Details for: TARS 18050, Musa hybr., EMB 404


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Musa hybr.
Top Name:
EMB 404
Origin:
Donated – Brazil
Maintained:
Historic Record
Received by NPGS:
Dec 2006
Improvement Status:
Clone
Life Form:
Tree
Life Habit:
Tree
Availability
This is historical information about this accession. It no longer exists and can not be requested.
Distributed as: Tissue Culture Plantlets
  
Images (7 total. Click on image for more.)

FRUIT

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Musa hybr.
Top Name:
EMB 404
Origin:
Donated – Brazil
Maintained:
Historic Record
Received by NPGS:
Dec 2006
Improvement Status:
Clone
Life Form:
Tree
Life Habit:
Tree
Source History
Donated
15 March 1993.
Brazil
Comment: Introduced by Z. Cordeiro, CNPMF/EMBRAPA
December 2006.
Belgium

Donor(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
EMB 404
Type: Institute identifier
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation

ITC 1261
Type: Donor identifier

TARS 18050
Type: Site identifier

Unknown AA Diploid
Type: Other or unclassified name

Narrative
Received as PA03-22. Known to be incorrect.
Musa hybr.
Genus:
Musa
Family:
Musaceae
Nomen number:

313059
Comment:
interim designation used in GRIN for Musa hybrids which lack an acceptable binomial
Verified:
11/03/1987 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Common names
Annotations
Other Links
Same Variety at MGIS
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
Pedigree
Description:
Musa acuminata, AA
  • Irish, B. M., A. Crespo, R. Goenaga, R. Niedz, & T. Ayala-Silva. 2009. Ploidy level and genomic composition of Musa spp. accessions at the USDA-ARS Tropical Agriculture Research Station. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 93(1-2):1-21.
Intellectual Property Rights
FAO Standard Material Transfer Agreement.

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
DISEASESIGATOKA_DSI_AT HARVESTSigatoka disease severity index at harvest according to: Craenen, K., 1998. Technical manual on black Sigatoka disease of banana and plantain. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Ibadan, Nigeria. 60 pp.53.3 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
DISEASESIGATOKA_DSI_AT FLOWERINGSigatoka disease severity index at flowering according to: Craenen, K., 1998. Technical manual on black Sigatoka disease of banana and plantain. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Ibadan, Nigeria. 60 pp.34.8 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHFruits in Third Hand LengthLength of fruits in third hand listed in cm.12.4 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHPlant Pseudostem HeightHeight of the plant's pseudostem.3.4 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHPlant Pseudostem DiameterDiameter of the plant's pseudostem.16 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHFunctional Lvs. at EmergenceFunctional leaves at bunch-emergence.8.5 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHFunctional Lvs. at HarvestFunctional leaves at harvest.6.1 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHFruits per BunchAverage number of fruits per bunch.114.5 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHHands per BunchAverage number of hands per bunch.7.7 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHBunch WeightNet bunch weight in kilograms (excluding rachis).6.9 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHFruits in Third Hand DiameterDiameter of fruits in third hand, measured in mm.29.2 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHPROPAGATING SUCKERS AT FLOWERPropagating suckers at bunch emergence / flowering.6.2 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
GROWTHTHIRD_HAND_MEAN_WEIGHTMean weight of third hand, measured in kg.1 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
PHENOLOGYDays Needed for Fruit FillNumber of days needed to fill the fruit.53.8 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
PHENOLOGYDays from Planting to HarvestNumber of days from planting to bunch harvest.314.5 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
PHENOLOGYDAYS FROM PL TO 2ND CYCLE HVSTNumber of days from planting to second cycle bunch harvest.624.1 
Gauhl's modification of Stover's Sigatoka severity scoring system, adapted from, was utilized. The scoring system follows a 0 to 6 scale where, 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1%; 2 = 2 to 5%; 3 = 5 to 15%; 4 = 16 to 33%; 5 = 34 to 50%; and 6 = > 50% of leaf area affected. Beginning 6 months after field establishment, which corresponded to the first appearance of BLS symptoms, every leaf on individual plants was scored monthly for two full crop cycles (mother and first ratoon). Disease severity was also recorded at flowering and harvest during both production cycles. During both cropping cycles, the following agronomic and bunch characteristics were recorded: length of crop cycle, number of functional leaves at flowering and harvest, plant height and pseudostem diameter at flowering, bunch weight, and number of hands and fruit per bunch. In addition, the weight of third hand fruit as well as the length and diameter for the middle six fruits in the third hand were recorded. Analysis of variance was carried out using the GLM procedure of SAS for Windows Ver. 9.1. After significant F test at *P <0.05, mean separation was performed with the least significant difference test.

***Descriptor data represents combined mother (1st) and ratoon (2nd) cycles.">MUSA.SIGATOKA.2010		 Not Available
Genotype Data
Poly TypeMarkerValueEvaluationStudy TypeInventory
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR45266 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR40163 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR39311 315 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR307145 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR27217 225 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR264241 249 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR260192 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR24228 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR231226 258 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR214103 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR196159 162 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR164387 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR152141 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR150237 243 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR13265 268 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR08241 249 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR07139 169 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR03101 103 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMMACIR01232 238 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMA3-90129 147 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT 
MICROSATELLITEMA1-32218 227 MUSASSR2012FINGERPRNT