Select the tab for the type of search. Each tab has everything you need to do to perform that type of search.

(Results of more than 500 will not return images.)

This search will show only accessions that have material that may be requested, including those not seasonally available.
You may list accessions with separators (commas or semicolons, as shown below) or by entering them on separate lines, such as
PI 651794
PI 651649
PI 651650
When searching a range of accessions, use the Advanced Search tab with the Accession Identifier Range criterion.

The more information you provide, the better the search will be.


Scientific name (any part, no hybrid symbols)

Plant name


Genebank
Country of Origin


Other search criteria:



With genomic data With NCBI link With images Only non-Genetically Engineered

If your results aren't what you expected, try using the Advanced Search tab and filling in more information.
Your query included: All accessions

View Observation Data

Selected item(s) below:


ACCESSIONPLANT NAMETAXONOMYORIGINGENEBANKIMAGEAVAILABILITYRECEIVEDSOURCE TYPESOURCE DATECOLLECTION SITECOORDINATESELEVATIONHABITATIMPROVEMENT LEVELNARRATIVE
0PI 539670'Citrus excelsa'Citrus sp.Sabah, MalaysiaRIV1972DONATEDPRE 1972Dick Hamilton received 4 fruits from a cooperator in Udet Sandakin, Sabak, North Borneo [sic, see comment below]. He believes that the fruit could have been a form of rough lemon. The fruits, however, had smooth, thin tightly adherant skin, large prominent oil glands, and bitter, acrid, inedible flesh. Polyembryonic. (original CES documentation ca 1972...WP Bitters?)

This accession had seedling yellows which was removed by shoot tip grafting (STG 172-1). (EM Nauer, 1986)

Fruit compared with fruit of RCRC 2316 = PI 109632, Citrus excelsa, and these two accessions appear to be identical in both fruit & foliage characteristics. May as well discard this one. (EM Nauer, 11/13/1987)

Appears to be identical to C. excelsa. (EM Nauer, 10/1988)

There are currently three accessions identified as "Citrus excelsa" (PI 109632, PI 539194, and the current accession. All three were originally received as something other than C. excelsa. C. excelsa is described in Wester (1915). The provenance of this particular accession is a little unclear since the political makeup of the area of origin has changed over the years. Best conjecture is that this is from the northeast coast of the Island of Borneo, corresponding to what is currently referred to as Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia. It is also unclear as to when Dr. Hamilton received the fruit. Were the fruit received in Hawaii in 1972 and seeds immediately sent to Riverside, or were the seeds sent to Riverside extracted from fruit from trees grown from seeds taken from fruit sent some time previously? All personnel from that time have passed into the big repository in the sky so any additional information will not be available in this world. (RR Krueger, 09/18/2018)

Additional information and nice photographs from the UC Riverside Citrus Variety Collection.

1434606PI 539670
1PI 539194Citrus excelsaCitrus ×aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle PhilippinesRIV1947COLLECTEDPRE 1947Dr Gardner reports in their preliminary rootstock trials that this variety looked very promising. Seeds germinated very well, vrey vigorous and uniform. (archival material on file at NCGRCD/CVC; origin unknown)

This is not Kalpi. Could be C. excelsa or C. davaoensis. (JA Brusca, 10/1964)

This accession had exocortis which was removed by shoot tip grafting (STG 205-2). (EM Nauer, 1986)

This accession appears to be identical to Citrus excelsa, [RCRC 2316 = PI 109632]. May as well discard? (EM Nauer, 01/14/1988)

Appears to be identical to Citrus excelsa, [RCRC 2316 = PI 109632]. (EM Nauer, 10/1988)

The association of this genotype with C. excelsa is not well documented, the only comment available being that of Mr. Brusca. There are currently three accessions identified as "Citrus excelsa" (PI 100632, PI 539670, and the current accession. All three were originally received as something other than C. excelsa. C. excelsa is described in Wester (1915). (RR Krueger, 09/18/2018)

Additional information and nice photographs from the UC Riverside Citrus Variety Collection.

1434130PI 539194
2PI 109632'Excelsa'Citrus ×aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle Maryland, United StatesRIV1914COLLECTED05/22/1914CultivarCutting from CPB Sept 1930 & pltd lathhouse, balled out 3/32. Planted Apr '32. Ref Philippine Agric Review Vol VIII, No 1, 1915, pg 26. This is not the same fruit we list as Limon Real in Fd 18A-34-2 [=PI 109624]. (JA Brusca, 1964-10)

This is listed as a member of the Papeda group because it was so listed in the old [UC Citrus Experiment Station] accession book. However, The Citrus Industry, Vol I, pp 364, puts it under aurantifolia in a table of comparison of major classification systems. What is it? (EM Nauer, 1986)

The Citrus Industry doesn't give a description of C. excelsa so here 'tis: A medium size fruit - medium yellow, basically smooth but variably bumpy. Round with flattened base and blunt nose surrounded by a depressed ring. Rind thin; seedy, flesh ricey, white to yellow, very sour. Used as an indicator plant for tatterleaf-citrange stunt. (EM Nauer, 1988-01-14)

The redundant accession number PI 539192 was assigned to this genotype in error in 1990. The observations were made when it was labelled as PI 539192. This accession was received by PIO as C. aurantiifolia "mandarin lime" and was so identified in the CPB records. However, all known CES records indentify it as C. excelsa and link it to the description in Wester, 1915. The reason or source for this is not known. There are two other apparently redundant accessions of C. excelsa: PI 539194 and PI 539670. This genotype needs rationalization. (RR Krueger, 2018-09-09)

Additional information and1434130 nice photographs from the UC Riverside Citrus Variety Collection.

1801068PI 109632
3PI 109624'Limon Real No. 18'Citrus sp.Central Visayas (Region VII), PhilippinesRIVNot Available1914COLLECTED02/21/1914CultivarThis is different from what we call C excelsa [PI 109632]. (JA Brusca, 10/1964)

This accession had psorosis, removed by shoot tip grafting (STG 179-2). (EM Nauer, 1985)

Fruit is much like a smooth, round lemon; lemon-like in flavor, seedy. Some fruits have a persistant style. (EM Nauer, 11/12/1987)

This accession was erroneously and redundantly assigned PI 539192 in 1990. This is now corrected to the correct PI 109624. Observatoins were made when this was numbered as PI 539192. Wester (1915) equates 'Limon real' with C excelsa, so thsere is some confusion between this PI 109624 and PI 109632. As per the record for PI 109632, it is unclear how that accession came to be identified as C excelsa and as to which may be the correct version of C excelsa/'Limon real'. Note that PI 109624 was originally received as seed, and PI 109624 as budwood. PI 109632 has more broadly winged petioles than PI 109624, as per Wester's description. (RR Krueger, 09/18/2018)

Additional information and nice photographs from the UC Riverside Citrus Variety Collection.

1801060PI 109624