Details for: PI 416937, Glycine max (L.) Merr., Houjaku Kuwazu


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Glycine max (L.) Merr.
Top Name:
Houjaku Kuwazu
Origin:
Collected – Japan
Maintained:
Soybean Collection
Received by NPGS:
Jul 1974
PI Assigned:
1977
Improvement Status:
Cultivated material
Reproductive Uniformity:

Pureline
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Availability
FormQuantityNoteInventoryCart
Seed50 count20S 7661 BulkOf2 SD
 
Restrictions
Plant material may be subject to additional regulations
https://www.nationalplantboard.org/uploads/1/3/6/7/136771235/idahoquarsumnsy2024_final_5.29.24.pdf
  • USA – Idaho (See state regulations: Plant Commodity Summaries.)
Images (1 total. Click on image for more.)

SEED

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Glycine max (L.) Merr.
Top Name:
Houjaku Kuwazu
Origin:
Collected – Japan
Maintained:
Soybean Collection
Received by NPGS:
Jul 1974
PI Assigned:
1977
Improvement Status:
Cultivated material
Reproductive Uniformity:

Pureline
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Source History
Collected

Japan
Locality: Kanto and Tosan region

Donated
July 1974.
Kanagawa, Japan
Comment: Seed increased at Urbana, Illinois and Stoneville, Mississippi
Donor(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
Houjaku Kuwazu
Type: Unverified name

H-040184
Type: Donor identifier
Group: NIAS
NIAS

Narrative
Glycine max (L.) Merr.
Genus:
Glycine
Subgenus:
Soja
Family:
Fabaceae (alt. Leguminosae)
Subfamily:
Faboideae
Tribe:
Phaseoleae
Subtribe:
Glycininae
Nomen number:

17711
Place of publication:

Interpr. Herb. amboin. 274. 1917
Verified:
03/19/1987 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Basionym
Phaseolus max L.

Autonym(s)
Glycine max (L.) Merr. subsp. max

Homotypic Synonym(s)
Soja max (L.) Piper

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Dolichos soja L.
Glycine gracilis Skvortsov
Glycine hispida (Moench) Maxim.
Glycine hispida (Moench) Maxim. var. brunnea Skvortsov
Glycine hispida (Moench) Maxim. var. hispida
Glycine hispida (Moench) Maxim. var. lutea Skvortsov
Glycine soja (L.) Merr.
Soja hispida Moench

Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
Englishedamame  1Carson, L. C. et al. 2011. Cultivar evaluation and lipid and protein contents of Virginia-grown edamame. HortTechnol. 21:181-185.
Englishsoya  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Englishsoya-bean  1Botanical Society of the British Isles. BSBI taxon database (on-line resource).
Englishsoybean  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Frenchsoja  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
GermanSojabohne  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Italiansoia  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Japanese Rōmajidaizu  2Ohwi, J. 1965. Flora of Japan (Engl. ed.).
Portuguesesoja  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishfrijol de soya  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishhaba soya  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishsoja  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Swedishsojaböna  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Chineseda dou  2Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds. 1994-. Flora of China (English edition).
Transcribed Koreankong  2Mun-Chan, B. et al. 1986. A checklist of the Korean cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 34:101-102.
Annotations
Other Links
Storage Information Form
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
  • Anand, S. C., K. M. Gallo, I. A. Baker, & E. E. Hartwig. 1988. Soybean Plant Introductions with Resistance to Races 4 or 5 of Soybean Cyst Nematode. Crop Sci. (Madison) 28:563-564. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030029x. Note: Data is in GRIN with evaluation name SOYBEAN.SCN.ANAND Number of accessions cited: 9657
  • Bianchi-Hall, C. M., T. E. Carter, Jr., M. A. Bailey, M. A. R. Mian, T. W. Rufty, D. A. Ashley, H. R. Boerma, C. Arellano, R. S. Hussey, & W. A. Parrott. 2000. Aluminum tolerance associated with quantitative trait loci derived from soybean PI 416937 in hydroponics. Crop Sci. (Madison) 40:538-545. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2000.402538x. Note: Al-tolerant Number of accessions cited: 2
  • Earl, H. J. 2002. Stomatal and non-stomatal restrictions to carbon assimilation in soybean (Glycine max) lines differing in water use efficiency. Environm. Exp. Bot. 48:237-246. Number of accessions cited: 2
  • Fasoula, V. A., D. K. Harris, M. A. Bailey, D. V. Phillips, & H. R. Boerma. 2003. Identification, mapping, and confirmation of a soybean gene for bud blight resistance. Crop Sci. (Madison) 43:1754-1759. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2003.1754. Note: Susceptible cultivar Number of accessions cited: 2
  • Funatsuki, H., M. Suzuki, A. Hirose, H. Inaba, T. Yamada, M. Hajika, K. Komatsu, T. Katayama, T. Sayama, M. Ishimoto, & K. Fujino. 2014. Molecular basis of a shattering resistance boosting global dissemination of soybean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111:17797-802. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1417282111. Number of accessions cited: 126
  • Gilbert, M. E., M. A. Zwieniecki, & N. M. Holbrook. 2011. Independent variation in photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance leads to differences in intrinsic water use efficiency in 11 soybean genotypes before and during mild drought. J. Exp. Bot. 62:2875-2887. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq461. Number of accessions cited: 4
  • Gilbert, M. E., N. M. Holbrook, M. A. Zwieniecki, W. Sadok, & T. R. Sinclair. 2011. Field confirmation of genetic variation in soybean transpiration vapor pressure deficit and photosynthetic compensation. Field Crops Res. 124:85-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.011. Number of accessions cited: 4
  • Hill, J. L., E. K. Peregrine, G. L. Sprau, C. R. Cremeens, R. L. Nelson, M. M. Kenty, & D. A. Thomas. 2001. Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups VI-VIII (FC 03.659-PI 567.235B). Techn. Bull. U.S.D.A. 1894:1-127. Note: Data is in GRIN with evaluation name of SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Number of accessions cited: 1617
  • Hudak, C. M. & R. P. Patterson. 1995. Vegetative growth analysis of a drought-resistant soybean plant introduction. Crop Sci. (Madison) 35:464-471. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500020031x. Note: drought-resistant accession Number of accessions cited: 2
  • Hufstetler, E. V., H. R. Boerma, T. E. Carter, & H. J. Earl. 2007. Genotypic variation for three physiological traits affecting drought tolerance in soybean. Crop Sci. (Madison) 47:25-35. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.04.0243. Number of accessions cited: 15
  • King, C. A., L. C. Purcell, & K. R. Brye. 2009. Differential wilting among soybean genotypes in response to water deficit. Crop Sci. (Madison) 49:290-290. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2008.04.0219. Number of accessions cited: 6
  • Kraemer, M. E., M. Rangappa, P. S. Benepal, & T. Mebrahtu. 1988. Field Evaluation of Soybeans for Mexican Bean Beetle Resistance. I. Maturity Groups VI, VII, and VIII. Crop Sci. (Madison) 28:497-499. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030014x. Note: Resistant Number of accessions cited: 38
  • Mian, M. A. R., M. A. Bailey, D. A. Ashley, R. Wells, T. E. Carter, W. A. Parrott, & H. R. Boerma. 1996. Molecular markers associated with water use efficiency and leaf ash in soybean. Crop Sci. (Madison) 36:1252-1257. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050030. Number of accessions cited: 2
  • Pantalone, V. R., G. J. Rebetzke, J. W. Burton, & T. E. Carter. 1996. Phenotypic evaluation of root traits in soybean and applicability to plant breeding. Crop Sci. (Madison) 36:456-459. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600020039x. Note: compared with Lee 74 Number of accessions cited: 2
  • Place, G. T., S. C. Reberg-Horton, D. A. Dickey, & T. E. Carter. 2011. Identifying soybean traits of interest for weed competition. Crop Sci. (Madison) 51:2642-2654. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0654. Number of accessions cited: 19
  • Sloane, R. J., R. P. Patterson, & T. E. Carter. 1990. Field drought tolerance of a soybean plant introduction. Crop Sci. (Madison) 30:118-123. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000010027x. Note: visually slow-wilting accession Number of accessions cited: 2
  • Villagarcia, M. R., T. E. Carter, T. W. Rufty, A. S. Niewoehner, M. W. Jennette, & C. Arrellano. 2001. Genotypic rankings for aluminum tolerance of soybean roots grown in hydroponics and sand culture. Crop Sci. (Madison) 41:1499-1507. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2001.4151499x. Number of accessions cited: 9
  • Yang, W. & D. B. Weaver. 2001. Resistance to Frogeye Leaf Spot in Maturity Groups VI and VII of Soybean Germplasm. Crop Sci. (Madison) 41:549-552. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2001.412549x. Note: Data is in GRIN with evaluation name of SOYBEAN.FROGEYE.AL.99 Number of accessions cited: 1677
  • Young, L. D. 1990. Soybean Germplasm Evaluated for Resistance to Races 3, 5, and 14 of Soybean Cyst Nematode. Crop Sci. (Madison) 30:735-736. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030052x. Note: Data is in GRIN with evaluation name of SOYBEAN.SCN.YOUNG.88 Number of accessions cited: 560
Pedigree

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
CHEMICALProteinProtein percent of dry weight of seed. Ex: 26.8, 49.947.1 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
CHEMICALOilOil percent of dry weight of seed. Ex: 16.4, 19.215.6 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
CHEMICALLinoleicLinoleic acid percent of oil. Ex: 44.1, 56.254.6 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
CHEMICALLinolenicLinolenic acid percent of oil. Ex: 6.3, 11.58.7 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
CHEMICALOleicOleic acid percent of oil. Ex: 18.7, 22.120.6 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
CHEMICALPalmiticPalmitic acid percent of oil. Ex: 10.9, 12.513.1 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
CHEMICALStearicStearic acid percent of oil. Ex: 2.1, 3.83.1 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
DISEASEBacterial pustuleReaction to bacterial pustule caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli. Based on natural infestations in the field.2 - Few lesions SOYBEAN.GENERALPI 416937 SDNot Available
DISEASENORTHERN STEM CANKERReaction to Northern Stem Canker caused by Diaporthe phaseolorum var. caulivoraR - Resistant, no lesions SOYBEAN.NSTEMCANKER.MS8693 Not Available
DISEASEFrogeye C-32 IsolateReaction to frogeye caused by Cercospora sojina (C-32 isolate). Based on artificial inoculation in the greenhouse.5 - 9.9 to 16.4% lesion area SOYBEAN.FROGEYE.AL.99 Not Available
DISEASESOUTHERN STEM CANKERReaction to Southern Stem Canker caused by Diaporthe phaseolorum var. meridionalisR - Resistant15SOYBEAN.SSTEMCANKER.BF.2009 Not Available
DISEASEPhytophthora Rot Race 1Reaction to phytophthora rot Race 1caused by Phytophthora sojaeR - Resistant SOYBEAN.GENERAL Not Available
DISEASEFROGEYE RACE 11Reaction to frogeye caused by Cercospora sojina, race 11.R - affected area 0 - 20%, lesion size 1 -2 mm SOYBEAN.FROGEYE11.BF.2010 Not Available
GROWTHHeightPlant height from ground to stem tip in centimeters measured at maturity. Descriptor is a numeric field. 999 = PROCUMBENT64 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
GROWTHStem termination typeEvaluation of stem growth habit, coded for determinate to indeterminate.D - Determinate (stem abruptly terminating) SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
INSECTMexican Bean Beetle damageFoliar feeding damage by Mexican Bean Beetle (Epilachna varivestis).3 SOYBEAN.GENERALPI 416937 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEarly shattering scoreEstimated percent of pods open at harvest. Score based on percentage of open pods as follows: 1 = no shattering, 2 = 1 to 10 percent, 3 = 10 to 25 percent, 4 = 25 to 50 percent, 5 = >50 percent.2 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYSeed qualityVisual quality evaluation considering wrinkling, defective seed coat, greenish or diseased seeds. Descriptor is a numeric field. Ex: 1.6. 1.0 = GOOD, 5.0 = POOR.1.8 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYSeed weightWeight of 100 seeds in grams (g).12.5 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYPubescence colorPubescence color.G - Gray SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYPubescence formPubescence form.E - Erect on leaf surface SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYSeed coat lusterSeed coat luster.I - Intermediate (between dull and shiny) SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYPubescence densityPubescence density.N - Normal density SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYPod colorPod color.Br - Brown SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYFlower colorFlower color.P - Purple SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYLodgingTendency of plant to lodge, measured at maturity. Scored 1 (erect) to 5 (prostrate)2 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYStem termination scoreStem termination score, measured at maturity. 1.0 = VERY DETERMINATE, 5.0 = VERY INDETERMINATE1 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYSeed coat colorSeed coat color.Y - Yellow SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYHilum colorHilum color.Y - Yellow SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYLate shattering scoreEstimated percent of pods open 2 weeks after harvest. Score based on percentage of open pods as follows: 1 = no shattering, 2 = 1 to 10 percent, 3 = 10 to 25 percent, 4 = 25 to 50 percent, 5 = >50 percent.3 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYMottling scoreEstimated percent of seed with dark pigmentation, hilum or saddle excluded. 1 = no mottling, 2 = 1 to 10%, 3 = 10 to 25%, 4 = 25 to 50%, 5 = >50%1.0 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYOther seed traitsOther seed characteristics. Multiple traits are possible, Ex: Abh,DefVhil SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
MORPHOLOGYSeed Shape of Glycine maxSeed shape of Glycine max based on height/length ratio and height/thickness ratio2N - Height-length ratio 0.87 - 0.94 and height-thickness ratio 1.11 - 1.39 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
NEMATODECyst Nematode Race 14Reaction to soybean cyst nematode infection Race 14 caused by Heterodera glycines.S - Susceptible7SOYBEAN.SCN.YOUNG.88 Not Available
NEMATODECyst Nematode Race 3Reaction to soybean cyst nematode Race 3 infection caused by Heterodera glycines.S - Susceptible7SOYBEAN.SCN.YOUNG.88 Not Available
NEMATODECyst Nematode Race 3Reaction to soybean cyst nematode Race 3 infection caused by Heterodera glycines.S - Susceptible SOYBEAN.SCN.ANAND Not Available
NEMATODECyst Nematode Race 5Reaction to soybean cyst nematode Race 5 infection caused by Heterodera glycines.S - Susceptible7SOYBEAN.SCN.YOUNG.88 Not Available
NEMATODECyst Nematode Race 5Reaction to soybean cyst nematode Race 5 infection caused by Heterodera glycines.S - Susceptible SOYBEAN.SCN.ANAND Not Available
PHENOLOGYFloweringDate that 50% of the plants have begun to flower; expressed as month (1 or 2 digits) and day (2 digits). Descriptor is a numeric field. Blank value means no data. Ex: 806715 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
PHENOLOGYMaturity dateDate that 95% of the pods have reached final color; expressed as month (1 or 2 digits) and day (2 digits). Blank value means no data. Ex: 10091007 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
PHENOLOGYMaturity groupMaturity evaluation. 000 = earliest, X = latest.VI - MATURITY GROUP VI SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available
PRODUCTIONYieldYield in megagrams per hectare (Mg/ha) at 13% seed moisture. Ex: 2.21, 3.050.91 SOYBEAN.EVALUATION.MS923 Not Available