Details for: TARS 18052, Musa hybr., 'PV03-44'

Summary Data

Taxonomy:

Musa hybr.

Cultivar:

'PV03-44'

Origin:

Donated – Brazil

Maintained:

Tropical Agriculture Research Station

Received by NPGS:

Dec 2006

Improvement Status:

Clone

Life Form:

Tree

Life Habit:

Tree

Availability

Form	Quantity	Note	Inventory	Cart
Tissue culture	count		TARS 18052 PL

Distributed as: Tissue Culture Plantlets

Images (8 total. Click on image for more.)

Core Passport Data

Taxonomy:

Musa hybr.

Cultivar:

'PV03-44'

Origin:

Donated – Brazil

Maintained:

Tropical Agriculture Research Station

Received by NPGS:

Dec 2006

Improvement Status:

Clone

Life Form:

Tree

Life Habit:

Tree

Source History

Donated

15 March 1993.
Brazil
Comment: Introduced by Z. Cordeiro, CNPMF/EMBRAPA
December 2006.
Belgium

Donor(s):

Vandenhouwe, Ines, Bioversity International - INIBAP Transit Centre

Accession Names and Identifiers

'PV03-44'

Type: Cultivar name

EMB 402

Type: Institute identifier

Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation

ITC 1262

Type: Donor identifier

TARS 18052

Type: Site identifier

Narrative

Synthetic hybrid

Musa hybr.

Genus:

Musa

Family:

Musaceae

Nomen number:

313059

Comment:

interim designation used in GRIN for Musa hybrids which lack an acceptable binomial

Verified:

11/03/1987 by ARS Systematic Botanists.

Other conspecific taxa

Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations

Common names

Annotations

Observations

Phenotype Data

Category	Descriptor	Description	Value	Study	Availability
DISEASE	SIGATOKA_DSI_AT HARVEST	Sigatoka disease severity index at harvest according to: Craenen, K., 1998. Technical manual on black Sigatoka disease of banana and plantain. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Ibadan, Nigeria. 60 pp.	41.9	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
DISEASE	SIGATOKA_DSI_AT FLOWERING	Sigatoka disease severity index at flowering according to: Craenen, K., 1998. Technical manual on black Sigatoka disease of banana and plantain. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Ibadan, Nigeria. 60 pp.	3.9	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Fruits in Third Hand Length	Length of fruits in third hand listed in cm.	18	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Pseudostem Height	Height of the plant's pseudostem.	3.6	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Plant Pseudostem Diameter	Diameter of the plant's pseudostem.	18	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Functional Lvs. at Emergence	Functional leaves at bunch-emergence.	12.4	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Functional Lvs. at Harvest	Functional leaves at harvest.	5.9	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Fruits per Bunch	Average number of fruits per bunch.	103.7	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Hands per Bunch	Average number of hands per bunch.	6.7	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Bunch Weight	Net bunch weight in kilograms (excluding rachis).	15.4	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	Fruits in Third Hand Diameter	Diameter of fruits in third hand, measured in mm.	36.5	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	PROPAGATING SUCKERS AT FLOWER	Propagating suckers at bunch emergence / flowering.	5.1	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
GROWTH	THIRD_HAND_MEAN_WEIGHT	Mean weight of third hand, measured in kg.	2.3	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days Needed for Fruit Fill	Number of days needed to fill the fruit.	137.2	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	Days from Planting to Harvest	Number of days from planting to bunch harvest.	322.4	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available
PHENOLOGY	DAYS FROM PL TO 2ND CYCLE HVST	Number of days from planting to second cycle bunch harvest.	532.1	Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test. **Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010	Not Available

Genotype Data

Poly Type	Marker	Value	Evaluation	Study Type
MICROSATELLITE	MA1-32	221 227 228	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MA3-90	129 131 133 149	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR01	226 236 240 271	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR03	99 100 103	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR07	130 136 145 151	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR08	241 243 245	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR13	256 265 267 268	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR150	237 241	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR152	144 163	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR164	278 378 387	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR196	145 159 162	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR214	100 103 105	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR231	224 234 258	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR24	222 228 234	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR260	190 192 202	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR264	224 241	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR27	225 227	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR307	143 145 149	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR39	315 336	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR40	160 163 181	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT
MICROSATELLITE	MMACIR45	257 269 275	MUSASSR2012	FINGERPRNT