Details for: PI 356894, Pisum sativum L., PLP 251


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Pisum sativum L.
Top Name:
PLP 251
Origin:
Collected – Uttar Pradesh, India
Received by NPGS:
14 Jul 1970
PI Assigned:
1971
Improvement Status:
Uncertain improvement status
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Availability
FormQuantityNoteInventoryCart
Seed30 countPI 356894 2004i SD
 
Images (3 total. Click on image for more.)

FLOWER

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Pisum sativum L.
Top Name:
PLP 251
Origin:
Collected – Uttar Pradesh, India
Received by NPGS:
14 Jul 1970
PI Assigned:
1971
Improvement Status:
Uncertain improvement status
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Source History
Collected

Uttar Pradesh, India
Locality: Bhindghi

Donated
14 July 1970.
Delhi, India

Donor(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
PLP 251
Type: Donor identifier
Group: IARI
IARI

G 20666
Type: Site identifier
Group: GENEVA
Ids used by the North Eastern Plant Intro. Station; N. Y.
Northeast Regional PI Station

Narrative
Yellow seeded 10
Pisum sativum L.
Genus:
Pisum
Family:
Fabaceae (alt. Leguminosae)
Subfamily:
Faboideae
Tribe:
Fabeae
Nomen number:

300472
Place of publication:

Sp. pl. 2:727. 1753
Verified:
08/06/1986 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Pisum sativum L. subsp. asiaticum Govorov (56 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (M. Bieb.) Asch. & Graebn. (105 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (M. Bieb.) Asch. & Graebn. var. brevipedunculatum P. H. Davis & Meikle (0 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (M. Bieb.) Asch. & Graebn. var. elatius (M. Bieb.) Alef. (9 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (M. Bieb.) Asch. & Graebn. var. pumilio Meikle (29 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. jomardii (Schrank) Kosterin (0 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum (713 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum var. arvense (L.) Poir. (78 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum var. macrocarpum Ser. (1 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum var. sativum (862 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. transcaucasicum Govorov (19 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Pisum sativum L. subsp. tibetanicum ined.

Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
Englishpea  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Italianpisello  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Swedishärt  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Chinesewan dou  2Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds. 1994-. Flora of China (English edition).
Transcribed Koreanwandu  2Mun-Chan, B. et al. 1986. A checklist of the Korean cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 34:118.
Annotations
Other Links
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
  • Grunwald, N. J., V. A. Coffman, & J. M. Kraft. 2003. Source of partial resistance to fusarium root rot in the Pisum core collection. Pl. Dis. 87:1197-1200. Number of accessions cited: 2695
  • Kraft, J. M., B. Dunne, D. Goulden, & S. Armstrong. 1998. A search for resistance in peas to Mycosphaerella pinodes. Pl. Dis. 82:251-253. Number of accessions cited: 1992
  • Tedford, E. C. & D. A. Inglis. 1999. Evaluation of legumes common to the Pacfic Northwest as hosts for the pea cyst nematode, Heterodera goettingiana. J. Nematol. 31:155-163. Number of accessions cited: 2252
Pedigree

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
DISEASEFusarium Wilt Race 1Resistance to Race 1 of Fusarium WiltR - RESISTANT PEA.FUSWILT1.1999.MUEHLBAUERPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
DISEASEFusarium Root RotResistance to Fusarium Root Rot caused by Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi4 - Pronounced brownish-black lesions at cotyledonary attachment area. Lesions extend upward to soil line and down into root system. PEA.FUSROOTROT.2000.KRAFTPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
DISEASEAscochyta BlightPercent damage caused by ascochyta. Maturity ratings: 0=still flowering, 1=flat pods; 2=semi-mature pods, 3=mature botto pods, 4=mature, 5=completely mature pods35 PEA.ASCOCHYTA.1992.DUNNEPI 356894 92ne9 SDNot Available
GROWTHPlant Height, finalPlant height of a typical plant in centimeters from the ground to tip at maturity.170 Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYNode Number to First FlowerA count from the second trifid bract as one, up to and including the first flowering node when 50% of the plants in a planting are flowering. Expressed as an average of five randomly chosen plants (in integers).20 Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYFlower ColorFlower colorW - White PEA.FLOWERCOL.1999.SPILLMANPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYFlower ColorFlower colorW - White PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYFlower ColorFlower colorW - White Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYFlowers per PeduncleMaximum number of flowers per peduncle.1 Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod LengthAverage length of pods from first reproductive node of five different plants at full pod stage recorded in centimeters. Expressed to one decimal place.4.6 PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYPod LengthAverage length of pods from first reproductive node of five different plants at full pod stage recorded in centimeters. Expressed to one decimal place.7 Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod WidthAverage width of pods from first reproductive node of five different largest pods (each from a different plant) measured at full pod stage recorded in centimeters. Expressed to one decimal place.1 Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod WidthAverage width of pods from first reproductive node of five different largest pods (each from a different plant) measured at full pod stage recorded in centimeters. Expressed to one decimal place.1.1 PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYPod ColorPod color, taken at first reproductive node at full pod stage.G - Green PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYPod ColorPod color, taken at first reproductive node at full pod stage.G - Green Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod ShapePod shape measured at flat pod stage.S - Straight PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYPod ShapePod shape measured at flat pod stage.S - Straight Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod ApexPod apex measured at flat pod stage.B - Blunt PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYPod ApexPod apex measured at flat pod stage.B - Blunt Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod TypePod type taken at full pod stage on first reproductive node.E - Flat or round edible Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYSeeds per PodFully develops on first reproductive node. Average number of seeds from five longest pods, each from five different plants. Expressed to one decimal place.5 PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYSeeds per PodFully develops on first reproductive node. Average number of seeds from five longest pods, each from five different plants. Expressed to one decimal place.7 Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYLeaflet MorphologyLeaflet morphologyN - Normal PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYLeaflet MorphologyLeaflet morphologyN - Normal Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYStipulesStipulesN - Normal PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYStipulesStipulesN - Normal Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYStem FasciationStem fasciationN - No PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYStem FasciationStem fasciationN - No Click for an Excel spread sheet of the 2004 Pisum Pullman screenhouse data.">PEA.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
MORPHOLOGYSeed weight 100Weight of 100 seeds in grams.15.32 PEA.SEEDWEIGHT.WRPISPI 356894 2004i SD
NEMATODECyst Nematode Leaf SymptomsResistance to the Pea Cyst Nematode (Heterodera goettingiana) - leaf rating.4 - CHLOROSIS 75% OF CANOPY PEA.NEMATODE.1994.INGLISPI 356894 92ne9 SDNot Available
NEMATODECyst Nematode Root SymptomsResistance to the Pea Cyst Nematode (Heterodera goettingiana) - Root rating.H - HIGH AMOUNT OF WHITE CYSTS PEA.NEMATODE.1994.INGLISPI 356894 92ne9 SDNot Available
OTHERImage/picture1A picture or imageflower PEA.IMAGE.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
OTHERImage/picture1A picture or imagepod PEA.IMAGE.2004.SHOUSEPI 356894 2004i SD
OTHERImage/picture1A picture or imageseed PEA.IMAGE.2014.SEEDPI 356894 2004i SD
PHENOLOGYDay of first bloomDay of the year when flowering begins.1750PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYDays to flowerNumber of days from sowing seed to first observed flower770PEA.1998.SHOUSEPI 356894 1998i SDNot Available