIZE.ECB2.AMES.MULT Not Available
INSECTECB2 Stalk DamageSTALK DAMAGE FROM SECOND BROOD OF EUROPEAN CORN BORER13.2 MAIZE.ECB2.AMES.MULT Not Available
INSECTRootworm Root DamageROOT DAMAGE FROM ROOTWORM FEEDING2 - (2) Feeding scars; but no roots eaten off. MAIZE.ROOTWORM.AMES.MULT Not Available
INSECTRootworm Caused Root SizeROOTWORM RELATED ROOT SIZE GROWTH1 - LARGE ROOT SYSTEM MAIZE.ROOTWORM.AMES.MULT Not Available
INSECTRootworm Secondary Root GrowthROOTWORM RELATED SECONDARY ROOT GROWTH3 - (1 = PROFUSE, THICK SECONDARY ROOTS, 9 = NO APPRECIABLE SECONDARY ROOTS) MAIZE.ROOTWORM.AMES.MULT Not Available
INSECTBlack CutwormRESISTANCE TO BLACK CUTWORM7 - (7) (1 = RESISTANT, 9 = SUSCEPTIBLE) MAIZE.B.CUTWORM.MULT Not Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel TypeKERNEL TYPEC - DENT MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel ColorKERNEL COLORB - YELLOW MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
PHENOLOGYHomologous AreaHomologous Area  MAIZE.DONOR Not Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING C LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees Celsius at latitude 40-49.8022MAIZE.OBSERVATION.AMES.2000PI 278720 62ncei01 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYDays to Silk 40-49 latitudeNumber of days from planting to when silks of 50% of observed plants have emerged where the observations are at latitude 40 to 49 degrees.742MAIZE.OBSERVATION.AMES.2000PI 278720 62ncei01 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.14382MAIZE.OBSERVATION.AMES.2000PI 278720 62ncei01 SDNot Available
PRODUCTION1000 Kernel WeightThe weight of 1000 kernels measured in grams, preferably with the weight adjusted to 10% moisture content.321 MAIZE.CURATOR.REVIEWPI 278720 85ncab01 SD
PRODUCTION1000 Kernel WeightThe weight of 1000 kernels measured in grams, preferably with the weight adjusted to 10% moisture content.353 MAIZE.DONOR.INITIAL.OBSERVATIONPI 278720 62ncei01 SDNot Available
TAXONOMICPrimary RacePrimary race of the accession. Mixed indicates that more than two races are present in the accession.CORNBD - Corn Belt Dent MAIZE.CURATOR.REVIEW Not Available