Details for: PI 357355, Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris, CRVENO


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris
Top Name:
CRVENO
Origin:
Collected – North Macedonia
Received by NPGS:
15 Feb 1970
PI Assigned:
1971
Improvement Status:
Cultivar
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Biennial
Life Cycle:
Biennial
Availability
FormQuantityNoteInventoryCart
Seed100 countPI 357355 93i SD
 
There are no images for this accession.

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris
Top Name:
CRVENO
Origin:
Collected – North Macedonia
Received by NPGS:
15 Feb 1970
PI Assigned:
1971
Improvement Status:
Cultivar
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Biennial
Life Cycle:
Biennial
Source History
Collected

North Macedonia
Locality: Prilep
Elevation: 660m.

Collector(s):
Donated
15 February 1970.
North Macedonia
Comment: Received under Public Law 480 Project E30-CR-33.
Donor(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
CRVENO
Type: Unverified name

564
Type: Donor identifier
Yugoslavia

IDBBNR 5482
Type: Institute identifier
Group: IPGRI
Bundesanstalt fur Zuchtungsforschung

Narrative
Beta vulgaris L. subspp. vulgaris
Genus:
Beta
Section:
Beta
Family:
Chenopodiaceae
Subfamily:
Betoideae
Tribe:
Beteae
Nomen number:

7057
Comment:
treated here to include Beta vulgaris Fodder Beet, Garden Beet, Leaf Beet, and Sugar Beet Groups
Verified:
03/24/2009 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Beta vulgaris L. (23 active accession[s])
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. adanensis (Pamukç. ex Aellen) Ford-Lloyd & J. T. Williams (0 active accession[s])
Beta vulgaris L. subsp. maritima (L.) Arcang. (627 active accession[s])
Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla (0 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Autonym(s)
Beta vulgaris L. f. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris

Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
Englishbeet  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Englishbeetroot  1Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. 1976. Hortus third. A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada
Englishfield beet  11998. Federal Seed Act and Regulations, Agricultural and Vegetable Kind Lists, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Seed Regulatory and Testing Branch.
Englishfodder beet  1Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Englishfoliage beet as Beta vulgaris var. cicla1Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Englishgarden beet  1Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Englishleaf beet as Beta vulgaris var. cicla1Erhardt, W. et al. 2008. Der große Zander: Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen 2:1244. Note: as Beta vulgaris var. cicla
Englishmangel  1Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. 1976. Hortus third. A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada
Englishmangold  1Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. 1976. Hortus third. A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada
Englishred beet  1Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Englishroot beet  1Botanical Society of the British Isles. BSBI taxon database (on-line resource).
EnglishSicilian broad-rib beet as Beta vulgaris var. flavescens1Davis, P. H., ed. 1965-1988. Flora of Turkey and the east Aegean islands.
Englishspinach beet as Beta vulgaris var. cicla1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Englishspinach chard  1FNA Editorial Committee. 1993-. Flora of North America.
Englishsugarbeet  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
EnglishSwiss chard as Beta vulgaris var. flavescens1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Englishyellow beet  1Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. 1976. Hortus third. A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada
Arabicshamandar  2Norton, J. et al. 2009. Illustrated checklist of the flora of Qatar.
Chinesetian cai甜菜 2Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds. 1994-. Flora of China (English edition).
Frenchbetterave  2Demilly, D. et al. 2001. Liste alphabétique des principales espèces de plantes cultivées et de mauvaises herbes. Noms latins et noms français, ed. 7 GEVES-SNES, Beaucouzé, France.
Frenchbetterave fourragère  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Frenchbetterave jaune  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Frenchbetterave potagère  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Frenchbetterave rouge  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Frenchbetterave sucrière  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Frenchpoirée à carde as Beta vulgaris var. flavescens2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants Note: as Beta vulgaris subvar. flavescens
Frenchpoirée à couper as Beta vulgaris var. cicla2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Frenchpoirée bette  2Demilly, D. et al. 2001. Liste alphabétique des principales espèces de plantes cultivées et de mauvaises herbes. Noms latins et noms français, ed. 7 GEVES-SNES, Beaucouzé, France.
GermanBlatt-Mangold as Beta vulgaris var. cicla2Erhardt, W. et al. 2008. Der große Zander: Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen 2:1244. Note: as Beta vulgaris var. cicla
GermanFutterrübe  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Germanmangel Wurzel  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
GermanMangold as Beta vulgaris var. cicla2Erhardt, W. et al. 2008. Der große Zander: Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen 2:1244. Note: as Beta vulgaris var. cicla
Germanrömische Bete as Beta vulgaris var. flavescens2Erhardt, W. et al. 2008. Der große Zander: Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen 2:1244. Note: lists as Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla var. flavescens as Beta vulgaris subvar. flavescens
Germanrote Bete  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Germanrote Rübe  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
GermanRunkelrübe  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
GermanSchnittmangold as Beta vulgaris var. cicla2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
GermanStielmangold as Beta vulgaris var. flavescens2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants Note: as Beta vulgaris subvar. flavescens
GermanZuckerrübe  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Italianbarbabietola  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Italianbarbabietola da foraggio  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Italianbarbabietola da zucchero  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Italianbietola da coste  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Italianbietola da orto  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Portugueseacelga as Beta vulgaris var. cicla2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Portuguesebeterraba  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Portuguesebeterraba-açucareira  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Portuguesebeterraba-forrageira  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Portuguesebeterraba-sacarina  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishacelga as Beta vulgaris var. cicla2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishacelga cardo as Beta vulgaris var. flavescens2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishbetarraga azucarera  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishbetarraga forrajera  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishremolacha amarilla  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishremolacha azucarera  2Office of the Union. 2009. UPOV: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. List of the taxa protected by the members of the Union
Spanishremolacha colorada  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishremolacha de mesa  2Office of the Union. 2009. UPOV: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. List of the taxa protected by the members of the Union
Spanishremolacha forrajera  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Spanishremolacha roja  2Rehm, S. 1994. Multilingual dictionary of agronomic plants
Swedishbeta  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Koreangeundae  2Mun-Chan, B. et al. 1986. A checklist of the Korean cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 34:84.
Annotations
  • Taxonomic Re-Identification: 12 Jun 2002, from Beta vulgaris L. to Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris
Other Links
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
Pedigree

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
CYTOLOGICPloidy levelPloidy level2n - DIPLOID SUGARBEET.PLOIDY.1995.DONEYPI 357355 71ncpo01 SDNot Available
DISEASECercosporaSusceptability to Cercospora.5 - 5: INTERMEDIATE Beta PIs from the USDA-ARS NPGS evaluated for resistance to Cercospora beticola, 2009.

Thirty Plant Introductions (PIs) from the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) (garden beet, sugar beet, leaf beet, fodder beet, and wild beet) were evaluated in an artificially produced epiphytotic environment (Ruppel, E.G., and J.O. Gaskill. 1971. Techniques for evaluating sugarbeet for resistance to Cercospora beticola in the field. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 16:384-389). A randomized complete-block design, with three replications was used to evaluate germplasm at the Saginaw Valley Research Farm (SVRF) near Frankenmuth, MI. Internal controls included a susceptible check, variety CE (kindly provided by Syngenta Seeds), and a resistant check, ACH355 (kindly provided by Crystal Beet Seed). Single-row plots 4.5 m long, with 51 cm between rows were planted on 6 May 09. Azoxystrobin was applied in a band in furrow at planting to control Rhizoctonia damping-off and crown and root rot. The nursery was inoculated on 9 Jul with a liquid spore suspension of Cercospora beticola. Visual evaluations on the plot with a disease index (DI) on a scale from where 0=no symptoms, 1=a few scattered spots, 2=spots coalescing or in large numbers on lower leaves only, 3= some dieback on lower leaves, but leaves not entirely dead, 4-8 are increasing amounts of dead and diseased tissue, 9= mostly dead with few remaining living leaves with large dead patches, and 10=all leaves dead. Evaluations were made on 19 Aug, 26 Aug, 2 Sep and 9 Sep, with the peak of the epidemic occurring around 9 Sep. The field was sprayed four times with phenmedipham, desmedipham, triflusulfuron methyl, and clopyralid (15 and 27 May and 4 and 16 Jun), once with S-metolachlor (25 Jun), and a cultivation was performed on 24 Jun to control weeds. The beet crop was thinned by hand. Bolting beets were removed throughout the season, after which some annual materials could not be rated as there was not sufficient remaining leaf tissue.

The moderate night time temperatures in the summer of 2009, combined with good moisture, contributed to a moderate leaf spot epidemic. The Beetcast leafspot advisory daily severity values accumulated in the Frankenmuth area from 15 May to 15 Sep were 129. Disease severity peaked by early September, after which regrowth started to outpace new disease development, so that disease ratings remained constant or decreased after that rating, thus ratings are not given after this date. At our 9 Sep rating, means of the resistant and susceptible internal control for the entire nursery (including two additional experiments) were 2.5 and 5.3 (scale of 0-10), respectively, across the nursery. At the peak of the epidemic in 2008 (2 Sep), these means were 2.4 and 5.2 respectively. Means of contributor lines in the entire nursery (including three additional tests) in 2009 ranged from 2.3 to 6.3. An analysis of variance (PROC GLM - SAS) on the disease indices (visual evaluation scores) determined that there were significant differences among entries (P<0.05) on all dates of evaluation. Three accessions (PI 518429, PI 540691, and PI 604208) had ratings that were not significantly different from the resistant control at all rating dates. Two additional accessions, (PI 540583 and PI 546401) had average ratings that were not significantly different from the resistant control at four of the five rating dates. PI 546401, however, had very few plants and lost a great deal of tissue from removal of seed stalks from bolting, so ratings may not be reliable for this accession. Only seven accessions (PI 518322, 518417, 540675, 540678, 540679, 546433, and 550718) as well as the two control varieties did not require removal of seed stalks during the course of the ratings. Of these, only the resistant control was rated as resistant to Cercospora leaf spot. These data, and more information on the accessions evaluated, are available through the USDA-ARS GRIN database at . Roots were collected from PIs with low disease ratings to be included in crosses with sugar beet germplasm.

For a .doc file with the disease index data ">SUGARBEET.CERCOSPORA.2009.HANSON

PI 357355 93i SD
INSECTRoot MaggotSusceptability to Root Maggot.6 - 6: in 0-9 scale between Intermediate and Susceptible23SUGARBEET.ROOTMAGGOT.2009.BOETELPI 357355 93i SD
MORPHOLOGYHypocotyl colorHypocotyl pigmentation3 - Red SUGARBEET.HYPOCOTYL.2017-2019.PAVELKAPI 357355 93i SD
MORPHOLOGYSeed weight 100Weight of 100 seeds in grams.0.7 SUGARBEET.SEEDWEIGHT.WRPISPI 357355 93i SD
MORPHOLOGYLifeformLife form of the accessionBI - Biennial SUGARBEET.LIFEFORM.1995.DONEYPI 357355 71ncpo01 SDNot Available
PRODUCTIONType of BeetGeneral growth type and/or use typeUNKNOWN - Passport and other associated data does not clearly indicate TYPE or there is not enough data to make a TYPE assignment. For a Excel file(xlsx) of this data

Beta vulgaris sp vulgaris TYPE evaluation 2016 Date: 12/28/2016

Every accession in the Beta vulgaris sp vulgaris collection (1,816 accessions) as of 12/28/2016 was given a TYPE designation based on previous evaluation data, passport data, information from the International Database for Beta (managed by the IPK, Germany) or other information found on the internet. In the accompanying Excel spreadsheet the source used to assign TYPE is given (data source 1 and data source 2). The following is information on the data sources:

Table Beet evaluation 2013 - conducted at Central Ferry, WA by the Beta curator and technician. Evaluated 140 accessions previously designated as table beet. Images of plants, dug roots and cut roots were taken.

USDA Release list - Panella L., Campbell, L.G., Eujayl, I.A., Lewellen, R.T., and McGrath, J.M. USDA-ARS Sugarbeet Releases and Breeding Over the Past 20 Years. Journal of Sugar Beet Research Vol. 52 Nos. 3 & 4, 7/28/2016. This article incorporates USDA-ARS sugarbeet releases listed in Doney’s 1995 paper. (Doney, D.L. 1995b. USDA-ARS sugarbeet releases. J. Sugar Beet Res.32:229-257.)

Passport data - passport data (on the web () or in the Plant Inventory Books. For a small number of accessions, little pieces of information in the Plant Inventory Book were not entered into the database.

Evaluation data - data from CGC(formerly known as CAC) funded evaluations and other studies. The year the evaluation(s) was conducted is listed.

Topname - the topname is the primary name associated with the accession. If it was used to designate TYPE, it is a known cultivar name (eg Huntley Chard, Ohio Canner).

Images - if images were used to help determine TYPE the year the image was taken is listed. All images are in GRIN-Global database

I followed the TYPE classification as described by Lange et al in Taxonomy and cultonomy of Beet, 1999 (see below for definitions) with the exception that garden beets are called table beet. For some accessions, there was only enough information to come close to a TYPE assignment. For example, an accession has large swollen hypocotyls but there is no cultivar name or sucrose content data. We know it is not a leaf or table beet but don’t have enough information to determine if it is a fodder or sugar beet. Accessions with this kind of information were assigned the TYPE of other.

There is a large group of accessions with no or little passport data and no or little evaluation data that indicated a TYPE. These accessions were given the TYPE of unknown. As more regenerations and evaluations are done with these accessions a TYPE will be assigned.

In addition to the above TYPE designations an accessions was assigned the TYPE of wild if it was collected from a wild population or if in an evaluation it was determined it did not fit the definitions of the cultivated beets.

Information on the data source(s) used and notes regarding TYPE are displayed in GRIN-Global concatenated under the column heading "Observation details" in the following format: Type notes(if present). data source 1; data source 2; data source 3.

This project was undertaken because not all the Beta vulgaris sp vulgaris accessions in the collection had a TYPE designation. This was true even for recent sugar beet cultivars. The addition of a TYPE assignment for all the B.v. sp vulgaris accessions will aid in the management and utilization of the collection. It is acknowledged that assigning a TYPE based on passport information rather than evaluation data (data collected from the actual material in the collection) is not ideal. If discrepancies are found between this TYPE data and plants derived from actual material for an accession, the user community is encouraged to contact the NPGS Beta curator.

From : LANGE, W., BRANDENBURG, W. A., & BOCK, T. S. D. (1999). Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 130(1), 81-96.

Leaf beet group (includes chard-large mid-rib, spinach beet. swollen hypocotyls and/or roots are absent or small ).

Garden beet group (dense swollen hypocotyls, used for vegetable, color can range from white to deep red)

Fodder beet group (large hypocotyls and root, color doesn’t matter, used as fodder or forage) Sugar beet group (used for sugar extraction, swollen part mainly root tissue)

">SUGARBEET.TYPE.2016.HELLIER		 Not Available