Methods
1997 peanut increase in Ashburn, Georgia.
1998 peanut increase in Ashburn, Georgia.
2010 cultivated peanut regeneration at Attapulgus, Georgia
2011 cultivated peanut regeneration at Attapulgus, Georiga
1994 peanut increase at the Bledsoe Farm, Pike County.
2003 cultivated peanut increase at the Bledsoe Farm, Pike County.
2004 cultivated peanut increase at the Bledsoe Farm, Pike County
2005 cultivated peanut increase at the Bledsoe Farm, Pike County
1999 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia.
2000 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia.
2001 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia.
2002 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia.
2006 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia
2007 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia
2008 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia
2009 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia
2010 cultivated peanut regeneration at Byron, Georgia
2011 cultivated peanut regeneration at Byron, Georiga
1998 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia.
1998 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia for botanical variety observation and increase.
1998 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia of large seeded accessions.
1998 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia of maturity standards.
1998 peanut increase in Byron, Georgia for testa color observation and increase.
2010 peanut regeneration at University of Florida Farm, Citra, Florida
2011 cultivated peanut regeneration at Citra, Florida
2012 cultivated peanut regeneration at Citra, Florida
2013 cultivated peanut regeneration at Citra, Florida in Short Plots
Fatty Acid composition of the peanut collection analyzed using a gas chromatograph (GC)
The U.S. germplasm collection for cultivated peanut,
Arachis hypogaea L. contains a great amount of genetic diversity. The development of a core collection for peanut provides a
subset of accessions that are representative of the entire collection and that, could be extensively examined. In order to select a core collection for peanut, the peanut germplasm collection was stratified by country of origin and by the amount of available morphological
data. When information was available for at least four of the same morphological
variables for at least 16 accessions from the same country of origin, then the data for these accessions were analyzed using multivariate statistical analysis. Results allowed the accessions
to be clustered into groups which, theoretically, are genetically similar. Random sampling was then used to select
about 10% from each group. Accessions with inadequate data for multivariate analysis were selected using a 10% random sample from each country of origin. Accessions from countries having few (<=5) entries in the collection were pooled and a 10% random sample was selected. The resulting 831 accessions form a core collection for peanut. Examination of data for six phenotypic traits indicated that the genetic variation expressed for each trait in the entire collection has been preserved in the selected core collection.
The complete list of accessions used by Holbrook et al to select the peanut core may be viewed or downloaded as an Excel file: Selection of a Peanut Core Collection.
Additional information about the traits evaluated, as well as material and methods, is available as an Acrobat file (pdf)
The Peanut Mini Core study/evaluation consisting of 112 accessions may be viewed at PEANUT.MINI.CORE
a>
Fatty Acid composition of the peanut core collection analyzed using a gas chromatograph (GC)
Accession which comprise the U.S. cultivated peanut core collection
2009 regeneration of cultivated peanut accessions from the 2008 regeneration at Dawson, Georgia
2009 peanut regeneration at Dawson, Georgia
1997 Ecuador peanut increase at Experiment, Georgia.
1997 peanut increase in Experiment, Georgia.
1997 peanut increase in Florida.
1998 peanut increase in Florida.
2012 cultivated peanut regeneration in greenhouse at Griffin, Georgia
Scanned pod and seed images of cultivated peanut accessions regenerated at Attapulgus, GA in 2011
Scanned pod and seed images of peanut accessions regenerated at Citra, FL in 2011
Image of plot of peanut accessions regenrated at Citra, FL in 2012
Scanned pod images of the peanut core from Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia
Images of flower or plant taken in the greenhouse at Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia in 2011
Scanned pod and seed images of peanuts accessions in the ICRISAT Mini Core regenerated by Dr. Corley C. Holbrook, USDA, ARS, Tifton, Georgia in 2011
Scanned pod and seed images of cultivated peanut regeneration at Raleigh, North Carolina
Scanned seed images of peanut minicore regeneration in Florida
Scanned pod images of the peanut minicore from Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia
Scanned seed images of peanuts from Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia in 2001
Scanned pod and seed images of Peanut Mini-Core at USDA, ARS, National Peanut Research Laboratory (NPRL), Dawson, Georgia in 2009
Scanned pod and seed images of cultivated and wild peanut accessions at Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia in 2011
Scanned seed images of peanuts from Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia
Images of plots and flowers on plants taken in Tifton, Georgia field plots of Dr. Corley C. Holbrook, USDA, ARS. Pod and seed images of U.S. Standards peanut accessions scanned at the Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia.
Scanned pod images of wild peanut accessions harvested from Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia greenhouses in 2012
Scanned pod and seed images of wild peanut accessions at Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia in April 2012
Scanned pod and seed images of wild peanut accessions at Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, Georgia in Marchl 2025
2009 peanut regeneration at Lubbock, Texas
A mini core of the U.S. Peanut germplasm collection. A 10% sample resulting in a core of the core collection (mini core) based on eight above-ground and eight below-ground morphological characteristics. The above-ground descriptors were growth habit, plant size, prominence of main stem at mid-season, prominence of main stem at harvest, presence of flowers on the main axis, leaf color, stem pigmentation, and maturity. The below-ground descriptors were measrued post harvest and included pod shape, pod constriction, pod reticulation, seed per pod, 100-pod weight, U.S. pod market type, seed coat color, and 100-seed weight.
A mini core of peanuts developed by ICRISAT
2012 cultivated peanut regeneration in New Mexico
2013 cultivated peanut regeneration in New Mexico
2006 peanut regeneration in Oklahoma
2008 cultivated peanut regeneration in Oklahoma
2010 cultivated peanut regeneration at Stillwater, Oklahoma
2011 cultivated peanut regeneration at Stillwater, Oklahoma
1997 peanut increase in Oklahoma.
1998 peanut increase in Oklahoma.
1996 peanut increase in Puerto Rico.
2006 cultivated peanut quarantine greenhouse regeneration observed for peanut stripe virus (PStV)
2012 cultivated peanut quarantine greenhouse regeneration observed for peanut stripe virus (PStV) on accessions
2011 cultivated peanut regeneration at Raleigh, North Carolina
2012 cultivated peanut regeneration at Raleigh, North Carolina
2013 cultivated peanut regeneration at Raleigh, North Carolina
Primary Seed Coat Colors 2022
2011 Cultivated Peanut Standards grown in Tifton, Georgia
2011 cultivated peanut regeneration in Texas
2013 cultivated peanut regeneration in Lubbock, Texas
2012 cultivated peanut regeneration in Tifton, Georgia
1997 peanut increase in Tifton, Georgia.
Contains data taken at the Southern RPIS in Griffin, GA. The information presented under this environment represents data which has been recorded over several years at the Southern Regional Plant Introduction Station. No one specific environment exists for the data.
1995 peanut increase in Griffin.
1996 peanut increase in Griffin at Bledsoe Farm.
Cultivated peanut hundred seed weights for available inventories updated semi-annually to incorporate new data on current regenerations
Cultivated peanut hundred seed weights
1996 peanut greenhouse increase in Griffin.
Contains data taken at the Southern RPIS in Griffin, GA. G.M. Bousch and M.W. Anderson collected the data on resistance to Diabrotica undecimpunctate howardii.
Contains data taken at the Southern RPIS in Griffin, GA. L.I. Miller collected the data on resistance to Belonolaimus spp.
Contains data taken at the Southern RPIS in Griffin, GA. G.M. Bousch and M.W. Anderson collected the data on resistance to thrips.