Details for: PI 658395, Citrus ×insitorum Mabb., KUSAIE LIME X TRIFOLIATE


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Citrus ×insitorum Mabb.
Top Name:
KUSAIE LIME X TRIFOLIATE
Origin:
Developed – California, United States
Maintained:
Historic Record
Received by NPGS:
Nov 1987
Improvement Status:
Cultivar
Form Received:
Plant
Life Form:
Tree
Life Habit:
Tree
Availability
This is historical information about this accession. It no longer exists and can not be requested.
 
There are no images for this accession.

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Citrus ×insitorum Mabb.
Top Name:
KUSAIE LIME X TRIFOLIATE
Origin:
Developed – California, United States
Maintained:
Historic Record
Received by NPGS:
Nov 1987
Improvement Status:
Cultivar
Form Received:
Plant
Life Form:
Tree
Life Habit:
Tree
Source History
Developed
1950.
California, United States
Comment: University of California Citrus Research Center, Riverside, Riverside County.
Developer(s):
Donated
17 October 1967.
California, United States
Comment: CCPP bud source: CRC, 8C-15-09, planted 1955.
Donor(s):
March 1989.
California, United States

Donor(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
KUSAIE LIME X TRIFOLIATE
Type: Developer identifier

RRUT 358
Type: Site identifier

VI 294
Type: Quarantine identifier
Calavan, E. Claire Dept of Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside

Narrative
Hybrid produced by UC Riverside citrus breeding program. Discarded from that program but retained at NCGRCD as of possible interest as a breeding parent. Evaluation data not maintained within NPGS but possibly available from UCR breeders. The source tree at 8C-15-9, used in the CCPP VI, was also the source of 13C-2-36, JW Cameron's "Code 6". JWC considered it promising but according to ML Roose, it has not done well in trials and does not have good nursery characteristics...'unlikely to have a future'. Should consider de-accesioning in the future. (RRK, 08/2006)

All propagations dead. De-accessioned (inactivated) (RRK, 03/19/2009)

Citrus ×insitorum Mabb.
Genus:
Citrus
Family:
Rutaceae
Subfamily:
Aurantioideae
Tribe:
Aurantieae
Subtribe:
Citrinae
Nomen number:

490128
Place of publication:

Gard. Bull. Singapore 54:193. 2002
Comment:
a replacement name (nom. nov.) for ×Citroncirus webberi J. W. Ingram & H. E. Moore, non Citrus webberi Wester
Verified:
Name not verified.
Other conspecific taxa
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Homotypic Synonym(s)
×Citroncirus webberi J. W. Ingram & H. E. Moore

Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
EnglishCarrizo citrange as ×Citroncirus webberi1Ruiz, M. et al. 2018. Molecular characterization and stress tolerance evaluation of new allotetraploid somatic hybrids between Carrizo Citrange and Citrus macophylla W. rootstocks. Front. Plant Sci. 9:901. Note: the Citrus tristeza virus is graft transmissible; 'Carrizo citrange' (Citrus × insitorum (as “C. sinensis × Poncirus trifoliata”)) is the most important graft stock of worldwide use, favoring high yield, fruit quality, and being tolerant to CTV but salt-intolerant; through somatic hybridization with Citrus × aurantiifolia (as C. macrophylla), this study obtained two hybrids; these plants combined the parental alleles, but also this study detected that most lost alleles occurred during the somatic hybridization; physiological tests showed that the somatic hybrids were tolerant to salinity; it recognized the potential of somatic hybrids SMC-58 and SMC-73 as graft stocks for areas with CTV and calcareous and saline soils
Englishcitrange as ×Citroncirus webberi1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Annotations
  • Nomenclature Name Change: 20 Apr 2020, from ×Citroncirus webberi J. W. Ingram & H. E. Moore to Citrus ×insitorum Mabb.
Other Links
Actions
  • Inactivated Accession: All propagations dead. 19 Mar 2009.
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
Pedigree
Description:
Kusaie lime X trifoliate; cross made by UC Riverside Citrus Breeding Program. Note: information received from CCPP has parentage reversed; pedigree as shown here is correct as per M Roose.