Details for: PI 206823, Pisum sativum L., 'TIMPERLEY WONDER'


Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Pisum sativum L.
Cultivar:
'TIMPERLEY WONDER'
Origin:
Developed – Wisconsin, United States
Received by NPGS:
02 Apr 1953
PI Assigned:
1953
Improvement Status:
Cultivar
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Availability
FormQuantityNoteInventoryCart
Seed30 countPI 206823 92i SD
 
Images (1 total. Click on image for more.)

SEED

Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Pisum sativum L.
Cultivar:
'TIMPERLEY WONDER'
Origin:
Developed – Wisconsin, United States
Received by NPGS:
02 Apr 1953
PI Assigned:
1953
Improvement Status:
Cultivar
Form Received:
Seed
Life Form:
Annual
Life Cycle:
Annual
Source History
Developed
02 April 1953.
Wisconsin, United States
Comment: Plants growning at the USDA-ARS NC-7 Regional Plant Introduction Station, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011.
Developer(s):
Accession Names and Identifiers
'TIMPERLEY WONDER'
Type: Cultivar name

S-657
Type: Donor identifier
Plant Introduction Station
Shoemaker, D.N. University of Wisconsin

G 18164 and G 1832
Type: Site identifier
Group: GENEVA
Ids used by the North Eastern Plant Intro. Station; N. Y.
Northeast Regional PI Station

Narrative
SMOOTH AND WRINKLED SEED SURFACE.
Pisum sativum L.
Genus:
Pisum
Family:
Fabaceae (alt. Leguminosae)
Subfamily:
Faboideae
Tribe:
Fabeae
Nomen number:

300472
Place of publication:

Sp. pl. 2:727. 1753
Verified:
08/06/1986 by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Pisum sativum L. subsp. asiaticum Govorov (56 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (M. Bieb.) Asch. & Graebn. (105 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (M. Bieb.) Asch. & Graebn. var. brevipedunculatum P. H. Davis & Meikle (0 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (M. Bieb.) Asch. & Graebn. var. elatius (M. Bieb.) Alef. (9 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (M. Bieb.) Asch. & Graebn. var. pumilio Meikle (29 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. jomardii (Schrank) Kosterin (0 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum (713 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum var. arvense (L.) Poir. (78 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum var. macrocarpum Ser. (1 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. sativum var. sativum (862 active accession[s])
Pisum sativum L. subsp. transcaucasicum Govorov (19 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Pisum sativum L. subsp. tibetanicum ined.

Common names
LanguageNameAlternate namenoteseqCitation
Englishpea  1Wiersema, J. H. & B. León. 1999. World economic plants: a standard reference CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Italianpisello  2International Seed Testing Association. 1982. A Multilingual Glossary of Common Plant-Names 1. Field crops, grasses and vegetables, ed. 2.
Swedishärt  2Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson. 2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
Transcribed Chinesewan dou  2Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds. 1994-. Flora of China (English edition).
Transcribed Koreanwandu  2Mun-Chan, B. et al. 1986. A checklist of the Korean cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 34:118.
Annotations
Other Links
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
  • Grunwald, N. J., V. A. Coffman, & J. M. Kraft. 2003. Source of partial resistance to fusarium root rot in the Pisum core collection. Pl. Dis. 87:1197-1200. Number of accessions cited: 2695
  • Jermyn, W. A. & A. E. Slinkard. 1977. Variability of percent protein and its relationship to seed yield and seed shape in peas. Legume Res. 1:33-37. Number of accessions cited: 878
  • Kraft, J. M., B. Dunne, D. Goulden, & S. Armstrong. 1998. A search for resistance in peas to Mycosphaerella pinodes. Pl. Dis. 82:251-253. Number of accessions cited: 1992
  • Malvick, D. K. & J. A. Percich. 1999. Screening of pea plant introduction collection for resistance to Aphanomyces root root 1990-1994. Biol. Cult. Tests Control Pl. Dis. 11:112-114. Number of accessions cited: 2195
  • Tedford, E. C. & D. A. Inglis. 1999. Evaluation of legumes common to the Pacfic Northwest as hosts for the pea cyst nematode, Heterodera goettingiana. J. Nematol. 31:155-163. Number of accessions cited: 2252
Pedigree

Observations

Phenotype Data

CategoryDescriptorDescriptionValueSample SizeStudyInventoryAvailability
CHEMICALProtein percentageSeed protein concentration (percentage) as calculated by the Leco nitrogen analyzer24.86  Excel spread sheet of the Pisum protein data.">PEA.PROTEIN.1977.CANADAPI 206823 92ne9 SDNot Available
DISEASEFusarium Wilt Race 1Resistance to Race 1 of Fusarium WiltR - RESISTANT PEA.FUSWILT1.1994.MUEHLBAUERPI 206823 92i SD
DISEASEFusarium Root RotResistance to Fusarium Root Rot caused by Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi3 - Pronounced brownish-black lessions which have coalesced at the cotyledonary attachment area, cotyledons have rotted off. Lower stem lessions are visible, few to moderate lesion development on lower stem and upper root. PEA.FUSROOTROT.1997.KRAFTPI 206823 92i SD
DISEASEAphanomyces Root RotPercent damage to plants caused by common pea root rot (Aphanomyces euteiches).94 PEA.ROOTROT.1993.MALVICKPI 206823 88i SDNot Available
DISEASEAscochyta BlightPercent damage caused by ascochyta. Maturity ratings: 0=still flowering, 1=flat pods; 2=semi-mature pods, 3=mature botto pods, 4=mature, 5=completely mature pods70 PEA.ASCOCHYTA.1991.DUNNEPI 206823 88i SDNot Available
DISEASEFusarium Wilt Race 2Percent resistant plants to Fusarium oxysporium f.sp. pisi race 2. Data was recorded 3-5 weeks after inoculation.25 PEA.FUSWILT2.1998.MUEHLBAUERPI 206823 92i SD
DISEASEFusarium Wilt Race 5Reaction to Fusarium oxysporum f. pisi Race 5S - Susceptible PEA.FUSWILT5.1969.HAGLUNDPI 206823 92ne9 SDNot Available
GROWTHPlant Height, finalPlant height of a typical plant in centimeters from the ground to tip at maturity.84 PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYNode NumberNumber of nodes on the main stem that have pods.5 PEA.1992.CFERRYPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYNode Number to First FlowerA count from the second trifid bract as one, up to and including the first flowering node when 50% of the plants in a planting are flowering. Expressed as an average of five randomly chosen plants (in integers).9 PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYFlower ColorFlower colorW - White PEA.1992.CFERRYPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYFlower ColorFlower colorW - White PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYFlowers per PeduncleMaximum number of flowers per peduncle.2 PEA.1992.CFERRYPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYFlowers per PeduncleMaximum number of flowers per peduncle.2 PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod LengthAverage length of pods from first reproductive node of five different plants at full pod stage recorded in centimeters. Expressed to one decimal place.6.2 PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod WidthAverage width of pods from first reproductive node of five different largest pods (each from a different plant) measured at full pod stage recorded in centimeters. Expressed to one decimal place.1.1 PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod ColorPod color, taken at first reproductive node at full pod stage.G - Green PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod ShapePod shape measured at flat pod stage.S - Straight PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod ApexPod apex measured at flat pod stage.B - Blunt PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYPod TypePod type taken at full pod stage on first reproductive node.NE - Non-edible PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYSeeds per PodFully develops on first reproductive node. Average number of seeds from five longest pods, each from five different plants. Expressed to one decimal place.5 PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYSeed SurfaceSeed surfaceR - Round PEA.SEEDSURF.YR.WRPISPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYSeedcoat ColorSeedcoat colorN - Non-pigmented Green/White PEA.SDCOATCOL.YR.WRPISPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYCotyledon ColorCotyledon color, should be evaluated from unweathered, unbleached pods.M - Mixed PEA.COTYLCOLOR.YR.WRPISPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYHilum ColorHilum colorC - Clear PEA.HILUMCOLOR.YR.WRPISPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYLeaflet MorphologyLeaflet morphologyN - Normal PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYStipulesStipulesN - Normal PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYStem FasciationStem fasciationN - No PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYSeed weight 100Weight of 100 seeds in grams.17 PEA.SEEDWEIGHT.WRPISPI 206823 92i SD
MORPHOLOGYSeed PatternPattern of the seed color distributionN - No pattern PEA.SDPATTERN.YR.WRPISPI 206823 92i SD
NEMATODECyst Nematode Leaf SymptomsResistance to the Pea Cyst Nematode (Heterodera goettingiana) - leaf rating.4 - CHLOROSIS 75% OF CANOPY PEA.NEMATODE.1994.INGLISPI 206823 92i SD
NEMATODECyst Nematode Root SymptomsResistance to the Pea Cyst Nematode (Heterodera goettingiana) - Root rating.H - HIGH AMOUNT OF WHITE CYSTS PEA.NEMATODE.1994.INGLISPI 206823 92i SD
OTHERImage/picture1A picture or imageseed PEA.IMAGE.2012.SEEDPI 206823 92i SD
OTHERImage/picture1A picture or imageseed IMAGE.2013.SEEDPI 206823 92i SD
PHENOLOGYDay of first bloomDay of the year when flowering begins.123 PEA.1992.CFERRYPI 206823 92i SD
PHENOLOGYDay of first bloomDay of the year when flowering begins.168 PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
PHENOLOGYDays to flowerNumber of days from sowing seed to first observed flower47 PEA.1995.PULLMANPI 206823 92i SD
PHENOLOGYDays to flowerNumber of days from sowing seed to first observed flower52 PEA.1992.CFERRYPI 206823 92i SD