Details for: PI 614899, Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang., M1-2


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang.
Top Name:
M1-2
Origin:
Developed – California, United States
Received by NPGS:
27 Nov 2000
Improvement Status:
Breeding material
Reproductive Uniformity:

Population
Form Received:
Seed
Availability
This accession is not available. Contact site for status.
 
There are no images for this accession.

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang.
Top Name:
M1-2
Origin:
Developed – California, United States
Received by NPGS:
27 Nov 2000
Improvement Status:
Breeding material
Reproductive Uniformity:

Population
Form Received:
Seed
Source History
Developed
PRE 27 November 2000.
California, United States

Developer(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
M1-2
Type: Institute identifier

Narrative
Multigerm, partially self-compatible, varies in bolting habit, plant type, and pigmentation. Roots mostly in fanged formation. Highly resistant to, if not homozygous, root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.). Resistant to multiple species of nematode, including M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, M. hapla, M. chitwoodi, and M. fallax. Useful for root-knot nematode resistance research in sugarbeet.
Beta vulgaris L. subspp. maritima (L.) Arcang.
Genus:
Beta
Section:
Beta
Family:
Chenopodiaceae
Subfamily:
Betoideae
Tribe:
Beteae
Nomen number:

103151
Place of publication:

Comp. fl. ital. 593. 1882
Verified:
02/23/2000 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Beta vulgaris L. (23 active accession[s])
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. adanensis (Pamukç. ex Aellen) Ford-Lloyd & J. T. Williams (0 active accession[s])
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris (1853 active accession[s])
Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla (0 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Basionym
Beta maritima L.

Homotypic Synonym(s)
Beta maritima L. subsp. maritima
Beta maritima L. var. maritima
Beta vulgaris L. var. maritima (L.) Moq.

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
Englishsea beet  11961. Webster's third new international dictionary.
Arabicsalq  2Boulos, L. 1999-. Flora of Egypt
GermanSee-Mangold  2Erhardt, W. et al. 2008. Der große Zander: Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen 2:1244.
GermanWild-Bete  2Erhardt, W. et al. 2008. Der große Zander: Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen 2:1244.
Indiapalangsag as Beta vulgaris var. orientalis2Nayar, M. P. & K. Ramamurthy. 1977. Beta vulgaris var. orientalis, a useful green vegetable of northern India. Econ. Bot. 31:372-373. Note: treats as Beta vulgaris var. orientalis (Roth) Miq.
Indiapalanki as Beta vulgaris var. orientalis2Nayar, M. P. & K. Ramamurthy. 1977. Beta vulgaris var. orientalis, a useful green vegetable of northern India. Econ. Bot. 31:372-373. Note: treats as Beta vulgaris var. orientalis (Roth) Miq.
Swedishstrandbeta  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Annotations
Other Links
Storage Information Form
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
Pedigree
Description:
Produced from inter-pollination of the selected Mi-1 (PI 593237) beet plants that carried a high level of resistance to root-knot nematode in isolation chambers.
Intellectual Property Rights
Crop Science Registration. GP-218, SUGARBEET. Issued: 01 Jan 2002.
  • Yu, M. H. 2002. M1-2 Root-Knot Nematode Resistant Bean. Crop Sci. (Madison) 42(1):317.

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
DISEASECercosporaSusceptability to Cercospora.8 - 8: in 0-9 scale between Susceptible and Highly Susceptible5 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910

PI 614899 2000o SDNot Available
DISEASERhizomaniaSusceptability to Rhizomania.4 - 4: in 0-9 scale between Resistant and Intermediate11 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310

PI 614899 2000o SDNot Available
DISEASERhizomaniaSusceptability to Rhizomania.5 - 5: INTERMEDIATE5 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910

PI 614899 2000o SDNot Available
DISEASERhizomania Canopy yellowingSusceptability to Rhizomania scored by the yellowing of the canopy; 0 is none and 9 is most yellowing1 - 1: VERY RESISTANT11 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310

PI 614899 2000o SDNot Available
DISEASERhizomania Canopy yellowingSusceptability to Rhizomania scored by the yellowing of the canopy; 0 is none and 9 is most yellowing9 - 9: 100 percent leaf yellowing5 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910

PI 614899 2000o SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYSeed weight 100Weight of 100 seeds in grams.2.08 SUGARBEET.SEEDWEIGHT.WRPISPI 614899 2000o SDNot Available
PRODUCTIONYieldRoot yield in tons per hectare25 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910

PI 614899 2000o SDNot Available
PRODUCTIONYieldRoot yield in tons per hectare411 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310

PI 614899 2000o SDNot Available