Details for: PI 587137, Zea mays L. subsp. mays, 'Ms71'


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Zea mays L. subsp. mays
Cultivar:
'Ms71'
Origin:
Developed – Michigan, United States
Received by NPGS:
06 May 1992
Improvement Status:
Breeding material
Reproductive Uniformity:

Highly inbred
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Availability
FormQuantityNoteInventoryCart
Seed100 countPI 587137 10ncai01 SD
 
Images (8 total. Click on image for more.)

KERNELS

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Zea mays L. subsp. mays
Cultivar:
'Ms71'
Origin:
Developed – Michigan, United States
Received by NPGS:
06 May 1992
Improvement Status:
Breeding material
Reproductive Uniformity:

Highly inbred
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Source History
Developed

Michigan, United States

Donated
06 May 1992.
Missouri, United States

Donor(s):
Accession Group(s)
Group name: Maize.Group.Ames.Panel.2010
Note: Original inbred accessions sent as Ames Panel in 2010.
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Maize.Group.Ames.Panel.2010

Group name: Maize.Set.Inbred.Diversity.282.Plus.NAM.Parents
Note: A maize collection of 282 Association Panel Inbreds and NAM (Nested Association Mapping) parental inbreds.
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Maize.Set.Inbred.Diversity.282.Plus.NAM.Parents

Group name: Maize.Set.Inbred.Diversity.NAM.Parents
Note: A maize collection of 26 inbreds crossed with B73 that were used to create the NAM RILs.
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Maize.Set.Inbred.Diversity.NAM.Parents

Group name: Maize.Set.Inbred.PVP.Application.Standard
Note: Standard Inbreds that are reference lines to be used in PVP comparisons for PVP application.
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Maize.Set.Inbred.PVP.Application.Standard

Accession Names and Identifiers
'Ms71'
Type: Cultivar name

CIMMYTMA 23832
Type: CGIAR International Center Identifier
Group: CIMMYT-GGLOBAL-MAIZE
Matched with GENESYS data; 2025-05-22.

CIMMYTMA-023832
Type: CGIAR International Center Identifier
Group: SINGER-CIMMYT-MAIZE
The format of this identifier was CIMMYTMA-000000 with a dash and zero fill for numbers that were less than 6 digits in length.

Ames 19320
Type: Site identifier
Group: AMES
NC-7
USDA ARS NCRPIS

Ames 24712
Type: Site identifier
Group: AMES
NC-7 Research Numbers

1760-2/01
Type: Other or unclassified name
Row and nursery year.
Goodman, Major M. North Carolina State University

Narrative
Zea mays L. subspp. mays
Genus:
Zea
Family:
Poaceae (alt. Gramineae)
Subfamily:
Panicoideae
Tribe:
Andropogoneae
Subtribe:
Tripsacinae
Nomen number:

311987
Verified:
07/15/1987 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Zea mays L. (1531 active accession[s])
Zea mays L. subsp. huehuetenangensis (H. H. Iltis & Doebley) Doebley (6 active accession[s])
Zea mays L. subsp. mexicana (Schrad.) H. H. Iltis (128 active accession[s])
Zea mays L. subsp. parviglumis H. H. Iltis & Doebley (250 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Autonym(s)
Zea mays L. var. mays

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
Englishcorn  1Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Englishdent corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishfield corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishflint corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishmaize  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Englishpod corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishpopcorn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishsweet corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Arabicdura shami  2Boulos, L. 1999-. Flora of Egypt
Chineseyu shu shu玉蜀黍 2Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds. 1994-. Flora of China (English edition).
Frenchmaïs  2Demilly, D. et al. 1996. Liste alphabétique des principales espèces de plantes cultivées et de mauvaises herbes. Noms latins et noms français, ed. 6. Note: GEVES-SNES, Beaucouzé, France
GermanMais  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Italiangranoturco  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Italianmais  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Japanese Rōmajitō-morokoshi  2Batra, L. R. 1995. Names of Japanese plants sorted by their Japanese names in Romanized Katakana and scientific nomenclature
Portuguesemilho  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishmaíz  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Swedishmajs  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Koreangangnaengi  2Mun-Chan, B. et al. 1986. A checklist of the Korean cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 34:134.
Transcribed Koreanogsusu  2Lee, Y. N. 1997. Flora of Korea.
Annotations
Other Links
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
  • Buckler, E. S., J. B. Holland, P. J. Bradbury, C. B. Acharya, P. J. Brown, C. Browne, E. Ersoz, S. Flint-Garcia, A. Garcia, J. C. Glaubitz, M. M. Goodman, C. Harjes, K. Guill, D. E. Kroon, S. Larsson, N. K. Lepak, H. Li, S. E. Mitchell, G. Pressoir, J. A. Peiffer, M. Oropeza-Rosas, T. R. Rocheford, M. Cinta-Romay, S. Romero, S. Salvo, H. Sanchez-Villeda, H. S. Da Silva, Q. Sun, F. Tian, N. Upadyayula, D. Ware, H. Yates, J. Yu, Z. Zhang, S. Krosovich, & M. D. McMullen. 2009. The Genetic Architecture of Maize Flowering Time. Science 325:714-718. DOI: 10.1126/science.1174276. Number of accessions cited: 28
  • Chia, J.-M., C. Song, P. J. Bradbury, D. Costich, N. de Leon, J. Doebley, R. J. Elshire, B. Gaut, L. Geller, J. C. Glaubitz, M. Gore, K. E. Guill, J. Holland, M. B. Hufford, J. Lai, M. Li, X. Liu, Y. Lu, R. McCombie, R. Nelson, J. Poland, B. M. Prasanna, T. Pyhäjärvi, T. Rong, R. S. Sekhon, Q. Sun, M. I. Tenaillon, F. Tian, J. Wang, X. Xu, Z. Zhang, S. M. Kaeppler, J. Ross-Ibarra, M. D. McMullen, E. S. Buckler, G. Zhang, Y. Xu, & D. Ware. 2012. Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux. Nat. Genet. 44:803-807. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2313. Number of accessions cited: 63
  • Choquette, N. E., F. Ogut, T. M. Wertin, C. M. Montes, C. A. Sorgini, A. M. Morse, P. J. Brown, A. D. B. Leakey, L. M. McIntyre, & E. A. Ainsworth. 2019. Uncovering hidden genetic variation in photosynthesis of field-grown maize under ozone pollution. Global Change Biol. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14794. Number of accessions cited: 11
  • Christensen, S. A., A. Huffaker, J. Sims, C. T. Hunter, A. Block, M. M. Vaughan, D. Willett, M. Romero, J. E. Mylroie, W. P. Williams, & E. A. Schmelz. 2018. Fungal and herbivore elicitation of the novel maize sesquiterpenoid, zealexin A4, is attenuated by elevated CO2. Planta 247(4):863-873. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-017-2830-5. Number of accessions cited: 24
  • Flint-Garcia, S. A., A. Thuillet, J. Yu, G. Pressoir, S. M. Romero, S. E. Mitchell, J. Doebley, S. Kresovich, M. M. Goodman, & E. S. Buckler. 2005. Maize association population: a high-resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. Plant J. 44(6)1054-1064. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02591.x. Number of accessions cited: 307
  • Flint-Garcia,S. A., A. L. Bodnar, & M. P. Scott. 2009. Wide variability in kernel composition, seed characteristics, and zein profiles among diverse maize inbreds, landraces, and teosinte. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119(6):1129-1142. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1115-1. Number of accessions cited: 55
  • Gore, M. A., J. M. Chia, R. J. Elshire, Q. Sun, E. S. Ersoz, B. L. Hurwitz, J. A. Peiffer, M. D. McMullen, G. S. Grills, J. Ross-Ibarra, D. H. Ware & E. S. Buckler. 2009. A first-generation haplotype map of maize. Science 326:115-1117. DOI: 10.1126/science.1177837. Number of accessions cited: 27
  • Gustin, J. L., S. K Boehlein, J. R. Shaw, W. Junior, A. M. Settles, A. Webster, W. F. Tracy & L. C. Hannah. 2018. Ovary abortion is prevalent in diverse maize inbred lines and is under genetic control. Nat. Sci. (Sci. Res. Press) 8(1):13032. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31216-9. Number of accessions cited: 26
  • Hansey, C. N., J. M. Johnson, R. S. Sekhon, S. M. Kaeppler, & N. de Leon. 2011. Genetic Diversity of a Maize Association Population with Restricted Phenology. Crop Sci. (Madison) 51(2):704-715. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0178. Number of accessions cited: 1351
  • Huang, C., H. Sun, D. Xu, Q. Chen, Y. Liang, X. Wang, G. Xu, J. Tian, C. Wang, D. Li, L. Wu, X. Yang, W. Jin, J. F. Doebley, & F. Tian. 2018. ZmCCT9 enhances maize adaptation to higher latitudes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115(2):E334-E341. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1718058115. Note: In Figure S12. Number of accessions cited: 121
  • Jones, G. J. & M. M. Goodman. 2018. Identification of M-Type Gametophyte Factors in Maize Genetic Resources. Crop Sci. (Madison) 58:719-727. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2017.09.0560. Number of accessions cited: 105
  • Marand, A. P., L. Jiang, F. Gomez-Cano, M. A. A. Minow, X. Zhang, J. P. Mendieta, Z. Luo, S. Bang, H. Yan, C. Meyer, L. Schlegal, F. Johannes & R. J. Schmitz. 2025. The genetic architecture of cell type–specific cis regulation in maize. Science 388(6744):eads6601. DOI: 10.1126/science.ads6601. Number of accessions cited: 172
  • McMullen, M. D., S. Kresovich, H. S. Villeda, P. Bradbury, H. Li, Q. Sun, S. Flint-Garcia, J. Thornsberry, C. Acharya, C. Bottoms, P. Brown, C. Browne, M. Eller, K. Guill, C. Harjes, D. Kroon, N. Lepak, S. E. Mitchell, B. Peterson, G. Pressoir, S. Romero, M. Oropeza-Rosas, S. Salvo, H. Yates, M. Hanson, E. Jones, S. Smith, J. C. Glaubitz, M. Goodman, D. Ware, J. B. Holland, & E. S. Buckler. 2009. Genetic Properties of the Maize Nested Association Mapping Population. Science 325:737-740. DOI: 10.1126/science.1174320. Number of accessions cited: 28
  • Millet, E. J., C. Welcker, W. Kruijer, S. Negro, A. Coupel-Ledru, S. D. Nicolas, J. Laborde, C. Bauland, S. Praud, N. Ranc, T. Presterl, R. Tuberosa, Z. Bedo, X. Draye, B. Usadel, A. Charcosset, F. Van Eeuwijk & F. Tardieu. 2016. Genome-Wide Analysis of Yield in Europe: Allelic Effects Vary with Drought and Heat Scenarios. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster) 172(2):749-764. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00621. Note: Experiment run on European seed sources of seed originally from the U.S. Number of accessions cited: 96
  • Moreau, R. A., V. Singh & K. B. Hicks. 2001. Comparison of Oil and Phytosterol Levels in Germplasm Accessions of Corn, Teosinte, and Job's Tears. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:3793-3795. DOI: 10.1021/jf010280h. Number of accessions cited: 60
  • Moreau, R. A., V. Singh, & K. B. Hicks. 2001. Comparison of oil and phytosterol levels in germplasm accessions of corn, teosinte, and Job's tears. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49(8):3793-3795. DOI: 10.1021/jf010280h. Number of accessions cited: 61
  • Mural, R. V., G. Sun, M. Grzybowki, M. C. Tross, H. Jin, C. Smith, L. Newton, C. M. Andorf, M. R. Woodhouse, A. M. Thompson, B. Sigmon, & J. C. Schnable. 2022. Association mapping across a multitude of traits collected in diverse environments in maize. GigaScience 11:gia080 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giac080. Number of accessions cited: 708
  • Quesada-Ocampo, L. M., J. Al-Haddad, A. C. Scruggs, C. R. Buell & F. Trail. 2016. Susceptibility of Maize to Stalk Rot Caused by Fusarium graminearum Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone Mutants. Phytopathology 106(8):920-927. DOI: 10.1094/phyto-09-15-0199-r. Number of accessions cited: 18
  • Revilla, P., V. M. Rodríguez, A. Ordas, R. Rincent, A. Charcosset, C. Giauffret, A. E. Melchinger, C. C. Schon, E. Bauer, T. Altmann, D. Brunel, J. Moreno-Gonzalez, L. Campo, M. Ouzunova, J. Laborde, A. Alvarez, J. I. Ruiz de Galarreta & R. A. Malvar. 2014. Cold Tolerance in Two Large Maize Inbred Panels Adapted to European Climates. Crop Sci. (Madison) 54(5):1981-1991. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2013.11.0733. Note: The direct source of accession was not from NPGS, but may have indirectly been obtained from the NPGS. PVPs could only have originated from NPGS. Replication of the results should be possible with the NPGS accession because inbred lines should not diverge appreciably if properly maintained. Number of accessions cited: 142
  • Rishmawi, L., F. Bauget, V. Protto, C. Bauland, P. Nacry & C. Maurel. 2023. Natural variation of maize root hydraulic architecture underlies highly diverse water uptake capacities. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster) 192(3):2404-2418 DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiad213. Note: Experiment run on European seed sources of seed originally from the U.S. Number of accessions cited: 88
  • Singh, R., S. Shim, D. E. P. Telenko & S. B. Goodwin. 2023. Parental Inbred Lines of the Nested Association Mapping (NAM) Population of Corn Show Sources of Resistance to Tar Spot in Northern Indiana. Pl. Dis. 107(2):262-266. DOI: 10.1094/pdis-02-22-0314-sc. Number of accessions cited: 26
  • Sun, H., C. Wang, X. Chen, H. Liu, Y. Huang, S. Li, Z. Dong, X. Zhao, F. Tian & W. Jin. 2020. dlf1 promotes floral transition by directly activating ZmMADS4 and ZmMADS67 in the maize shoot apex. New Phytol. 228(4):1386-1400 DOI: 10.1111/nph.16772. Number of accessions cited: 38
  • Van Heerwaarden, J., M. B. Hufford, & J. Ross-Ibarra. 2012. Historical genomics of North American maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109(31):12420-12425. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1209275109. Number of accessions cited: 413
  • Venkatesh, T. V., G. G. Harrigan, T. Perez, & S. Flint-Garcia. 2015. Compositional Assessments of Key Maize Populations: B73 Hybrids of the Nested Association Mapping Founder Lines and Diverse Landrace Inbred Lines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 63(21):5282-5295. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00208. Number of accessions cited: 48
  • Wang, J., X. Li, K. D. Kim, M. J. Scanlon, S. A. Jackson, N. M. Springer, & Y. Yu. 2019. Genome-wide nucleotide patterns and potential mechanisms of genome divergence following domestication in maize and soybean. Genome Biol. 20(1):74. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1683-6. Number of accessions cited: 61
  • Yu, J., J. B. Holland, M. D. McMullen & E. S. Buckler. 2008. Genetic Design and Statistical Power of Nested Association Mapping in Maize. Genetics 178(1):539-551. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.074245. Number of accessions cited: 28
Pedigree
Description:
A619 x R168

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
CHEMICALOil PercentageWhole kernel oil concentration corrected to a standard moisture level (dry weight basis). Value is expressed in percent oil. The method of obtaining the value is described in the method record and may be by calibrated NIR or using wet lab procedures.4.4 MAIZE.NIR.DUPONT-PIONEER.2000PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
COMMENTCore SubsetA flag to indicate the accession is part of a core subset. The set is indicated by the method that was used to designate the set.Y - YES, ACCESSION IS PART OF CORE MAIZE.CORE.SUBSET.PVP.REFERENCE.INBREDS Not Available
COMMENTCore SubsetA flag to indicate the accession is part of a core subset. The set is indicated by the method that was used to designate the set.Y - YES, ACCESSION IS PART OF CORE MAIZE.CORE.SUBSET.GOODMAN.DIVERSE.INBREDS Not Available
COMMENTCore SubsetA flag to indicate the accession is part of a core subset. The set is indicated by the method that was used to designate the set.Y - YES, ACCESSION IS PART OF CORE MAIZE.CORE.SUBSET.MAPPING.POP.INBREDS Not Available
COMMENTCore SubsetA flag to indicate the accession is part of a core subset. The set is indicated by the method that was used to designate the set.Y - YES, ACCESSION IS PART OF CORE MAIZE.CORE.SUBSET.NAM.PARENT.INBREDS Not Available
COMMENTNotes and RemarksObservations made by cooperators or curators while evaluating or regenerating germplasm. Usually these observations are not published and need verification or there are too few observations of this type to promote a separate trait.OBSERVATION-NURSERY_YES MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.NCIANYMOPI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
COMMENTNotes and RemarksObservations made by cooperators or curators while evaluating or regenerating germplasm. Usually these observations are not published and need verification or there are too few observations of this type to promote a separate trait.OBSERVATION-NURSERY_YES MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.NCIANYMOPI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
DISEASEGoss's WiltPlant Response To Goss's Wilt organism (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis (Vidaver & Mandel) Davis et al. = Corynebacterium michiganense pv. nebraskense (Schuster et al.) Dye & Kemp ). Disease names include Goss's bacterial wilt and blight (leaf freckles and wilt).2 - (2) High Resistance MAIZE.GOSSS.U_OF_ILLINOIS.2016-2017PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
DISEASENorthern Leaf BlightLeaf response to northern leaf blight organism (Exserhilum turcicum [Pass.] Leonard & Suggs - previous name was Helminthosporium turcicum.5 - Many lesions; abundant sporulation.18MAIZE.NLB.PIONEER.JOHNSTON.2009PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
DISEASEStewarts WiltPlant response to the Stewart's wilt organism (Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert, Verdonck & Kersters) formerly called (Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye ). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.1 - (1) Little or no spread.30MAIZE.STEWARTS.NCRPIS.2013PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
DISEASEStewarts WiltPlant response to the Stewart's wilt organism (Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert, Verdonck & Kersters) formerly called (Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye ). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.3 - (3) Limited spread predominately toward tip end of leaf only.30MAIZE.STEWARTS.U_OF_ILLINOIS.1997PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
DISEASEStewarts WiltPlant response to the Stewart's wilt organism (Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert, Verdonck & Kersters) formerly called (Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye ). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.3 - (3) Limited spread predominately toward tip end of leaf only.21MAIZE.STEWARTS.NCRPIS.2002PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
DISEASEStewarts WiltPlant response to the Stewart's wilt organism (Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert, Verdonck & Kersters) formerly called (Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye ). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.3 - (3) Limited spread predominately toward tip end of leaf only.30MAIZE.STEWARTS.NCRPIS.2014PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
DISEASEStewarts WiltPlant response to the Stewart's wilt organism (Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert, Verdonck & Kersters) formerly called (Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye ). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.6 - (6) Moderate systemic infection with 5-25% symptomatic leaf area on non-inoculated leaves. MAIZE.STEWARTS.NCRPIS.2000PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
DISEASEGray Leaf SpotLeaf response to gray leaf spot caused by (Cercospora zeae-maydis Tehon & E.Y. Daniels). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.  MAIZE.GRAYLEAF.MONSANTO.MONMOUTH_IL.2000PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
DISEASEGray Leaf SpotLeaf response to gray leaf spot caused by (Cercospora zeae-maydis Tehon & E.Y. Daniels). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.5 - (5) Intermediately susceptible. MAIZE.GRAYLEAF.VIRGINIA_TECH.2000PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
DISEASEEyespotLEAF RESPONSE TO EYESPOT ORGANISM (Aureobasidiumzeae (Narita & Hiratsuka) J.M. Dingley = Kabatiella zeae Narita & Hiratsuka)5 - (5) Whole leaves killed up to the ear and some disease evident above the ear.2MAIZE.EYESPOT.ISU.2000PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
DISEASENorthern Leaf Blight Race OLeaf response to northern leaf blight race O organism (Exserhilum turcicum [Pass.] Leonard & Suggs - previous name was Helminthosporium turcicum.4 - (4) (0 = NO SYMPTOMS OBSERVED, 9 = SEVERE DISEASE DEVELOPMENT)2MAIZE.NCLB.ISU.2000PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
GROWTHPlant HeightHeight of the plant from ground level to the top of the tassel at full growth measured in centimeters (cm).160.000005MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
INSECTEuropean Corn Borer Gen1RESISTANCE TO THE FIRST GENERATION OF EUROPEAN CORN BORER.3 - (3) Partial Resistance. Several leaves with shot-hole lesions.6MAIZE.ECB1.AMES.98PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
INSECTEuropean Corn Borer Gen1RESISTANCE TO THE FIRST GENERATION OF EUROPEAN CORN BORER.4 - (4) Intermediate response. Several leaves with shot-hole lesions and elongated lesions6MAIZE.ECB1.AMES.97PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYTassel TypeClassification of the amount of tassel branching from no branching to beyond tertiary tassel branching.1 - The tassel has branches, but there are no branches on the primary tassel branches. (40%)5MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYTassel TypeClassification of the amount of tassel branching from no branching to beyond tertiary tassel branching.2 - Branching to secondary tassel branches only. No tertiary tassel branches. (60%)5MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYPeduncle HeightDistance from ground level to the node where the tassel emerges on the central stalk.1155MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYBottom Tassel Branch HeightDistance from ground level to the insertion point on the tassel stem of the bottom tassel branch of the central stalk.1355MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYTop Tassel Branch HeightDistance from ground level to the insertion point on the tassel stem of the upper most tassel branch of the central stalk.1455MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYNode Number Above the EarNumber of Nodes on the main stalk starting at the node above the ear node up to and including the peduncle node.45MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel TypeKERNEL TYPEC - DENT (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYKernel TypeKERNEL TYPED - SEMIDENT (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel ColorKERNEL COLORB - YELLOW (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel ColorKERNEL COLORM - YELLOW CAP (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYKernel Row ArrangementARRANGEMENT OF KERNEL ROWS FROM THE BASE TO THE TIP OF THE EAR.1 - REGULAR (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel Row ArrangementARRANGEMENT OF KERNEL ROWS FROM THE BASE TO THE TIP OF THE EAR.1 - REGULAR (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYKernel row NumberNUMBER OF KERNEL ROWS COUNTED ON THE CENTRAL PART OF THE UPPERMOST EAR ON THE PLANT.015MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel row NumberNUMBER OF KERNEL ROWS COUNTED ON THE CENTRAL PART OF THE UPPERMOST EAR ON THE PLANT.0141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYEar LengthLENGTH OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS.12.3141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYEar LengthLENGTH OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS.13.515MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEar DiameterDIAMETER OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS MEASURED AT THE CENTRAL PART OF THE UPPERMOST EAR ON THE PLANT.3.515MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEar DiameterDIAMETER OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS MEASURED AT THE CENTRAL PART OF THE UPPERMOST EAR ON THE PLANT.3.7141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYEar HeightHEIGHT OF THE TOP EAR ON THE CENTRAL STALK FROM GROUND LEVEL TO THE NODE WHERE THE EAR ATTACHES TO THE STALK.525MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB2 - RED (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB2 - RED (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB2 - RED (100%)2MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2011.IAPI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB2 - RED (100%)2MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2011.IAPI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB2 - RED (100%)2MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2011.IAPI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYUpper Kernel ShapeSHAPE OF THE UPPER SURFACE OF THE KERNEL.2 - INDENTED (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYUpper Kernel ShapeSHAPE OF THE UPPER SURFACE OF THE KERNEL.2 - INDENTED (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYEar NumberNUMBER OF EARS WITH KERNELS ON THE MAIN STEM15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYNode NumberNumber of Nodes on the main stalk from ground level up to and including the peduncle node.115MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYTiller NumberNUMBER OF TILLERS PER PLANT05MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 98ncao01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEndosperm ColorCOLOR OF THE HARD ENDOSPERM LAYER4 - YELLOW (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEndosperm ColorCOLOR OF THE HARD ENDOSPERM LAYER4 - YELLOW (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYEar ShapeSHAPE OF THE UPPERMOST EAR2 - CYLINDRICAL - CONICAL (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEar ShapeSHAPE OF THE UPPERMOST EAR2 - CYLINDRICAL - CONICAL (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYAleurone ColorThe color and pattern of the kernel aleurone layer. The first entry represents the color and the second number represents the pattern of that color.11 - COLORLESS / UNIFORM (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYAleurone ColorThe color and pattern of the kernel aleurone layer. The first entry represents the color and the second number represents the pattern of that color.11 - COLORLESS / UNIFORM (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYPericarp ColorTHE COLOR AND THE PATTERN OF THE PERICARP. THE FIRST NUMBER IS THE COLOR, THE SECOND NUMBER IS THE PATTERN.11 - COLORLESS / UNIFORM (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYPericarp ColorTHE COLOR AND THE PATTERN OF THE PERICARP. THE FIRST NUMBER IS THE COLOR, THE SECOND NUMBER IS THE PATTERN.33 - RED / HALO (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYGlume DevelopmentGlume development1 - None (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYGlume DevelopmentGlume development1 - None (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYColored Silk ScarColored Silk ScarN - Colored silk scar is not present (100%)15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYColored Silk ScarColored Silk ScarN - Colored silk scar is not present (100%)141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING C LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees Celsius at latitude 40-49.7802MAIZE.EYESPOT.ISU.2000PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYDays to Silk 40-49 latitudeNumber of days from planting to when silks of 50% of observed plants have emerged where the observations are at latitude 40 to 49 degrees.782MAIZE.EYESPOT.ISU.2000PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.131811MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.IAPI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.13699MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.IAPI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.13876MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.NYPI 587137 08ncai01 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.13962MAIZE.EYESPOT.ISU.2000PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.14338MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.NYPI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
PRODUCTION1000 Kernel WeightThe weight of 1000 kernels measured in grams, preferably with the weight adjusted to 10% moisture content.262141MAIZE.INC.AMES.2010.PLANTING1PI 587137 10ncai01 SD
PRODUCTION1000 Kernel WeightThe weight of 1000 kernels measured in grams, preferably with the weight adjusted to 10% moisture content.293 MAIZE.INC.AMES.1994PI 587137 94ncai03 SDNot Available
PRODUCTIONHeterotic GroupThe heterotic group an accession belongs to for breeding purposes. When forming hybrids that demonstrate heterosis (high performance), accessions from different heterotic groups should be crossed.NS - (NS) Belongs to the non-stiff stalk combining group. Accessions belonging to this group produce higher performing hybrids when combined with stiff stalk accessions. Mo17 would be an example of a non-stiff stalk inbred line. MAIZE.CURATOR.AND.MAIZE.EXPERT.REVIEW Not Available