Select the tab for the type of search. Each tab has everything you need to do to perform that type of search.
(Results of more than 500 will not return images.)
This search will show only accessions that have material that may be requested, including those not seasonally available.
You may list accessions with separators (commas or semicolons, as shown below) or by entering them on separate lines, such as
PI 651794
PI 651649
PI 651650
When searching a range of accessions, use the Advanced Search tab with the Accession Identifier Range criterion.
The more information you provide, the better the search will be.
Scientific name (any part, no hybrid symbols)
Genebank
Country of Origin
Other search criteria:
If your results aren't what you expected, try using the Advanced Search tab and filling in more information.
Your query included:
All accessions
| ACCESSION | PLANT NAME | TAXONOMY | ORIGIN | GENEBANK | IMAGE | AVAILABILITY | RECEIVED | SOURCE TYPE | SOURCE DATE | COLLECTION SITE | COORDINATES | ELEVATION | HABITAT | IMPROVEMENT LEVEL | NARRATIVE | | |
|---|
| 0 | PI 673003 | 'Nash' | Cicer arietinum L. | Washington, United States | PVPO | | Not Available | 2014 | DEVELOPED | | | | | | Cultivar | During the past five years (2009-2013) an average of almost 160,000 acres of chickpea were harvested annually in the USA. The value of a chickpea crop is influenced by both yield and seed size. Larger seeds are more desirable in the whole seed markets and have a higher value than smaller seeds, which are typically processed into hummus. The USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service separates chickpeas into two size classes based on the diameter of seed: small (< 7.9 mm), and large(<:: 7.9 mm). Over a recent five year period (2009-2013), large chickpeas have received an average price of '0.80 kg-1, which is 48% higher than the average price of '0.54 kg-1 received for small chickpeas. "Nash" kabuli chickpea (Experimental designation CA04900843C; Reg. No. XXX Pl ) was released by the USDA-ARS in July 2013. Nash was released because of its superior yield and large seed size compared to the popular chickpea cultivar "Sierra" based on replicated yield trials conducted across 30 location-years in Idaho and Washington. Nash had similar performance as Sierra for several important agronomic traits including days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, and canopy height. Nash also exhibited moderate resistance to Ascochyta blight, caused by Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labrousse, which was similar to the disease reaction of Sierra. The mean yield of Nash over all trials was 1825 kg/ha, which was 17.2% higher than the mean yield of Sierra. Nash consistently produced larger seed than Sierra. The 100 seed weight of Nash was 59. 7 g, which was greater than Sierra .. Over 76% of the seed of Nash was > 9.1 mm in diameter. | 1920931 | PI 673003 |