Details for: PI 618386, Rubus ×neglectus Peck, 'Estate'

Summary Data

Taxonomy:

Rubus ×neglectus Peck

Cultivar:

'Estate'

Origin:

Donated – Indiana, United States

Maintained:

National Clonal Germplasm Repository

Received by NPGS:

25 Feb 1999

Improvement Status:

Cultivar

Form Received:

Plant

Life Form:

Perennial

Life Cycle:

Perennial

Availability

This accession is not available. Contact site for status.

National Clonal Germplasm Repository

Request are accepted July 1st - Sept. 30th; Ships in Nov.

Images (2 total. Click on image for more.)

Core Passport Data

Taxonomy:

Rubus ×neglectus Peck

Cultivar:

'Estate'

Origin:

Donated – Indiana, United States

Maintained:

National Clonal Germplasm Repository

Received by NPGS:

25 Feb 1999

Improvement Status:

Cultivar

Form Received:

Plant

Life Form:

Perennial

Life Cycle:

Perennial

Source History

Donated

25 February 1999.
Indiana, United States

Donor(s):

Indiana Berry and Fruit Co.

Accession Group(s)

Group name: Rubus: purple raspberries
Note: black raspberry x red raspberry hybrids
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Rubus: purple raspberries

Accession Names and Identifiers

'Estate'

Type: Cultivar name

Group: PURPLE RASPBERRY

CRUB 1995

Type: Site identifier

Group: LOCAL

Corvallis local number

Narrative

Estate. This purple raspberry was tested for five years in several northern states. It is a round, large raspberry, has more uniform drupelets and is more attractive to the retail market than Royalty and Brandywine. It is more red, less purple, lighter in color, and about as winter hardy as either ~brandywine or Royalty. It suckers very little, is much more upright, distinctly sweeter and 3-5 days later than Brandywine. Plants should be 30-36" apart within the row.

Rubus ×neglectus Peck

Genus:

Rubus

Subgenus:

Idaeobatus

Family:

Rosaceae

Subfamily:

Rosoideae

Tribe:

Rubeae

Nomen number:

32391

Place of publication:

Rep. (Annual) New York State Mus. Nat. Hist. 22:53. 1869

Protologue link:

https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35472483

Comment:

correct name for all hybrids between Rubus idaeus and R. occidentalis (Shenzhen ICN Art. H.5.2) despite R. idaeus subsp. strigosus as a parent (published as R. strigosus)

Verified:

02/29/2024 by ARS Systematic Botanists.

Other conspecific taxa

Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations

Common names

Annotations

Taxonomic Re-Identification: 30 Apr 2009, from Rubus hybr. to Rubus ×neglectus Peck

Observations

Phenotype Data

Category	Descriptor	Description	Value	Sample Size	Study	Inventory	Availability
PRODUCTION	PROPAGATION	Propagation by tip layering or rooted cuttings	tip		RUBUS.PROPAGATION.2017	CRUB 1995 .001 PL	Not Available