Skip to main content
Skip to site map
United States Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service
0
Cart
Welcome!
***THIS IS A TESTING SITE ONLY.***
Please do not place germplasm orders on this site.
GRIN-Global
Menu
USDA National Plant Germplasm System
Version:
2.3.12 [npgstest -- bhunt2312-0204]
Menu
Accessions
Descriptors
Reports
GRIN Taxonomy
Search Taxonomy
Crop Wild Relative Data
Nodulation Data
Regulations
World Economic Plants
About GRIN Taxonomy
GRIN
USDA Genetic Resource Collections
About GRIN-Global
Use of Cookies
NPGS Distribution Policy
Software Disclaimer
GRIN-U
Help
Contact Us
Your Profile
Your Profile
Your Web Request History
Your Address Book
Your Wish List
Details for: Ames 24988,
Ulmus
sp., 'Lobel'
Summary
Passport
Taxonomy
Other
Pedigree
IPR
Observation
Summary Data
Taxonomy:
Ulmus
sp.
Cultivar:
'Lobel'
Origin:
Donated – Gelderland, Netherlands
Maintained:
North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station
Received by NPGS:
31 Dec 1991
Improvement Status:
Cultivar
Form Received:
Plant
Life Cycle:
Perennial
Life Habit:
Tree
Availability
This accession is not available. Contact site for status.
North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station
There are no images for this accession.
Core Passport Data
Taxonomy:
Ulmus
sp.
Cultivar:
'Lobel'
Origin:
Donated – Gelderland, Netherlands
Maintained:
North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station
Received by NPGS:
31 Dec 1991
Improvement Status:
Cultivar
Form Received:
Plant
Life Cycle:
Perennial
Life Habit:
Tree
Source History
Donated
31 December 1991.
Gelderland, Netherlands
Donor(s):
Heybroek, H.M., De Dorschkamp
Accession Names and Identifiers
'Lobel'
Type: Cultivar name
Clonal number 454
Type: Donor identifier
Q 28834
Type: Quarantine identifier
BE-3781
Type: Other or unclassified name
APHIS
Ames 24988
Type: Site identifier
Group: AMES
NC-7 Research Numbers
USDA ARS NCRPIS
Narrative
Tree with considerable resistance to DED, narrow crown with ascending branches that have a strong herringbone pattern. Resistant to exposure. Sown 1954, released 1975. All four clones can be propagated by softwood cuttings, probably also by root cuttings (like Ulmus pumila). Donor's nurserymen graft them on clonal rootstock of U. hollandica 'Belgica' or on seedlings of U. glabra Hudson. Latter shows delay.
Ulmus
spp.
Genus:
Ulmus
Family:
Ulmaceae
Nomen number:
300649
Comment:
catch-all record for unidentified or unnamed plants of
Ulmus
Verified:
05/10/2000
by ARS Systematic Botanists.
Other conspecific taxa
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Common names
Name
References
Annotations
Other Links
Actions
Pathogens
Vouchers
Citations
Bonsen, K. J. M., R. J. Scheffer, & D. M. Elgersma.
1985. Barrier zone formation as a resistance mechanism of elms to Dutch elm disease. IAWA J. 6(1):71-77.
DOI:
10.1163/22941932-90000916
.
Number of accessions cited:
4
Buiteveld, J., B. Van Der Werf, & J. A. Hiemstra.
2014. Comparison of commercial elm cultivars and promising unreleased Dutch clones for resistance to
Ophiostoma novo-ulmi
. IForest 8(2):158-164.
DOI:
10.3832/ifor1209-008
.
Number of accessions cited:
5
Gibbs, J. N., C. M. Brasier, H. S. McNabb, Jr., & H. M. Heybroek.
1974. Further studies on pathogenicity in
Ceratocystis ulmi
. Eur. J. Pl. Pathol. 5:161-174.
DOI:
10.1111/j.1439-0329.1975.tb00461.x
.
Number of accessions cited:
10
Gillner, S. J. Vogt, A. Tharang, S. Dettmann & A. Roloff.
2015. Role of street trees in mitigating effects of heat and drought at highly sealed urban sites. Landsc. Urban Plan. 143:33-42.
DOI:
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.005
.
Number of accessions cited:
1
Grbić, M., D. Skočajić, M. Đukić, D. Đunisijević-Bojović, & M. Marković.
2015.
Mass clonal propagation of elms as way for replacement of endangered autochthonous species
. Proceedings, Internation Conference Reforestation Challenges, 3-6 June 2015, Belgrade, Serbia 60-67.
Number of accessions cited:
1
Griffiths, H. M., W. A. Sinclair, E. Boudon-Padieu, X. Daire, I.-M. Lee, A. Sfalanga, & A. Bertaccini.
1999. Phytoplasmas associated with elm yellows: Molecular variability and differentiation from related organisms. Pl. Dis. 83:1101-1104.
DOI:
10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.12.1101
.
Number of accessions cited:
1
Heybroek, H. M.
1976.
Three new clones of elm
.
Note:
Cultivar release publication from Wageningen.
Number of accessions cited:
1
Miller, F., K. Malmquist, & G. Ware.
2001. Evaluation of Asian, European, and North American Elm (
Ulmus
spp.) biotypes to feeding by spring and fall cankerworms. J. Environm. Hort. 19(4):216-221.
DOI:
10.24266/0738-2898-19.4.216
.
Number of accessions cited:
1
Mocali, S., E. Bertelli, F. Di Cello, A. Mengoni, A. Sfalanga, F. Vilianani, A. Caciotti, S. Tegli, G. Surico, & R. Fani.
2003. Fluctuation of bacteria isolated from elm tissues during different seasons and from different plant organs. Res. Microbiol. 154:105-114.
DOI:
10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00031-7
.
Number of accessions cited:
1
Pinon, J., C. Husson, & E. Collin.
2005.
Susceptibility of native French elm clones to
Ophiostoma novo-ulmi
. Annals Forest sci. 62:689-696.
Number of accessions cited:
2
Santini, A., A. Fagnani, F. Ferrini, L. Ghelardini, & L. Mittempergher.
2005. Variation among Italian and French elm clones in their response to
Ophiostoma novo-ulmi
inoculation. Forest Pathol. 35:183-193.
DOI:
10.1111/j.1439-0329.2005.00401.x
.
Number of accessions cited:
2
Solla, A., J. Bohnens, E. Collin, S. Diamandis, A. Franke, L. Gil, M. Buron, A. Santini, L. Mittempergher, J. Pinon & A. V. Broeck.
2005. Screening European elms for resistance to
Ophiostoma novo-ulmi
. For. Sci 51(2):134-141.
DOI:
10.1093/forestscience/51.2.134
.
Number of accessions cited:
2
Sutherland, M. L., L. Mittempergher, & C. M. Brasier.
1995. Control of Duth elm disease by induced host resistance. Eur. J. Pl. Pathol. 25:307-318.
DOI:
10.1111/j.1439-0329.1995.tb01346.x
.
Number of accessions cited:
2
Pedigree
Description:
202 (U. glabra 'Exoniensis'/U. wallichiana P39)/ 336 (U. carpinifolia 'Bea Schwarz' selfed)
Material Transfer Agreement
Observations
Phenotype Data
Category
Descriptor
Description
Value
Sample Size
Study
Inventory
Availability
DISEASE
DED CROWN SYMPTOMS 1 YPI
Average percent of the tree's crown displaying symptoms (e.g. defoliation, dieback, wilting or death) in a field setting one year post inoculation with
Ophiostoma novo-ulmi
and/or
O. ulmi
spore suspensions.
35.4
DED CROWN SYMPTOMS - BUITEVELD ET AL 2014
Not Available
DISEASE
DED CROWN SYMPTOMS 28 DPI
Average percent of the tree's crown displaying symptoms (e.g. defoliation, dieback, wilting or death) in a field setting 28 days post inoculation with
Ophiostoma novo-ulmi
and/or
O. ulmi
spore suspensions.
10.8
DED CROWN SYMPTOMS - BUITEVELD ET AL 2014
Not Available
DISEASE
DED CROWN SYMPTOMS 8 WPI
Average percent of the tree's crown displaying symptoms (e.g. defoliation, dieback, wilting or death) in a field setting eight weeks post inoculation with
Ophiostoma novo-ulmi
and/or
O. ulmi
spore suspensions.
1.5
DED CROWN SYMPTOMS - ALICE HOLT
Not Available
DISEASE
DED CROWN SYMPTOMS 8 WPI
Average percent of the tree's crown displaying symptoms (e.g. defoliation, dieback, wilting or death) in a field setting eight weeks post inoculation with
Ophiostoma novo-ulmi
and/or
O. ulmi
spore suspensions.
32.9
DED CROWN SYMPTOMS - BUITEVELD ET AL 2014
Not Available