Select the tab for the type of search. Each tab has everything you need to do to perform that type of search.

(Results of more than 500 will not return images.)

This search will show only accessions that have material that may be requested, including those not seasonally available.
You may list accessions with separators (commas or semicolons, as shown below) or by entering them on separate lines, such as
PI 651794
PI 651649
PI 651650
When searching a range of accessions, use the Advanced Search tab with the Accession Identifier Range criterion.

The more information you provide, the better the search will be.


Scientific name (any part, no hybrid symbols)

Plant name


Genebank
Country of Origin


Other search criteria:



With genomic data With NCBI link With images Only non-Genetically Engineered

If your results aren't what you expected, try using the Advanced Search tab and filling in more information.
Your query included: All accessions

View Observation Data

Selected item(s) below:


ACCESSIONPLANT NAMETAXONOMYORIGINGENEBANKIMAGEAVAILABILITYRECEIVEDSOURCE TYPESOURCE DATECOLLECTION SITECOORDINATESELEVATIONHABITATIMPROVEMENT LEVELNARRATIVE
0PI 653535'Lassik'Triticum aestivum L. subsp. aestivum California, United StatesPVPONot Available2008DEVELOPED2007Cultivar Lassik , previously designated UC1495 is a hard red spring wheat developed and released by the University of California, Davis. The most similar variety to Lassik is its hard red spring recurrent parent Anza (CItr 15284) Qualset et al 1984. Both varieties have similar height (95 cm), flowering (160 d from sowing to flowering at Davis, CA 2006), and leaf color (green). Lassik is resistant to most of the field strains of stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis Westend) conferred by the resistance gene Yr17 transferred from the variety Madsen (PI 511673) Allan et al, 1989, and the gene for high temperature stripe rust resistance Yr36 (Uauy et al. 2005) transferred from the variety Glupro (PI 592759). The percent final infection of the penultimate leaf was higher in Anza than in Lassik in the eight locations analyzed. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) in six of the eight locations and marginally significant (P=0.05) in one. These results confirmed that Lassik has a better field resistance to stripe rust than Anza. Lassik has higher grain protein content than Anza (11% higher), both in the grain (P= 0.02) and the flour (P= 0.04), as expected by the presence of the Gpc-B1 gene (Uauy et al. 2006) transferred from the variety Glupro.Lassik showed significantly higher yields than Anza in 2006 at the UC Davis Agronomy Farm (35% increase, P= 0.009) and Madera (39% higher, P=0.015). These are the two locations that exhibited the highest levels of stripe rust infection, suggesting that the increased yield was due to the improved stripe rust resistance of Lassik. Lassik has better gluten strength than Anza as expected from the incorporation of two high molecular weight glutenin (HMWG) alleles 1 and 5+10 . The stronger gluten of Lassik resulted in significantly higher farinograph peaks than Anza (110% higher). Lassik also has longer mixing time (109% longer), longer departure time (98% longer), and larger loaf volume (16% larger) than Anza, but the differences for these three parameters were borderline non-significant (0.051752772PI 653535