Details for: TARS 18059, Musa acuminata Colla, FHIA-23

Summary Data

Taxonomy:

Musa acuminata Colla

Top Name:

FHIA-23

Origin:

Donated – Honduras

Maintained:

Tropical Agriculture Research Station

Received by NPGS:

Nov 2006

Improvement Status:

Clone

Form Received:

Plant

Life Form:

Tree

Life Habit:

Tree

Availability

Form	Quantity	Note	Inventory	Cart
Tissue culture	count		TARS 18059 PL

Distributed as: Tissue Culture Plantlets

Images (7 total. Click on image for more.)

Core Passport Data

Taxonomy:

Musa acuminata Colla

Top Name:

FHIA-23

Origin:

Donated – Honduras

Maintained:

Tropical Agriculture Research Station

Received by NPGS:

Nov 2006

Improvement Status:

Clone

Form Received:

Plant

Life Form:

Tree

Life Habit:

Tree

Source History

Donated

November 2006.
Honduras
Comment: From Honduran Agricultural Research Foundation (FHIA)

Accession Names and Identifiers

FHIA-23

Type: Institute identifier

TARS 18059

Type: Site identifier

Narrative

Musa acuminata Colla

Genus:

Musa

Section:

Musa

Family:

Musaceae

Nomen number:

24706

Place of publication:

Mem. Reale Accad. Sci. Torino 25:394. 1820 (Mem. gen. Musa 66)

Protologue link:

https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7653367

Comment:

or Musa AA, AAA, and AAAA Groups
non-hybrid forms of edible bananas

Verified:

05/23/1995 by ARS Systematic Botanists.

Other conspecific taxa

Musa acuminata Colla subsp. acuminata (0 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla subsp. burmannica N. W. Simmonds (1 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla subsp. errans (Blanco) R. V. Valmayor (0 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla subsp. halabanensis (Meijer) M. Hotta (0 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla subsp. malaccensis (Ridl.) N. W. Simmonds (0 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla subsp. microcarpa (Becc.) N. W. Simmonds (0 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla subsp. siamea N. W. Simmonds (0 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla subsp. truncata (Ridl.) Kiew (0 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla var. acuminata (0 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla var. sumatrana (Becc.) Nasution (0 active accession[s])
Musa acuminata Colla var. zebrina (Van Houtte ex Planch.) Nasution (1 active accession[s])

Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Musa ×sapientum L. var. suaveolens (Blanco) Malag.
Musa cavendishii Lamb.
Musa chinensis Sweet, nom. nud.
Musa nana Lour.
Musa sinensis Sagot ex Baker

Common names

Language	Name	note	seq	Citation
English	banana		1	Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
English	Cavendish banana	as Musa nana	1	Smith, A. C. 1979-1991. Flora vitiensis nova. Note: = Musa nana
English	Chinese banana	as Musa nana	1	Smith, A. C. 1979-1991. Flora vitiensis nova. Note: = Musa nana
English	dwarf banana		1	Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
French	bananier		2	Feuillet, C. 1998. pers. comm. Note: re. French common names
French	bananier nain		2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
German	Banane		2	Erhardt, W. et al. 2008. Der große Zander: Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen 1564.
German	Zwergbanane		2	Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Indonesian	pisang batu		2	Boer, E. & A. B. Ella, eds. 2000. Plants producing exudates. In: Faridah Hanum, I. & L. J. G. van der Maesen, eds., Plant Resources of South-East Asia (PROSEA) 18:130.
Indonesian (Java)	gedang klutuk		2	Boer, E. & A. B. Ella, eds. 2000. Plants producing exudates. In: Faridah Hanum, I. & L. J. G. van der Maesen, eds., Plant Resources of South-East Asia (PROSEA) 18:130.
Portuguese (Brazil)	banana-nanica		2	Groth, D. 2005. pers. comm. Note: re. Brazilian common names
Portuguese (Brazil)	nanicão		2	Groth, D. 2005. pers. comm. Note: re. Brazilian common names
Spanish	plátano		2	Bibliograf, S. A., eds. 1964. Vox modern college Spanish & English dictionary.
Sudanese	cau batu		2	Boer, E. & A. B. Ella, eds. 2000. Plants producing exudates. In: Faridah Hanum, I. & L. J. G. van der Maesen, eds., Plant Resources of South-East Asia (PROSEA) 18:130.
Swedish	ädelbanan		2	Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Uganda	bitoki		2	Simmonds, N. W. 1966. Bananas. Tropical Agriculture Series. 2nd edition. Note: Longman, NY, NY
unknown	bungulan		2	Merrill, E. D. 1922-1926. An enumeration of Philippine flowering plants.

Annotations

Taxonomic Re-Identification: 31 May 2013, from Musa hybr. to Musa acuminata Colla

Observations

Phenotype Data

Category	Descriptor	Description	Value	Study	Availability
DISEASE	SIGATOKA_DSI_AT HARVEST	Sigatoka disease severity index at harvest according to: Craenen, K., 1998. Technical manual on black Sigatoka disease of banana and plantain. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Ibadan, Nigeria. 60 pp.	33.3	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
DISEASE	SIGATOKA_DSI_AT FLOWERING	Sigatoka disease severity index at flowering according to: Craenen, K., 1998. Technical manual on black Sigatoka disease of banana and plantain. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Ibadan, Nigeria. 60 pp.	11	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Fruits in Third Hand Length	Length of fruits in third hand listed in cm.	21.9	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Pseudostem Height	Height of the plant's pseudostem.	3.6	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Pseudostem Diameter	Diameter of the plant's pseudostem.	26.1	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Functional Lvs. at Emergence	Functional leaves at bunch-emergence.	10.3	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Functional Lvs. at Harvest	Functional leaves at harvest.	4.4	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Fruits per Bunch	Average number of fruits per bunch.	233.6	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Hands per Bunch	Average number of hands per bunch.	12.9	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Bunch Weight	Net bunch weight in kilograms (excluding rachis).	40.8	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Fruits in Third Hand Diameter	Diameter of fruits in third hand, measured in mm.	38.8	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	PROPAGATING SUCKERS AT FLOWER	Propagating suckers at bunch emergence / flowering.	5.3	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	THIRD_HAND_MEAN_WEIGHT	Mean weight of third hand, measured in kg.	4	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days Needed for Fruit Fill	Number of days needed to fill the fruit.	114.3	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days from Planting to Harvest	Number of days from planting to bunch harvest.	423.9	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	DAYS FROM PL TO 2ND CYCLE HVST	Number of days from planting to second cycle bunch harvest.	755.4	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available

Genotype Data

Poly Type	Marker	Value	Evaluation	Study Type
MICROSATELLITE	MA1-32	218 227 228	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MA3-90	127 129 149	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR01	236 240 248 252	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR03	101 103	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR07	136 150 151	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR08	241 245	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR13	253 263 265 268	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR150	237 241	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR152	144 145	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR164	378 380 387	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR196	145 158 162	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR214	100 103	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR231	224 228 234 258	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR24	228 234	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR260	190 192	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR264	217 241 249	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR27	217 223 225 227	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR307	143 145	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR39	309 315	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR40	158 163 184	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR45	266 269	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT