Details for: PI 540609, Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang., WB 863


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang.
Top Name:
WB 863
Origin:
Collected – France
Received by NPGS:
Jan 1990
Improvement Status:
Wild material
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Biennial
Life Cycle:
Biennial
Availability
FormQuantityNoteInventoryCart
Seed100 countPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
 
There are no images for this accession.

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang.
Top Name:
WB 863
Origin:
Collected – France
Received by NPGS:
Jan 1990
Improvement Status:
Wild material
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Biennial
Life Cycle:
Biennial
Source History
Collected
19 August 1989.
France
Locality: Gravel soil, Etel Beach, 10km S E of Lorient, Morbihan County.
Coordinates: 47.4000, -3.1000 (Map it)
Elevation: 1m.

Collector(s):
Donated
January 1990.
North Dakota, United States
Comment: Received through Sugarbeet Exploration in France, Belgium, and Denmark, August 1989.
Donor(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
WB 863
Type: Donor identifier

DD 0889
Type: Exploration identifier
Group: PEO-EXPLORATIONS
Exploration ID links

Narrative
Plants variable, scattered with very poor seed set (one very good, one next to it poor seed set), poor seed set associated with dark-prostrate. Population of more than 100. Twenty-six plants sampled.
Beta vulgaris L. subspp. maritima (L.) Arcang.
Genus:
Beta
Section:
Beta
Family:
Chenopodiaceae
Subfamily:
Betoideae
Tribe:
Beteae
Nomen number:

103151
Place of publication:

Comp. fl. ital. 593. 1882
Verified:
02/23/2000 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Beta vulgaris L. (23 active accession[s])
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. adanensis (Pamukç. ex Aellen) Ford-Lloyd & J. T. Williams (0 active accession[s])
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris (1853 active accession[s])
Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla (0 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Basionym
Beta maritima L.

Homotypic Synonym(s)
Beta maritima L. subsp. maritima
Beta maritima L. var. maritima
Beta vulgaris L. var. maritima (L.) Moq.

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
Englishsea beet  11961. Webster's third new international dictionary.
Arabicsalq  2Boulos, L. 1999-. Flora of Egypt
GermanSee-Mangold  2Erhardt, W. et al. 2008. Der große Zander: Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen 2:1244.
GermanWild-Bete  2Erhardt, W. et al. 2008. Der große Zander: Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen 2:1244.
Indiapalangsag as Beta vulgaris var. orientalis2Nayar, M. P. & K. Ramamurthy. 1977. Beta vulgaris var. orientalis, a useful green vegetable of northern India. Econ. Bot. 31:372-373. Note: treats as Beta vulgaris var. orientalis (Roth) Miq.
Indiapalanki as Beta vulgaris var. orientalis2Nayar, M. P. & K. Ramamurthy. 1977. Beta vulgaris var. orientalis, a useful green vegetable of northern India. Econ. Bot. 31:372-373. Note: treats as Beta vulgaris var. orientalis (Roth) Miq.
Swedishstrandbeta  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Annotations
  • Taxonomic Re-Identification: 31 Dec 1995, from Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang. to Beta vulgaris L. var. maritima (L.) Moq.
  • Taxonomic Re-Identification: 30 Dec 1998, from Beta vulgaris L. var. maritima (L.) Moq. to Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang.
Other Links
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
  • Hanson, L. E. & L. Panella. 2001. Evaluation of Beta PIs from the USDA-ARS NPGS for resistance to curly top virus, 2001. Biol. Cult. Tests Control Pl. Dis. Note: Curly Top 2001 Number of accessions cited: 30
Pedigree

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
CYTOLOGICPloidy levelPloidy level2n - DIPLOID SUGARBEET.PLOIDY.1995.DONEYPI 540609 90nceo01 SDNot Available
DISEASECercosporaSusceptability to Cercospora.1 - 1: VERY RESISTANT18 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910

PI 540609 91ncei01 SD
DISEASECercosporaSusceptability to Cercospora.5 - 5: INTERMEDIATE SUGARBEET.CERCOSPORA.1993.RUPPELPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
DISEASECurly TopSusceptability to Curly top.7 - 7: SUSCEPTIBLE SUGARBEET.CURLYTOP.2001.PANELLAPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
DISEASEErysipheSusceptability to Erysiphe.6 - (0 = IMMUNE, 9 = HIGHLY SUSCEPTIBLE)14SUGARBEET.ENDUSE.2002.LEWELLENPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
DISEASERhizomaniaSusceptability to Rhizomania.3 - 3: RESISTANT14SUGARBEET.RHIZOMANIA.2002.LEWELLENPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
DISEASERhizomaniaSusceptability to Rhizomania.4 - 4: in 0-9 scale between Resistant and Intermediate17 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310

PI 540609 91ncei01 SD
DISEASERhizomaniaSusceptability to Rhizomania.5 - 5: INTERMEDIATE18 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910

PI 540609 91ncei01 SD
DISEASERhizoctoniaSusceptability to Rhizoctonia.6 - 6: in 0-9 scale between Intermediate and Susceptible SUGARBEET.RHIZOCTONIA.1993.RUPPELPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
DISEASERhizomania Canopy yellowingSusceptability to Rhizomania scored by the yellowing of the canopy; 0 is none and 9 is most yellowing1 - 1: VERY RESISTANT17 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310

PI 540609 91ncei01 SD
DISEASERhizomania Canopy yellowingSusceptability to Rhizomania scored by the yellowing of the canopy; 0 is none and 9 is most yellowing1 - 1: VERY RESISTANT18 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910

PI 540609 91ncei01 SD
INSECTBeet Cyst NematodeSusceptability to Beet Cyst Nematode (Heterodera schachtii).9 - HIGHLY SUSCEPTIBLE SUGARBEET.BCN.1994.YUPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
INSECTRoot MaggotSusceptability to Root Maggot.5 - 5: INTERMEDIATE36SUGARBEET.ROOTMAGGOT.2002.BOETELPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
INSECTRoot Aphids (1-4)Susceptibility to Root Aphids.3 - nymphs present, few adults present14For an Excel (xlsx) file of Michels screening data from 1995 to 2010">SUGARBEET.ROOTAPHID.2002.MICHELSPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
MORPHOLOGYHypocotyl colorHypocotyl pigmentation4 - Mixed SUGARBEET.HYPOCOTYL.2022.PULLMANPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
MORPHOLOGYBolting tendency 1Bolting tendency - (percentage of bolters from an early sowing).100 SUGARBEET.CERCOSPORA.1993.RUPPELPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
MORPHOLOGYBolting tendency 1Bolting tendency - (percentage of bolters from an early sowing).64 SUGARBEET.RHIZOCTONIA.1993.RUPPELPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
MORPHOLOGYSeed weight 100Weight of 100 seeds in grams.1.009 SUGARBEET.SEEDWEIGHT.WRPISPI 540609 91ncei01 SD
MORPHOLOGYLifeformLife form of the accessionBI - Biennial SUGARBEET.LIFEFORM.1995.DONEYPI 540609 90nceo01 SDNot Available
PRODUCTIONType of BeetGeneral growth type and/or use typeWILD - Collected from a wild population SUGARBEET.TYPE.1995.DONEYPI 540609 90nceo01 SDNot Available
PRODUCTIONYieldRoot yield in tons per hectare417 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310

PI 540609 91ncei01 SD
PRODUCTIONYieldRoot yield in tons per hectare518 Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets.

A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910

PI 540609 91ncei01 SD