Details for: PI 479562, Rosa rugosa Thunb., JH-8-82


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Rosa rugosa Thunb.
Top Name:
JH-8-82
Origin:
Collected – Japan
Maintained:
Historic Record
Received by NPGS:
Oct 1982
PI Assigned:
1983
Improvement Status:
Wild material
Form Received:
Seed
Availability
This is historical information about this accession. It no longer exists and can not be requested.
 
There are no images for this accession.

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Rosa rugosa Thunb.
Top Name:
JH-8-82
Origin:
Collected – Japan
Maintained:
Historic Record
Received by NPGS:
Oct 1982
PI Assigned:
1983
Improvement Status:
Wild material
Form Received:
Seed
Source History
Donated
October 1982.
United States
Comment: March, S., & Meyer, F.G.; U.S. National Arboretum Washington, D. C.; 20002, United States Kawase, M., & Nielsen, D.; Ohio Agric. Res. & Dev. Center Ohio State Univ., Wooster, Ohio; 44691, United States
Donor(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
JH-8-82
Type: Collector identifier

NA 51028
Type: Site identifier
Group: NA
U.S. National Arboretum

MK 0982
Type: Exploration identifier
Group: PEO-EXPLORATIONS
Exploration ID links

Narrative
Snow cover 50cm or more for 67 days. Minimum temperature -l9C. Shrub deciduous, 1-1.25m, rhizomatous, makes extensive colonies. Leaves lustrous dark green. Flowers deep rose-purple, fragrant. Hips deep orange-red, lustrous. Common on high beach (30.8m) by sea. Growing along hwy 238.
Rosa rugosa Thunb.
Genus:
Rosa
Family:
Rosaceae
Subfamily:
Rosoideae
Tribe:
Roseae
Nomen number:

32156
Place of publication:

J. A. Murray, Syst. veg. ed. 14:473. 1784 May-Jun (Fl. jap. 213. 1784 Aug)
Comment:
for authorship of Thunberg names first published by Murray see comments in Taxon 45:672. 1996 & 46:311-314. 1997
Verified:
02/15/1996 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Rosa rugosa Thunb. var. chamissoniana C. A. Mey. (0 active accession[s])
Rosa rugosa Thunb. var. rugosa (0 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Autonym(s)
Rosa rugosa Thunb. f. rugosa

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Rosa andreae Lange
Rosa rugosa Thunb. f. alba Rehder
Rosa rugosa Thunb. var. albiflora Koidz.

Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
EnglishJapanese rose  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Englishrugosa rose  1Krüssmann, G. 1984. Manual of cultivated broad-leaved trees and shrubs (English translation of Handbuch der Laubgehölze. 1976)
Englishrugose rose  1McGuffin, M., J. T. Kartesz, A. Y. Leung, & A. O. Tucker. 2000. Herbs of commerce, ed. 2 American Herbal Products Association, Silver Spring, Maryland.
EnglishTurkestan rose  1Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. 1976. Hortus third. A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada
English (Canada)Japanese rose Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada official name2Darbyshire, S. J. 2003. Inventory of Canadian Agricultural Weeds Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 139-140.
Frenchrosier du japon  2Erhardt, W. et al. 2000. Zander: Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 16. Auflage
French (Canada)rosier rugueux Agriculture & Agroalimentaire Canada nom officiel2Darbyshire, S. J. 2003. Inventory of Canadian Agricultural Weeds Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 139-140.
GermanKartoffel-Rose  2Erhardt, W. et al. 2000. Zander: Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 16. Auflage
Swedishvresros  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Chinesemei gui  2McGuffin, M., J. T. Kartesz, A. Y. Leung, & A. O. Tucker. 2000. Herbs of commerce, ed. 2 American Herbal Products Association, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Transcribed Koreanhaedanghwa  2Hoang, H.-D. et al. 1997. Additional notes to the checklist of Korean cultivated plants (5). Consolidated summary and indexes. Genet. Resources Crop Evol. 44:370.
Annotations
Other Links
Actions
  • Description Of NC7 Ornamental Trials: The NC-7 Regional Ornamental Plant Trials, began in 1954 through the efforts of a small group of dedicated horticulturists under the leadership of Professor S.A. McCrory of South Dakota State College (now University). The north central United States is a region of climatic extremes, and many parts of the region have alkaline soils that developed under grasslands. Because of these conditions, the diversity found in commercially available woody plants adapted to the area is less than that found in most other parts of our nation. The NC-7 Regional Ornamental Plant Trials were started with the ultimate goal of expanding the range of useful plants in the nursery trade. The emphasis in this program has been placed on detailed, long-term evaluations at a broad range of sites rather than on promotion of new plants. The NC-7 Trials rely on a network of horticultural cooperators located at sites scattered across the Central United States. Cooperators establish plantings, observe and evaluate the plants through the seasons, and prepare performance reports one, five, and ten years after planting. These reports are sent to the North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station (NCRPIS) in Ames, Iowa where they are recorded. Because of the broad range of environments found among the trial sites, it is unusual for any particular trial plant to perform well at a majority of the sites, making system-wide releases difficult. However, when plants perform especially well at sites, the NCRPIS Horticulturist assists trial site cooperators in introducing the new plants, with any official releases initiated through the cooperators' institutions rather than through the Plant Introduction Station. For more information about the NC7 trials, see link at 'Other information about accession'.
  • Summary Of The Ten Year Performance: Nine sites evaluated this accession through the 5-year evaluation period; seven sites reported on living plants through the 10-year evaluation period. Eight sites reported the foliage was clean all season though the Chanhassen, MN and Carrington, ND sites reported slight to severe stem galls, borers, and cankers. The Morris, MN site reported slight leaf damage and browning of new growth. Six sites reported showy flowers and fruits. This accession was recommended by six sites. Low-growing habit, ease of growing, groundcover attributes, hardiness, disease free plants, repeat blooming, and excellent fruit display were all reported as good ornamental qualities of this accession. Two sites did not recommend this accession siting stem dieback to the snowline in '89-90 (Grand Rapids, MN) and leaf browning (Morris, MN). 1995.
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
Pedigree