| CYTOLOGIC | Ploidy level | Ploidy level | 2n - DIPLOID | | SUGARBEET.PLOIDY.1995.DONEY | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| DISEASE | Cercospora | Susceptability to Cercospora. | 1 - 1: VERY RESISTANT | 21 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910 | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| DISEASE | Cercospora | Susceptability to Cercospora. | 4 - 4: in 0-9 scale between Resistant and Intermediate | | Beta PIs from the USDA-ARS NPGS evaluated for resistance to Cercospora beticola, 2008. Sixty one Plant Introductions (PIs) from the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) (Garden Beet, Sugar Beet, Leaf Beet, Fodder Beet, and wild beet) were evaluated in an artificially produced epiphytotic environment (Ruppel, E.G., and J.O. Gaskill. 1971. Techniques for evaluating sugarbeet for resistance to Cercospora beticola in the field. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 16:384-389) at the Saginaw Valley Bean and Beet Research Farm (B&B) in MI. A randomized complete-block design, with three replications was used to evaluate germplasm. Internal controls included a susceptible check, variety USH20, and a resistant check, ACH355. One-row plots m long, with 56 cm between rows were planted on 1 May 08. Azoxystrobin was applied in a band in furrow at planting and broadcast on 16 Jun 08 to control Rhizoctonia damping-off and root rot. The nursery was inoculated on 10 Jul 08 with a liquid spore suspension. Visual evaluations on the plot with a disease index (DI) on a scale from 0 (no disease) to 10 (plant dead) at the B&B were made on 5 Aug, 12 Aug, 19 Aug, 26 Aug, 2 Sep and 9 Sep 08, with the peak of the epidemic occurring around 2 Sep 08. The field was sprayed four times with phenmedipham, desmedipham, triflusulfuron methyl, and clopyralid (9 and 20 May and 2 and 12 Jun 08) and a cultivation was performed on 7 July 08 to control weeds. The field was thinned by hand. Bolting beets were removed 1 Sep 08, after which some annual materials could not be rated as there was not sufficient remaining tissue. The moderate nighttime temperatures in the summer of 2008, combined with good moisture, contributed to a moderate leaf spot epidemic. Disease severity peaked by early September, after which regrowth started to outpace new disease development, so that disease ratings remained constant or decreased after that rating (trial mean 9 Sep 08 = 4.2), thus ratings are not given after this date. At our 2 Sep 08 rating means of the resistant and susceptible internal control for the entire nursery (including three additional experiments) were 2.4 and 5.2 (scale of 0-10), respectively, across the nursery. In 2007 (27 Sep), these means were 1.8 and 5.3, respectively. Means of contributor lines in the entire nursery (including five additional tests) in 2008 ranged from 2.3 to 6.8. An analysis of variance (PROC GLM - SAS) on the disease indices (visual evaluation scores) determined that there were significant differences among entries (P#0.05) on all dates of evaluation. One accession (PI540576) had ratings that were not significantly different from the resistant control at all rating dates. Five accessions (PI518309, PI504261, PI540612, PI518371, and PI540600) had disease ratings that were significantly lower than the susceptible control on at least three of the last rating dates. These data, and more information on the accessions evaluated, are available through the USDA-ARS GRIN database at http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs. For a .doc file with the disease index data ">SUGARBEET.CERCOSPORA.2008.HANSON | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| DISEASE | Erysiphe | Susceptability to Erysiphe. | 7 - SUSCEPTIBLE | 75 | SUGARBEET.ERYSIPHE.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania | Susceptability to Rhizomania. | 3 - 3: RESISTANT | 24 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310 | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania | Susceptability to Rhizomania. | 4 - 4: in 0-9 scale between Resistant and Intermediate | 21 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910 | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| DISEASE | Rhizoctonia | Susceptability to Rhizoctonia. | 7 - 7: SUSCEPTIBLE | 32 | SUGARBEET.RHIZOCTONIA.2007.PANELLA | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania Canopy yellowing | Susceptability to Rhizomania scored by the yellowing of the canopy; 0 is none and 9 is most yellowing | 0 - 0: no leaf yellowing | 24 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310 | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| DISEASE | Rhizomania Canopy yellowing | Susceptability to Rhizomania scored by the yellowing of the canopy; 0 is none and 9 is most yellowing | 0 - 0: no leaf yellowing | 21 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910 | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| GROWTH | Uniformity | Population uniformity | 1 - Uniform single type | 75 | SUGARBEET.UNIFORMITY.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| INSECT | Root Maggot | Susceptability to Root Maggot. | 3 - 3: RESISTANT | 38 | SUGARBEET.ROOTMAGGOT.2008.BOETEL | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| INSECT | Root Aphids (1-4) | Susceptibility to Root Aphids. | 2 - nymphs present, no adults present | 15 | For an Excel (xlsx) file of Michels screening data from 1995 to 2010">SUGARBEET.ROOTAPHID.2009.MICHELS | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Flowering pattern | Flowering pattern between plants | 1 - Synchronous | 75 | SUGARBEET.FLWRPATB.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Flowering pattern within | Flowering pattern within plants | 2 - Indeterminate | 75 | SUGARBEET.FLWRPATW.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Leaf pigmentation | Mature leaf blade pigmentation | 2 - Green | 75 | SUGARBEET.LFPIGMENT.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Leaf hairiness | Hairiness of leaf surface | 0 - Glabrous - hairs completely absent | 75 | SUGARBEET.LEAFHAIR.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Petiole color | Color of petiole | 1 - Green | 75 | SUGARBEET.PETIOLECOL.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Cluster fasciation | Inflorescence cluster fasciation | 9 - Present | 75 | SUGARBEET.CLUSTERFAS.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Leaf length minimum | Minimum leaf blade length in centimeters | 30 | 75 | SUGARBEET.LEAFLENMIN.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Leaf length maximum | Maximum leaf blade length in centimeters | 65 | 75 | SUGARBEET.LEAFLENMAX.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Bolting-2 | Percent of bolters from plants given prolonged cold treatment at 7 degrees centigrade. | 90 | 75 | SUGARBEET.BOLTING2.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Leaf width minimum | Minimum leaf blade width in centimeters | 20 | 75 | SUGARBEET.LFWIDTHMIN.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Leaf blade width maximum | Maximum leaf blade width in centimeters | 45 | 75 | SUGARBEET.LFWIDTHMAX.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Seed weight 100 | Weight of 100 seeds in grams. | 1.01 | | SUGARBEET.SEEDWEIGHT.WRPIS | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Lifeform | Life form of the accession | BI - Biennial | 75 | SUGARBEET.LIFEFORM.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| MORPHOLOGY | Lifeform | Life form of the accession | MX - Mixed annual and biennial within the accession | | SUGARBEET.LIFEFORM.1995.DONEY | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| PRODUCTION | Isolation | Isolation from other beet populations | 3 - Isolated from both wild and cultivated | 75 | SUGARBEET.ISOLATION.YR.HODGDON | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| PRODUCTION | Type of Beet | General growth type and/or use type | WILD - Collected from a wild population | | SUGARBEET.TYPE.1995.DONEY | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| PRODUCTION | Yield | Root yield in tons per hectare | 4 | 21 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1910 | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| PRODUCTION | Yield | Root yield in tons per hectare | 5 | 24 | Excel file from Kelly Richardson 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 data with multiple worksheets. A general overview of the Rhizomania evaluation work at Salinas, California.">SUGARBEET.RICHARDSON.2010.TEST1310 | PI 518309 2001i SD | Not Available |
| SUBSET | IPRGI Core subset | A flag to indicate the accession is part of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) core subset. | Y - Yes, the accession is part of the IPGRI core subset. | | SUGARBEET.IPGRI.CORE | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |
| SUBSET | Core subset | A flag to indicate the accession is part of the core subset. | Y - Yes, the accession is part of the core subset. | | SUGARBEET.CORE.1999.MARITIMA | PI 518309 88nceo01 SD | Not Available |