Details for: PI 358523, Zea mays L. subsp. mays, 'Il14H'


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Zea mays L. subsp. mays
Cultivar:
'Il14H'
Origin:
Developed – Illinois, United States
Received by NPGS:
02 May 1969
PI Assigned:
1971
Improvement Status:
Breeding material
Reproductive Uniformity:

Highly inbred
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Availability
FormQuantityNoteInventoryCart
Seed100 countPI 358523 08ncai01 SD
 
Images (8 total. Click on image for more.)

KERNELS

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Zea mays L. subsp. mays
Cultivar:
'Il14H'
Origin:
Developed – Illinois, United States
Received by NPGS:
02 May 1969
PI Assigned:
1971
Improvement Status:
Breeding material
Reproductive Uniformity:

Highly inbred
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Source History
Developed
PRE 02 May 1969.
Illinois, United States

Developer(s):
Donated
02 May 1969.
Illinois, United States
Comment: Seed received through NC-7 Regional Plant Introduction Station, USDA-ARS, Iowa State Universisty, Aimes, Iowa, 50011.
Donor(s):
Accession Group(s)
Group name: Maize.Group.Ames.Panel.2010
Note: Original inbred accessions sent as Ames Panel in 2010.
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Maize.Group.Ames.Panel.2010

Group name: Maize.Set.Inbred.Diversity.282.Plus.NAM.Parents
Note: A maize collection of 282 Association Panel Inbreds and NAM (Nested Association Mapping) parental inbreds.
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Maize.Set.Inbred.Diversity.282.Plus.NAM.Parents

Group name: Maize.Set.Inbred.Diversity.NAM.Parents
Note: A maize collection of 26 inbreds crossed with B73 that were used to create the NAM RILs.
To search for accessions in this group, click the following link. Maize.Set.Inbred.Diversity.NAM.Parents

Accession Names and Identifiers
'Il14H'
Type: Cultivar name

14H-588-68(B)
Type: Developer identifier

STRAIN 14H-588-68(B)
Type: Donor identifier

PI 690323
Type: Duplicate accession name
Group: AMES.PI.DUPES
These are PI's for accessions with another active PI number.

Ames 1291
Type: Site identifier
Group: AMES
NC-7
USDA ARS NCRPIS

Ames 27118
Type: Site identifier
Group: AMES
NC-7 Research Numbers

599-1/99
Type: Other or unclassified name
Row and nursery year.
Goodman, Major M. North Carolina State University

Narrative
Strain 14h-588-68(b). Hybrid combinations 14 X 11 and 14 X 13 equal Narrow Grain Evergreen in commercial use. Non-Bantam type evergreen sweetcorn inbred. Medium maturity and height. Ears 10 cm., 16 rows, grain white, narrow.
Zea mays L. subspp. mays
Genus:
Zea
Family:
Poaceae (alt. Gramineae)
Subfamily:
Panicoideae
Tribe:
Andropogoneae
Subtribe:
Tripsacinae
Nomen number:

311987
Verified:
07/15/1987 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Zea mays L. (1531 active accession[s])
Zea mays L. subsp. huehuetenangensis (H. H. Iltis & Doebley) Doebley (6 active accession[s])
Zea mays L. subsp. mexicana (Schrad.) H. H. Iltis (128 active accession[s])
Zea mays L. subsp. parviglumis H. H. Iltis & Doebley (250 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Autonym(s)
Zea mays L. var. mays

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
Englishcorn  1Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Englishdent corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishfield corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishflint corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishmaize  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Englishpod corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishpopcorn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Englishsweet corn  1Terrell, E. E. et al. 1986. Agricultural Handbook no. 505
Arabicdura shami  2Boulos, L. 1999-. Flora of Egypt
Chineseyu shu shu玉蜀黍 2Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds. 1994-. Flora of China (English edition).
Frenchmaïs  2Demilly, D. et al. 1996. Liste alphabétique des principales espèces de plantes cultivées et de mauvaises herbes. Noms latins et noms français, ed. 6. Note: GEVES-SNES, Beaucouzé, France
GermanMais  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Italiangranoturco  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Italianmais  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Japanese Rōmajitō-morokoshi  2Batra, L. R. 1995. Names of Japanese plants sorted by their Japanese names in Romanized Katakana and scientific nomenclature
Portuguesemilho  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishmaíz  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Swedishmajs  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Koreangangnaengi  2Mun-Chan, B. et al. 1986. A checklist of the Korean cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 34:134.
Transcribed Koreanogsusu  2Lee, Y. N. 1997. Flora of Korea.
Annotations
  • Nomenclature Name Change: 01 Dec 1989, from Zea mays L. to Zea mays L. subsp. mays
Other Links
Link to MaizeGDB Stock Information
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
  • Baseggio, M., M. Murray, D. Wu, G. Ziegler, N. Kaczmar, J. Chamness, J. P. Hamilton, C. R. Buell, O. K. Vatamaniuk, E. S. Buckler, M. E. Smith, I. Baxter, W. F. Tracy & M. A. Gore. 2021. Genome-wide association study suggests an independent genetic basis of zinc and cadmium concentrations in fresh sweet corn kernels. bioRxiv 2021.02.19.432009. DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.19.432009. Number of accessions cited: 103
  • Baseggio, M., M. Murray, M. Magallanes-Lundback, N. Kaczmar, J. Chamness, E. S. Buckler, M. E. Smith, D. DellaPenna, W. F. Tracy, & M. A. Gore. 2019. Genome-Wide Association and Genomic Prediction Models of Tocochromanols in Fresh Sweet Corn Kernels. Pl. Genome 12:180038. DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2018.06.0038. Note: Accession specifically stated in suppliment. Number of accessions cited: 100
  • Buckler, E. S., J. B. Holland, P. J. Bradbury, C. B. Acharya, P. J. Brown, C. Browne, E. Ersoz, S. Flint-Garcia, A. Garcia, J. C. Glaubitz, M. M. Goodman, C. Harjes, K. Guill, D. E. Kroon, S. Larsson, N. K. Lepak, H. Li, S. E. Mitchell, G. Pressoir, J. A. Peiffer, M. Oropeza-Rosas, T. R. Rocheford, M. Cinta-Romay, S. Romero, S. Salvo, H. Sanchez-Villeda, H. S. Da Silva, Q. Sun, F. Tian, N. Upadyayula, D. Ware, H. Yates, J. Yu, Z. Zhang, S. Krosovich, & M. D. McMullen. 2009. The Genetic Architecture of Maize Flowering Time. Science 325:714-718. DOI: 10.1126/science.1174276. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 28
  • Chia, J.-M., C. Song, P. J. Bradbury, D. Costich, N. de Leon, J. Doebley, R. J. Elshire, B. Gaut, L. Geller, J. C. Glaubitz, M. Gore, K. E. Guill, J. Holland, M. B. Hufford, J. Lai, M. Li, X. Liu, Y. Lu, R. McCombie, R. Nelson, J. Poland, B. M. Prasanna, T. Pyhäjärvi, T. Rong, R. S. Sekhon, Q. Sun, M. I. Tenaillon, F. Tian, J. Wang, X. Xu, Z. Zhang, S. M. Kaeppler, J. Ross-Ibarra, M. D. McMullen, E. S. Buckler, G. Zhang, Y. Xu, & D. Ware. 2012. Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux. Nat. Genet. 44:803-807. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2313. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 63
  • Choquette, N. E., F. Ogut, T. M. Wertin, C. M. Montes, C. A. Sorgini, A. M. Morse, P. J. Brown, A. D. B. Leakey, L. M. McIntyre, & E. A. Ainsworth. 2019. Uncovering hidden genetic variation in photosynthesis of field-grown maize under ozone pollution. Global Change Biol. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14794. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 11
  • Christensen, S. A., A. Huffaker, J. Sims, C. T. Hunter, A. Block, M. M. Vaughan, D. Willett, M. Romero, J. E. Mylroie, W. P. Williams, & E. A. Schmelz. 2018. Fungal and herbivore elicitation of the novel maize sesquiterpenoid, zealexin A4, is attenuated by elevated CO2. Planta 247(4):863-873. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-017-2830-5. Number of accessions cited: 24
  • Flint-Garcia, S. A., A. Thuillet, J. Yu, G. Pressoir, S. M. Romero, S. E. Mitchell, J. Doebley, S. Kresovich, M. M. Goodman, & E. S. Buckler. 2005. Maize association population: a high-resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. Plant J. 44(6)1054-1064. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02591.x. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 307
  • Flint-Garcia,S. A., A. L. Bodnar, & M. P. Scott. 2009. Wide variability in kernel composition, seed characteristics, and zein profiles among diverse maize inbreds, landraces, and teosinte. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119(6):1129-1142. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1115-1. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 55
  • Gore, M. A., J. M. Chia, R. J. Elshire, Q. Sun, E. S. Ersoz, B. L. Hurwitz, J. A. Peiffer, M. D. McMullen, G. S. Grills, J. Ross-Ibarra, D. H. Ware & E. S. Buckler. 2009. A first-generation haplotype map of maize. Science 326:115-1117. DOI: 10.1126/science.1177837. Number of accessions cited: 27
  • Gustin, J. L., S. K Boehlein, J. R. Shaw, W. Junior, A. M. Settles, A. Webster, W. F. Tracy & L. C. Hannah. 2018. Ovary abortion is prevalent in diverse maize inbred lines and is under genetic control. Nat. Sci. (Sci. Res. Press) 8(1):13032. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31216-9. Number of accessions cited: 26
  • Hansey, C. N., J. M. Johnson, R. S. Sekhon, S. M. Kaeppler, & N. de Leon. 2011. Genetic Diversity of a Maize Association Population with Restricted Phenology. Crop Sci. (Madison) 51(2):704-715. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0178. Number of accessions cited: 1351
  • Huang, C., H. Sun, D. Xu, Q. Chen, Y. Liang, X. Wang, G. Xu, J. Tian, C. Wang, D. Li, L. Wu, X. Yang, W. Jin, J. F. Doebley, & F. Tian. 2018. ZmCCT9 enhances maize adaptation to higher latitudes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115(2):E334-E341. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1718058115. Note: In Figure S12. Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 121
  • Jones, G. J. & M. M. Goodman. 2018. Identification of M-Type Gametophyte Factors in Maize Genetic Resources. Crop Sci. (Madison) 58:719-727. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2017.09.0560. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 105
  • Marand, A. P., L. Jiang, F. Gomez-Cano, M. A. A. Minow, X. Zhang, J. P. Mendieta, Z. Luo, S. Bang, H. Yan, C. Meyer, L. Schlegal, F. Johannes & R. J. Schmitz. 2025. The genetic architecture of cell type–specific cis regulation in maize. Science 388(6744):eads6601. DOI: 10.1126/science.ads6601. Number of accessions cited: 172
  • McMullen, M. D., S. Kresovich, H. S. Villeda, P. Bradbury, H. Li, Q. Sun, S. Flint-Garcia, J. Thornsberry, C. Acharya, C. Bottoms, P. Brown, C. Browne, M. Eller, K. Guill, C. Harjes, D. Kroon, N. Lepak, S. E. Mitchell, B. Peterson, G. Pressoir, S. Romero, M. Oropeza-Rosas, S. Salvo, H. Yates, M. Hanson, E. Jones, S. Smith, J. C. Glaubitz, M. Goodman, D. Ware, J. B. Holland, & E. S. Buckler. 2009. Genetic Properties of the Maize Nested Association Mapping Population. Science 325:737-740. DOI: 10.1126/science.1174320. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 28
  • Quesada-Ocampo, L. M., J. Al-Haddad, A. C. Scruggs, C. R. Buell & F. Trail. 2016. Susceptibility of Maize to Stalk Rot Caused by Fusarium graminearum Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone Mutants. Phytopathology 106(8):920-927. DOI: 10.1094/phyto-09-15-0199-r. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 18
  • Revilla, P., V. M. Rodríguez, A. Ordas, R. Rincent, A. Charcosset, C. Giauffret, A. E. Melchinger, C. C. Schon, E. Bauer, T. Altmann, D. Brunel, J. Moreno-Gonzalez, L. Campo, M. Ouzunova, J. Laborde, A. Alvarez, J. I. Ruiz de Galarreta & R. A. Malvar. 2014. Cold Tolerance in Two Large Maize Inbred Panels Adapted to European Climates. Crop Sci. (Madison) 54(5):1981-1991. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2013.11.0733. Note: The direct source of accession was not from NPGS, but may have indirectly been obtained from the NPGS. PVPs could only have originated from NPGS. Replication of the results should be possible with the NPGS accession because inbred lines should not diverge appreciably if properly maintained. Number of accessions cited: 142
  • Singh, R., S. Shim, D. E. P. Telenko & S. B. Goodwin. 2023. Parental Inbred Lines of the Nested Association Mapping (NAM) Population of Corn Show Sources of Resistance to Tar Spot in Northern Indiana. Pl. Dis. 107(2):262-266. DOI: 10.1094/pdis-02-22-0314-sc. Note: Evaluated under PI 690323 which was reasigned a previously assigned duplicate PI 358532. Number of accessions cited: 26
  • Sun, H., C. Wang, X. Chen, H. Liu, Y. Huang, S. Li, Z. Dong, X. Zhao, F. Tian & W. Jin. 2020. dlf1 promotes floral transition by directly activating ZmMADS4 and ZmMADS67 in the maize shoot apex. New Phytol. 228(4):1386-1400 DOI: 10.1111/nph.16772. Number of accessions cited: 38
  • Swarts, K., R. M. Gutaker, B. Benz, M. Blake, R. Bukowski, J. Holland, M. Kruse-Peeples, N. Lepak, L. Prim, M. C. Romay, J. Ross-Ibarra, J. Sanchez-Gonzalez, C. Schmidt, V. J. Schuenemann, J. Krause, R. G. Matson, D. Weigel, E. S. Buckler, & H. A. Burbano. 2017. Genomic estimation of complex traits reveals ancient maize adaptation to temperate North America. Science 357:512-515. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam9425. Note: Supplement Table S6 Taxon:Il14H Number of accessions cited: 213
  • Venkatesh, T. V., G. G. Harrigan, T. Perez, & S. Flint-Garcia. 2015. Compositional Assessments of Key Maize Populations: B73 Hybrids of the Nested Association Mapping Founder Lines and Diverse Landrace Inbred Lines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 63(21):5282-5295. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00208. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 48
  • Wang, J., X. Li, K. D. Kim, M. J. Scanlon, S. A. Jackson, N. M. Springer, & Y. Yu. 2019. Genome-wide nucleotide patterns and potential mechanisms of genome divergence following domestication in maize and soybean. Genome Biol. 20(1):74. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1683-6. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 61
  • Yu, J., J. B. Holland, M. D. McMullen & E. S. Buckler. 2008. Genetic Design and Statistical Power of Nested Association Mapping in Maize. Genetics 178(1):539-551. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.074245. Note: Published as Ames 27118. Number of accessions cited: 28
Pedigree

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
CHEMICALOil PercentageWhole kernel oil concentration corrected to a standard moisture level (dry weight basis). Value is expressed in percent oil. The method of obtaining the value is described in the method record and may be by calibrated NIR or using wet lab procedures.6.2 MAIZE.NIR.DUPONT-PIONEER.2000PI 358523 87ncab01 SDNot Available
COMMENTNotes and RemarksObservations made by cooperators or curators while evaluating or regenerating germplasm. Usually these observations are not published and need verification or there are too few observations of this type to promote a separate trait.OBSERVATION-NURSERY_YES MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.NCIANYMOPI 358523 08ncai01 SD
COMMENTNotes and RemarksObservations made by cooperators or curators while evaluating or regenerating germplasm. Usually these observations are not published and need verification or there are too few observations of this type to promote a separate trait.OBSERVATION-NURSERY_YES MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.NCIANYMOPI 358523 87ncab01 SDNot Available
DISEASEGoss's WiltPlant Response To Goss's Wilt organism (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis (Vidaver & Mandel) Davis et al. = Corynebacterium michiganense pv. nebraskense (Schuster et al.) Dye & Kemp ). Disease names include Goss's bacterial wilt and blight (leaf freckles and wilt).4 - (4) Some Resistance MAIZE.GOSSS.U_OF_ILLINOIS.2016-2017PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
DISEASECommon RustLeaf Response to common rust organism (Puccinia sorghi Schwein.). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response. 6 - (6) (0 = NO SYMPTOMS, 9 = SEVERE DISEASE DEVLOPMENT) MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
DISEASECommon SmutPlant response to the common smut organism (Ustilago zeae(Beckm.) Unger = U. maydis (DC.) Corda)). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.3 - FEW PLANTS WITH MODERATE SIZED GALLS. MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
DISEASEDiplodia Stalk RotSTALK RESPONSE TO DIPLODIA STALK ROT ORGANISM (Diplodia maydis (Berc.) Sacc.)9 - 96-100% OF INOCULATED INTERNODE ROTTED MAIZE.DIPLODIA.MULT Not Available
DISEASEStewarts WiltPlant response to the Stewart's wilt organism (Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert, Verdonck & Kersters) formerly called (Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye ). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.4 - (4) Abundant spread bi-directionally in inoculated leaves only.30MAIZE.STEWARTS.U_OF_ILLINOIS.1997PI 358523 87ncab01 SDNot Available
DISEASEStewarts WiltPlant response to the Stewart's wilt organism (Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert, Verdonck & Kersters) formerly called (Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye ). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.4 - (4) Abundant spread bi-directionally in inoculated leaves only.13MAIZE.STEWARTS.NCRPIS.2003PI 358523 87ncab01 SDNot Available
DISEASEStewarts WiltPlant response to the Stewart's wilt organism (Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert, Verdonck & Kersters) formerly called (Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye ). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.4 - (4) Abundant spread bi-directionally in inoculated leaves only.20MAIZE.STEWARTS.NCRPIS.2006PI 358523 87ncab01 SDNot Available
DISEASEStewarts WiltPlant response to the Stewart's wilt organism (Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert, Verdonck & Kersters) formerly called (Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye ). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response.4 - (4) Abundant spread bi-directionally in inoculated leaves only.30MAIZE.STEWARTS.NCRPIS.2009PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
DISEASENorthern Leaf Blight Race OLeaf response to northern leaf blight race O organism (Exserhilum turcicum [Pass.] Leonard & Suggs - previous name was Helminthosporium turcicum.6 - (6) (0 = NO SYMPTOMS OBSERVED, 9 = SEVERE DISEASE DEVELOPMENT) MAIZE.NLB.PIONEER.JOHNSTON.2005PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
DISEASECommon Rust Race RP1-DLeaf Response to Rp1-D virulent strain of common rust organism (Puccinia sorghi Schwein.). The trait is coded 1-9 with 1 representing the most resistant response and 9 the most susceptible response. 4 - (4) (0 = NO SYMPTOMS, 9 = SEVERE DISEASE DEVLOPMENT)2MAIZE.COMMONRUST.U_OF_ILLINOIS.2001PI 358523 87ncab01 SDNot Available
GROWTHPlant HeightHeight of the plant from ground level to the top of the tassel at full growth measured in centimeters (cm).170.00000 MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
GROWTHPlant HeightHeight of the plant from ground level to the top of the tassel at full growth measured in centimeters (cm).212.000005MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
GROWTHPlant VigorVisual rating of plant vigor. Rating is based on plant height, breadth, biomass accumulation, and color.1 - GOOD MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
INSECTEuropean Corn Borer Gen1RESISTANCE TO THE FIRST GENERATION OF EUROPEAN CORN BORER.4 - (4) Intermediate response. Several leaves with shot-hole lesions and elongated lesions MAIZE.ECB1.AMES.88PI 358523 71ncai01 SDNot Available
INSECTEuropean Corn Borer Gen2RESISTANCE TO THE SECOND GENERATION OF EUROPEAN CORN BORER.9 - (9) Susceptible. MAIZE.ECB2.AMES.MULT Not Available
INSECTSpider MiteSPIDERMITE RATING9 - (9) Susceptible. MAIZE.SPIDERMIT.MULT Not Available
INSECTBlack CutwormRESISTANCE TO BLACK CUTWORM6 - (6) (1 = RESISTANT, 9 = SUSCEPTIBLE) MAIZE.B.CUTWORM.MULT Not Available
MORPHOLOGYTassel TypeClassification of the amount of tassel branching from no branching to beyond tertiary tassel branching.1 - The tassel has branches, but there are no branches on the primary tassel branches. (20%)5MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYTassel TypeClassification of the amount of tassel branching from no branching to beyond tertiary tassel branching.2 - Branching to secondary tassel branches only. No tertiary tassel branches. (80%)5MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYPeduncle HeightDistance from ground level to the node where the tassel emerges on the central stalk.1535MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYBottom Tassel Branch HeightDistance from ground level to the insertion point on the tassel stem of the bottom tassel branch of the central stalk.1765MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYTop Tassel Branch HeightDistance from ground level to the insertion point on the tassel stem of the upper most tassel branch of the central stalk.1905MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYNode Number Above the EarNumber of Nodes on the main stalk starting at the node above the ear node up to and including the peduncle node.65MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel TypeKERNEL TYPEH - SWEET MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel TypeKERNEL TYPEH - SWEET (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel TypeKERNEL TYPEH - SWEET (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYKernel ColorKERNEL COLORA - WHITE MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel ColorKERNEL COLORA - WHITE (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel ColorKERNEL COLORA - WHITE (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYKernel Row ArrangementARRANGEMENT OF KERNEL ROWS FROM THE BASE TO THE TIP OF THE EAR.1 - REGULAR (95%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel Row ArrangementARRANGEMENT OF KERNEL ROWS FROM THE BASE TO THE TIP OF THE EAR.2 - IRREGULAR (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYKernel Row ArrangementARRANGEMENT OF KERNEL ROWS FROM THE BASE TO THE TIP OF THE EAR.2 - IRREGULAR (5%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel row NumberNUMBER OF KERNEL ROWS COUNTED ON THE CENTRAL PART OF THE UPPERMOST EAR ON THE PLANT.085MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYKernel row NumberNUMBER OF KERNEL ROWS COUNTED ON THE CENTRAL PART OF THE UPPERMOST EAR ON THE PLANT.0402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYKernel row NumberNUMBER OF KERNEL ROWS COUNTED ON THE CENTRAL PART OF THE UPPERMOST EAR ON THE PLANT.14 MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYEar LengthLENGTH OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS.11 MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYEar LengthLENGTH OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS.11402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYEar LengthLENGTH OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS.11.385MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEar DiameterDIAMETER OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS MEASURED AT THE CENTRAL PART OF THE UPPERMOST EAR ON THE PLANT.3.8402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYEar DiameterDIAMETER OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS MEASURED AT THE CENTRAL PART OF THE UPPERMOST EAR ON THE PLANT.3.985MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEar HeightHEIGHT OF THE TOP EAR ON THE CENTRAL STALK FROM GROUND LEVEL TO THE NODE WHERE THE EAR ATTACHES TO THE STALK.55 MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYEar HeightHEIGHT OF THE TOP EAR ON THE CENTRAL STALK FROM GROUND LEVEL TO THE NODE WHERE THE EAR ATTACHES TO THE STALK.605MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB1 - WHITE MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB1 - WHITE (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB1 - WHITE (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB1 - WHITE (100%)27MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2011.IAPI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYCob ColorCOLOR OF THE COB1 - WHITE (100%)2MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2011.IAPI 358523 87ncab01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYUpper Kernel ShapeSHAPE OF THE UPPER SURFACE OF THE KERNEL.1 - SHRUNKEN (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYUpper Kernel ShapeSHAPE OF THE UPPER SURFACE OF THE KERNEL.1 - SHRUNKEN (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYEar NumberNUMBER OF EARS WITH KERNELS ON THE MAIN STEM15MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEar NumberNUMBER OF EARS WITH KERNELS ON THE MAIN STEM2 MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYHusk LengthLENGTH OF HUSK BEYOND OR BELOW THE TIP OF THE EAR IN CENTIMETERS. VALUE CAN BE NEGATIVE WHEN THE HUSK DOES NOT COVER THE EAR TIP.6.5 MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYNode NumberNumber of Nodes on the main stalk from ground level up to and including the peduncle node.12 MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYNode NumberNumber of Nodes on the main stalk from ground level up to and including the peduncle node.125MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYRoot LodgingVISUAL RATING OF PLANTS LEANING FROM THE VERTICAL DUE TO ROOT LODGING1 - FEW STALKS BROKEN/LODGED MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYStalk LodgingVISUAL RATING OF PLANTS BROKEN FROM GROUND LEVEL TO THE TOP EAR NODE.1 - FEW STALKS BROKEN/LODGED MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYTiller NumberNUMBER OF TILLERS PER PLANT05MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYTiller NumberNUMBER OF TILLERS PER PLANT2 MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
MORPHOLOGYEndosperm ColorCOLOR OF THE HARD ENDOSPERM LAYER1 - WHITE (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEndosperm ColorCOLOR OF THE HARD ENDOSPERM LAYER1 - WHITE (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYEar ShapeSHAPE OF THE UPPERMOST EAR2 - CYLINDRICAL - CONICAL (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYEar ShapeSHAPE OF THE UPPERMOST EAR2 - CYLINDRICAL - CONICAL (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYAleurone ColorThe color and pattern of the kernel aleurone layer. The first entry represents the color and the second number represents the pattern of that color.11 - COLORLESS / UNIFORM (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYAleurone ColorThe color and pattern of the kernel aleurone layer. The first entry represents the color and the second number represents the pattern of that color.11 - COLORLESS / UNIFORM (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYPericarp ColorTHE COLOR AND THE PATTERN OF THE PERICARP. THE FIRST NUMBER IS THE COLOR, THE SECOND NUMBER IS THE PATTERN.11 - COLORLESS / UNIFORM (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYPericarp ColorTHE COLOR AND THE PATTERN OF THE PERICARP. THE FIRST NUMBER IS THE COLOR, THE SECOND NUMBER IS THE PATTERN.11 - COLORLESS / UNIFORM (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYGlume DevelopmentGlume development1 - None (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
MORPHOLOGYGlume DevelopmentGlume development3 - Basal (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYColored Silk ScarColored Silk ScarN - Colored silk scar is not present (100%)85MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
MORPHOLOGYColored Silk ScarColored Silk ScarN - Colored silk scar is not present (100%)402MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD
PHENOLOGYDTS Relative 40-49 LatitudeNumber of days plus or minus the days to silk for the named check at latitude 40-49.B73-06 MAIZE.NLB.PIONEER.JOHNSTON.2005PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYDays to Silk 40-49 latitudeNumber of days from planting to when silks of 50% of observed plants have emerged where the observations are at latitude 40 to 49 degrees.74 MAIZE.INC.AMES.COMPOSITE.DATA Not Available
PHENOLOGYGDU ANTHESIS F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% anthesis in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.1520 MAIZE.NLB.PIONEER.JOHNSTON.2005PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.13458MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.IAPI 358523 08ncai01 SD
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.13849MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.NYPI 358523 08ncai01 SD
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.13967MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.IAPI 358523 87ncab01 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.1548 MAIZE.NLB.PIONEER.JOHNSTON.2005PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
PHENOLOGYGDU SILKING F LAT40-49Growing degree units (GDU or GDD) from planting to 50% silking in degrees farenheit. Data is taken at 40 to 49 degrees N or S latitude. This (86,50) system uses the equation ((Tmax+Tmin)/2)-50. Tmax to 86 maximum and Tmin to 50 minimum.16373MAIZE.OBS.INBRED.DIVERSITY.2010.NYPI 358523 87ncab01 SDNot Available
PRODUCTION1000 Kernel WeightThe weight of 1000 kernels measured in grams, preferably with the weight adjusted to 10% moisture content.175 MAIZE.INC.AMES.2003.MID1PI 358523 03ncai01 SDNot Available
PRODUCTION1000 Kernel WeightThe weight of 1000 kernels measured in grams, preferably with the weight adjusted to 10% moisture content.222401MAIZE.INC.AMES.2008.PLANTING2PI 358523 08ncai01 SD